HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-03-09City of Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting
February 3, 2009
6:00 PM
MINUTES
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
City Hall — 500 W. Markham
February 3, 2009
6:00 PM
The Board of Directors of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, met in a regular session with
Mayor Stodola presiding. Susan Langley, Acting City Clerk, called the roll; followed by
the invocation delivered by Director Erma Hendrix. The following directors present:
Hendrix, Keck, Wyrick, Wright, Cazort, Kumpuris, Hurst, Director Richardson, and Vice
Mayor Fortson and Mayor Stodola. Directors Adcock and Wright were absent. Director
Adcock enrolled shortly after roll call.
Mayor Stodola asked the Board to consider modifications.
The addition of Items M -1, M -2, and M -3, and the Deferral of Item 4; and the retirement
recognition of Beverly Dunbar, due to illness.
Director Cazort, seconded by Director Richardson made the motion to add Item M -1 to
the Grouped Items, and M -2 and M -3 to the Consent Agenda; and defer Item 4. By
unanimous voice vote the modifications were made.
City Manager, Bruce Moore announced that in regards to Item M -3; that the Community
Housing Advisory Board had voted to ask the Mayor not to issue the letter of support for
this project, and believed it should be held separate for discussion. Director Cazort with
drew the motion to add M -3 to the Consent Agenda; Director Richardson seconded the
motion, and by voice vote of the Board Members present, the motion carried.
ADDITIONS:
M -1 ORDINANCE NO. 20,075 - To dispense with competitive bidding and authorize
the City Manager to enter into a sole source contract with World Bird Sanctuary for a
series of free -flight bird shows at the Little Rock Zoo; and for other purposes. staff
recommends approval. Synopsis: This is a sole source ordinance to authorize the City Manager to
dispense with competitive bidding to contract with World Bird Sanctuary to provide a series of free -
flight bird shows during the spring and summer of 2009 at the Little Rock Zoo.
M -2 RESOLUTION NO. 12,930 - To authorize the Mayor to issue a letter in support
for a forty -eight (48) unit senior apartment community and a ninety -six (96) unit multi-
family apartment complex in the 9500 Block of Mabelvale Pike; and for other purposes.
Staff recommends approval. Synopsis: To authorize the City Manager to sign a letter of support for
tax credits to the Arkansas Development Finance Authority.
M -3 RESOLUTION NO. 12,929 - To authorize the Mayor to issue a letter of support
for a fifty -six (56) unit rental complex at 40th and Whitfield Streets; and for other
purposes. Staff recommends denial. Synopsis: To authorize the City Mayor to sign a letter of
support for tax credits to the Arkansas Development Finance Authority.
City of Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting
February 3, 2009
6:00 PM
Director Adcock stated that the Board had received a letter from Director Wright asking
the Board not to approve this project, which is in Ward 6.
The applicant Craig Jeup, representing JPM Group handed out information for the Board
to review, which contained the location of the project, information about their company,
etc. Mr. Juppe stated the ADFA (Arkansas Department of Finance Administration) had
announced the tax credit financing for low income housing under the disaster relief plan
and they planned to build Multi- family Residential, 9 units per acre. He stated getting the
Mayors letter of approval is the first step in the process. He explained that the deadline
for this is Friday (February 6, 2009). If they do not have the letter by then they would
probably lose the application. He said in the three weeks time they had to look at
properties that made sense to develop, submit materials to be distributed to the
neighborhood associations and had made calls to Director Wright, and had not gotten a
response. Director Richardson asked if the ADFA required notification to the Little Rock
Housing Authority. Mr. Jeup said he was not ware of this.
Director Adcock stated she had a problem that the neighborhoods were not involved in
this process. That part of the application is neighborhood involvement.
Mayor Stodola asked staff in reference to Director Wright's letter requesting that the
project not be approved, and Community Housing Advisory Boards denial; if there is a
process in place where these types of applications are reviewed. He stated that the
zoning was appropriate if they comply with the M -F 12 zoning requirements.
Mr. Bernard answered that the CHAB (Community Housing Advisory Board) had
established a review process several years ago. He overviewed the process, and said that
Mr. Jeup had done several of the tax credit developments, and was aware of what the
process required. He said that as part of the process review, the applicant is to submit a
project description and he has not seen that, and there is no documentation that the
contact with the neighborhood associations was made. He said staff has not received the
proper documentation from the applicant that applies to this project.
Mayor Stodola asked who in the city is required to give the applicant the process
information. Mr. Bernard replied that Mr. Ward Hanna, the Assistant Housing Director
indicated by email, that the information had been sent to Mr. Jeup.
Mr. Jeup said that he had not seen this process list. He said that he had relied on Lisa
Spigner (city staff) to guide him on the information required. He said they had never
applied using this (criteria) list. He said the forty-five day time frame on this application
would have been impossible for him to meet. He stated he had not been required to
provide that material on his other projects which have been approved.
Mayor Stodola asked if staff had documentation that Mr. Jeup was sent the information.
Mr. Bernard said that staff did not have the documentation, but that Mr. Jeup has done
these types of projects before, and is aware of the process that is necessary.
2
City of Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting
February 3, 2009
6:00 PM
Mr. Bernard said the major concern was that the applicant did not involve the
neighborhood, and he felt it was important that the neighborhoods should be involved.
Mayor Stodola stated this is zoned MF -12, and is the proper zoning for this project; what
is the substance of objection staff and CHAB has regarding this project. Mr. Bernard
answered that staff, and CHAB does not feel the neighborhoods were involved.
Mayor Stodola said this property is zoned properly, and if the applicant wanted to build
he could. Mr. Bernard said that part of the review criteria on these types of projects is
that the neighborhoods are involved.
Director Hendrix asked what constitutes a Neighborhood Association. She said that her
concern is that sometimes one individual comes to the Board, and says they represent a
neighborhood association. Who are they, how often do they meet.
Vice Mayor Fortson said if the property is already zoned and if the development went to
get a commercial loan, then Community Housing would not be involved. He asked if this
is true then what the City is looking at is whether they would support seeking a special
type of tax free financing.
Mr. Bruce Moore, City Manager, explained that in the past, ADFA as part of their
requirement, the applicant must have a letter of support for their development. The
request came in, and staff would do very little background work, and issue the letter.
There was a process to notify the neighborhood association, and not a process to vet the
applicants. That is why this review process was created. Mr. Moore said from his
standpoint, it is not an issue of whether it's a tax credit application. It is whether it goes
through the process, and this did go though the process.
Mayor Stodola stated that the applicant had alluded to the circumstances that funding is
only available during this cycle, and it concerned him that staff could not document that
they had submitted this required document to the applicant. Staff says they don't know if
the applicant got it, and the applicant says he did not get it until after the CHAB Meeting.
He said he wanted to be fair, but it seems our process may be a little bit loose in terms of
assuring we are giving everyone the same chance if they are going to have to go through
that review.
Director Richardson asked Mr. Moore, City Manager or Mr. Bernard, Housing Manager,
if the applicant had to provide written documentation to the local housing authority of its
intent to develop low income multi - family rental development properties and asked staff
to find out if that is the correct language or requirement of ADFA; and to provide that to
him.
Mayor Stodola asked if there was any further discussion. There was none.
Mayor Stodola asked for the reading of the resolution, and then a roll call vote.
City of Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting
February 3, 2009
6:00 PM
The resolution was read. The roll was called and recorded as follows:
Director Hendrix, abstained, Directors Richardson, Hurst, Wyrick, Kumpuris, Adcock
and Fortson voted no. Director Cazort Voted yes. Director Wright was absent. The
resolution did not pass.
DEFERRALS:
PRESENTATION
City of Little Rock Retirement Recognition — Beverly Dunbar
4. RESOLUTION - To authorize the City to enter into an agreement with the Little
Rock Airport Commission to establish the Airport Enhancement Funds; to manage and
distribute monies from that fund; and for other purposes. (Deferred until March 3, 2009)
Mayor Stodola called for the reading of the Consent Agenda, consisting of Items
M -2, and Items 1, 2,3,5,6 and 7.
1. MOTION - To approve the minutes of the Little Rock Board of Directors Special
Meeting of December 9, 2008.
2. RESOLUTION NO. 12,825 - To authorize the sale of a parcel of Port property and
execution of a warranty deed for such property. Staffrecommends approval.
Synopsis: The resolution permits the sale of certain Port Industrial Park property and authorizes
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a special warranty deed for sale of the property to Burlington
Northern Santa Fe.
3. RESOLUTION NO. 12,826 - To set the date of public hearing for February 17, 2009,
to consider a ordinance authorizing the issuance of sewer revenue bonds for the purpose
of financing betterments and improvements to the City's sewer system. Staffrecommends
approval.
4. RESOLUTION — DEFERRED - -To authorize the City to enter into an agreement
with the Little Rock Airport Commission to establish the Airport Enhancement Funds; to
manage and distribute monies from that fund; and for other purposes. Staffrecommends
approval.
5. RESOLUTION NO. 12,828 - To approve an annual contract with Cruse Uniforms
and Equipment, as primary vendor, and Stroud Safety Apparel, as secondary vendor, to
provide various police uniforms, accessories and equipment items for the Little Rock
Police Department; and for other purposes. Staffrecommends approval. Synopsis: The Little
Rock Police Department is requesting approval to award a contract to Cruse Uniforms and Equipment as
the primary vendor to provide various police uniforms, accessories and equipment items and Stroud Safety
Apparel as the secondary vendor for specific item
City of Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting
February 3, 2009
6:00 PM
6. RESOLUTION NO. 12,816 - Authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract
with A- Demolition Asbestos, for asbestos abatement and demolition of twenty (20)
residential properties within the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. Staff recommends approval.
Synopsis: Twenty (20) residential structures in dilapidated and /or burned condition causing a
negative environmental impact on the residential neighborhoods in which they are located.
7. RESOLUTION NO. 12,824 - In support of Senate Bill 77, the Animal Cruelty Bill,
an act concerning aggravated cruelty to dogs, cats and horses and related offenses and
concerning animal management practices; and for other purposes. Staffrecommends
approval. Synopsis: Senate Bill 77 is the Animal Cruelty Bill, which is a much more comprehensive law
with respect to definitions of what constitutes animal cruelty, and includes a felony penalty for aggravated
animal cruelty.
The Consent Agenda was read. A motion was made by Director Adcock,
seconded by Director Cazort to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. By
unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, the Consent Agenda, as
amended was adopted.
Citizens Communication was the next consideration on the agenda. There was
no one present to speak.
Mayor Stodola asked for the first reading of items 13 -16 and M -1, then 2 "d reading
on Items 8 -16 and Item M -1.
GROUPED ITEMS (Items 8 - 16)
8. ORDINANCE NO. 20,063 - LU- 08- 04 -02A — To amend the Land Use Plan (16,222)
in the Heights Hillcrest Planning District from Single - Family and Multi- Family to
Public Institutional; and for other purposes. Planning Commission: 6 ayes, 0 nays, 2 absent, 3
open positions. Staff recommends approval. (]'Reading January 20, 2009). Synopsis: A Land Use Plan
amendment in the Heights Hillcrest Planning District at Hillcrest Street and Kavanaugh Boulevard
from Single - Family and Multi- Family to Public Institutional for future development.
9. ORDINANCE NO. 20,064 - Z- 6323 -L — Approving a modification to a Planned
Zoning Development titled The Village at Rahling Road Lot 913 Revised PCD, located
at 24 Rahling Circle, Little Rock, Arkansas; amending the Official Zoning Map of the
City of Little Rock, Arkansas; and for other purposes. Planning Commission: 6 ayes, 0 nays, 2
absent, 3 open positions. Staff recommends approval. (]"Reading January 20, 2009). Synopsis: The
applicant is requesting a revision to the previously approved PCD to allow the placement of a
covered parking structure and a three (3) -car garage within the rear parking lot of this existing office
building.
10. ORDINANCE NO. 20,065-X - Z- 7626 -A — Approving a Planned Zoning
Development and establishing a Planned Office District titled Joe T. Robinson Middle
School Long -Form PD -O, located at 21001 Highway 10, Little Rock, Arkansas;
5
City of Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting
February 3, 2009
6:00 PM
amending the Official Zoning Map of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; and for other
purposes. Planning Commission: 6 ayes, 0 nays, 2 absent, 3 open positions. Staffrecommends
approval. (Ist Reading January 20, 2009). Synopsis: The applicant is seeking a rezoning of the site
from R -2, Single - Family to Planned Office Development to allow the existing school to place a new
drive inconsistent with the typical standards established by the Highway 10 Design Overlay District.
11. ORDINANCE NO. 20,066 - Expressing the intent of the City of Little
Rock, Arkansas, to issue revenue bonds and to reimburse from the proceeds of those
revenue and bonds preliminary costs incurred in the construction, equipping,
improvement, expansion and acquisition of various real property, fixtures and equipment
related to the construction of a manufacturing and distribution facility project located
within the City of Little Rock at the Port of Little Rock; and setting forth other matters
pertaining thereto. (Novus International, Inc.) Staffrecommends approval. (]'Reading
January 20, 2009).
12. ORDINANCE NO. 20,067-Condemning Certain Structures in the City of Little
Rock, Arkansas, as structural, fire and health hazards; providing for summary abatement
procedures; taking such action as is necessary to raze and remove said structures;
declaring an emergency; and for other purposes. Staffrecommends approval. (1" Reading
January 20, 2009). Synopsis: The structures at 5008 and 5010 West 65th Street have become
rundown, dilapidated, unsightly, dangerous and detrimental to the public welfare of the citizens of
the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, despite the City's efforts to work with F &F Corporation, the
owner of the properties, to rehabilitate the structures.
13. ORDINANCE NO. 20,070 - LU08- 11 -02A — To amend the Land Use Plan (16,222)
in the Interstate 430 Planning District from Community Shopping to Commercial and
Office; and for other purposes. Planning Commission: 9 ayes; 0 nays; 1 absent; I open position.
Staffrecommends approval. Synopsis: A Land Use Plan amendment in the Interstate 430 Planning
District from Community Shopping to Office and Commercial to recognize existing and probable
future uses.
14. ORDINANCE NO. 20,071 - A -317 — Accepting the Porocel -Dixon Annexation (A-
317) adding certain lands to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; and classifying said
property to Porocel Planned Industrial District (PID) (Z- 8287 -A) amending the
official zoning map for the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; and for other purposes.
Planning Commission: 10 ayes; 0 nays; 1 absent. Staffrecommends approval. Synopsis: Annexation of
26.4 acres along the west side of Arch Street Pike at Dixon Road and zoning approximately thirty
(30) acres to Planned Industrial District for Porocel Industries at 10300 Arch Street Pike.
15. ORDINANCE NO. 20,072 - Z- 6883 -A — Approving a modification to a Planned
Zoning Development titled Harp's Short-Form PD -R, located at 5212 I Street, Little
Rock, Arkansas, amending Ordinance No. 18,379 and the official zoning map of the City
of Little Rock, Arkansas; and for other purposes. Planning Commission: 10 ayes; 0 nays; 1
absent. Staffrecommends approval. Synopsis: The request is to allow a revision to the previously
approved PD -R to allow the two (2) lots located along "I" Street to develop with single - family homes.
16. ORDINANCE NO. 20,073 - Amending Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances of the
City of Little Rock, Arkansas, providing for a deferral of Master Street Plan construction
requirements for Cantrell Road and Highway 300. Staffrecommends approval. Synopsis:
2
City of Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting
February 3, 2009
6:00 PM
Ordinance to authorize a five (5) -year deferral of boundary street improvements for Winfield United
Methodist Church located at the northeast corner of Cantrell Road and Highway 300.
Items 13 -16 were read the first time. Director Adcock, seconded by Director Cazort
made a motion to suspend the rules and place Items 8 -16 on second reading and by
unanimous voice of the Board Members present, being two - thirds in number, the rules
were suspended and the ordinances were read the second time. A motion was made by
Director Adcock, seconded by Director Cazort to suspend the rules and place the
ordinances on 3rd reading and by unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present,
being two - thirds in number the rules were suspended and the ordinances were read the
third time. By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, the ordinances,
and emergency clause (Item 12) were passed.
SEPARATE ITEMS (Item 17)
17. ORDINANCE NO. 20,068 - Z- 4524 -G — Approving a Planned Zoning
Development and establishing a Planned Office District titled GCC Addition Lot 2
Short -Form POD, located at 13000 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas; amending
the Official Zoning Map of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; and for other purposes.
Planning Commission: 6 ayes, 0 nays, 2 absent, 3 open positions. Staff recommends approval. (1"
Reading January 20, 2009. Synopsis: The request is a rezoning to POD to allow the subdivision of an
existing 2.9 -acre lot into two (2) lots with lot areas less than the two (2) -acre typical minimum
requirement per the Highway 10 Design Overlay District.
The ordinance was read the first time. A motion was made by Director Keck, seconded
by Director Cazort to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on second reading. By
unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, being two- thirds in number the
rules were suspended and the ordinance was read the second time. A motion was made
by Director Keck, seconded by Director Cazort to suspend the rules and place the
ordinance on third reading. By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present,
being two - thirds in number the rules were suspended and the ordinance was read the third
time. Mayor Stodola stated that this was another one of those developments that was
less than two acres on Highway 10. Director Cazort stated that was correct but the
difference was that this one was office as opposed to retail. Mayor Stodola asked if
anyone had any further questions or statements. There being none, Mayor Stodola called
for a voice vote. By unanimous voice vote of the Board members present being two -
thirds in number, the ordinance was passed.
Item 18 was the Board's next consideration.
Mr. Russell, Bond Counsel, addressed the Board to say that he believed that Item 18 was
listed incorrectly on the agenda. He stated that earlier on the Consent Agenda, the public
hearing was set for February 17, 2009. Tonight, the applicant would like to have the first
and second readings of the ordinance, and then have the public hearing on February 17,
2009. He stated that the public hearing had not yet been advertised or published, and this
was only to be for the first and second readings, if the Board approved.
7
City of Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting
February 3, 2009
6:00 PM
18. PUBLIC HEARING & ORDINANCE - (3rd reading will be held on February 17,
2009). Authorizing the construction of betterments and improvements to the Sewer
System of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; authorizing the issuance of a Sewer
Revenue Bond, Series 2009A for the purpose of financing the cost thereof, providing for
the payment of the principal and interest on the bond; and prescribing other matters r
The ordinance was read the first time. A motion was made by Director Hurst, seconded
by Director Cazort to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on second reading. By
unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, being two - thirds in number, the
rules were suspended and the ordinance was read the second time. (Is' and 2nd Readings
Only)
Mayor Stodola announced that the Ordinance would be held on second reading, until the
next meeting.
19. PUBLIC HEARING & ORDINANCE NO. 20,069 - Z -8404- Approving a Planned
Zoning Development and establishing a Planned Commercial District titled the Dog
House Short-Form PCD located at 2619 Kavanaugh Boulevard, Little Rock, Arkansas;
amending the Official Zoning Map of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; and for other
purposes. Planning Commission: I aye, 9 nays, 0 absent. Staff recommends approval Synopsis: The
request is an appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation of denial of a rezoning to this
site from C -3, General Commercial District to PCD to allow the addition of an outdoor play area for
pets as an allowable activity behind the existing building.
Mayor Stodola opened the public hearing. Mr. Lucian Gillam, representing Mr. Robert
Smith, the applicant, handed out letters of support from neighbors existing in a one block
area. He stated this application is for a dog grooming and dog day care for ten dogs and
the hours would be from 9 AM to 4:30 PM, and the area would be fenced. The area is
secured with a double gate to minimize the change of pets escaping when the gates are
open to add or remove a dog. Mr. Gilliam and Mr. Smith stated that there would be no
more than ten dogs, and that no dogs would not be kept overnight. When questioned by
the Board, Mr. Smith said the area would be cleaned as needed, that the solids would be
picked up and the pad where the dogs would be outside would be hosed off. The Board
asked what type of fencing was used. Mr. Smith said it was chain link. They contended
that Mr. Smith had been in business for seven and a half years, and had never once
received a complaint until recently when City staff contacted them concerning the use.
Mr. Smith said that the pen is a 20 -foot by 40 foot pen. He said there is a capacity for
approximately thirty dogs, but this application was only for ten. The Board also wanted
assurance that the use was to be daytime only, no nighttime activities. Mr. Smith assured
the Board that they plan to limit the outside activity to the hours of 9AM and 4:30 PM.
The Board also wanted to know if the dogs would be supervised while in the pen. Mr.
Smith answered no. He stated that about every half hour they would be doing cleaning,
so the area is never unkempt. The Board asked about the type of surface. Mr. Smith
answered that it was concreted. The Board asked staff to give an overview of the
application, and staff recommendation. Mr. Bozynski, Planning Director gave an
overview of the application saying that the applicant operates a dog grooming, bathing,
and daycare and limited boarding facility. He said the business incorporated an outdoor
�3
City of Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting
February 3, 2009
6:00 PM
area just behind the building that is used during business hours. He stated the outdoor
play area is not an allowable use under the current zoning. He said the activity was
brought to staff's attention, and they informed the applicant of the need for rezoning if
the outdoor activity was to remain. He said the property is zoning C -3, General
Commercial District and the applicant is seeking a rezoning to Planned Commercial
Development to allow the addition of an outdoor play area for pets as an allowable use.
He said the business had been operating for approximately one and a half years in
violation. He said that when the notified the applicant that they were in violation, the
applicant applied for the correct zoning. He said that staff recommends approval because
of the limited number of hours, they are limited daytime hours, the business is limited to
the current applicant, and it is a restricted daytime use. Mr. Gilliam said that when
petitions were circulated opposing the rezoning that there was a misconception that they
would board thirty dogs outside, and they would be a twenty -four -seven operation. He
said the letters of opposition were based on things that were not true. He said the
business right next door has no problem with the business.
Mr. Steve Giles representing Rose and Ed Back, adjacent property owners, addressed the
Board saying that his clients were opposed to the rezoning of the site to allow the animals
outdoors. Mr. Giles stated the site was unique in that there was an eight foot wall behind
the building with the home located on top of the wall, where the sound amplified. Mr.
Giles said the Backs had owned their home for a number of years and had chosen to
move because of the noise. He said the "Dog House" would place 15 to 20 dogs within
the outside enclosure, and as a new dog entered the area, the dogs as a matter of practice
bark in greeting. He said that once the barking started within the alley then the dogs of
the people living on the south side of the Backs would start barking. He said that Hillcrest
is a unique area in that business and residents could co- exist. He stated that his clients
thought that the outdoor activity was allowed under the current zoning, so rather than
object, his clients moved. Mr. Giles stated that his clients had placed their home on the
market, and had been unable to sell due to the barking dogs. He stated there were
neighbors and businesses in the area that were in opposition to the request for rezoning,
which were presented at the Planning Commission Meeting. He said his clients have
done extensive renovations, and are trying to sell their property, and that realtors have
brought by interested prospects, but they are not interested because of the barking dogs.
He asked the Board if they would want to live by a house that has up thirty barking dogs;
or even ten dogs. You cannot assume the dogs will be quite. He said the Backs have a
Carriage House located to the back of their property, which had been rented, but the last
tenant moved because of the barking dogs. He felt sure that other neighbors felt the dogs
had a bad affect in the neighborhood.
There was no further discussion. Mayor Stodola closed the public hearing. The
ordinance was read the first time. A motion was made by Director Cazort, seconded by
Director Adcock to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on second reading. By
unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, being two - thirds in number, the
rules were suspended and the ordinance was read the second time. A motion was made
by Director Cazort, seconded by Director Hurst to suspend the rules and place the
ordinance on third reading. By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present,
City of Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting
February 3, 2009
6:00 PM
being two- thirds in number, the rules were suspended and the ordinance was read the
third time. By unanimous voice vote of the Board members present, being two- thirds in
number, the rules were suspended and the ordinance was passed.
A motion was made by Director Cazort, seconded by Director Hurst to recess the meeting
to go into executive session for the purpose of making liaison Board appointments, and
appointments to various City Boards and Commissions.
Director Kumpuris asked if this could be deferred two weeks because all the directors
were not present. Director Cazort said he would withdraw his motion.
Director Cazort stated since there are also various Boards and Commissions, why not go
into executive session to make appointments to the Boards and Commissions, and defer
the liaison positions for two weeks. Director Kumpuris had no objection. Director
Cazort seconded by Director Kumpuris make the motion to go into executive session to
make appointments to various Boards and Commissions.
20. EXECUTIVE SESSION & RESOLUTION NO. 12,931 - To make appointments
to represent the Little Rock Board of Directors as liaisons and members to City of
Little Rock Boards and Commissions and to make appointments to various City of
Little Rock Boards and Commissions. Synopsis: Little Rock Animal Services Advisory
Board: three (3) positions. Board of Adjustment: one (1) position. Little Rock Sanitary Sewer
Commission: one (1) position. Little Rock Zoo Board of Governors: two (2) positions.
Mr. Bruce Moore, City Manager, read the nominations of the following persons to the
listed Boards and Commissions: Sanitary Sewer Committee - Marilyn Perryman (Ward
4); Little Rock Zoo Board of Governors - Matthew Coffield (Ward 4) and C. Tad
Bohannon (Ward 6); Animal Services Advisory Board, Dr. Bob Hale, Kimberly Steed
Landrum, and Lance Lieblong. A motion was made by Director Cazort, seconded by
Director Richardson to make the appointments to the Boards and Commissions as listed.
By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present, the resolution making the
appointments was adopted.
There was some discussion regarding the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
The Board asked the Mayor to forward them information as it became available.
City Manager, Bruce Moore announced that the Sales Use Tax for January had exceeded
projections; but staff is watching this daily. Director Adcock announced that the NUSA
Conference would be held in Little Rock next year. The dates are May 26 -29, 2010.
10
City of Little Rock Board of Directors Meeting
February 3, 2009
6:00 PM
There being no other business to discuss, Director Keck made a motion, seconded by
Director Richardson to adjourn. By unanimous voice vote of the Board Members
present, the meeting was adjourned.
ATTEST:
a cy ood City Jerk
APPROVED:
Mark Stodola, Mayor
11