Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-19-93236 t Board of Directors Meeting Little Rock, Arkansas January 19, 1993 - 6:05 P.M. The Board of Directors of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas met in regular session with Mayor Jim Dailey presiding. City Clerk Robbie Hancock called the roll with the following Directors present: Directors Priest, Roy, Sharp, Mason and Adcock - total 5; Absent - Director Lewellen - total 1. With a quorum present, Mayor Dailey declared the Board of Directors in session. The Invocation was given by Director Priest, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. The Consent Agenda was the first presentation, consisting of the following items: (a) Approval of the Minutes of the previous reconvened meetings held December 21, 1992, December 23, 1992, December 27, 1992 and December 30, 1992, and the special meeting held January 1, 1993. (b) Resolution No. 8,856, entitled: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE ARKANSAS HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE CITY WITH WARNING AND REGULATORY SIGNS. (c) Resolution No. 8,857, with the title being: A RESOLUTION SETTING THE DATE OF HEARING ON THE PETITION TO ABANDON A PORTION OF RIGHT -OF -WAY OF RILEY DRIVE IN THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. (February 2, 1993) By a motion from Director Priest, seconded by Director Roy, the Consent Agenda was unanimously adopted as follows: (a) The Minutes of the previous reconvened meetings held December 21, 1992, December 23, 1992, December 27, 1992 and December 30, 1992, and the special meeting held January 1, 1993 were approved as written and distributed to the members of the Board of Directors; and (b and c) Resolutions No. 8,856 and 8,857 were read in full and adopted by unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present. At the time allotted for Citizen Communications, Mr. Washington Adams, 2408 Cross Street, stated he damaged his car tire because of the unsafe condition of the street gutter on West 16th Street between Pulaski and High Streets. He said City Attorney Tom Carpenter has a copy of his claim but has said the City of Little Rock is not responsible. Mr. Adams concluded with the statement: "All I'm asking for is a car tire." Mayor Dailey asked City Manager Charles Nickerson to investigate and provide a report to the Board of Directors and Mr. Adams. The next speaker was Ms. Delbra Stewart, 2300 State Street, President of the Downtown Neighborhood Association, who asked the Board to put police protection back in the neighborhoods now that police protection is no longer required for President -elect Clinton since he has moved from Little Rock to Washington D.C. Mrs. Kathy Wells, Vice President of the Coalition of Little Rock Neighborhoods, spoke in support of utility franchise increases, which would cost a household $2.50 per month and would raise $1.4 million which the City should apply to increased Minutes January 19, 1993 2 3 � police protection. There is a relief from this tax for households on fixed income and low income. Customers of Arkansas Power & Light Company may file a form stating their income is $12,000 or less annually and they will pay no sales tax on the first 500 kilowatt hours of power. There are related services by the gas and electric companies who offer home energy audits. The City's cable TV channel has the Home Seasoning series which offers suggestion on how to reduce energy use and control utility costs. All these things should be publicized. Mayor Dailey asked that City Manager Charles Nickerson provide a response on some of the suggestions made by Mrs. Wells. The last speaker was Mr. Ray Rinchuso, 15 Woodhill Drive, who asked the Board to reconsider the zoning regulations for the proposed shopping center to be constructed at the intersection of Bowman Road and Chenal Parkway which will house a Wal -Mart and Sam's Super Center. He addressed the following issues: (1) 50' wooded area at rear of houses is not enough; (2) back of buildings would be in view from some of the residents, (3) noise from the loading docks, (4) decreased property values, (5) lighting of such magnitude would give neighborhood a glow, (6) hours of operation, especially loading docks, (7) traffic volume on streets, (8) drainage easement runs through his back yard. Mayor Dailey asked for a report from the Planning Department. Mr. Jim Lawson, Director of Neighborhoods and Planning stated that a meeting would be held Thursday (Jan. 21) at 7:00 P.M. at the Assembly of God Church on Financial Parkway and Wal -Mart officials and engineers were to meet with area residents. Director Sharon Priest introduced her sister, Colleen Gerry from Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Consideration was then given to a proposed Ordinance entitled: — AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A DESIGN OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE CHENAL /FINANCIAL CENTER PARKWAY URBAN CORRIDOR PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN OVERLAY AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 36 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY; and the Ordinance was read the second time. (See Minutes of December 15, 1992 for first reading of proposed Ordinance.) Mr. Jim Lawson, Director of the Department of Neighborhoods and Planning, explained that two paragraphs had been added under Item 4 of the proposed Ordinance and Planning Staff has worked with the Attorney for the landowners. There was no motion to suspend the rules; therefore, the proposed Ordinance remained on the calendar for third reading on February 2, 1993. A public hearing had been scheduled for this time and place on the appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of Zoning Case Z -5646 - National Home Center PCD at Highway 10 and Taylor Loop Road. The appeal was filed by David Jones of Vogel Realty Company on behalf of Taylor -Ten Partnership, Marvin Itzkowitz, and National Home Centers. Mayor Dailey declared the public hearing open. There was a staff presentation by Mr. Jim Lawson, Director of Neighborhoods and Planning. Mr. Lawson gave a brief history of the Highway 10 Land Use Plan and pointed out the commercial nodes indicated in the Plan. He stated that a portion of the National Home Center property is in a transitional zone and about two - thirds is in the single - family area. The development will be 184,000 square feet on a 17 acre tract, which is a very intense use and way out of scale for the Highway 10 Land Use Plan. Mr. Lawson expressed concern for the impact this development will have on the area and the Design Overlay District (DOD). Mr. Lawson then answered questions by Board Members. Mayor Dailey allowed 15 minutes each for support and opposition. Those speaking in support of the Home Center PCD were Mr. David Jones, Ms. Cher A. Harlson, and Mr. Danny 2 238 Minutes January 19, 1993 Funderburg. Mr. Jones, representing Vogel Realty, stated that a PCD is more restrictive than a general zoning request; that National Home Center has met every Ordinance requirement; and this is a quality development which should be passed. Ms. Harlson, designer of the National Home Center, presented drawings and explained the design plans. Mr. Funderburg, Vice President of National Home Centers, explained the National Home Center industry, retail business and contractor oriented business, and asked the Board of Directors to approve the PCD. Those speaking in opposition to the National Home Center PCD were Attorney Hal Kemp, Mr. Gene Pfeifer, Attorney Wes Holmes, Ms. Ruth Bell, and Mr. Randolph Mowry. Mr. Kemp, representing property owner Eugene Pfeifer, stated the vision that was contemplated for Highway 10 by adoption of the Team 4 Plan, which originated in the early 19801s, and subsequent land use plans was never a use like this. This is an industrial use and not a retail use. Mr. Gene Pfeifer stated it would be absolutely unprecedented anywhere else in the city to consider putting a 17 acre development in a residential area where every piece around it is residential. He pleaded with the Board to vote against the PCD. Mr. Wes Holmes, attorney representing Mr. Jim Moore, stated that Mr. Moore and other families had moved into the area relying on the plan that this area would maintain its residential character. If this proposal is adopted, they would be deprived of their reliance on that representation. Ms. Ruth Bell, representing the League of Women Voters of Pulaski County, stated changing a plan that has been adopted such a short time sends a message to the entire city. Planning and zoning are some of the tools used by the City to encourage stability in deteriorating central city neighborhoods. It becomes harder for citizens to make plans based on the City's rules if the City seems to change its mind suddenly and illogically. Mr. Randy Mowry, representing the Coalition of Little Rock Neighborhoods, stated the Coalition voted to oppose this rezoning request because this area is residential and this large development will significantly alter the residential character. Mayor Dailey then declared the public hearing closed. Director Priest moved that the reading of the ordinance be deferred until a public hearing can be held on the Highway 10 Land Use Plan. The motion died for lack of a second. Ordinance No. 16,337 was then presented, with the title being: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISHING A PCD DISTRICT TITLED HOME CENTER PCD, 16,515 CANTRELL (Z -5646) IN THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES; (Z -5646 - National Home Center PCD located at 16,515 Cantrell Road.) and the Ordinance was read the first time. There was a motion and second by Directors Roy and Mason, respectively, to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on second reading. Director Priest voiced opposition to the Board moving forward with this zoning request when both the Planning Commission and Staff have recommended denial, stating the Board is required to zone property for reasonable use and not the highest use, and this is not reasonable use; it is much more industrial and commercial than a neighborhood commercial use. The motion to suspend the rules was adopted by a roll call vote of 5 ayes, 1 no (Director Priest) and 1 absent (Director Lewellen) . There was a second reading of the Ordinance, followed by a motion to again suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on third and final reading. The motion was made by Director Mason, seconded by Director Sharp, and adopted by a voice vote of 5 ayes, 1 no (Director Priest) , and 1 absent (Director Lewellen) . A third and last reading of the Ordinance ensued. Director Priest again stated that approval of this zoning reclassification will destroy the Highway 10 Plan, the integrity of it, and will send a negative 3 Minutes January 19, 1993 239 message to the citizens of Little Rock and she very strongly opposed it. Director Adcock questioned Mr. Jim Swink about the plans for his property. Mr. Swink owns 15.5 acres on the west border of the proposed Home Center PCD property and stated he would like the opportunity to have his property zoned commercial in the future if he desired, and that he very much supports this project. Director Priest asked Mr. Swink if he would still be in favor of the PCD if he knew that was the only property that could ever be zoned commercial. Mr. Swink responded that he would. The Aye and No Vote taken on passage of the Ordinance resulted as follows: Ayes - Directors Roy, Sharp, Mason and Adcock - total 4; Noes - Director Priest and Mayor Dailey - total 2; Absent - Director Lewellen - total 1. Whereupon, the Ordinance was declared PASSED. The next presentation was Ordinance No. 16,338, entitled: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISHING A PRD DISTRICT TITLED RESERVOIR TOWNHOMES PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT SHORT -FORM, 1900 BLOCK RESERVOIR ROAD (Z- 2203-A) IN THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES; (Z- 2203 -A - Reservoir Townhomes Planned Residential District Short -Form located in the 1900 block of Reservoir Road.) and after a first reading of the Ordinance, there was a motion by Director Adcock, seconded by Director Mason, to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on second reading. The motion was unanimously adopted by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect. There was a second reading of the Ordinance followed by a subsequent motion made and seconded by Directors Priest and Roy, respectively, to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on third and final reading. The motion received unanimous adoption by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect, and the third and last reading of the Ordinance ensued. The Aye and No Vote taken on passage of the Ordinance received the following response: Ayes - Directors Priest, Roy, Sharp, Mason, Mayor Dailey, and Director Adcock - total 6; Noes - None; Absent - Director Lewellen - total 1. The Ordinance was then declared PASSED. Ordinance No. 16,339 was introduced next, with the title being: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISHING A POD DISTRICT TITLED ROGERS POD, 16,719 CANTRELL ROAD (Z- 5377 -A) IN THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES; (Z- 5377 -A - Rogers Planned Office District located at 16,719 Cantrell Road.) and after a first reading of the Ordinance, there was a motion by Director Adcock, seconded by Director Mason, to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on second reading. The motion was unanimously adopted by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect. There was a second reading of the Ordinance followed by a subsequent motion made and seconded by Directors Priest and Roy, respectively, to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on third and final reading. The motion received unanimous adoption by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect, and the third and last reading of the Ordinance ensued. The Aye and No Vote taken on passage of the Ordinance 4 240 Minutes January 19, 1993 received the following response: Ayes - Directors Priest, Roy, Sharp, Mason, Mayor Dailey, and Director Adcock - total 6; Noes - None; Absent - Director Lewellen - total 1. The Ordinance was declared PASSED. Consideration was then given to Ordinance No. 16,340, described as: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 30 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS PROVIDING FOR A DEFERRAL OF THE SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE BOUNDARY STREET ORDINANCE AT 1000 NIX ROAD (BP 92 -110); (92 -110 - Northwest Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses located at 1000 Nix Road - deferral of sidewalk construction requirements.) and after a first reading of the Ordinance, there was a motion by Director Adcock, seconded by Director Mason, to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on second reading. The motion was unanimously adopted by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect. There was a second reading of the Ordinance followed by a subsequent motion made and seconded by Directors Priest and Roy, respectively, to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on third and final reading. The motion received unanimous adoption by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect, and the third and last reading of the Ordinance ensued. The Aye and No Vote taken on passage of the Ordinance received the following response: Ayes - Directors Priest, Roy, Sharp, Mason, Mayor Dailey, and Director Adcock - total 6; Noes - None; Absent - Director Lewellen - total 1. The Ordinance was then declared PASSED. Introduced next was Ordinance No. 16,341, entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 31 AND 36 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN DEFINITION MODIFICATIONS, PROCEDURAL REVISIONS, TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS; (Amending Subdivision Code - Chapter 31 and Zoning Code - Chapter 36.) and after a first reading of the Ordinance, there was a motion by Director Adcock, seconded by Director Mason, to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on second reading. The motion was unanimously adopted by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect. There was a second reading of the Ordinance followed by a subsequent motion made and seconded by Directors Priest and Roy, respectively, to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on third and final reading. The motion received unanimous adoption by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect, and the third and last reading of the Ordinance ensued. The Aye and No Vote taken on passage of the Ordinance received the following response: Ayes - Directors Priest, Roy, Sharp, Mason, Mayor Dailey, and Director Adcock - total 6; Noes - None; Absent - Director Lewellen - total 1. The Ordinance was then declared PASSED. 5 Minutes January 19, 1993 241 Presented next was Ordinance No. 16,342, with the titled being: AN ORDINANCE REDUCING THE RATE OF COLLECTION OF THE ASSESSMENT OF BENEFITS TO BE RECEIVED BY THE OWNERS OF EACH OF THE SEVERAL BLOCKS, LOTS AND PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE MABELVALE- ALEXANDER SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 142 OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES; and after a first reading of the Ordinance, there was a motion by Director Adcock, seconded by Director Mason, to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on second reading. The motion was unanimously adopted by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect. Attorney Bill Spivey responded to a question asked by Director Roy at the Agenda Meeting, which was "Why not leave the levy at the rate at which taxes are paid at a higher level, thereby allowing the bonds to be paid off sooner." Mr. Spivey said what the Underwriters have proposed to the Commissioners of the District is a refunding of the bonds which will both reduce the debt service and will also reserve a portion of the surplus collections and thereby continue to repay the bonds at a faster rate. The levy is being reduced in order to share a part of those savings with the property owners and to permit a quicker repayment as well as a reduced tax levy, so there will be a shortened maturity. There was a second reading of the Ordinance followed by a subsequent motion made and seconded by Directors Priest and Roy, respectively, to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on third and final reading. The motion received unanimous adoption by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect, and the third and last reading of the Ordinance ensued. The Aye and No Vote taken on passage of the Ordinance received the following response: Ayes - Directors Priest, Roy, Sharp, Mason, Mayor Dailey, and Director Adcock - total 6; Noes - None; Absent - Director Lewellen - total 1. The Ordinance was then declared PASSED. Consideration was then given to Ordinance No. 16,343, with the title being: AN ORDINANCE DISPENSING WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF COMPETITIVE BIDDING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE HEISCHMAN COMPANY FOR THE PURCHASE OF SIMULATION EQUIPMENT FOR RADIO AND TELEPHONE SIMULATION -BASED TRAINING FOR DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES /OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES; and after a first reading of the Ordinance, there was a motion by Director Adcock, seconded by Director Mason, to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on second reading. The motion was unanimously adopted by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect. There was a second reading of the Ordinance followed by a subsequent motion made and seconded by Directors Priest and Roy, respectively, to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on third and final reading. The motion received unanimous adoption by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect, and the third and last reading of the Ordinance ensued. The Aye and No Vote taken on passage of the Ordinance received the following response: Ayes - Directors Priest, Roy, Sharp, Mason, Mayor Dailey, and Director Adcock - total 6; Noes - None; Absent - Director Lewellen - total 1. The Ordinance was then declared PASSED. 242 Minutes January 19, 1993 The next presentation was a proposed Ordinance, entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 13,920, 14,159, 15,391 AND 15,777, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULES FOR BUILDING, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND RELATED WORK PERFORMED IN THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK; REPEALING ALL TECHNICAL CODE ORDINANCE AND CODE OF ORDINANCE PROVISIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES; At the request of Mayor Dailey, City Attorney Tom Carpenter explained he had listened to the tape of the January 5, 1993 meeting at which the proposed Ordinance was read the first time, followed by a motion and second to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on second reading. There was a subsequent motion by Director Priest to table the motion to suspend the rules to place the Ordinance on second reading. The motion was seconded by Director Roy and adopted by a voice vote of 4 ayes (Dailey, Priest, Roy, Lewellen) and 3 noes (Adcock, Sharp, Mason). Therefore, the second reading did not occur and the Ordinance was left on the calendar for second reading on January 19, 1993. Following the City Attorney's explanation, Director Priest moved that the Ordinance be tabled until the Board can deal with all budget related ordinances. The motion was seconded by Director Roy, and adopted by a voice vote of 5 ayes, 1 no (Director Adcock) and 1 absent (Director Lewellen). Therefore, the Ordinance was tabled and the second reading of the proposed Ordinance did not occur. The next presentation was Ordinance No. 16,344, entitled: AN ORDINANCE CONDEMNING CERTAIN STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK AS STRUCTURAL, FIRE AND HEALTH HAZARDS; PROVIDING FOR SUMMARY ABATEMENT PROCEDURES; DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO TAKE SUCH ACTION AS IS NECESSARY TO RAZE AND REMOVE SAID STRUCTURES; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. Several residents of the Wakefield Neighborhood Association and representatives of Arkansas Baptist College were present to speak regarding the demolition of Guardian Court Apartments which were listed in the proposed Ordinance. Ms. Anne Johnston, representing the Wakefield Neighborhood Association, stated the apartments in question have been an eyesore and a source of crime and other problems to the area for a long time. She stated the Wakefield residents were present to ask the Board to approve the demolition of the apartments, but would be happy to see the apartments redeveloped in a useful manner if they can be boarded up and their use by drug dealers be stopped immediately and not wait 30 days. Ms. Mary Jarrett, Dean for Academics of Arkansas Baptist College, read a letter from Dr. W. Thomas Keaton, President of Arkansas Baptist College, in which he asked for time to assess the cost of renovating and bringing the property up to standards before accepting or rejecting the offer of Mr. Jerry Taylor, owner of the Guardian Court Apartments, to donate the property to the College. Board Members questioned Mr. Taylor about boarding and securing the property. Mr. Taylor stated he had made several attempts to board and secure the property and had also fenced the property, but he has been unable to keep it secured. City Attorney Tom Carpenter expressed concern about the City's liability should anyone be injured on the condemned property and also the difficulty of obtaining financing for condemned property. Mr. Taylor said he would continue to keep the property fully insured. During the discussion, Board Members generally agreed to grant a 30 day administrative waiver for the Guardian Court Apartments (with the condition that the buildings be boarded and secured and that Mr. Taylor assume any liability that may occur during the 30 day period) to allow Arkansas Baptist College time to assess the costs involved before accepting or rejecting the donation of the property. Rev. Zane Clark, pastor of Wakefield Baptist Church, was present to encourage demolition of the property, but said the church would 7 Minutes January 19, 1993 241 be supportive of the College obtaining and improving the property. The Ordinance was then read the first time. The rules were suspended and the Ordinance placed on second reading by motion and second from Directors Priest and Roy, respectively, and unanimously adopted by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect. The second reading of the Ordinance ensued, followed by a subsequent motion by Director Roy to suspend the rules and place the Ordinance on third and final reading. The motion was seconded by Director Mason and unanimously adopted by the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect. There was a third and final reading of the Ordinance, followed by an Aye and No Vote taken on passage of the Ordinance, which is recorded as follows: Ayes - Directors Priest, Roy, Sharp, Mason, Mayor Dailey, and Director Adcock - total 6; Noes - None; Absent - Director Lewellen - total 1. The Emergency Clause contained in Section 2 of the foregoing Ordinance was then read and adopted by the following roll call vote: Ayes - Directors Priest, Roy, Sharp, Mason, Mayor Dailey, and Director Adcock - total 6; Noes - None; Absent - Director Lewellen - total 1. Therefore, the Ordinance, together with the Emergency Section, was then declared PASSED. The next item on the Agenda was a discussion of the request by Mr. Sterling Cockrill, Executive Director of Metrocentre Improvement District No. 1, for a refund of a portion of the funds Metrocentre contributed to the reopening of Main Street. (See Minutes of December 15, 1992 and January 5, 1993.) Mr. Cockrill was not present, but City Attorney Tom Carpenter advised Board Members that he had met with Mr. Cockrill and thought he had discovered the source of the controversy and would provide a report at the Agenda Meeting on January 27, 1993. Therefore, the discussion was deferred. Appearing on the Agenda as Items 12(a) and (b) were two options regarding the form of government for the City of Little Rock. 12(a) A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FUTURE - LITTLE ROCK STEERING COMMITTEE; OR 12(b) A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROCEDURE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE COUNCIL - MANAGER FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Proposal (a) was recommended by the Governance Task Force and Proposal (b) was recommended by Director John Lewellen. A motion was made by Director Roy, seconded by Director Mason, that this meeting be recessed and the proposed Resolutions be deferred until Wednesday, January 27, 1993, due to the absence of Director John Lewellen, who initiated Resolution 12(b), and the motion was unanimously adopted by the Board Members present. (Director Lewellen was attending the Presidential Inauguration in Washington, D.C.) Consideration was then given to Ordinance No. 16,345, described as: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 16,306, EXPANDING THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE SISTER CITIES COMMISSION; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES; (Membership increased from 11 to 13; may include City employees and members of the Board of Directors.) The proposed Ordinance was written to include the statement "Members of the Commission shall include two employees of the City and can include members of the Board of Directors... 11. Interim City Manager Charles Nickerson advised the Board of Directors that it was not necessary to add two staff persons in the Ordinance because the City will supply a staff person and that Personnel Director Britt Rice is interested in serving as a private citizen, rather than a City employee. City Attorney Tom Carpenter recommended that the phrase be changed to read "Members P 244 Minutes January 19, 1993 of the Commission may include employees of the City..." The Ordinance was then read the first time, followed by a motion from Director Priest, seconded by Director Roy, that the rules be suspended and the Ordinance placed on second reading. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect, and a second reading of the Ordinance ensued. A motion was then made for a third and last reading of the Ordinance, with the motion being made by Director Sharp and seconded by Director Mason, and adopted by unanimous vote of the Board Members present, being six in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board of Directors - elect. The Ordinance was read the third and last time, and there was an Aye and No Vote taken on passage of the Ordinance with the response being: Ayes - Directors Priest, Roy, Sharp, Mason, Mayor Dailey, and Director Adcock - total 6; Noes - None; Absent - Director Lewellen - total 1. Whereupon, the Ordinance was declared PASSED. A proposed Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO THE LITTLE ROCK SISTER CITIES COMMISSION" was deferred until other appointments are made. (See discussion related to Ordinance No. 16,345 above.) The last presentation was Resolution No. 8,858, described as: A RESOLUTION APPOINTING MAYOR JIM DAILEY TO THE ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. and the Resolution was read in its entirety. A motion was made by Director Priest, seconded by Director Roy, that the Resolution be adopted. The Resolution was adopted by unanimous voice vote of the Board Members present. There being no further business to be presented, Mayor Dailey declared the Board of Directors in recess at 8:25 o'clock P.M. until Wednesday, January 27, 1993, to reconvene at 1:30 o'clock P.M. to consider the two proposed Resolutions regarding the form of government. ATTEST: a "JZ" oArAtz ek, City Clerk Robbie Hancock APPROVED: Mror Ji m Dailey 0j