The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About9362r 1 Fa 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 RESOLUTION NO. 9,362 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1996 TRANSPORTATION IISPROVffiiNT PROGRAM (TIP) . 119 WHEREAS, the 1996 TIP Submittal was prepared and prioritized as recommended by the Department of Public Works; and WHEREAS, eighteen projects are included in this year's submission; and WHEREAS, the Intermodal Service Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) Funding process requires a competitive analysis of all projects submitted within the identified urbanized boundaries; WHEREAS, the projects are being submitted for rating by Metroplan for inclusion in the 1996 TIP; and WHEREAS, a total of approximately $6,000,000 of projects will be selected during this process; and WHEREAS, if Little Rock is successful with at least 30% of the available funds, then a total match of $400,000 will be required in order to receive Federal Funding for the submitted projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. The City Manager is authorized to approve the 1996 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for the recommended projects outlined in the attached submittal. ADOPTED: APRIL 4, 1995 ATTEST: i P. le �! •t �' O � • I •. "PROVED: L/. ' HO The following projects are approved for submittal for 1996 Transportation Improvement Program. 1. University Ave. Widening (Park Plaza Drive to Asher Avenue) 2. Fair Park Blvd. Widening and intersection improvements (I -630 to 12th St.) 3. Geyer Springs Road Widening and RR grade separation (Mabelvale Pike to Frozen Rd.) 4. Rodney Parham Road Widening (Green Mountain to Woodland Heights Dr.) 5. Napa Valley Safety Project (Hinson Road to Bowman Road) 6. Bowman Road Widening and intersection improvements (Hermitage to Kanis) 7. Chicot Road Sidewalks (Mabelvale Cutoff to Yarberry Lane) 8. Scott Hamilton Road Widening (1 -30 to Baseline Road) 9. Fair Park Blvd. Overlay Project (I -630 to W. 30th) 10. W. Markham St. Overlay Project (Rodney Parham to Chenal Parkway) 11. Rodney Parham Rd. Overlay (Green Mountain Dr. to Choctaw Road) 12. Signing improvements in Historical District 13. Boyle Park Pedestrian and Bicycle Trail 14. War Memorial Park Bicycle and Pedestrian Ways 15. Rebsamen Parkway Pedestrian and Bicycle Trail 16. Capitol Avenue Sidewalks 17. Visitor Center - Downtown Historic District 18. East Markham Streetscape Project TIRDOC • City of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Sub 4/6/95 121 CHICOT RD. SIDEWALKS (MABELVALE C.O. TO YARBERRY LANE) EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: This project will construct a 6 foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the proposed east right -of- way line of Chicot Road from Mabelvale Cutoff to Yarberry Lane and purchase right -of- way based on 45 feet from the existing centerline of Chicot Road. PROJECT SCOPE: The project engineering will be done by the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department or contracted to their chosen outside consultant. Right -of -way documents will be prepared by the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department and subsequently acquired. It is estimated the total project cost including engineering, right -of way procurement and construction will be approximately $155,000. The City's match portion will be $31,000. The City will fund this project through a Special Appropriation. CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY 96 Jurisdiction(s) _r }e Rarkt Ar_ Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address 701 W Markham PART 1. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION M M M 0 Project Control No. AHTD Job No. Contact Person Chan RLJCCpI l Phone Number 371 -4475 122 1. Project Type (Check one only.) A Roadway D Bridge D Intersection Improvement 2. Location (from /to or site): University Ave, - Asher o Pak PI A7..q D . 3. Length in miles: 21 hjj l pc (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x 11" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: -Total accidents, year(s), accident rate -Traffic volumes, year and source -Projected volumes • Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, long unth proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this form. PART II. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width ynri,gc Type _ Rpha1t Number of lanes _1i, l,8Aeg 2. Shoulders O Yes ll No Width Paved D Yes ❑ No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? 'X Yes = No 4. Does proposed project enhance inter-modal opportunity? (explain) Projp t will enhance intprmod,91 oppartunity with the rnnstntrtinn of sidewalks and hike ways as well as bus turnouts. M 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety, concerns? _TjL.alji t i pnal 1 anpe Will reduce coneestion and there by decrease accident rates i. this section. The removal of the -treetlizbts traffic safety. from the median will also enhance PART III. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE I. Total anticipated cost of project $ 9,0()0 rOno Phase I anticipated cost: $ _ 401000 Work type: aaina ri nA FY 96 Phase 2 anticipated cost: S 1, 900, 000 Work type: Right -nf -vast FY q_ Phase 3 anticipated cost: S 6,200,000 Work type: Cnngtrurti nn FY 98 R, 99 Phase 3 anticipated cost: S Work type: FY Note: Use additional paper if necessary :aae4 :mail (a.nwuals) (aanlvu3ls) : AQ :meq :alail :Ag :aced :ala�l :algeaydde )l 'suoiampsunf leuomppy (IAMIM.181s) uonaipsunf Aq leaacwgns ao) panoiddy vonoIpsunI yava)o pannbaa si y mu IeDol )o ivawiiwwoo pue uonedpnaed )o uoneot)faaaZ), :ON •a}e -4sza -4uz auo pus SAeMq�ftq agels OMq ggTM aoeglaJui JITM joaLOja s U.1 - QJIJy :(IS}l) *s 'k ( 3umgddv alq 8ga .iuv sap gnu ixaluoa s Y w „uo2 N jn j ( w v m pasodo d 7-1*ad ayP TI aoafoad leuon3lpsnn( -ulnN £ (aa'PaF'P Z '�sI) --------- T— :vafad snp uo a:ygd lumgddv aulsodad ay swop Guoud TMM A311011d leuonoIpsun( Z . ON u.9&3 jmauaaambaa iaapa j v tp!m avuvgdwov umturow m io Iuawaambaa Ivaapa j v jo avumldu+o.7 unpum uomn sun[ a�7 a" (n aapao uz ,Gayssaoau uafad pasodoad aye sl aoue�ldwo0 jeaapad I NOI.LYMOdI-II'IVNOI.LIQ<IV •AII'dVd »afoad ay )o uonaldwo> ao) paaeldwaauoo woa) awn ay uitp" uuay pagwx p a3afoad aya)o'paieoipui sooanos ay woay aaeys Iml sa Aed oa spuaaut aueoildde aya aeya 8w.Ouaa� •aa�i�o annnasa)pyD ao aoAew aya woa) a=umuwoO Jo aaaaaj paugis e yoeny [ uoTgeTZ oz y -feio g 000 008`T a3anos iunowy E7 T spun) y»ew leool )o saDanos lie astj M M M M M� City of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Subirtill UNIVERSITY AVENUE (MARKHAM ST. TO ASHER AVENUE) LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS (Priority 1) EXISTING CONDITIONS: University Avenue is the major north/south arterial connecting Arkansas Highway 10 on the north to I -30 on the south. The proposed section for improvement is approximately 2.1 miles in length. University is the major access for two area hospitals, two regional shopping malls, and a major University. CAT has two bus routes that serves this area. The ADT on this section of roadway ranges from 33,860 to 42,020 vehicles per day based on 1992 volume counts. Based on the growth of traffic in the past 12 years in this oorhdoor, a growth rate of 2% per year was calculated. The 2010 traffic projection based on this calculation is approximately 45,366 to 56,300 vehicles per day. During peak hours, many sections of this roadway operate at a level of service F. This is due to the fact that the facility is only 4 lanes wide with the exception of some areas where widening has already occurred. Accident studies were completed for two different sections of University and are enumerated below: 1) Markham to 19th with an accident rate of 17.53 per million vehicle miles. 2) 19th to Asher with an accident rate of 12.06 per million vehicle miles. A project was recently completed in 1990 that improved the intersections and signals from Park Plaza Drive to Asher Avenue. As recently as 1991, a closed loop signal system was installed to further increase the capacity of this facility. 3/16/95 12d 9 ?T suogoas�aiutaalq ;pazgauuegoa� OSie loafold aq L laailS qlZ t of wugNjuw isam woaJ u000as aql ui Sui;gSil ;slew gSiq pollleisui ioafo.id stay loafold luawanoldwl It,iuie. 8861 Rump panowal Sullq &I Uetpaw aqi pleq umogs uoiioas is.Ig aqZ 'C661 Jo iiJdy ut u331lel alaM salniold asagy •anwAy XIiS.Ianiun JO SUOtioaS oMl Jo an sgdEiSologd luooefple aq.L •uoijvudoiddy IEioodS E gsnoigl popurg aq Ipm 000`008`1$ Jo uotuod Suigolew s,,CUZ) aqZ -sluellnsuoo opislno to lauuosiad asnoq -ut gSnojgl Jaglia 3uau liudaCl uoileuodsweil :.. `.,: ' l "<: pUt, xEMgsq -j sESUEJl.iv �:- ;)q; Xq !P g g a uE a IM ; oafold P [l. aqL 'saa3 Suuaauisua 8urpnloui IM I �,f�� 000`000`6 $ 3E pa ;ewtisa st loafold e�eZ x'�ev 3 a. r�xagea. °' '"'E ..� s IM a EIOOSSE S soo �CEM- o IN a iql qi P i i J ZSNNHx21M30'S.LLISdaAiNn -iq$u put, uoilonlisuoo poleuniso aqj •loafold sigl uo udiaq ueo voilonnsuoo alo;aq simS inoJ of aanll X(allewixoAdt, aq iiiM li wqi ait,uuiso am -uisaq uleo uotiomisuoo pule paslego ind aq ueo KwA 3o -1gSu `suleld SuuaauiSua Jo uogojdiuoo aqi Jo iEa C avo u. vm lt,gi pawnsst, st 1I aiewl ;sa lsoo uot;arulsuoo aAisuagalduioo E put, spaav SEM ;o - 148u p HIDE autuuaiap Iii^ asegci sigL -asegd Sui_Iaautsuo uSisap aqi aq IIIM loafold sigl jo asegd puooas aqy •loafold sigl quM palEioosst, slsoo 11t,Jano puE iEM 3o -slop papaau Jo uoilleumualap aqi puE `uotlEdtowud oggnd `pUewap alatgan paioadxa iaaw of suon-olnBguoo uoiloasialui aqi pue earn loafold aqi 1nogilnon{l suoilwagaoo aUel aunwaiap of SuuaauiSua kmutwgald apnloui iIIM loofoid aqi Jo asels isle; aqZ =adOOS ,LOaf02Id •SuiigSll UMPOW aqi Jo IEAaual aql Xq ,CIaJES anoldwi of loplo m Suilvil ism q&q Jo uotlElluisut aql puE QajUs loJ suEtpaw SUIJSIXa aql SututE;mew `vlVD Xq paieuSisop suontlool osogl iE sinouin; snq jo uoilippe aqi `ogpil punogglnos puE gliou ioJ sauel aiItq jo uoilippE aql `sapis gioq uo sNjrALapis apnloui SIUaWanOldwl pasodoid aqZ 'deMpleol Jo uotloas SIT inogSnalgi papaau st souel ulnl ;qSu put, gal q;iM uotloos -ssolo auUI -9 E Uolluog[SSEIo sigl uo posleg IuuauV lediouud a sE onuany AIIS10AIUCI sisg UEId laaJJS JQISR q aql 96/91/£ :S.LA 3W3A0HJWI QdSOdOH;l *ignS loafold dl.L 9661 1300 DIM-1Jo SID • m �w w �w iw w� w �w w w� w ■w w �■ w� iw CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM Project Control No. for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY AHTD Job No. Jurisdiction(s) Little Rock Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address 701 W, Markham PART I. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Contact Person Chan Russell Phone Number 371 -4475 1. Project Type (Check one only.) M Roadway tD Bridge 0 Intersection Improvement 2. Location (from /to or site): Fair Park Blvd. - 12th -I630 3. Length in miles: 0. 19 m,: (.write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x 11' paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: *Total accidents, year(s), accident race -Traffic volumes, year and source • Projected vo) umes • Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along unrh proposed project diagram, skew-het or maps, to this form. PART II. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width 27'-36' Type Asphalt Number of lanes 2 2. Shoulders 0 Yes N No Width Paved �] Yes 0 No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? -x Yes No 4. Does proposed project enhance intermodal opportunity? (explain) This as a main pedestrian route to stadium events and War Memorial Park. Improvement will also reduce delay times for DATA Bus route on 12th St. with the ir�terhsection dlm�rovegrn 5. How oes t e propose p Ject a ress stated safety concerns? Due to this route operating In excess of capacity accident rates are unacceptable (24.34 MVM). Added capacity will reduce this rate to an acceptable level. PART 11I. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE 1. Total anticipated cost of project: S 1,100,000 Phase 1 anticipated cost: S 220,000 Work type, Engr & RW FY 96 Phase 2 anticipated cost: S 200,000 Work type: RW FY 97 Phase 3 anticipated cost: s 680,000 Work type: Construction Fy 98 Phase 3 anticipated cost: s Work type: FY Note: Use additional paper if necessary (a1n7DUSrS) :area :ahil (aantvuats) :ale(] :api1 :Aq m :algeatldde )t 'suomysunf leuoutppy (ainimals) :alga :allll m uonatpsunf .iq leuwgns ao) panoiddy uono}psun( y7va)o pairnbal s. 9--new leool )o luaw unuoo pue uonednt>led )o uoneoi}tllaz)* :ON '0£9 -I u -4zn sa-oe3aaIuz 3a9,oad - GLHd :(1511),3ak ( lumgddv alq 8 to .Cuv sapnput lxaluoo stye ut „uoutpsun[, : aloN) tuojja uotlq)rpsunf -vptw v sv pasodoad vafwd ay rl loa[oid leuouotps inf•n(nN .£ Cma TA 'puZ '151) puz :loafosd slyl uo a>v[d lumpddv 8utsodo+4 Ap saop kluouW mqm muoud leuoualpsunf -Z -- -- - -- - ON :urvldx3 iluauaambal lvlapajv yltm aouvgd=:) urvluww m JD luawalmbai ioupa j v jo Mv ldulo:) u yum uov.7rys. n! ayl 8uuq 07 iapio w ,Cwssa:au l:afold pasodoid ay si a:)uet(dwoJlejapaj 'l KOI.LVMOA II - IVNOI.Lla(Id 'Al IHVd »a(oid ay )o uonaldwov lo) paleldwmuoo wojj awn ayl utgatm utiay paquvsap »a(oid ayjo'paleorput saolnos ayl woy weLls leaol 531 bed ol spualut lueotldde ayz zeyi Sut,i)lvao laot})o antlnoaxa)tay� io lo.(ew ayl woi) lvawatwwo�)o lallal pau5ts e yoelly � uoTILTa oaddy juToadS 0009 OZZ $ 431nos lunowy spun) yplew leJOl )o saDmos lle lst-1 Z M M a• � M M M M M M M • City of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Subm0 FAIR PARK BLVD. (FROM 12TH STREET TO I -630) (Priority 2) EXISTING CONDITIONS: The project area extends from 12th street 1,000 feet north to 1 -630. The existing street width ranges from 27' to 36' wide. This section of roadway provides direct access to War Memorial Park, the University of Arkansas at Little Rock and I -630 on the north. This is a parallel facility to University Avenue and provides access to St. Vincent Infirmary Medical Center, the V. A. Medical Center and the U.A. Medical Center. During Razorback 3/16/95 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed project will upgrade Fair Park Blvd. to a minor 4 and 5 -lane minor arterial standard, which includes the construction of sidewalks on both sides. This project includes rechannelization of the Fair Park Blvd. and 12th street intersection and it's resignalization. Widening of 12th street is required at the intersection with Fair Park Blvd. to accommodate the heavy left turn movements. The project will bring this section of Fair 128 HMOS OM? O I H.LOI ,Ld N'dVd uoiluudoiddV p:roadS u gSnongi papun3 aq ([[^x 000`OZZ$ 3o uoillod Surgoluw s,,Clr:) aq.L '000`00I1I$ 6[aluwrxolddu aq IPM luawalnooid XutA 3o -igSu puu uoporulsuoo `Suuaau[Sua Swpnlow isoo loafoid juloi wql parm.isa si lI -luowlJUdaQ aql dq luulinsuoo aprslno uu of paimmoo to luawltudaQ uoiluuodsuul,L pUU AUAig5q -j sEsuBNry oqi Xq auop aq piers suoilismUou puu iusiuJddu CEM JO -slgSu puu uSisap SuuaawSug :3dO3S .Laaf02Id -susulsopod Jo3 ivawuol[nua la3us a ap!noid of puu Alaps aWtil aouuqua of pasodoid oslu si SullgSil laallS '(SIdVD) ,CpmS uoiluuodsmij, IuuoiSag susu -mjjV Iuiluag aql ql!M aouuwJOJuoo olul )(Jud r 6 96/9 U£ I *gnS )�afad d11 9661 3I00ZI OIITI Jo ,4 0 * r CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM Project Control No. for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY AHTD Job No. Jurisdiction(s) Little Rock Contact Person Chan Russell Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address 701 W. Markham Phone Number 371 -4475 PART I. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 1. Project Type (Check one only.) KI Roadway U Bridge ❑ Intersection Improvement 2. Location(from /to or sire): Geyer Springs Rd - Mavelvale PK to Frozen Rd. 3. Length in miles: 0.7 Miles (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x 11" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: *Total accidents, year(s), accident rate *Traffic volumes, year and source • Projected volumes • Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along urith proposed project diagram, skeuhes or maps, to this form. PART 11. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width 20' Type Asphalt Number of lanes 2 2. Shoulders 11 Yes I No Width Paved ❑ Yes O No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? M Yes = No 4. Does proposed project enhance intermodal opportunity? (explain) Yes, provides bus turnouts and will remove a RR grade crossing there by removing intermodal conflicts. 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerns? PART 111. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE 1. Total anticipated cost of project S 3,500,000 Phase 1 anticipated cost: s 300,000 Work tyke: Engineering FY96 Phase 2 anticipated cost: $ 200,000 Work type: Right -of -way Fy 97 Phase 3 anticipated cost: s 3,000,000 Work type: Construction FY 98 Phase 3 anticipated cost S Work rnpe: FY Note: Use additional paper if necessary :aie4 ales :aleq (alnivusts) aliil AQ (alnivu815) - apt1, :alg=ldde p 'suotimpstanf leuotlippy (alnivu815) :91311 :dg uodatpsun( dg leiltwgns aoj Panolddy votlotpsunf tyava jo paainbai 7 Lpiew leool jo iu=anuiuoo pue uopedtvtlaed jo uoneot)n1a0, :o(y 10stU .'a.l ( iut»rJddv aly 2p CUD sap put 7xa7u07 snp u! „uoval Ssf., :710N) iuoffa uooDrpsunGvinw v so pasodold iw(014 ay s; nafold leuoinipstan( -u1nW -£ (ha'pa£'PuZ 'isl) PzE :7.731014 sn(i uo a7qd tuvopddv8utsodold 3yi saoP.Cxuoud tm{m titlottd leuotlotpsun( 'Z - :u,tv7dx3 jivawalmbal lvlapaf v y!(n avuvgdu= u=umw m 10 tuawalmba11o1apaf v fo aauvtlduioa unp" uooatpsunf mp 8uug of "p1O ut ,Cm -aoau »a(o.4 pasodold mp sl aouetldwo0 jelapa j 'f ... N0I .L'dM03NI'1dN0I,LIQQd 'Al I'd cI -ioa(oid ay )o uoualdwoo ioj paieldwaiuoo wolj awtl ay utyltm utaay paquxap ioaloid ayl)o'paieotput na jnos ayi woij'aleys le-aol S3t bed of spuaiut iueotldde ayl ieyl 8ut.t;nlao '1ax�o annmaxa )uyo 10 io�iew ayl wolf luawltwwo0 jo imiaZ pau8ts e yoe»y £ uoi -4u TazjadS 000`004 $ a3inos iunowy T spunj yoiew leool )o saolnos fle ist j Z � M GEYER SPRINGS ROAD (1VIABE • Citgv of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Sub 3/16/95 LVALE PIKE TO 65TH STREET) (Priority 3) EXISTING CONDITIONS: The area improvement extends from I%p Mabelvale Pike 0.7 miles south to 65th street. The roadway is unimproved with pavement widths varying from 20' to 22', with the exception of some half- street improvements that have been made over the years due to the construction of adjacent developments. A minimal under- ground drainage system exists along this section. The majority of the storm runoff is conveyed into side ditches which are undersize and cause maintenance problems and traffic hazards. Master Street Plan designates Geyer Springs as a minor arterial street. The route currently carries appivn.,1LuL J - 11,500 vehicles per day and is designated TA bu, route. ehiclest per day basedyon a 1e.3% growth rate per will increase to approximately year. The accident rate for this section of roadway is 8.11 per million vehicles miles. 532 uogs!udolddy [o!oadS V Swzg!ln popun3 aq II!M 000`OOL$ 3o uolliod Sulgolsw .�1!o aql '000`00S`£$ Slalswlxoldds aq ljlm luawamoold XLm 3o -IgS!1 pus uollorulsuoo `Suuaawsua Sulpnjoui lsoo loofold Idol Imp palsuillso ST II -pallnbos 'if luanbosgns pus Q.LHV Xq pondagd aq ll!m sluawnoop XvM 3o -lgsru Glffv .Cq luullnsuoo op!slno UL, of palos.13u00 .io (CLLHV)3uowusda(j uollsl.iodsuvil pus X-mg5gII sysuLnjjV agl Aq au op aq jllm uSlsop Suuaauisuo aqs :adoos 139foud .walsss aSsulstp uuols punojslapun us 3o uollon isuoo aql g1pa sogol!p ap!s poleulunla ljlm su loafo�d ags -sulsapad Jo3 luawuannua SunjjsM 33ss s pus ,tla3ss oqsll ap!noid o1 glsual loafoid aq1 Suole posodold s! SullgSll laa.glS -sop!s gloq uo s3llsmap!s qum uopoos -ssolo ausj ang pus ino3 a 01 uolloaS -ssoio hails Sullslxa ay 3o SuquapiM sapnloul loofoid aqZ -uollooslalul psog ssuudS iafag pus laailS g3 S9 ag13o gljou lsnf sssdlopun psoipw s ;o uollongisuoo agl apnlout ll!m loafold slgy uolisool sn{l�o guou aql of popun3 Xpsails on sloafold jsualls slgl3o 1uawSas lssl oql Sullajdwoo dq 63!n!loauuo3 ap!noad ljlm loafold sm I&L- dVD)�pniS uoillmodsuril [uuogsag susumliV jr-quaD aq1 glgm oouswlojuoo olu! 11 Suuq pus spnpusls psualas iounu of psog ssuudS joSaD opuiSdn ll!m loafoid slgs 96/91!£ :SJLK3W3AOHJWI Q3sodoxd SgnS 13001d dl.L 9661 310021 0111!'IJO SID '• am m CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY Project Control No. AHTD Job No. Jurisdiction(s) Little Rock Contact Person Chan Russell Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address 701 W. %rkham St. Phone Number 371 -4475 PART 1. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION M � 134 I. Project Type (Check one only.) CR Roadway a Bridge O Intersection Improvement 2. Location(from /to or site): Rodney Parham Rd. - Hinson Road—Woodland Heights Drive 3. Length in miles: (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x I I" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: -Total accidents, year(s), accident rate *Traffic volumes, year and source • Projected volumes -Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along unth proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this form. PART II. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width 22' Type Asphalt Number of lanes ? 2. Shoulders hl Yes Z No Width Paved Yes O No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? L� Yes = No 4. Does proposed project enhance inter-nodal opportunity? (explain) Yes, Constructs bus turnouts on Rodney Parham. 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerns? Removal of side ditches and increased street widths will lower current accident rates on this roadway. PART III. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE I. Total anticipated cost of project. Phase I anticipated cost: Phase 2 anticipated cost Phase 3 anticipated cost: Phase 3 anticipated cost. Note: Use additional paper if necessary 5 1,440,000 $ 222,000 work tvpe:Enngr & RW FY 96 5 1,218,000 Work type; RW & Const. Fy 97 `n work type: I FY 61 'York type: FY (aan=315) :a7e.4 :aril :Ag (a1n1DUBi5) :a�e.Q :alvl :6g :algeagdde p 'suonoipsijn( leuouippy (aanwuBis) :aie4 :aril :,(g uopoysim[ Acl leutwgns loj panojddy ,uoi»Ipsun[ yava jo pannbai si yoiew leool jo wawitwwoo put uouedronledjo uoneoljniao„ :ON :(7S11) .s'.l ( lum.gddv a(g 8.qa .<uv sapnlaur ixa uoa sn{: uy „uo 3o psun(„ :Z'ION) vojja uovarysun( -gJnw v m pasodo d nafo d aye s( »a(old leuono(psun[ -ulnw ('ma 'Pl£ 'PuZ 'tsl) g417 :iaaloLd sr'T uo aao)d )uv -lnddv &asodwd asp saop Q.LLO.1d Jvq m Aaiiou j leuouoipsun[ _z - :unldxg jluawaimbal iviapaj v yiun aouv.qdwo3 utmurvw m io ivawaimbai ivlapaf o fo aaumldwoa uniivn uovhpsunf asp 8uuq o3 zapio ui ,C. vmoau jrataB pasodoad aye sj aoueildwooleiapaj -1 NOLLdi^ U0.gN1 - IVN01 -1QQH 'Al LdVd -ioa(oid ayi jo uonaldwoo >oj paaeldwa3uoo woi4 awu ay3 uiynm uuay paquasap »a(oid aye jo •paieoiput savnos 4y3 woij 'aieys leaol ns ded of spuaiui iueoildde ay> >ey� 8u�,(ju�a� •�aoijjo a,.nnaaxa j�ayo.io io�(ew aye woil �uaw�iwwoo jo �ana1 pau8is e yoeny [ uoi1 aoinos wnowy spunj y»ew leool }o sa»nos Ile Isrl • City of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Subme 3/16/95 RODNEY PARHAM (WOODLAND HEIGHTS DRIVE TO HINSON ROAD) EXISTING CONDITION: 13G The proposed area of improvements extends from Hinson Road 1.1 miles north to Woodland Heights Drive. The roadway is unimproved and the pavement width is approximately 22', with side ditches, no shoulders or no sidewalks. The Master Street Plan designates this roadway as a minor arterial street. This route carries approximately 13,300 vehicles per day and is designated as a CATA bus route. It is projected that volume will increase to approximately 15,600 vehicles per day by the year 2010 based on a 111/o annual growth rate. The accident rate for this section of roadway is 5.54 per million vehicles miles. RODNEY PARHAM ROAD LOOKING SOUTH FROM WOODLAND HEIGHTS Zi(I'NLW N39HO ScrdvmoJ. H.Lf10S OI UNOOZ avOW YiVHHVd ASNGOU 313103 HMT) ATFTVA WOM Hinos 0["Ooll atlO)I INVHldyd AHNGod voljuudolddy [t,!oadS u Aq papun3 aq Ij!M 000`88ZS 3o uotuod Swq'ojt,w .Sjla agL 000`Obb`t$ Xjajt,wncojddt, aq ll!M juawalnooid St,M3o -jgsu Sulpn[ouT jsoo joafold jujoj jugj pajsw!jso s! g -juawjlsdaQ agj ,fq jut,jjnsuoo ap!sjno ut, of pojov4uo3 io jurtuuodaCj uo!jujlodsuvil put, ALAkgS fH sususiiry aqj Xq auop aq jgM suoijismbot, pus slus!alddu Xvm 3o -sjgsu `uSisep Suuaau!Suo aq,L 13JOOS .L33f O2Id .Xiojt,s oTgjt,tj ajowoid of pus susujsapod .1o3 juouTuoiTAUa jq IlaM `ojLs t, ap!Aoid of iaplo ui ajnol srgj .1o3 pasodoJd si Su!jyS!I 1aa1jS suor3oaslaju! siowis jovoljoo loft,w ju saut,i wnj apnioui osp q!M joafold sigl majsXs aSuu!slp uuols punoi iapun us 3o uoponajsuoo aqj g1!M pajt,unu!ja oq jl!M sagoup ap!speog -saps yoq uo slluMap!s quM uoijoas -ssoio auul ang pus ino3 u of loons Su!js!xa aq] Su!uap!M apnlouT sjuawanoJdw! pasodoid -sssuujly juljuaD aq1 qj!M aouuwiojuoo gsgqujsa pus spiupums jaaljs luuajas Jounu of puog wugjud Xaupog opu-iSdn jpM joafoid aqs 96 /91/£ :S.LNIgIV3AONdb1II GaSOd02Id qnS Imfaddfll966[ 3100- I0IM-IJo,ti)!J 10 CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY Jurisdiction(s) Little Rock Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address 701 W. Markham PART 1. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 1. Project Type (Check one only.) • 138 Project Control No. AHTD job No. Contact Person Chan Russell Phone Number 371 -4475 IX Roadway D Bridge O Intersection Improvement 2. Location (from/to or site): Napa Valley & Lynn (Hinson Rd.- Bowman Rd. ) 3. Length in miles: 0.85 Miles (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x 11" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: -Total accidents, year(s), accident rate -Traffic volumes, year and source • Projected volumes • Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, abng unrh proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this form. PART 11. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width 22' - 481 Type ASPhalt Number of lanes 2 - 4 2. Shoulders ❑ Yes No Width Paved _,, Yes O No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? �E Yes = No 4. Does proposed project enhance intermodal opportunity? (explain) Yes, removes vertical alignment problems throughout this roadway. 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerns! PART Ill. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE I. Total anticipated cost of project: $ 1,7_501000 Phase 1 anticipated cost: $ 250,000 Work type: Engr. & RW FY 96 Phase 2 anticipated cost: $ 1,500,000 Work rype: Cosntr. Fy 97 Phase 3 anticipated cost b Work type: FY Phase 3 anticipated cost: S Work n t e: F1' Note: Use additional paper if necessary (aanicols) :aMG :a13!1 (ain3au81s) :are4 :all!1 Ul :ajgeo!jdde jr 'suonolpsun1 jeuonippV (aAmm a!s) :a3e4 :ajl!1 A9 UOnalpSl3nf.tq ie33lwgns aoj pa..oaddy vo!»!psunf yava jo pa3!nba3 s! 4]3ew jeooj jo 3uaw31wwoo pup uonedmu and jo uoneo!ju3a). X :ON ( 3umgddv afq 8ga .Cuv saprjou! tta wo rnf3 u! „uow psun(, :r ON) ,3wffa uonorps.0 [ -.ajnw v sv pasodoid »a16-4 aye sj 3oafo3d jeuon:)ipsunf -ujn;N £ ( ma 'p3£ 'puz 'Is[) :»afoul snp uo a7gd 3umgddv 8u!sodold mp swop k3uoud mqm Aiuoyd jeuono!psun f Z ON :urvldx3 jivawaambai lv'apf v Y3vn aouvgduioa urmu!mu o3 10 ruawaimbaa iviapa f v fo aauv.tdwo:7 unpvn uoa-,rpsun! ayr 8uuq m aapio u! ,Cwmoau mafad parodold mp sl aoue!jdwo,j junpad j NOIIVMOgNI -IVNOIII(IQV 'Al I)JVd -»afoid 341 jo uonaldwoo 3oj pa3ejdwaluo3 wolj awn ay u!y " u!3ay paquosap 3oafo3d ay jo'pmeo!pui sao3nos ay wolf 'a3eys leool s3! 6ed o3 spuwu! 3ueo!idde 343 ley] 3u!.4!3J3J'MIJJ0 ann roaxa)Iago 30 IOAeW 3y7 u303j IUaw31W WOO jo 3011WI PQU2IS a q:)EUV £ uozl S aJlnos 000 0 lunowy spun) yo3ew je--�oj )o sao3nos lie 3s!-1 - e r r r r r r rr r� r rr r r r r • City of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Subm 3/16/95 NAPA VALLEY AND MARA LYNN (HINSON ROAD TO BOWMAN ROAD) EXISTING CONDITIONS: 1. Nava Valley between Hinson Road and Rainwood Road: This section of the road provides access to two churches on the west side and new public library on the east. Deficient vertical curves in this area causes sight distance problems. The sudden narrowing of pavement at Rainwood Road is an obvious traffic hazard for northbound traffic. This street segment is 1,365 feet long. 2 Nava Valley north of inter. section with St. Charles Blvd.: Only limited sight distance is available on Napa Valley at this location Short vertical curves with steel grades cause sight distance problem! 140 •uogsrldolddu It,lOads Xq papun3 aq lIr^n pule 000`OS£$ s! uauod 3vlgowul SvD aqL 000`09L`I $ Ajaluwlxolddt, aq [IyA luawa noold fmm-jo -jigSu put, uollorulsuoo `Suilaatusua gutpnlout isoo loafold Iulol aql pairtunsa si II 'Q,LHd Xq pallnbos aq II!M ,(lens 3o -1gSlg luawllt,daQ Cumq�lyl aq1 Aq luullnsuoo ap!slno ut, o1 paimwoo to 1uaw11udaQ uorllellodsmj, pule ArtAgSg3 st,suvIly aql Xq ouop aq ll!M uslsop SuuaauiSua aqZ aaODS t33fOHd -saxaldum luawlludu dlnut,3 -lgnw pus loogos alunud a81t,I t, `suoisinipgns Iulluaplsal Susw `Crslgg pggnd_`saqamq0 oMl aq1 01 ssao0u a0ulegua AllualS Igm sluawanoidwi Clajts osags -sop!s gloq uo s3llunnap!s g1!m plupusls luuails loulw ausl aAg R 01 pauap!nn aq Minn anuQ Xallsn uduM pus puo-d uuwnnog uaannlaq uuA-1 t,my-I •anogs pag!luap! swolgold luoum8llu Isoll.tan aq1 10a1100 II!M Ioafold slgZ :SIN aWaAOHdPa a3SOdOHa salnv alargaA uolll!w lad LZ b s! .Ct,nnpuol 30 uolloas slgl lo; alt,l luop!oou aq� '�Iior++Ial,I polllunuoD aqI uo pasuq 0I OZ luo-S aql dq ,Cup lad salolgaA Z69`LI 611x0 of paloofold s! pus Sup lad salouIOA 001`6 Slalt,wlxolddt, sawt,o 6lluallno alnol aqZ -jowls luuaw lounu le sr pleol slgl saw ugisop uuld 100115 lalsrW aqZ 'toual u! 1aa3 000`1 st uollonlisuoo jo uolu pasodold aqZ '6uAnpuol aql Buualua sluap!sai lo3 omulslp IgS!s p:luozlloq put, It,0lllaA awnbapuui sap!Aold pule panoldwlun s! sluawllledd ,Callus t,dum of luooufpu uu6-I UIRW3o uolloas aqj •peog uuwe+og oI apb-A s u,N[ wo {I uu -I uJUN T 'Suol Iaa3 006`1 s! luawanoldw13o sale pasodold aqs pt,og 63IIuA P&M oluo sallugD -IS wo13 Sal Oulum aldood lo3 I 6 56 /9I /£ IognS 103(old dII 9661 Vold OPP-1 JO ,()!D m M M M M M 0 CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY Project Control No. AHTD Job No. M = r Jurisdiction(s) Little Rock Contact Person Chan Russell Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address 701 W. Markham Phone Number 371 -4475 I1 PART 1. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION I . Project Type (Check one only.) 2 Roadway L 1 Bridge ❑ Intersection Improvement 2. Location (fromho or site): Bowman Road ( Hermitage - Kanis Rd.) 3. Length in miles: 0.30 Miles (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x 11' paper, describe the need and hour the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: -Total accidents, year(s), accident rate -Traffic volumes, year and source • Projected volumes • Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along unth proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this form. PART 11. Ey1STING CONDITIONS I. Pavement width 20' Type Asphalt Number of lanes 2 2. Shoulders ❑ Yes a No Width Paved Yes ❑ No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? 7X Yes = No 4. Does proposed project enhance intermodal opportunity? (explain) Removes side ditches and corrects intersection difficiences at Bowman and Kanis 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerns? PART III. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE 1. Total anticipated cost of project: Phase 1 anticipated cost: Phase 2 anticipated cost: Phase 3 anticipated cost Phase 3 anticipated cost Note: Use additional paper if necessary i 850,000 roads. 5 225,000 XXlork type: Engr. & RW FY 96 5 625,000 XXlork type: Const. FY 97 S XXlork type: FY $ XXtork ry pe: FY a1e4 aged :area (almvu8r5) a�nl AQ (alnrvu8r5) a�nl :AG :aptl :atgeottdde It 'suonatpsunf tzuotltppV (aimm ar5) :Aq uonatpsun( Aq tellrwgns 1o) panolddV uonotps m[ yava)o pannbal i yolew teJOt )o luaujvwwoD pue uopedtonled)o uoue3tlusa0, :oN ON :(1s11) :sl ( ruvo>)ddv a7gt8ga ,Cuv sapmour rxarwo sry ur „uonorPsun(, :MOO) juoffa uovorpsunf ..aInw v sv pasodord vafwd xp s) na[ord jeuonotpsun(•utnN .E (,Ma 'pap'PUZ 'rs)) uq9 :roafold sryr vo avv(d tuv»)ddv 8Wsoda4 atp saop ,CIuoud rvym Aluoud leuonorpsun( - -Z oN :urvldx3 iruawa1mba1Iv.upaf v tpn ntivgdwoo urmurvw m w mawaimbai )v,apaf o fo axtvr. dwoo unprrn uovorpsun! mg 8uuq or 1ap10 ur .Ctvm:?7u nafold pasodold xp s) aouetidwo01eiapaj 'I N0UVM0JN1 `IVNOI.LI(1QV 'AI L'dVd -na[old ay1)o uonatdwoo 1o) paletdwaluov woy awn ay wyltm uuay paquosap natoid ay1)o'pareotpur saoinos ay wo1)'weys teJOt s1t Aed o1 spualur lueogdde ay1 reyl Jut.ynlaJ'1a]1 Ao anunoasa pap io 1o6ew ayr wo1) 1uawltwwo0)o rarla -t pau8ts e yoeny [ uolq aalnos UT •1 000 OLI lunowy spun) yorew teJOt )o saolnos Ile rsrt z � M M • City of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Subrn BOWMAN ROAD (HERMITAGE TO KANIS ROAD) EXISTING CONDITIONS: The proposed area of improvements encompasses a 1,600 foot section of roadway. The existing roadway is 20 feet wide with drainage ditches on both sides and no shoulders or sidewalks. Bowman Road serves as major link between existing commercial and rapidly expanding residential areas in West Little Rock. It is an important link with Chenal Parkway, Little Rocks major east/west transportation corridor. The Master Street Plan designates Bowman Road as a minor arterial. Bowman carries approximately 20,716 vehicles per day based on 1994 volume counts. Continued commercial expansion will push the 20 year projected volumes in excess of 30,000 vehicles per day. The accidents rate for this section of the roadway is 4.12 per million vehicles miles. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: This project will upgrade Bowman Road to minor arterial street standards. The proposed improvements include widening of existing pavement to a 60 feet wide 5 -lane section with sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. Roadside ditches will be eliminated with the installation of an underground storm drainage system. Street lighting is proposed for this route to enhance traffic safety and promote. The project also includes improving the Bowman and Kanis Road intersection to Master Street Plan finished sections. This improvement will include the permanent signalization of this location. PROJECT SCOPE: The project engineering will be done by the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department or contracted to their chosen outside consultant. Right -of -way documents will be prepared by the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department and subsequently acquired. It is estimated the total project cost including engineering, right -of way procurement, channelization and signalization of the Kanis Road and Bowman intersection will be approximately $850,000. The City's matching portion of $170,000 will be made utilizing a Special Appropriation. 3/16/95 144 ' ilmidolddV p;TOadS E g3nol4i loafold styli punt Ipm XuD agy '000`l £$ aq Ipm uoTliod golm S,XI!D au .000`SSI$ AIalEwnco.TddE aq 11pA uoilorulsuoo puE luawainoo.Td Stm Jo -lg3u `3uuaauT3ua 3uTpnloui isoo 3oafold p:lol aql polEwllsa sc lI - palmbou ,illuanbasgns puE luawl1Eda(I uoilEUOdsuEus put, XutAgFq-j susuvjiV ay Aq pandald aq Ipm sluawnoop (EM 3o -3g3[g 'luEllnsuoo apislno uasoqo iiogl of palowwoo To luawl-TEdaQ uoiiuijodsuEi,L puE Xtmg31H susuE3l.TV aql Xq auop aq Ipm 3uuaouT3ua 3oafold aq j :ddOOS 1319foud pEOg loonl3 Jo aug.Taluao 3utlszxa aql woiJ laaJ 5ti uo posaq ,Germ 3o- lg3l.[ asugoind puE auEZ fajagmA of jjoln0 apanlagtW woTJ peog lootgo Jo auil fIRM 3o -3g3u im pasodo.Td aql of luooefpE 3Ip:map!s apcm loot 9 E 3oru3suoo Ipm 3oafold snl,L :S.LN 3WaAOHdWI GaSOdoxd CEp lad salonlan OOZ`S I Jo ssaoxa UT Minn a3Ei gVA01S %E E uo pasnq sawnlon paloafojd waX OIOZ aq.L 'Q.LHV Aq slunoo awnloA Z66I uo pasuq Aup sad saloalOA 000`ZI Ala3Ewnco iddu saulEO pEOg loony Z .1miol E ioulw E sE pro-d loot gD sal8u - 31saPId 1aa13S jalsuw ag1 'S}IIEM i K O 0 �. N.,., -ap!s jo siapinogs ou puE saps gloq uo sagol!p a3E -uTElp qWA aplM laaJ OZ AlalEwncoiddE au 41—M s[ XEMptoi 3ullsTXa O L 'PEOg loony Ma qiW Jo uolloas loot 000`b E sassudwoo dvw L5dro2Ia -ua sluawanoldwT Jo Eaju pasodoid aql :SNIOI LIQNI00 ONII.LSIXg (3KV'I AHH3ffHV7- OZ 'O'O 3'IVA'I3gVW) SN IVA &MIS XM ,LOOIHO T WOVE qnS IMfad dI.L 9661 100'd 3U1!'IJO ,11!D • m m m m m M (♦ m � m m m m m CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY Project Control No. AHTD Job No. Jurisdicrion(s) Little Rock Contact Person Chan Russell Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address 701 W. Markham Phone Number 371 -4475 PART I. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION M M 146 1. Project Type (Check one only.) Lf Roadway ❑ Bridge 0 Intersection Improvement 2. Location (from /to or site): Chicot RD. (Mabelvale C.O. to Yarberry Ln. ) 3. Length in miles: ("Tice NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x 11" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: •Tow[ accidents, year(s), accident rate -Traffic volumes, year and source • Projected volumes -Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along unch proposed project diagram, sketrhes or maps, to rhi form. PART 11. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width 20' Type Asphalt Number of lanes 2 2. Shoulders ❑ Yes CX No Width Paved ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? i1 Yes X No 4. Does proposed project enhance inter-modal opportunity? (explain) Yes, this is a sidewalk project to provide pedestrian access to Chicot Elementary School. 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concert s? O trrpnt 1 y, srhnol children are walking adjacent to the traffic lanes, with the construction of this project these children will be provided a sefe route to and from school. PART Ill. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE 1. Total anticipated cost of project s 155,000 Phase 1 anticipated cost: $ 100,000 Work type: Engr. & RW FY 96 Phase 2 anticipated cost: s 55,000 Work type: Const. FY 96 Phase 3 anticipated cost s Work type: FY Phase 3 anticipated cost: $ Work type: FY Note: Use additional paper if necessary (aamvw4ts) (aanlvots) :area :a(ltl :AG :al ea a(lil :a(geJtdde p 'suonnpsunf (euontppy (almmats) Is uonotpsunf Aq (eurmgns Joy panoJddy -uouotpsunf yava jo paiinbai s< yolew jeno(jo luawliwwoo pue uouedmcaled jo uoneo!jnJaO, X :ON :(lsil) ,1-1,1 (- n+mgddv aft Sga Cuv sap go ixatuoo s yl u „uono psv f :aloe) wffa uopo psunGpp w v v pasodo d lva(oJd aY s( loafold (euonoipsunf- n(nyy£ (ola 'plF 'puz '19T) l jj t :va(oJd snp uo a7qd lumgddv 8ulsodoJ4 Ap swop Uuoud Mt Aluoud(euonotpsunf -z- :urvldx3 iluauJaJmbaJ (oJapaf v y{tm aouvgdwoo uzmurow of o luawaambaJ (vJapaf v jo a�uvgdwo� u ylvn uon� psun(ayl 8uuq of JapJo uz Cmssaoau mfoJd pasodoJd ay s( aouez(dulo01eJapaj 'I PI0I.LVM03III'IVN0I.LIQad 'Al I'd V'cI loafold ay jo uopa(dwoo loj pale)dwaiuoo woJj awn ay uiLpm unay paquasap loafoJd ay jo'paleatpui saJJnos ay wolf 'wets leool sit Aed of spuawi lueogdde a 4 Mll annnoaxajlayo to lo,Cew ayl woJj luawJIwwoOjo Jallaq pau2Is e gm3V .f uoiq —II6� aDJnoS lunowy - spunj Mew je:>ol jo saoinos (fie lsi-I ru t r (lei CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY Jurisdiction(s) Little Rock Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address 701 W Mark aM PART 1. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION S Project Control No. AHTD Job No. Contact Person Chan Russell Phone Number 371-44715 M M � 1. Project Type (Check one only.) Ck Roadway U Bridge ❑ Intersection Improvement 2. Location (fiom/toorsite): Scott Hamilton (Racelina to T -Rfl) - 3. Length in miles: n - 7R Mi I �q (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x 11" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: -Total accidents, year(s), accident rate -Traffic volumes, year and source -Projected volumes • Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along unrh proposed project diagram, sketches cr maps, to this form. PART 11. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width 77' Type p�sphalt Number of lanes 2 2. Shoulders ❑ Yes [X No Width Paved ED Yes ❑ No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? _X Yes = No 4. Does proposed project enhance intermodal opportunity? (explain) BUS tj=oUtS to be provided h>z thic pLiarct_ 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerns? Removes deep '.;ide di t hes and provides sidewalks for pedestrian traffic. PART III. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE 1. Total anticipated cost of project $ 2,000,000 Phase I anticipated cost $ 120,000 Work type: Engineering FY 96 Phase 2 anticipated cost $ 380,000 Work type: RW FY Phase 3 anticipated cost: $ 1,500,000 Work type: Cons r tr ti nn FY q7 Phase 3 anticipated cost: $ Work type: FY Note: Use addirionaf paper if necessary (a1n7O1LQiS) :ale4 :alltl :,(g pimmAs) _ :a7e.4 :awl, :algr:)gdde y 'suopoipsianf IeuotitppV (aln7mals) a7e4 :alit j :6g uono!psun[ 6g Ielitwgns 1oj panolddV uon3tpstlnf 4=ajo pannbal si ynew le3ol jo luawltwwoo pue uonedpued jo uone3tj11130, UN :ON (7um>]ddv a7gt8ga .Cuv saprlr,-ut 7xa7uo3 sty? ut „uoc3tpsun(„ :970N) iuojja uovrpsun( --aTnw o m pasodo d 7331014 ay sI nafold leuou3tpsun[ -nlnw (37a 'pi£ 'puz '7sf) u,8 :73afoj4 stp uo n old 7u7n>)ddo 8utsodol4 ay7 swop .C7uoud wtum Aatlop(I leuot73tps in( .z - :uroldc3 jivawalmbaa Ivlapaj o y7vn a3uvh4ulo3 um7urow o7 10 7uawalmbal Ivlapa j v jo mvndwo3 upp" uouwrpsun1 ay Buoy o7 laplo ut .Qvm:)au 73afoid pasodad mp s) aouetldwoj lelapad f N0UVM03NI `IVNOI.LIQQV 'AI I'dVd - nafoid agi jo uoualdwo3 ioj paieldwaluo3 wo1; awn ay7 utgltm uuaq pagtnsap nafold aqi jo'painiput sa3lnos ay woij 'alegs le3ol sit Aed of spualut wimildde ayi ieyl antln]axa jtwp 1010.(ew ayi wolf w3w1twwoo jo Jalia'I pauSts e yJeliv '4 uo-pupdoaddV IpTjacTg- 431nos GVT •� 00 $ lunow V spun] 437ew IeJO) jo sa3lnos lie 1st j Z 10, &City of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Subm6 SCOTT HAMILTON ROAD (BASELINE ROAD TO 1 -30) EXISTING CONDITIONS: Scott Hamilton Road from Baseline Road to Interstate 30 is primarily 4,100 feet of two lane unimproved roadway. The roadway is approximately 22' in width with a hot mix asphalt concrete surface and no definite shoulder system. Some gravel shoulders do exist, but vary from 0' to 3' and are utilized exclusively for mail delivery. The drainage system consists of open ditches and a limited number of undersized driveway culverts that are located immediately adjacent to the roadway surface. Power poles are located in the flow line of the drainage ditches which not only restrict the capacity of the ditch, but provide additional obstacles for the motorist. Scott Hamilton Road serves as a direct route to Interstate 30 from a large area of Southeast Little Rock. This area includes not only a number of residential subdivisions and commercial developments, but incorporates the Metropolitan Vocational Technical Education Center that operates classroom instruction both day and night. This institution attracts a large number of students from the local population and use Scott Hamilton Road as a walking route. A CATA bus route traverses this section of Scott Hamilton daily. This route currently carries approximately 14,912 vehicles per day. The volume is projected to be 17,700 vehicles per day by 2010, The accident rate for this section of the roadway is 3.49 per million vehicle miles. This section of Scott Hamilton Road is classified as a minor arterial on the Master Street Plan. 3/16/95 15 SCOTT HAMILTON SOUTH OF I -30 SCOTT HAMILTON SOUTH OF •uoiipudoiddy Iv!oodS p gSno.tyi popun3 oq 1pm pup 000`OOb$ si ivawa.nnbai yoipw s,43 aq.L '000`000`Z$ 3o isoo uoiloruisuoo palmilso p:ioi p glim syluow ual st awil uoilorulsuoo paipwiisg -Xvm 3o -s1ySu popaau annbop of polsonbal aq oslp lIpA lays -lumuedaQ uocleisodsupls pup iemySrH susupaljy ayl �q paialdwoo ag Ilion uSisap SuuaamSua ayZ :ddOOS .L3af02Id 'orTRll oql woi3 laquB palpool Suiaq salod of anp saSelno lamod 3o jagwnu aql 3o Supomol e pup spunoiS Swpaalq olmbsow ;o Ipnowal ayi apnloui sluawano.idwi osayi wog sigauoq loanpul •uoulsapad ayi lo3 luawuoiTAUa 19Jps p ap!Aad oslu Ipm inq `lsuoiow ayl lo3 f4a3ps oglpll anardwi A[uo iou ll!m loafold siyy •sauel inoulnl snq pup slysil loads 3o uotlpllplsui aql apnlour oslp Ipm loafold ayZ -sadid aSeumlp wjols punaSiapun pup `sialu! glno pup dap `jannS pup glno 3o isisuoo Ilim sluawanoidwi aSuuiplQ saps qioq uo sIlpmapis ql!m uOIioas -ssOJo aupl ang pup mo3 a of Suivapim opnloui sivawanoidwi pasodoid ayy -spnpuels luuaup lOunu of PBO-d uoll!wpll ilooS appiMn 1pm loafold stgj, 56 /9I /£ :S,LAIdb1IdAOH,llVl a3SOdOH;f 6 6 &qnS hafard dIJ. 9661 400g 011WIJo -+I!D �.- 0 CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY Jurisdictions) Little Rock Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address 701 W. Markham 0 Project Control No AHTD Job No. Contact Person Chan Russell Phone Number 371 -4475 152 PART 1. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 1. Project Type (Check one only.) $J Roadway 0 Bridge 0 Intersection Improvement 2. Location (from /to or site): Fair Park Blvd. (I -630 - W 30th) 3. Length in miles: 1.35 Miles (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x 11" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: PART 11. -Total accidents, year(s), accident rate -Traffic volumes, year and source -Projected volumes -Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along with proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this form. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width 30 feet Type Asphalt Number of lanes 2. Shoulders 0 Yes It No Width Paved Yes D 3. Does proposed project add capacity? ❑ Yes No 4. Does proposed project enhance intermodal opportuniry? (explain) NO 2 I .7 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerru? No safety concerns, this is A maintenance project. PART 111. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE 1. Total anticipated cost of project. Phase I anticipated cost: Phase 2 anticipated cost: Phase 3 anticipated cost Phase 3 anticipated cost-. Note: Use additional paper if necessary g 150,000 150,000 Work type: overlay Fy 96 $ Work type: FY Work type: FY Work, c}gre: FY (alnim2zs) :area :altil :Afl (aimvuBls) :ateQ :alit] :Afl :ale(j :alge7gdde jt 'suotlaipstunf leuo4tppto pAnivals) :x1711 :Afl uonatpsunf ,Sq lnitwgns loj panoaddy uomtpsunf tj=a jo pannbai st 4-new leooljo luawltwwoo pue uopedptlued)o uoneognla3, :ON :(istl) .Ta.0 (-3uvopddv ajgt$.ga .Cuv sapnput ixamoo sty: ut „uorJ vsur (, :atoN) iuoffa uonDrpsun( -prow v M Pasodwd »alotd RIP sl ioafold leuotlotpsunf -nlnN .p (,ma'PIC'Puz '191) 14q6 :toafold snp uo aavid tuuopddv aursodoid ay swop K=4 royjm Anloud leuot»tpsyn( 'Z ON :u.lq(tx3 ituatuaambal lv,apaf v tpvn aouvgdwoo utmumw m ao luawalmbaa jviapaf o fo aouvgdwoo unpvn uovorpsun.f ay 8uuq m iapio ut ,Civm:77u »afoad p'asodozd mp sl aouetjdwoZ) leiapad t NOI.LYNR OI II'IVNOI- I-I(IUV 'Al IliYd -na.fold ay jo uopaldwoo ioj paieldwaluoo wo.9 awn ayl utylim uuay paquosap toafold ay jo •pateotput s :)lnos ayl woij'aleys level sa Aed of spualut lueatldde ay imp ButA4t73aD'iaotjjo a, +nnoaxajtayo >o joAew ay wolj ivawttwwoO jo lauaj pauEts e yoeliy fl, S6 10 000 0£ lunowy spunj gotew leool jo sa»nos lie ist-t .i •City of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Submio FAIR PARK BLVD. (FROM 12TH STREET TO I -630) EXISTING CONDITIONS: The project area extends from I -630 to just north of W30th Street. The existing street width ranges from 30 to 36 feet wide. This section of roadway provides direct access to War Memorial Park, the University of Arkansas at Little Rock and I -630 on the north. Fair Park Blvd. is also a parallel facility to University Avenue and provides access to St. Vincent Infirmary Medical Center, the V. A. Medical Center and the U.A. Medical Center. This route carries approximately 19,300 vehicles per day based on 1992 traffic volumes. It is projected, based on 1% growth rate, that the volumes will increase to 22,500 vehicles per day by the year 2010. This route is also a designated CATA bus route that provides access to UALR and the Arkansas School for the Blind. The accident rate for this section of roadway is 24.34 per million vehicles miles. This is an exceptionally high accident rate. IM M 3/16/95 164 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed project will provide an asphalt overlay for Fair Park Boulevard from I -630 to W 30th Street on the south. This route is experiencing severe pavement distress as shown in the following picture. Without rehabilitation of the surface of this street, the roadway will continue to degrade. J d -uoiiupdoiddV p;ioadS u ggnoigi papun3 aq lIpA 000`0£$ 3o uauod Suigoiuul s,f4fj agy 000`OST$ , laiuu molddu si ioafold sigi jo isoo uoiioruisuoo pale ullsa OU salnu SE,l si ioafold srgi Jo giBual OU iaalls g10£M of 0£9 -I UJOJJ plunalnoq 31nd nu33o ivauluSilu SMISIXa aqi AEPOno of st ioafold sigl 3o adoos aqy :3dOOS .LOafoud 56l91!£ lognS hafad d1l 9661 13014 aDU'I Jo S)!D • M S M s 0 CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection lmprovement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY Jurisdiction(s) Little Rock Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address 701 W. Markham PART I. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION PART 11. M � 0 Project Control No. AHTD Job No. Contact Person Chan Russell Phone Number 371 -4475 M M 156 1. Project Type (Check one only.) (X Roadway U Bridge ❑ Intersection Improvement 2. Location (from/to or site): W . Markham St. (Rodney Parham - Chenal Parkway)_ 3. Length in miles: 2.6 Miles (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x I I" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but nor be limited to) the following information: *Total accidents, year(s), accident rate -Traffic volumes, year and source • Projected volumes • Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project descript ion, along with proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this form. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width 50' Avg" Type AsPhalt Number of lanes 4 2. Shoulders ❑ Yes :X No Width Paved Yes 0 No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? Yes :X No 4. Does proposed project enhance incermodal opportunity? (explain) No 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerns? No PART III. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE 1. Total anticipated cost of project. Phase 1 anticipated cost Phase 2 anticipated cost: Phase 3 anticipated cost: Phase 3 anticipated cost Note: Use additional paper if necessary $ 400,000 $ 400,000 Work type: Construction FY 9- $ Work type: FY work type: FY $ Work rype: FY .. , $. II., 1 .,. (ainivols) :area :alill :A¢ :aie4 :a1111 :area -:a {Ill (alnlvuls) M :a(geagdde p 'suotaDtpspn( leuontppy (aamvu8ls) :Afl uooalpslmf ,Sq leurwgns aol panoaddy uonoIpsunf y-,va)o paimbaj sr q»ew leool)o ruawiiwwoo pue uonedlolued)o wimm)ulaO, OR —:ON ( rumilddv a7g18ga ,Cuv sapnimt ix27uoa mp ut „uoawrpmn f, :—ON) juoffa ugw.t Sun( -prow v m pasodo.d 3.7a(oJ4 aye s( ioafoid leuonotpsun( -u1nN £ ( ha 'pie ,puZ 'isf) u30T :»afosd Sap uo avv(d Iuvo?(ddv 8wsoda4 alp saop ,Cauoud lvym Aiuoudleuopolpsunf -Z :urvldx3 jwawalmbai papaf v tpyn aoumidwoo urmurow m w mawaambaa roiapaj v fo aauvgdwoa unuu q iapio ra aad old ay s( (» mf aouelldwoO1eiapad -1 PIOI.LVM0.4iLII'IVNOI.L1QQd 'AI 'dVd »afoid aye )o uopa(dwoo lol paieldwaiuoo woid awn aye uiy ii upay paguosap »a(oid ay )o'pmeozpui saoinos aLp wo.9 'aieys leool ni Aed of spuaiui iueogdde ay> >eyl 3UTA41 Ila7'133lJ40 annnoaxa )kayo io IoAew aLP wol) IuawliwwoO )o iana-t pau2ts e yoeny £ uozj a g 000`08 $ a»nog iunowy I Y spun) yoiew leool )o saojnos lie isil Z a a■I as a s a� a a�� a ■a a • City of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Subm#f 3116/95 158 WEST MARKHAM STREET (RODNEY PARHAM TO CHENAL PARKWAY) EXISTING CONDITIONS: The project area extends from Rodney Parham Road on the east to Chenal Parkway on the west. The existing street width varies from 48 feet to 84 feet wide. This section of roadway provides direct access to major commercial developments and three major area hospitals. West Markham Street is also a CATA bus route. The bus route runs the length of this project. West Markham Street carries approximately 24,300 vehicles per day based on 1992 traffic volumes. It is projected, based on 1% growth rate, that the volumes will increase to 28,500 vehicles per day respectively by the year 2010. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed project will provide an asphalt overlay for West Markham Street from Rodney Parham Road to Chenal Parkway on the west. West Markham Street is experiencing signs of severe distress as shown in the following picture. Without rehabilitation of the surface, this route will continue to degrade. M n T 96/91/£ weg3iJuW 'A\ peo-d maleg le •uollE!1dolddy jupadS B gsno.nll popun3 aq llpA 000`08$ 3o uoiliod Sulgoluw s,,cwo aql '000`Oob$ S[alrumo.iddu sr lsoo uollo ulsuoo polmilsa aqs 'sal!ui 9'Z si loafold srgl 3o glSuol aq j AvAi llzd I2uagD of p>?og wEgaE(l Xaupog wog 1aa11S wu"113W lsaM Jo luawuAgz Supsnca ay Aellano of sr loafold srgl 3o adoos ails :ddo3s 139roud l qnS loafad d1l 9661 )I00N 0IM-1JO f1!J 10) • CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY Jurisdiction(s) Little Rock Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address 701 W. Markham PART I. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION • Project Control No AHTD Job No. Contact Person Chan Russell Phone Number 371 -4475 M M 1.60 1. Project Type (Check one only.) I Roadway ❑ Bridge ❑ Intersection Improvement 2. Location(from /to or site): Rodney Parham (Green Mtn .Rd. to Choctaw Rd.) 3. Length in miles: (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x I V paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: -Total accidents, year(s), accident rate •Traffic volumes, year and source • Projected volumes • Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along w th proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this form. PART 11. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width 60' Type Asphalt Number of lanes — 2. Shoulders ❑ Yes LX No Width Paved ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? '❑ Yes 01 No 4. Does proposed project enhance intermodal opportunity? (explain) No 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerns? Existing pavement is failing. New overlay will recuce ottuurence of Aotholes. PART Ill. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE 1. Total anticipated cost of project Phase 1 anticipated cost: Phase 2 anticipated cost: Phase 3 anticipated cost: Phase 3 anticipated cost Note: Use add tional paper if necessary 5 460,000 S 460,000 Worktype: Constr ctinn FY qb- S Work type: FY S Work type: FY S Work type: FY :ate4 :ate4 :a IeQ :ahi1, :aptl. :a 131-L (aa.nvuars) (a4mouats) :Ag In :algeotldde )t •suotuatpsunf leuontppV (aanim ats) Irs uonotpsunf Aq leurwgns Jo) panoiddV -uouotpsun.f ti"a)o pannbai st y»ew leool )o ivaw3muwoo pue uouedouied )o uoueognaa0. :ON ( tuvorlddv afgIagR .Cuv sapmour azi=:l sn(r ur .uorPorFs4n f,, :710N) iuoffa uounpsunf -tgnw v sv pasodoid vafwd 7tp si rmfoid leuou3tpsun( -nlnVj 'f ( ra'P'£'P" Z 'tsl) L1gIT :ioafojd snr uo aogd tumgddvaursodold alp saop Ltuoud roy/m Siuoud leuonoipsun( - -Z :uroidx3 imawaambal Imapaf v tpun aauvriduwo urmumw of ro mawaimbai lvsapaf v fo aoumldwoo unpun uoporpsu 1 alp auuq o7 lapio ul ,Ctvm:;2u nmroid pasodoad ay sj aouetldwo01elapaj 'l PI0I.LVM0dN1'IVt 011100V 'Al LUycl -»afoid aye )o uonaldwoo >o1 paieldwaiuoo woy awn aye uty li uuay pagiaxap »afold aya )o •paieoiput sa-3inos ayi woy •aieys leool ni Aed oo spua2ut 3ueotldde ay> teyI annnoaxaluya to joAew aya wolf ivawnwwoo)o iaua-1 pauais e yveuy [ uoz�a- 00— $ 434nos wnowy spun) vl»vw le-aol )o sa»nos Ile isi-1 tsr �� ? • City of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Subm 3/16195 RODNEY PARHAM ROAD (GREEN MOUNTAIN RD. TO CHOCTAW RD.) EXISTING CONDITIONS: The project area extends PROJECT MAP from Green Mountain Drive on the north to . The existing street width is 60 feet wide. This section of roadway provides direct access to major commercial developments Pro ° " °7POs "• "°"' as well as two interstate highways. This route also has one CATA bus route which runs the length of , this project. This route - carries approximately 21,000 to 31,000 vehicles`" MITE per day along the length of this route based on 1992 K` traffic volumes. It is _162 lu PLO-d UluqJud PON UmqlL',f i6UPO`d UO SSO . 1.IsTG -uoiltludo.iddV jupodS p q'gnojqi papurg aq MAI 000'Z6$ JO uoiliod SUTqOILIW S.XJID Oql '000'ogt7$ Ala . jimixoAdt, st joafold si i q 10j ]Soo uoilonjisuoo pailnullso Qql 'SQPw 9-Z si joafo-id ST41 JO 41RU31 Qql TROW AILVIOOqD 01 9AI.I(j uiulunoW uaalo wolj Pro-d WLqnd Aaupoa Jo juaLUUSIILI Sul)SIXD QqJ AE119A0 of st joafoid Siqj Jo adoas aqj, :3J03s 133road 9T 96/91/E leotIS IWOOld dl.L 9661 3100-d OPP-1 JO,<)K) 0) ■a a� a� a �a r � viii . w� a� a a� r■�r � a CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM Project Control No. for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY AHTD Job No. Jurisdiction(s) Little Rock Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address 701 W. Markham PART I. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Contact Person Chan Russell Phone Number 371 -4475 1. Project Type (Check one only.) W Roadway G Bridge ❑ Intersection Improvement 2. Location (from/toorsite): Downtown Little Rock (see map) 3. Length in miles: N/A (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x I I" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but nor be limited to) the following information: *Total accidents, year(s), accident rate Traffic volumes, year and source • Projected volumes • Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along unth proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this form. PART Il. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width N/A Type Number of lanes 2. Shoulders ❑ Yes ❑ No Width Paved Yes ❑ No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? '� Yes —_ No 4. Does proposed project enhance intermodal opportunity? (explain) Yes, provide directional signage for pedestrians within- the historical districts. 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerns? PART III. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE 1. Total anticipated cost of project: S 150,000 Phase I anticipated cost: S 150,000 Work type, Construction FY 96 Phase 2 anticipated cost: S Work type: FY Phase 3 anticipated cost: $ Work type: F1' Phase 3 anticipated cost. $ IXlork type: FY Note: Use additional paper IJ necessary .. i air' (ainwuBis) :a�eQ :ahi1 a1g (almvu8a) . :ale4 :aliil :Aq calge3lldde 1F •suotimpspni leuonippy (ainrvu8is) :aieQ :al��l :.tg uonalpsianf Aq leiiiwgns lo): panojddy UOUD(psunf yavajo pannbai s! 9omu leool)o luaw]lwluOJ pue uonedyoaied)o uo¢eo }}naaO, ON :ON :(]Sll) .nA (�umgddv a q 8qa .Cuv sap i ut ixa uoa snp w „uoporpsun( :azoN) lvoffa uono pswf -alnw v sv pasodo d »alad ayr sl »a(ad ieuono(psunf -uinN £ ( ma'pA£ 'puz rs() TFq raaloid snp uo as ald rum .qddv 8ulsodOJ4 ay swop ,Uuoud rvym - Aiuoud-leuonoipsilnf Z' :urqdc3 jruawalmbai lv a(raf v yirm aaumldwoa urmurvw or .o ruawaambaa lv apaf v fo aouvgduioo unpvn uoparpsunf ay 8uuq of wpw ut i ivssaoau »afoid pasodotd aye sl aoue}ldwoO leiapad l N0lLYM0dNI'IVNOI,L1QQd 'AlXdVd -»afoid agijo uoualdwo>>o} paieldwaiuoo woy awn aya ulyliM uuay paquasap mfoid ay p •paieoipui saoanos ayi wol) •aegs 1e7Ol s3i bed m spuaiul weoildde ay> >eya 8m.{)naao vaai�o anunoaxal�ayo ao �o.Sew aye woi) �uawnwwoO }o �a»a-1 pauEis e yoeny .f maang s.z04isTA rg uoiluanuo0 xaog alggTl winos 191 000`OE $ lunowy spun) yoiew leool Io saounos lie isi-I Z �l a� � _ar ��a a _�a ttr `�a r �a a a it ■� a PROJECT PROPOSAL City of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Subm� SIGNING LITTLE ROCK PROJECT MAP =1 r 3/17/95 The purpose of this project is to design, construct, and install signs in the City of Little Rock in order to identify historic walking tour routes, sites of interest, and historical districts. For example, the Governor's Mansion Historic District would be identified, as would the Governor's Mansion itself. The signs will serve to direct tourists and residents to four districts in Little Rock, and to numerous sites within those districts, all of which are included on historic walking tours. (The four districts are the Govemor's Mansion Historic District, the McArthur Park Historic District, the Central Business District, and the Capitol Zoning District.) This project will be the first phase of a multi - phased signage project for Little Rock. Phase I will entail design, construction, and installation of "hub" signage, street signage, and site signage. Hub signage will consist of "kiosk" type signs informing visitors of the history and importance of an area, and will include a map of the area. Street signage will direct the visitor to the area hub. Site signage identifies specific sites, and explains the significance of each site. Phase II of the project, to be undertaken in the future, will include city -wide signage, to be located on freeways, major arterials, and major exit ramps. Phase II will also include additional site signage. This project will enhance the State's tourism efforts by providing tourists following the historic walking tours with clear information about the location of Little Rock's historic districts and sites. The Clinton Presidency has generated increased tourism in Little Rock, -loafold agl jo lsoo aql pJemol oo0`o£$ alnquluoo Minn nsaing sJollslA puu uolluanuoD 31oog allu'1 '000`OSI$ aq of powtuilso s! lsoo Iulol •nsaJng siol!s!A Put' uoluanuoD Hood 0144! -1 ayl Jo 109pnq iiu!lelado oql woJJ awoo Ilion goltuz gsso aqs -wnosnpg s,uaipinl3/uollslS uo!un pus wnasnW aoumS/Su!P1!ng ltivasJy aq1 se guns `Jazs!Sag Isuo!lmM ayl uo aJS aSsuSls Lli!m pag!luap! aq of sol!s s!ql Jo awoS s1no1 Sunpsm ouols!q Sullm pus `slaaJls �!o Smisp a Suo1u paosld aq p!m aSsuS!s agJ •poloajp slouls!p aql pus `(alts pus `laoils `ap!m -Aj!o `qnq `•a•!) ,igoJSJalq aSsuft oql pags!Iquiso s! 4I - umiSoid g -jVf -I s `uS!saQ pus salpnlS usgin JoJ loafold XogSeuo(I aql Aq paJSdaid seen usld Jalsiw „313o21 aµ1!'1 Su!uSlS„ a1,1, •nsaJng uo!luanuoO oq1 Aq poldops pus Moog alu!-1 Jo 61rO aq1 JoJ pandaJd usld u uo passq si loafold aqZ adOOS ,Wis!H pus aoualoS Jo wnasnW sesus3IJd uo!lsiolsag MloluJay stsuinf!v asnoH alslS PIO Ja1uao suy sssus)IJy aSsluaH sssumjiv Jo •idaQ solu[oossy lol-mni,) mudsno nuaJng sJol!s!A pus uolluanuoO Moog 0111!'1 :suollsz!u0io lgoid- JoJ -lou Jo oggnd Su!molloJ aql Jo san!lsluasaJdaJ opnlou! aallu.uwoo oq1 Jo sJagwoW aall!wwoO suo!loejjjv ouols!H JoJ ma!Aag uSIS s Jo sSu!laaw IsJanas ut possnoslp pue pauusld uaoq ssq loafold sigl •u011moossy Jauena mudsnj) oql g1lm uolle!oossu u! `nsaJnq siol!s!A pus uo!luanuoO Moog 0µ11Z agl Xq padolanap sJno3 Su!a11sm Suµs!xo aql gllm u! all II!m pus `sJSO ul asogl sr llam ss looJ uo asogi of oIq!ssaoos aq Illm loafold aSsuSts slgl g0noJg1 pap!noJd uoguuuoJul aqZ -sispnol of uo!3uwJoJuj ap!noJd of stem Ja11aq JoJ poau aql paguslo suq pus 4 9 T 961L11C I *qnS I0Ofad dl.L 9661 3PO1i 311TI Jo X10 •' p CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM Project Control No. 8 for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY_ AHTD Job No. Jurisdiction(s) LA-e Qnck I lIt` Applicant (if _ different from jurisdiction) Address W. mAKW ZM (),00 PART I. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Contact Person IytGlr� kleb�e Phone Number 37 ( - (0853 1. Project Type (Check one only.) Roadway E-1 ❑ Intersection Improvement 2. Location (from/to or site): YGIYk�QP_VXrAWP -a �3(9"t35}�rt� 3. Length in miles: VZ vvN • (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x 11" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: -Total accidents, year(s), accident rate -Traffic volumes, year and source -Projected volumes -Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project descript ion, along uhth proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this form. PART II. EXISTING CONDITIONS ^ - 1. Pavement width 12 4• Type A5_ Number of lanes 2. Shoulders ❑ Yes Z No Width Paved D Yes 3. Does proposed project add capacity? ❑ Yes No VA.A • 1 4. Does proposed project enhance inrermodal opportunity? (explain) 35, IT KC 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerns? PART Ill. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE i. Total anticipated cost of project: Phase l anticipated cost: Phase 2 anticipated cost Phase 3 anticipated cost: Phase 3 anticipated cost Note: Use additional paper if necessary N-14. No $ 353jSu)D- � 4� $ S51). �O Work type: �N AV -J_1on FY � $ Work type: FY $ Work type: FY $ Work type: FY 45%�_06 (alnlmais) :ilea - - - :api1 - - :Aq area :a 1311 :ilea (alramals) I :algeo!Idde j! 'suona!psunf peuop!ppV (amlml8!s) . uop:)ipsunf ,cg jiml qns loj panolddV •uouaipsunf gava jo pol!nbal si yalew leaol jo maull!wwoa pue uoned!anled jo uopeaijnla0, :ON N (luva!�ddv afq!gga ,Cuv saMou! lx2luoa snp u! „u000rpsun f, :aioj.)) t� %!a uona psun! ulnw v sv pasodold laafold ayl s) laafojd jeuopDtpsunf -ujnN f ( 333'P'f 'PuZ'lsI) ��I :loafold snp uo aogd lumgddn Eu!sodoid agf saop,Guoud lm(,'A .0u0pd Ieuona!psunf - .Z :uroldx3 puawalmbal Ivlapaf v glen aauvgdwla urmuww m AD luawalmbal jvlapaj v jo M17.gdwoa unpun uouarpsvnf agl auuq of lapio u! .Cua=au laafold pasodosd ml sI aoue!Idwao jzaapa_q . , I NOLLVKUO!INI "IVNOI.LIQQV 'Al LdVd -lDafold ayl jo uoualdwoo joj pale(dwaluoa woij awn ayl ulyl!M ullay pagpasap laafold ayl jo'paieDlput saalnos ay woij'aleys leaol mi Aed of spualul lueal'dde ay] leyl su!Aju7a3'laaijjo aAnnaaxo)Iaya Io joAew ayl wolf luawllww0o jo lalla,l pau81S e yaelld 'f XA S Sti2 tL4 1 a�laoc� lunowV .spunj yalew peaol )o saalnos lie ls!-I Z 69T �� ty of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Submittab BOYLE PARK PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE TRAIL 36th and Boyle Park Road no^ Icrr Mono 170 EXISTING CONDITIONS: The project is located within a unique park setting. Boyle Park and its' structures are currently under consideration on the the National Registry for Historic Sites. The park is centered around Rock Creek and a mature hardwood and pine forest. There are pedestrain asphalt trails that connect pavilions and other activities within the park. There is a vehicle road that roughly parallels Rock Creek. There is a need to provide a pedestrain and bicycle trail running north /south and parallel to Boyle Park Drive and Rock Creek. PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS: This project will provide for a twelve foot class I asphalt bike path beginning at the north end of Boyle Park near Glenmere Drive moving southward and roughly parallel to Boyle Park Road. Lights are planned at 100' centers for this facility. The path would continue through the pavilion area of the park and run parallel along Rock Creek to 36th street. Two existing bridges that cross Rock Creek would be replaced with wider bridge structures for convenient access. Seating and resting areas are proposed along 00'S£Z'tiL$ eq II!M Llolew s,Al!O '00'OOS'£9£$ aq ll!m lsoo loefoJd lelol aL413eL43 polew!lse s! 11 *Al!I!oe; pasodoJd s!yl Jo; uollonJlsuoo Joj JoloeJluoo a u!elgo of pan1908J aq 1l!m sp!g 'loefoJd ayl Jo; s6uimeJp uo!lon.ilsuoo pue u6!sep a.ledaJd ll!m }}els ,s�ied AdOOS iOgrO2ld -sl!eJl 6u!ls!xe of suogoauuoo LIl!m yled 9i1!q I sse!o lgoo; an!annl ;o laal Je9UII 0008 AIalew!xoJdde pasodoJd s! aJayl 'llam se AL-me)i!q at43 T!� elnugng ioaCold dl L 9661 )POd 311111Jo'Q! *I O' r r r r r +■■� r r r r r r 0 CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY Ct(g 11 Project Control No AHTD Job No. Jurisdiction(s) L kOck t AA Contact Person Mavk kleb(e Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) M"4 am �� , Mam +&YV1, JW Phone Number 371 -1vQ53 PART 1. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 172 1. Project Type (Check one only.) $ Roadway 0 Bridge 1 - O Intersection Improvement 2. Location (from/to or site): �iOIJ O! t4L Pa, t "kn4_•_ - < 4 i - FJ� r. 3. Length in miles: 117— M; • (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x 11" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: -Total accidents, year(s), accident rate -Traffic volumes, year and source -Projected volumes -Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along with proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this form. PART Il. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1- t 1. Pavement width _U f+ 4 Type i �- GP"Number of lanes 2. Shoulders CJ Yes I, No Width Paved J Yes C No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? E3 Yes No \, 4. Does proposed project enhance intermodal opportunity? (explain) \ h W I4' A� r0 V 1 t -'- _ - I- - - J - I--I , _ _. 1_ _h 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerns? 1 I( __ . 1 I I I PART 111. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE L Total anticipated cost of project Phase l anticipated cost. Phase 2 anticipated cost Phase 3 anticipated cost Phase 3 anticipated cost Note Use additional paper if necessary $ 22Q'1000 ( $ Z?.I, }OUQ Work type: CX>A&U FY VIP $ Work type: FY $ Work type. FY 9 Work type: FY (almm als) :area :ovll :Ag :area :31111 :area :ap�l (aanrma!s) Iry :a(geiiIdde Ir 'suonarpspnf IeuomppV (ainlvu8rs) LE uonxpsun( Aq (t73rwgns ioj panojddV vonoips!ln( yava)o pannbai si yorew (eoof )o ruawuwwo-j pue uopedioived jo uoue3g3ja0, :ON N (•ntvonddv a(gi8rfa , uv sapnjaut ixamoa snp w „uoporpnmL, :moN) fuoojja uovorpsunGpjnw v sr pasodold rnfoad ayi s( ioafoad feuomipsunf -nfnN I ('ma 'PICFuZ "So � roafwd snp uo a>,qd xumgddv ButsOdOld ay S20P f4uoud rv" A3uoud Ieuonoips!an( :Z. p N :urv(dx3 puawalmbaa (v apaj v yppn aouvgdusoo urmumw m ro tuawaimbai )oiap-aj v jo aouvndwoa unpyn uonorpsunf alp 8uvq or sapio ui Cwssw2u uafoad paso(toid ayr sj aoueydwoZ) (ejapa3 NOI,LVMOdNI "IVNOILIQQV 'Al .LUVd �oa(o�d ayr Io uonafdwoa io) paie)dwawoo woa) awn ay ullpm uuay paquxap »afoad ayp)o'paieoipui saasnos axp woij •ajeys leoo( sit Aed o3 spuami iueoydde ay> reyl8u}A)nsao'saoi�o annmaxa )kayo �o ro6ew ayr woi) ruawnwwo0lo aanxj pau8�s e yoeily 'I aoinos 7unowy I spun) yonew (eoo( Io saoinos lie rsi1 Z /EST j� ay ofLittic Rock 1996 TIP Project Submit t� IN WAR MEMORIAL PARK 012(1 IFr:T MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS: The proposed area for improvement is located between Markham and 1-630. The existing park comprises many land uses that provide the city a range of leisure activities. Fair Park Boulevard which runs through the park in a north /south direction is without pedestrian and bicycle access. PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS: This project will construct a six foot class II asphalt bike path and a six foot concrete pedestrian path from 1-630 to Fair Park Boulevard along the east side of Fair Park Boulevard. A six foot tree planting strip is proposed between these facilities to provide safety and beautification for the entire stretch. A sheltered rest area for the bikers similar to the bus shelter is planned near the intersection of Fair Park Boulevard and Park Drive. Wall construction, storm drain relocation, curb and gutter removal and reconstruction and fence relocation at the Zoo would be necessary to successfully implement this project. The proposed improvements would improve biker and pedestrian accessibility through the park as well as to football games and Zoo events. There is proposed 2650 linear feet of six foot class II asphalt bike line, 2650 linear feet of tree planting strip and 2650 linear feet of six foot pedestrian path. 00'088'Lb$ aq II!M 4olew s,A110 - 00.000'8ZZ$ aq Ipm Isoo loefoid 181019141 IaLII palewllsa sl 11 -A1llioe; pesodoid s141 jo; uollonjlsuoo jo; joloeiluoo a ulelgo of paniaoaJ eq limn sp18 'loefoid e41 io; s6uimeip uoilonjlsuoo pue u6lsep ajedajd ll!m gLlIS .S lied :3dOOS logrObd 6 ol!uigng loafold clI.L 9661 3130ZI 0[1 I3o .4! *) S ,m m r r = m g r= m i w m m r � � � r r ■� r a� � a. r� �� r� r CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM Project Control No. for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY CNO_ AHTD Job No. Jurisdiction(s) (mot*Ic lZocc a 1NK Contact Person �- Applicant (ifdifferenc from jurisdiction) Address _ 500 ". Mawkle�ann I RVN. ice) Phone Number 37 J — a53 PART 1. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 1. Project Type (Check one only.) ;K Roadway ❑ Bridge I' C] Intersection Improvement" 2. Location (from/to or site): QebGaMen %wkw y Pti� i %V�w+ Lot. 4 Umim, 47 -F* A4LL 3. Length in miles: One VIA; V_ (write NA if not applicable) SvbSr 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x I I" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: -Total accidents, year(s), accident rate -Traffic volumes, year and source • Projected volumes •Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along udth proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this form. PART I1. EXISTING CONDITIONS ^ t 1. Pavement width Q. +_k Type t"+Sp r Number of lanes N.A. 2. Shoulders D Yes X No Width Paved . , Yes C No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? ❑ Yes ❑ No A. f 4. Does proposed project enhance inter-modal opportunity? (explain) Yes. IT CC)✓t�r�� 1 1 4 I_• 1 _ _ _ I i r 5. How does the PART III. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE 1. Total anticipated cost of project: Phase I anticipated cost: Phase 2 anticipated cost Phase 3 anticipated cost: Phase 3 anticipated cost: Noce: Use additional paper if necessary stated safety $ 37S.Ooo $ 31!5;000 Worktype: $ Work type: $ Work type: $ Work type ram CM5} V V C6O"1 FY G FY m :a�e.4 :a�i1l (aanivuats) (a.mlvols) Im :aIe4 - - - - - - - - -- - - - :;,jail _ - - - - -- :Ag :algeat1dde 1! -suotimpsun( puolllppy P=VUais) :a1eq :a(nl :,(g uopoipsian( Ag laprwgns 1oj panolddV von�lpsun( yava jo pannbw si golew le'ol jo waWLwwOD pue uonedunled jo uopeoyplaO. nm anti � o, 51 ssrrro a M4(t. - NW :ON .v . (ruvxlddv atglaga kuv sapnpul ixaiuoo snp w ,.uono+psun(. :aionj) iuof fa uono psun( ujnw v m pasodold naiad aye sl ioa[old leuomlps11nf -glnN £ (na 'P1f 'PuZ '),I) 5 +�� 1oa(ouJ snp uo aid rumgddv 8wsodoid aip swop k. o 4 MW 011011,1 leuonxpslmf z ON :umidxg iruaw M a' lv1apaf v tpvn avuv,)duloo unnumw of ao ruawaimbai lvlapaf v fo a:7uvgdwo3 unpun uo.pagn n! aye auuq of lap o w Cwssaoau nalold pasodold mp sl aauei1dwo0 lelapad I NOIJ VMOaNI'IVNOI- LlG(IV 'AI J,)iVd -»a(old ayi )o uona(dwoo 1oj paaeldwaiuoo wolf awn ay3 u1ya1M uuay pagpxap »atold aqp jo'paieolpul saolnos ay woij "any le-ol nl ded of spualul laealldde aya MI] 3ulAjnla1'Jaoljjo aAUn]axa jlay> >o Iodew ayj wolj mawnwwaJ jo 1alla7 pauSls e yoeny .I Cl aolnog lunowV spun] yo�¢w 1eoo1 jo saolnos lle 7s1� 'Z ■■� r � , .r �ar �r �w r � r �� ,r r r �r y of Little Rock 1996 TIP Project Submittae REBSAMEN PARKWAY PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE TRAIL: PHASE III .•AM EXISTING CONDITIONS: 1178 This project follows the approved Phase I Jimerson Creek Pedestrian Bridge and Bikeway and the Phase II Rebsamen Parkway Bikeway. It will extend the bikeway 7500 feet and provide the most easterly section to date linking with the previous two. This section runs between the Arkansas River and the Rebsamen Parkway. PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS: A twelve foot class I asphalt bike path is planned for beginning at the east end of Murray Lock and Dam #7 moving eastward towards Murray and Rebsamen Golf Course. The trail will continue between the existing river and road and connect to existing bike path east of Murray Park. Small covered rest areas with bench seating and bike rack stations will be developed for the convenience of the trail user. This development will extend the linkage of Rebsamen Parkway Pedestrian and Bicycle creating approximately four miles of Class and. bikeways. 00'OSL'f3L$ aq ll!m yolew s.Al!o '00'000'SLE$ aq Illm }soo loefoid jelol ay1 leyl palewilse si ll -Al!l!oe; posodad siyl iol uoilonilsuoo jo; joloejluoo a welgo o; paniaoaJ eq ll!m spi8 'loefold ayl jol s6uimeip uoilon.ilsuoo pue u6isep ajedaid jl!m gels S>Xd :3dOOS iOXMfd `L b O.wgnS g fad dI.L 9661 1002I 3111!110 SUID • CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY q(0 Jurisdiction(s) U We 9" , Pt•t2 Applicant (if different from juriisdicti1on) —� Address w W • Wr c%Yluw . 1 vv, _ 16 PART I. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 0 180 Project Control No. AHTD Job No. Contact Person MdLeL �cbr2 Phone Number 1. Project Type (Check one only.) XRoadway I❑ Bridge 4 Intersection Improvement) /� �t 2. Location( from /to or site): Q.01'tU� .rl S'�`� dA_• epyvt+�1P.JCk -SV #�i 4jll 3. Length in miles: (0 00 (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x I V paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: -Total accidents, year(s), accident rare -Traffic volumes, year and source • Projected volumes •Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along with proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this form. PART II. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width 'rA.dl 2.( Type Cm^c Number of lanes 2. Shoulders ❑ Yes X No Width Paved ❑ Yes _ No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? ❑ Yes No t 4. Does roposed project enhance intermodal opportunity? (explain) Y2S 1 I� wC�ie,ns D a�(_tE,A GtU�CS p 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerns? �b $A. eorn et y%r, y ko%ge4e✓ 1t'ylnea&WL oxxrli PART III. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE Total anticipated cost of project Phase 1 anticipated cost Phase 2 anticipated cost: Phase 3 anticipated cost Phase 3 anticipated cost. Note: Use additional paper if necessary $ (P5 00 a (� $ 100, 0 U O Work type: e 1 FY -1(t $ ?iGt :, 0 0 Work type: ei. FY � $ Work type: FY $ Work type: FY (aintw8is) :ated :alil1 :Aq (aintvu8rs) :aced :apr1 :Ara :aced :ain1 :ajgealjdde jt 'suonatpsiinf IeuonzppV (aimmt8rs) Iri nopalpsun(Ay jeiijwyns ioj panoiddV voi»ipsun( yava )o pannbai si y»ew leJOl jo luawliwwoo pup uonediotlaed)o uoneo!jniaO, :ojl :(lstl) :SaA ('tumgddv a7q�8ga ,Cuv sapnpu! ixatuoa mp ui „uoparpsun f,, : MON) iuof fa uovaipsun! -.vptw v m pasodouJ taafold aye s) na(old jeuon3lpnin( -njnV4 ( Ml 'Pif 'PuZ 'tsj) taafoid snp uo a-md tumgddv Fulsodoid ayt MP btuoud WwA ,S.luoud Ipuouoips!m( 'z umjdxg <tuawaimbai jviajraf v Yiun aauvgdwoa uroturow of io mawaimNi joiapaj v jo aauvgdwo3 unppn uovarpsunf ayt 8uuq of opio ut kwssaoau ioafoid pasodoid ay sj aouelldwoojeiapaj •j NOLLVi^Ri ANI "IVNOI71ddV 'Al LHVcl -loa(oid ay )o uonaldwoo loj paieldwamoD woi) awn ay uiyltm uuay pagy:=p iaa(oid ayl )o'pzieoipxn saoinos ayi woij 'aieys IeDoj Sli Aed w spuaiul iueolldde ayt ieyt SUTA)niaJ vaoi))o annnoaxa)iay� io io6ew ayl woi) lvawnwwoOjo iwla j pau8rs e yveiiy [ QS L bb winos iunowy spunj 4-.nm jeool )o saoinos lie tst-I Z T S T �� r r r rr �r I• � r r r r -- Wof Little Rock ] 996 TIP Project Submitl0 CAPITOL AVENUE SIDEWALKS PROJECT MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS: 182 Capitol Avenue has been identified as a ceremonial boulevard by Future Little Rock. It encompasses twenty blocks of land uses that are described as financial, federal, residential, commercial and state districts. The 1988 Bond Issue provided design and limited construction to begin the project near the new location of the U.S. Post Office on Capitol Avenue. Recently, the City of Little Rock Board of Directors approved Capitol Avenue Enhancement Task Force's recommendation to allocate an additional $425,000 to expand the streetscape construction to include an additional one and one half blocks. Presently, as recommended by the Task Force, approval of application for ISTEA funds is being initiated. PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS: This project will continue extension of Capitol Avenue Streetscape westerly towards the State Capitol. Enhancements included are underground utilities, wider sidewalks, pedestrian scaled street lights, benches, trash receptacles and handicapped access. r '09L'66$ aq pinn 4olew s,�C ;l0 ayl '000'9917$ Ala;ew!xoidde }soo II!M uogonilsuoo pue u6lsep 6ulpnloul ;soo loefoid le;ol ay; 1e41 palewgsa s! 11 -s> oolq leuol;lppe onn; �(la ;ewlxoidde loni;suoo o; Joloei;uoo a jo; splq Maas o; s6uimeip pue lenuew uogonilsuoo e41 aiedaid II!m sluellnsuo0 sdals ls.l!; alell!u! Ipm slue;lnsuoo u6lsap woj; slesodoid jo; lsanba�l (� y :3dOOS 103('O2Jd (9 6 G!wqng loafo]d dil 9661 3I001I a111t'IJo S)!D* 0 CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY Jurisdiction(s) Little Rock Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address _ 701 West MARKHAM PART I. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 0 Project Control No AHTD Job No Contact Person Chandra Russell Phone Number 371 -4475 M M 184 I. Project Type (Check one only.) Ek Roadway ❑ Bridge ❑ Intersection Improvement 2. Location (from/to or site): Sherman Street @ Capital Avenue 3. Length in miles: N/A (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x I1" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: -Total accidents, year(s), accident rate -Traffic volumes, year and source • Projected volumes •Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along with proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this form. PART II. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width N/A Type 2. Shoulders ❑ Yes ❑ No Width Paved 3. Does proposed project add capacity? ❑ Yes ❑ No 4- Does proposed project enhance intermodal opportunity? (explain) _ 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerns? PART Ill. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE I. Total anticipated cost of project. Phase I anticipated cost Phase 2 anticipated cost Phase 3 anticipated cost: Phase 3 anticipated cost. Note: Use additional paper if necessary $ 225,000 $ 225,000 Work type: $ Work type: $ Work type: $ Work type: Number of lanes ❑ Yes ❑ No ConstructiciFy 95 FY FY FY :area :aP!1 (ainrvals) (alnimais) IV :area :all!1 :A9 :area :aFt1 :algeatlddz It 'suorptpsunf leuontppV (aamvu8ts) w uomtpsianf Ag Iminugns aoj panoaddV vouatps �nf yaoa)o paatnbal si yaaeui leaol )o ivawmaujoa pue uouedtatlazd)o uoneat)t1ia0, :ON :(Is!D .sak (•rutnpddv a198Ra Auv sapnput rxaruoa s"P ut „uonatpstm f, :moN) iuoffa uop�rpsunf amw v sv pnodoad »a(oid a p sI 7oafoid leuonatpstanf -ppW .0 ('ma'Paf 'PuZ 'is[) K4L L :r.7afoad snp uo aavtd rumgddo 8utsodoad ay swop C*Wyd mym Aauoud leuona!pstanf -Z :utvidx3 jmawaambai loaapaf v yrtn aouvgduLoo urmumu m 10 ruawaambaa Iviapaf v fo aauvgd=:) unrtn uouatpsunf Ap 8uuq m aapto ut ,Ctasmm roafad pnodoad mp sI aauetldwo0 leiapad • I NOI.LV O.4NI 7VN0I.LIQ4V 'Al J.HVd -aoaload aya)o uonaldwoo ao) paieldwaauoa woa) awn ay uty7tro uuay paguasap saafomd aya)o 'pamiput saajnos aye woa) 'weys leaol sit Aed of spuaiui iueatlddz aya mp SwAjpnz)'aaatAo annnaaxa)taya ao JoAew ayr woa) luawnwwoO)o canal pau8ts e yae33v '{ uOiss>:unuoD uor40w02d 9 6uzsz4sanpy XOOg G14gTI 000 5b 9 aaanos aunowy spun) yoiew Ieaol Io saainos lie isi-I -Z - � � � lr rr r r ��■ r +r err �r� rr �r _ � •City of LittleRock 1996 TIP Submittal 3/27/95 • ' 18 VISITOR CENTER - DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT ENTRANCE TO LITTLE ROCK EXISTING CONDITION is no one central place Rock or the adjacent to eas'llylac access and obtain information of he City However, and Region. With increasing interest in Little Rock, there is a need to provide information to the traveling public. PROPOSAL The project is to obtain, renovate and use Curran Hall, 615 East Capitol as a visitor center for the sides benefit is Adverts innatio d promotion r hisBtor casit Beside ould be renovatedoand protected. eit wound provide a unique opportunity for a visitor center that would emphasize the historic character of Little Rock. PROJECT SCOPE k Ad ertisin and Promotion Acquisition of the Curran Hall building $225,000. The Little Roc v g Commission will provide the local match of $45,000. CARTS PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM for Roadway, Bridge and Intersection Improvement Projects Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY q (o Jurisdiction(s) L;4+le- Qc<,Kr A2 Applicant (if different from jurisdiction) Address 50o W. MakL6rrt ' Am. l08 PART 1. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 0 Project Control No AHTD Job No. Contact Person MAM Wr_bre Phone Number 371 — logs 3 187 1. Project Type (Check one only.) Roadway ❑ Bridge ❑ Intersection Improvement 2. Location (from/to or site): 5'1— i'V1ClrL4uivt ry4- Curnb,w_ na -)o 30 3. Length in miles: (00o L_j- (write NA if not applicable) 4. Project Description. Using additional, 8.5 x 11" paper, describe the need and how the proposed project will meet the need. Your project description should include (but not be limited to) the following information: -Total accidents, year(s), accident rate -Traffic volumes, year and source *Projected volumes -Horizontal and vertical alignments (meet AASHTO standard ?) Attach project description, along "th proposed project diagram, sketches or maps, to this forth. PART II. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Pavement width M'N• &; _ Type Or[Gte..fL Number of lanes AI.A 2. Shoulders ❑ Yes K No Width Paved C7 Yes No 3. Does proposed project add capacity? ❑ Yes Z No N.A. 4. Does proposed project enhance intermodal opportunity? (explain) Ti y r o v%4c S Ar PP�CCi -.,,.r r� 71c1Gt+JcCIICS. 5. How does the proposed project address stated safety concerns? )sS_ 1¢- r o ylc% \ 5tdr, "Iks ti.4k h4fia -dtc19,190d CiGPcSS. PART III. FINANCE AND PROJECT PHASE I. Total anticipated cost of project. Phase I anticipated cost Phase 2 anticipated cost: Phase 3 anticipated cost-. Phase 3 anticipated cost: Note: Use additional paper if necessary $ 5oo' otz' $ 1 300 bon Work type: DGStGn. FY $ 370,000 Work type: 6e n54ruc4f,:^ FY $ Work type: FY Work type: FY (aanrvu8u) :area :apr1 :Afl (aanrvu8rt) :aaea :aprl :A9 aalgeoTldde p suop3tpsun( IeuopippV ' (aanavuB�s) :area :ap�1 A8 uopolpsun( Aq Ieianugns aoj panojddV -uoiaoipsunf ywajo pannbaa si yoaew leJOl jo auawarwwoo pue uonedionaed jo uoneoyuiao* :ON clumnddv a]gAga .Cuv saprgaur ixaauoo snp u} „uozm un j•• : MON) iaaof fa uonarpsun1 -.vinw v m pasodoad iwfoad aya sl nafoadleuonoipsunf -nfnN .p 'puZ 'rs f) �:laa.lo,d snp uo aDqd rum Iddv 8wsodoid aye taop Aruoud imM OO'' Aauoxid Ieuopoipsim( -Z urvfdx3 jauawalmbaa iv'apaf v spun aouvrldwvo urmumw m ao luawaimbaa Iviapaf v fo avuvgdwoo uryapn uovarpsunf xp 8uuq oa iopio uI Aivssaaau aoafoad pasodoad ay sl aoueydwoo leaapa3 1 NOI.LVMOdld1 "1VNOI.L1(IQV 'AI JHVd -aoafoad ay jo uonaldium aoj paaeldwaauoo woaj awn aya uly»m uuay paquosap )-.afoad aya jo `paaeoipui saoanos ay woaj 'aaegs leool sn Aed m spumi aueogdde aya aeya EulAjnaao'aaogjo annnoaxa jlayo ao ioAew aya woaj auawnwwoOjo aaaawl pauals e yoeaaV [ � ybud<XA 00 a�anoS 7unowv spun) yoaew leool jo saoanos lle asrl .Z 88T f\ - • City of Little Rock 1996 TIP Submill� 3/27/95 EAST MARKHAM STREETSCAPE 189 EXISTING CONDITIONS: This project includes two blocks on West Markham in the area from LaHarpe Blvd. to I- 30. The specific block locations will be identified in the design study. Within the area, there are several public projects that are currently being planned and developed ( i.e. Riverfront Park, Museum of Science and History and Central Arkansas Library System). It is desired to prepare streetscape plans that will unify these and all other projects. PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS: Initial improvements will focus on East Markham Street and include putting utilities underground, pedestrian lighting, sidewalks with handicapped access, street trees and wayfinding system. These improvements will establish a unified character that will define and identify the district. It is intended to carry this character over time throughout the entire district. PROJECT SCOPE: Design and construction drawings for one to two blocks will be prepared by consultants. Bids will be received for construction of the project. It is estimated that total project cost will be $500,000. City's match will be $105,000.