Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-16-10Little Rock Board March 16, 2010 6:00 PM Little Rock Boa March 16, 2010 6:00 PM Directors Meeting of Directors Meeting The Board of Directors of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, met in a regular meeting with Mayor Manc Stodola presiding. City Clerk Susan Langley called the roll with the following Directors present: Hendrix; Richardson; Hurst; Cazort; Keck; Wright; Wyrick; Kumpuris; Adcock; Vice Mayor Fortson; and Mayor Stodola. Director Cazort delivered the invocation, w4ich was followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. ADDITIONS: M -1 M -2 RESOLD' consortium fun( Community DeN Department of 1=1 in furtherance o Program 2 Grant Synopsis: To autt submit to the Unite 10, 2010. M -3 RESOL recommends apprc Synopsis: A resc Youth, and Famil M -4 ORDIN Martin Luther and health haz, for summary a necessary to rE purposes. Staff; M -5 DEFERRALS: ON: 2010 Census Update ION NO. 13,104: To authorize the City Manager to enter into three ng agreements with the Little Rock Housing Authority, Better lopers and Habitat for Humanity, as required by the United States using and Urban Development, in an amount not to exceed $8,600,000 the consortium's receipt of an award of Neighborhood Stabilization unds; and for other purposes. Staffrecommends approval. rize the City Manger to execute three (3) consortium funding agreements and States Department of Housing and Urban Development by the deadline of April TION NO: 13, 105: Board and Commission Reinstatement. Staff ion to make reinstatement of Paula Smith to the City of Little Rock Children, Commission. WE NO. 20,235: To condemn a certain structure located at 1601 ag Boulevard in the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, as a structural, fire ; ratifying the removal of the south wall on March 12, 2010; providing :ement procedures; directing the City Attorney to take such action as and remove said structure; to declare an emergency; and for other 9mmends approval. : Recovery Centers of Arkansas — The Oasis Renewal Center 8. ORDINANCE; • Z- 8515: To reclassify property located at 11125 Interstate 30 in the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, amending the Official Zoning Map of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; and for other purposes. Planning Commission: 9 ayes; 0 nays and 2 absent. Staff recommends ap roval. (Deferred from March 2, 2010) Little Rock Board 0 Directors Meeting March 16, 2010 6:00 PM Synopsis: The owner of the six (6) -acre property located at 11125 Interstate 30 is requesting that the zoning be reclassifi d from R -2 to I -2. 10. ORDINANCE• LU09- 04 -03: To amend the Land Use Plan (16,222) in the Heights Hillcrest Planning District from park/open space to office; and for other purposes. Planning Commission: 9 ayes and I nay. Staff recommends approval. (Deferred from March 2, 2010) Synopsis: A Land Use Plan amendment in the Heights Hillcrest Planning District from Park/open Space to Office for future development. 11. ORDINAT University Avei the Official Zoi Planning Commiss 2010) Synopsis: The of Avenue and Evers Mayor Stodola ii speak on Item D motion, secondec Separate Items, I for discussion. added to Presen to the Consent 2 for discussion. Director Wright and 11. By unz were deferred. Z- 1859 -I: To reclassify property located at the northeast corner of and Evergreen Street in the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, amending Map of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; and for other purposes. 9 ayes; I nay and I absent. Staff recommends approval. (Deferred from March 2, of the 1.42 acres of property located at the northeast corner of University Street are requesting that the zoning be reclassified from R -2 to 0-3. Ecated that he had received a card from an individual that wished to -2 and asked that it be read separately. Director Cazort made the by Director Adcock, to add Item M -1 to Presentations, Items M -2 to -m M -3 to the Consent Agenda, M -4 to Grouped Items and Item M -5 y unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, Item M -1 was ttions, Item M -2 was added to Separate Items, Item M -3 was added ;enda, M -4 was added to Grouped Items and Item M -5 was added the motion, seconded by Director Richardson, to defer Items 8, 10, is voice vote of the Board Members present, Items 8, 10, and 11 ATIO : 2010 Census Update CONSENT A 1. RESOLUTIO on the petition to which were grant Little Rock, Arka Synopsis: SPC Par abandonment of cc easements were gra needed. A (Items 1— 7 and Item M -3) y NO. 13,097; G -24 -206: To set April 6, 2010, as the date of hearing bandon certain utility easements within the former University Mall site d to Arkansas Power and Light (Entergy Corporation); in the City of sas; and for other purposes. Staffrecommends approval. Avenue Limited Partnership and Target Corporation are requesting the tain utility easements within the former University mall site. The specific ited to Arkansas Power and Light (Entergy Corporation) and are no longer 2 Little Rock Board March 16, 2010 6:00 PM 2. RESOLUT Policemen's Per the DROP Plan purposes. Staffre Synopsis: Act 13' participant's DRO the funds in the nh Directors Meeting ON NO. 13,098: To allow the participants of the Little Rock ion & Relief Fund the option to continue with the deposit of funds in Lfter the expiration of their DROP participation period; and for other 9mmends approval. of 2003 authorizes pension fund members to defer receiving payment of the account at the conclusion of their DROP participation period and continue with , if the governing body approves. 3. RESOLUTIION NO. 13,099: To approve the purchase of eight (8) unmarked vehicles from Sta e Contract. Staff recommends approval. Synopsis: The Little Rock Police Department is requesting approval to purchase eight (8) unmarked Chevrolet Impala p lice vehicles from State Contract No. SP -10 -0001. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 13,100: To set April 6, 2010, as the date of hearing on the petition to form the City of Little Rock Municipal Property Owners Multipurpose Improvement District No. 2010 -311 (The Gardens at Valley Falls Recreation Project); and for other purposes. Staff recommends approval. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 13,101: To set April 6, 2010, as the date of hearing on the petition to form the City of Little Rock Municipal Property Owners Multipurpose Improvement Di trict No. 2010 -310 (Gardens at Valley Falls); and for other purposes. Staff recommends ap, roval. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 13,102: To authorize the City Manager to purchase up to $1,500,000 of park amenities for the renovation and construction of City Parks; and for other purposes. Staffrecommends approval. Synopsis: A resolution to authorize the City Manager to allow $1.5 million of park amenity purchases. 7. RESOLUTION NO. 13103: To award a contract to Professional Account Management, LLC, for parking citation devices and parking citation management services for the City; authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract with Professional Account Management, LLC, for such devices and services; and for other purposes. Staff recommends approval. Synopsis: This reso #ution awards a contract to Professional Account Management, LLC, for parking citation manageme t services and parking citation devices for which Professional Account Management, LLC, will receive 11.5% of total parking fine revenues collected and authorizes the City Manager to en er into a contract, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, with Professional Account Management, LLC, for such services. M -3 RESOLUTION NO: 13105: Board and Commission Reinstatement. Staff recommends approva� Synopsis: A resolution to make reinstatement of Paula Smith to the City of Little Rock Children, Youth, and Families Commission. Director Adcock Agenda. By unai was approved. the motion, seconded by Director Cazort, to approve the Consent s voice vote of the Board Members present, the Consent Agenda 3 Little Rock Board 0 Directors Meeting March 16, 2010 6:00 PM SEPARATE ITEM (Item M -2) M -2 RESOLUTION NO. 13,104: To authorize the City Manager to enter into three consortium furic ing agreements with the Little Rock Housing Authority, Better Community Dev lopers and Habitat for Humanity, as required by the United States Department of H using and Urban Development, in an amount not to exceed $8,600,000 in furtherance o the consortium's receipt of an award of Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 Grant Funds; and for other purposes. Staffrecommends approval. Synopsis: To authorize the City Manger to execute three (3) consortium funding agreements and submit to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development by the deadline of April 10, 2010. Paul Dodds 2119 West 17"' Street: Stated that he supported the Resolution with a condition that the Board require the houses being built east of University Avenue be subjected to design review guidelines so that the architecture was consistent with the existing building structures. Director Hurst as ed how the City would enforce the requirement. Mayor Stodola stated that several of the properties were actually located within the Central High Design Overlay District so there will be an obligation to comply with the Overlay District. In addition, Mayor Stodola reported that the consortium members had agreed to submit several architectu al plans to the process so that staff could ensure that the structures were built consistently with existing structures. Director Hurst asked if the Planning & Development Staff, or the neighborhood, would have input as to ow the houses looked. City Manager Bruce Moore stated that staff from Housing & Neighborhood Programs would work closely with staff from Planning & Development. Director Wyrick asked how the information regarding these homes would come to the attention of the City. City Manager Moore stated that through grant funds, a Project Manager would b hired, who would be responsible for working, on a daily basis, with the three (3) partners within the consortium. Director Adcock 2. By unanimous GROUPED 9. ORDINANC with Act 209 of from each defenc a plea of nolo c violation; to use related to prisons the motion, seconded by Director Richardson, to approve Item M- vote of the Board Members present, Item M -2 was approved. (Item 9 & M -4) , NO. 20,232: To impose an additional fine of $20.00, in accordance 009 enacted by the 87th Arkansas General Assembly, to be collected nt in a Little Rock District Court upon a conviction, a plea of guilty, or !tendere, or for each bond forfeiture, for any misdemeanor or traffic ie revenues from such a fine for the purposes set forth in the act as to provide for the deposit of such monies into the City Treasury to be Little Rock Board o Directors Meeting March 16, 2010 6:00 PM deposited into a fund to be used exclusively for the purposes set forth in the act; to declare and eme gency; and for other purposes. Staffrecommends approval. M -4 ORDINANCE NO. 20,235: To condemn a certain structure located at 1601 Martin Luther King Boulevard in the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, as a structural, fire and health hazard; ratifying the removal of the south wall on March 12, 2010; providing for summary abatement procedures; directing the City Attorney to take such action as necessary to raz and remove said structure; to declare an emergency; and for other purposes. Staff re ommends approval. Synopsis: Pursuant to State Statute, as amended by Act 209 of 2009, the City has the ability to impose a $20.00 fine on every person on each offense that results in a conviction, please of guilty, plea of nolo contendere, or bond forfeiture, as long as these funds are used only for certain purposes associated with the incarceration in a City, County, or regional jail. This ordinance implements a City fine pursuant t this statute. The ordinances were read the first time. Director Adcock made the motion, seconded by Director Cazort, to suspend the rules and place the ordinances on second reading. By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, the rules were suspended and the ordinances were ead a second time. Director Adcock made the motion, seconded by Director Cazort, to place the ordinances on third reading. The ordinances were read a third time. By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, the ordinances were approved. By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, the emergency clause or Item 9 was approved. By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present,�the emergency clause for Item M -4 was approved. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Items 12 —13) 12. ORDINANCE NO. 20,233; Z -8470: To approve a Planned Zoning Development and establish a Planned Commercial District titled Ramirez Short-Form PCD, located at 3825 West 98th S reet, Little Rock, Arkansas, amending the Official Zoning Map of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; and for other purposes. Planning Commission: 3 ayes; 6 nays; 0 absent and 2 open positions. Staff recommends denial. Synopsis: The applicant is appealing the Planning Commission's recommendation of denial to allow rezoning of the commercial portion of the property to PCD to recognize the existing auto repair business on the property. Mayor Stodola opened the public hearing and asked for the first reading of the ordinance. The ordinance was read the first time. Director Adcock made the motion, seconded by Director Keck, to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on second reading. By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, the rules were suspended and the ordinance was red a second time. Director Adcock made the motion, seconded by Director Richards o n, to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on third reading. By unanimous voice ote of the Board Members present, the rules were suspended and the ordinance was rea a third time. 5 Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting March 16, 2010 6:00 PM Director Cazort made the motion, sec debate to fifteen (15) minutes per si with Director Ric ardson voting in of CdLsy Monterre 400 West Capitol: and that the actual property in questio some confusion egarding the applic Street. Ms. Mo iterrey stated that t portion of the prc perty was actually 3 building was an z uto repair shop and was annexed by the City. The loci owned by Bob Stanton, who is now -di Ms. Monterrey stated that emphasis h control of the property. Ms. Moni Ramirez met wi h the tenants of disturbances, nuisances or illegal acti, Monterrey stated that since that nice reports filed regarding the property at reported that fro July 1, 2009, to da reports filed regarding the property at Director Adcock asked when the prox Monterrey stated that she had always property was 3723 West 98th Street; r 3825 was the correct legal address for Juanita Jordan 1321 College Street: the property and asked that they Board Julio Anzora 131 4 Pitts Road: State Isaias Ramos 37 23 West 981h Street application and had lived at 3723 We; problem. Manuel J. Perez 723 West 98th Stref business that was to be located on M opportunity to open his business and d Gus Ma'ors 4023 West Drive: Did r that he was in opposition to the re -zoni Sally Majors 402 3 West Drive: Did i that she was in opposition to the re -zor Arthur Metcalf, 1713 Arapaho Trail recognized that he was in opposition tc Evelyn Carter, 31805 Arapaho Trail: recognized that she was in opposition t onded by Vice Mayor Fortson to limit the time for le. By voice vote of the Board Members present, position, the motion passed. Stated that she was legal counsel for the applicant a was 3825 West 981h Street, and early on there was ition in that it was referred to as 3723 West 98th ie address for the mobile homes on the northern 723 West 981h Street. Ms. Monterrey stated that the 'lad been utilized for commercial purposes before it tion was originally a trailer repair shop that was ceased, and then as a motorcycle repair shop. td been placed on police reports and Mr. Ramirez's errey reported that on December 18, 2009, Mr. the trailer park and stressed to them that any ,ity would be grounds for immediate eviction. Ms. Ling, there had been no 911 calls made or police 3723 West 98th Street. In addition, Ms. Monterrey e, there had not been any 911 calls made or police 3825 West 98th Street. erty became known as 3825 West 98th Street. Ms. been under the impression that the address of the owever, Planning & Development Staff stated that that particular portion of the property in question. Stated that she was in support of the re- zoning of approve the request. I that he was in support of the re- zoning request. Stated that he was in support of the re- zoning t 981h Street for two (2) years and had never had a t: Stated that he was the owner of the auto repair r. Ramirez's property and that he just wanted the honest work. of want to speak; however, the Mayor recognized ng. iot want to speak; however, the Mayor recognized ing. Did not want to speak; however, the Mayor the re- zoning. Did not want to speak; however, the Mayor the re- zoning. n Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting March 16, 2010 6:00 PM Director Hendri asked for a staff presentation. Tony Bozynski, Planning and Development Department Director, stated that staff was in opposition to the re- zoning request due to th fact that during the Planning Hearing, in was apparent that the owner of the property did not have control of activities occurring on the property. Mayor Stodola been located in had been some documented. T documented, the Tom Carpenter letters received auto repair shop. credibility the F situation where t Dana Carney, annexed into the history of the p Carney reported or business licei the applicant wa the business to r( ;ked if staff was able to determine if an auto repair shop had previously ae facility. Mr. Bozynski stated that staff was in agreement that there type of repair business on the property; however, it could not be r. Bozynski stated that due to the fact that the use could not be iroperty could no longer be considered non - conforming. City Attorney tated that while staff could not provide documentation, several of the .ate that the individuals support the continued use of the facility as an City Attorney Carpenter stated that there was some freedom as to what )ard wanted to give the mention in the letters; however, this was a e City could not prove that the use had continued. ning and Subdivision Manager, stated that when properties were ity, staff attempted to conduct field surveys in an attempt to assemble a perties; however, in this case, staff had absolutely no history. Mr. at staff asked the applicant to provide information, such as utility bills ;s, to establish the non - conformity of the auto repair business. Since not able to provide supporting information, staff felt that in order for lain open, re- zoning needed to be filed. Director Wyrick asked what prompted staff to investigate the property. Mr. Carney stated that staff had received notification regarding the fact that construction was occurring on the property without a building permit on Hilaro Springs Road. While en- route to the property on Hilaro Springs Road, the Building Inspector ended up on the property at 3825 West 98th Street by mistake; however, he observed construction taking place at that property, as well without a building permit. that she was in Carol Haskins recognized that s Pat Gee, 8409 L Neighborhood i boundaries. Ms. opposition to the property had bee when the larger 1 as a party house owner had utilize the forty -three (4 the auto repair w, [ogan Drive: Did not want to speak; however, the Mayor recognized position to the re- zoning. 400 Stanton Road: Did not want to speak; however, the Mayor e was in opposition to the re- zoning. )wan Drive: Stated that she was the President of the Upper Baseline ;sociation and the property in question was located within their see reported that the Upper Baseline Neighborhood Association was in e- zoning request. 2 Arapaho Trail: Stated that the smaller of the two (2) buildings on the i utilized as a body shop in the past; however, the complaints started xilding was built. Mr. Hays stated that the larger building was utilized nd that was where the issues started. Mr. Hays stated that the former l the smaller building for his personal use and auto repairs; however, in years that he had lived in the neighborhood, he did not remember that a commercial business. 7 Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting March 16, 2010 6:00 PM At the end of the Idiscussion, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Director Hendrix made the motion, seconded by Director Richardson, to defer Item #12 until April 6, 2010, so that follow -up information that had been requested by Board Members could be received and studied. By voice vote of the Board Members present, the motion failed. Director Hurst as ed for a clarification of the vote. Mayor Stodola stated that a yes vote would be an approval of the Planned Zoning Development that would establish the Planned Commercial District and would restrict the use specifically to a body shop and a no vote would allow the body shop to remain with no restrictions. By roll call vote of the Board Members present, the votes were as follows: Ayes: Keck; Wright; Kumpuris; Hendrix; Richardson; Hurst; Cazort; and Vice Mayor Fortson. Nays: Wyrick and Adc ck. By a vote of 8 ayes and 2 nays, the ordinance was approved. Director Cazort en ade the motion, seconded by Director Richardson, for the Board to recess for fifte 15) minutes. By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, the motion was nnroved. 13. ORDINANCE NO. 20,234; G -24 -205: To abandon portions of the easements retained in the former rights -of -way located at West 13th and State Streets, within the campus of Philander Smith College, in the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; and for other purposes. Planning Commission: 9 ayes; 0 nays and 2 absent. Staff recommends approval. Synopsis: Philand r Smith College is requesting the abandonment of portions of the easements retained in the for er right -of -ways of West 13th Street and State Street within the college campus to allow for the constr ction of new student housing. The ordinance was read the first time. Director Adcock made the motion, seconded by Director Wright, to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on second reading. By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, the rules were suspended and the ordinance was read a second time. Director Adcock made the motion, seconded by Director Cazort, to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on third reading. By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, the rules were suspended and the ordinance was read a third time. Mayor Stodola opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present that desired to speak to the issue. None being present, Mayor Stodola closed the public hearing. By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, the ordinance was approved. E Little Rock Board o Directors Meeting March 16, 2010 6:00 PM 'Ali_ I M -5. DISCUSSION: Recovery Centers of Arkansas — The Oasis Renewal Center Director Kumpurlis made the acknowledgement that his sister -in -law served on the Board of the Recovery enters of Arkansas. Mr. Bozynski s ated that late in 2009, the Recovery Centers of Arkansas (RCA) contacted staff regarding the possible use of the Oasis Renewal Center. Information was provided to staff and a meeting was held with the Carole Baxter, RCA Director, and Jim Deets, RCA Board Member. Once Planning & Development Staff reviewed the information and researched the history of the property, it was determined that the property was No - Conforming, 0-3 General Office and that what was being proposed by RCA was a cont nuation of the property's Non - Conforming Use. Mr. Bozynski stated that the status st yed with the property, not with the sale of the property, as long as twelve (12) mont s had not passed since the property was last utilized. Mayor Stodola asked how the RCA proposed to utilize the property. Mr. Bozynski reported that the information provided which was dated December 22, 2009, stated that RCA would utilize the space for business meetings, training and retreats. Two (2) independent houses would be utilized for families seeking to conduct substance abuse treatment and int rvention, and families could stay overnight for a maximum of three (3) nights. In addition, Intensive Addiction Recovery Services would be offered and three (3) dormitories with a total maximum of capacity of twenty -four (24) individuals, with a maximum stay of twenty -one (21) days, would be available for individuals in need of extensive substance abuse treatment. Jim Julian 1201 River Road North Little Rock: Stated that he was an RCA Board Member. Mr. Julian stated that when the RCA Board learned the property was available, they contacted City Staff to determine if their use of the property would be an acceptable use; once they received notification that their use was acceptable, they purchased the property. Mr. Julian stated that the property would not be utilized in a manner such as other RCS prope ies were operated; the plan was for it to be an up -scale rehabilitation type facility, simi ar to the Hazelton Facility in Minnesota. Director Keck a ed if the RCA Board would be willing to meet with the bordering neighborhoods to discuss the plans for the facility. Mr. Julian stated that they wanted to be a good neighbor and would be willing to attend such a meeting. Carole Baxter, 1201 River Road North Little Rock: Stated that she was the RCA Executive Director and was present to answer any questions that individuals would like to ask. Ross Phillips, 34 Vista Drive: Stated that he lived in the Spring Valley Neighborhood and urged the City to review their Non - Conforming Use Policy. 9 Little Rock Board ol Directors Meeting March 16, 2010 6:00 PM Mark Conine 15407 Hartford Street: Neighborhood and did not understand why the placement of his facility. Pat Albert 1470 Cooper Orbit Road: Stat the facility and in the past, had utilized the opposed to the placement of a rehabilitatior, Brian Sirak 16300 Cooper Orbit Road: St,- of this type of facility at the Oasis Renewal Anita Spence, 1 Vista Drive: Voiced hE facility at this location. Ted U shave 11 Manor Circle: Stated t] he was displeased that tb facility; however, if the issue could be recalled. City Attorney Carpenter stated that there w, Melanie Stri el 4800 Cooper Orbit Road investigation didn't occur into the extent o that she lived net door to the Oasis Renev at the location for a substantial amount of tii Lenice Garrison 28 Willow Oak Court: Neighborhood and she looked forward to t] RCA accountable as to the type of facility tl Jane Bristow, 14750 Cooper Orbit Road: Oasis Renewal Center property and the faci] In ermann Stri e 14800 Cooper Orbit Roo of the property w s made in private and nov Joel Gordon 11 cho Point: Stated that h given public notice. wished that they had David Prudhom e 13 Echo Point: State opened; it was an asset to the community a Arkansas purchas d the property, it became Brian Mzgers, 16221 Cooper Orbit Road: to the placement f the facility at this locatic Director Adcock asked that all the Board M be scheduled between RCA and the neighb felt the main issue was that fact that there w; that before a change to the Non- Conformin, notification process could be changed. City the change that any request for a contin reviewed in the City Manager's Office. Stated that he lived in the Capital Lakes there would not be a public hearing regarding -d that she lived within walking distance from walking trails. Ms. Albert stated the she was facility at the location. ted that he was in opposition to the placement Center location. �r opposition regarding the placement of the iat he was not in opposition to this type of ere was no public notice. Mr. Upshaw asked s nothing to recall. Stated that she was disappointed that more the non - conforming use. Ms. Strigel stated al Center and there had not been any activity ne. Stated that she lived in the Parkway Place ie neighborhood meeting and would hold the iat they have said the facility would be. Stated that her property was adjacent to the ity had not been utilized in quite some time. d: Stated that he felt that the deal for the sale the neighbors could do nothing about it. supported the RCA Programs; however, he d the when the Oasis Renewal Center first id the neighbors; however, when the ARC of a private property. Stated that he wanted to voice his opposition n. embers be notified of the meeting that would orhoods. Vice Mayor Fortson stated that he is no requirement of public notice, and he felt Policy was made, and simple change to the Manager Moore stated that he recently made nation of a non - conforming use had to be K Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting March 16, 2010 6:00 PM CITIZEN'S CO MUNICATION Gar Iverson 12 4 South Park Street Rock Housing A Ahority Project that Streets and felt I hat it was not safe School. Robert Jones 1123 South Park Street; Authority Project that would be built z James Thomson 7700 Apache Road: Association and hat they didn't feel changes at the go I f course. Luke Skrable 9602 Woodford Drive regards to the Professor Bowl case 1 years. Director Kumpu is made the motion, vote regarding Item #12 and asked tha the Board Members present, the vot Adcock; and Vie Mayor Fortson. Cazort. Abstain: Wright. By a vote failed. Director Cazort made the motion, s meeting. By un inimous voice vote adjourned. z 96� ( r ity Clerk Stated that he was still in opposition to the Little would be located at the intersection of 12" & Park to build low- income housing near Central High Voiced his opposition to the Little Rock Housing t the intersection of 12th & Park Streets. Stated that he represented the War Memorial Golf like they had been included in the planning of the Stated that he had still not received answers in hat had been in Environmental Court for several seconded by Director Adcock, to reconsider the t is be reviewed at a later date. By roll call vote of °s were as follows: Ayes: Wyrick; Kumpuris; Nays: Keck; Hendrix; Richardson; Hurst; and of 4 ayes, 5 nays and 1 abstention, the motion econded by Director Richardson, to adjourn the :)f the Board Members present, the meeting was 11 APPROVED: Mark Stodola, Mayor