Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout152681 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ORDINANCE NO. 15,268 196 AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $107,520 FROM THE CITY'S GENERAL FUND FOR THE HOUSING DEMOLITION PROGRAM. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. There is hereby appropriated from the City's unappropriated balance of the General Fund the sum of $107,520 for the City's Housing Demolition Program as specified on the attached fact sheets. PASSED: April 7, 1987 ATTEST: APPROVED: CIT CLERK J;Ni CZECH MAYOR LOTTIE SHACKELFORD AP TO MARK STODOLA, CITY ATTORNEY D-2a b - /p City of Little Rom • En sneering Division Department of 701 West Markham Public Works Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 371 -4800 19! M_E_M_O_R_A_N_D_U_M March 30, 1987 TO: Charles Nickerson, Assistant City Manager VIA: Bob Lane, Direi4'�( � FROM: Jim Hathcock, Environmental Codes Chief SUBJECT: Requested Budget Increase - Housing Demolition Program Recent discussions on ways to accelerate removal of burned out structures has resulted in a basic decision to modify our standard process for the removal of condemned vacant structures. The new procedure eliminates the necessity of going through the lengthy process traditionally used. The effectiveness of the City Attorney's office in handling condemned vacant structures through regular process now permits' processing of a larger volume of our substandard housing backlog, which now becomes limited by our current staff . capabilities: Unless. additional staffing is provided it will.become necessary to curtail our ability to respond to the level of service request currently being experienced. I feel it will be necessary to provide at least one additional inspector to assist specifically in the burn out removal emphasis with an evaluation of progress in six to eight months to see if additional personnel are needed to make desired progress. We currently have a backlog of 233 condemned vacant structures with 78 of this number being destroyed or damaged by fire. During 1986 we averaged condemning 18 structures per month due to deterioration, vandalism, or fire damage. This figure is projected to increase because our existing housing stock is ageing and we lack the staffing capabilities to perform a systematic inspection program. We realize a five year inspection cycle is daydreaming for the City of Little Rock (28 inspectors required). However, our current staff level of six demonstrates how far we are below an acceptable systematic inspection program. Therefore, we are requesting an increase in budget to hire one additional Housing Inspector so that we may concentrate on the removal of burnouts while continuing at our current level of service in the removal or rehabilitation of all substandard and /or condemned structures. I 1 i Page 2 • Following is a proposed budget for the position we are requesting: ENFORCEMENT OFFICER (HOUSING) 1.01 Salary 1.02 FICA TOTAL SALARY SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 2.01 Office Supplies 2.04 Postage 2.06 Petroleum Products (300 gal. at $1.15 per gallon) 2.07 Petroleum Products other than fuel 2.10 Chemical Lab and Photo 2.13 Printing and Forms 4.06 Vehicle Repair TOTAL SUPPLIES AND MATERIAL CONTRACTS 6.01 Telephone and Telegraph CAPITAL ITEMS 7.01 Office Machines, Furniture and Fixtures 1 -4 Drawer File Cabinet 160 1 - Single Pedestal. Desk - 220 1 - Executive Swivel Desk Chair - 260 1 - Calculator - 150 1 - Camera - 90 7.06 Vehicle (1 Subcompact With Air) Salary Supplies and Materials Contracts Capital TOTAL CAPITAL TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST $ 16,400 1,180 17,580 $ 75 300 345 50 200 75 75 1,120 $ 300 $ 880 $ 7,640 8,520 $ 17,580 1,120 300 8,520 27,520 • Page 3 • Our existing demolition account (8503) has a balance of $115,000. During the past three years we have expended an average of $1,280 for each structure demolished with this fund. In 1985 we accelerated our removal efforts with the beginning of our affidavit /demolition program. Recently we realized that burn -outs were a greater problem than we initially anticipated, and we further project this problem to continue indefinitely. However, we do feel that by removing the sixty existing burn -outs (eighteen have demolition or rehabilitation efforts underway) we will be able to gain control of the situation and eventually incorporate burn -out removal into our existing affidavit /demolition program. In order for us to effectively solve the immediate problem by removing these structures within 60 to 90 days we request an additional appropriation of $80,000 to be used specifically in the removal of our current backlog of burned out structures. Once this is accomplished we will then merge future burn -out demolitions into our existing program of accelerated removal of all condemned vacant structures. SUMMARY OF REQUESTED BUDGET INCREASE Personnel Cost Contract Cost TOTAL JRH /vc cc: Don McChesney Roy Beard $ 27,520 80,000 107,520 awn 199