Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHDC2005-011 Staff Report Item No. One, Project Background And Description 08/04/2005DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT LITTLE ROCK J f 723 West Markham Street HISTORIC Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 !" DISTRICT Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 -,� COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. One. DATE: August 4, 2005 APPLICANT: Barbara Core ADDRESS: 1020 Rock Street, Little Rock, AR 72202 COA REQUEST: Enlarge an existinggarage door, replace existing fence, addition of a rearporcb roof, and addition of awnings over front doorways. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION: The subject property is located at 1020 Rock Street. The property's legal description is "East 68 feet of Lot 7 Block 45 of the Original City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. And the West 72 feet of Lot 7, Block 45 of the Original City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas." This property is a commercial building that is used as a residence. The building is classified as being Italianate Commercial Style and was constructed circa 1886. The Italianate Commercial Style is characterized by buildings having a first floor facade often of cast iron, the second of brick. Typically capping the building is a requisite heavy, bracketed cornice. It is considered a "Contributing Above. The propenty at 1020 Bock Street at the present time. Below. The property as shown in the 1988 Architectural Survey. August 4, 2009 ITEM NO. One (CONT.): 1020 Rock Street Structure" to the MacArthur Park Historic District. The building is currently undergoing interior renovations, which does not require a Certificate of Appropriateness. The applicant has indicated that they would like to enlarge an existing garage door opening, replace an existing fence, add a shed roof over the rear porch, and addition of awnings over front doorways. ANALYSIS: The applicant has requests multiple changes for this property that may require different levels of consideration. The door enlargement and redesign is on the south facade of the building and is easily visible to residents along 1 j,h Street. The applicant proposes new awnings on east facade which represents the front facade of the building. This facade has a strong relationship to Rock Street and the street corner. Since this is a contributing structure and poses a significant presence in the neighborhood any additions to either of the street facades will need to respect the districts overall character and be compatible with nearby historic structures. Staff feels that the addition of the doors and the rear shed roof are of lesser importance because of their limited visibility from the street. Front Facade Awnin The applicant proposes the addition of two awnings over the existing storefront front doors. These awnings will have a metal standing seem roof material and wooden brackets. The applicant has also provided exhibits indicating that the style is common with commercial storefronts in the area. The applicant supplied "Awning Bracket Design" exhibit shows a scissor design holding up the awning. Staff believes that this design is compatible with the district as long as the brackets are wooden. The applicant has not indicated if a separate material will be used for the underside of the awning. If so, staff would support a Above: Awnings are proposed above the two doorways which are currently covered during renovation. Below. Existinggarage door, window, and fence on the property. The door and the 2 August 4, 2005 ITEM NO. One (CONT.): 1020 Rock Street wooden material similar to that in the "Awning Bracket Design" exhibit. Garage Door/Exterior Door: The applicant has proposed expansion of an existing single car garage door on the south fagade. The existing garage door is not original to the structure. (See applicant provided - "Existing Garage Door Exhibit".) Expanding this door will result in the loss of one four over four single hung wood window. The applicant's proposed new garage door will be 8 '/z' wide and retain the same height. Also proposed will be a three-foot exterior door adjacent to the new garage door. The three-foot door will be in place of the existing window. The applicant has indicated that the new garage door and exterior door will be solid wood. The applicant has based the design off of a garage door that exists in the historic district. (See applicant provided "Style of Proposed Garage Door Exhibit".) Staff reminds the Commission that the existence of one particular style of door or architectural style does not set precedent for all appropriate design in the district. Individual plans are reviewed upon their own merit. The applicant has noted that the design for the door is approximate. The appearance of a wooden garage door similar to the one proposed may not harm the district's character. Staff also would like to remind the applicant or contractor performing the work that they would be working with historic masonry and should be knowledgeable in working with mortar on historic buildings. Use of Portland cement on this building could cause damage to the surrounding brickwork. Staff suggests a type "N" mortar. Staff also encourages recycling of the old window so it can be used on the property if needed. Fence: The applicant has indicated that they would like to replace an existing fence in the historic district with an eight foot wooden board on board fence with brick piers. The applicant has also stated that the piers are replicated from existing piers at 11`sand Scott Streets. The existing fence on the property is a wood picket fence just under six feet tall. This fence has approximately a quarter inch separation between boards. Staff would be supportive of similar gap sizes in a new fence. Staff has noted that property setbacks the property is zoned R-4A which requires a five foot setback from the property line for any new fence over four feet tall. The applicant has indicated that they will file for the August 29, 2005 Board of Adjustment hearing date. Existing fence to be replaced The applicant has indicated that the proposed fence height is to be in character with both of the existing buildings and will have extensive landscaping in between the piers. Staff feels that the eight -foot fence may not be appropriate for the district and would prefer a six-foot August 4, 2009 ITEM NO. One (CONT.): 1020 Rock Street fence since residential properties front 1 Vh Street directly across the street from the proposed fence. No fence has been proposed for the north property line. Rear Facade: The applicant has indicated that they would like to install a pair of 3' X 8' antique oak doors on the rear of the structure. These new doors will be located on a currently windowless / doorless facade. Staff recommends that the person completing the work be respectful to the existing antique brick and mortar to minimize any possible effects brick removal and mortar addition may cause. These doors have limited visibility from the street and should not affect the district's character. Existin8gara,gc door, window, and fence on the property. 1 he door ana toe wznaow unu be removed as part of this application. Also indicated on the rear facade is a "slant roof' approximately 10' deep X 30' across. Staff will refer to this roof porch as a shed roof. Metal shed roofs were common on commercial structures at the turn of the 1 9th Century. Typically these roofs were located on the front facade but were sometimes located on the back. The applicant has indicated that the roof material will be corrugated tin. Staff feels like the shed roof and its location would not have a detrimental effect on the character. The applicant has not indicated any additional materials that would be used for construction of the roof. The applicant has provided "prospective views" which indicate exposed rafters and an elevation drawing indicating vertical siding. The horizontal siding and verge board is visible from 1 Vh Street. Staff would recommend that materials for the siding be cement fiberboard, which has the crisp dimensions of wood, or wood. Staff prefers that the application be amended at the public hearing to identify what materials will be used. 4 August 4, 2005 ITEM NO. One (CONT.): 1020 Rock Street Other Comments: Upon a site visit staff noticed several elements of the building were in need of repair. On the southern facade stucco had cracked and broken off in several places. Staff feels that damage to the stucco is fixable and would encourage that it be done in a respectful manner in the future. This repair will not require a COA if it repaired with a similar stucco. Staff also noticed that there was some deterioration of the windowsill that will remain on the south facade. The sill will most likely have to be replaced in the future. Again, a COA is not required if the repairs are done with a similar wood material. Staff has noted damage to the stucco on southern facade. Also noted was damage to the n endow .rill that will remain on the .youth facade. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS AND REACTION: At the time of printing, there were no comments regarding this application. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation approval as filed with the following staff recommendations: 1. Front Facade Awnings a. The underside of awnings (if needed) be wood. 2. Garage Door/Exterior Door a. The overall appearance of the door is to reflect vertical slats held together by diagonal slats with alternating interior angles on every other door. b. The applicant provide detailed drawings of the rear doors of the structure when design is complete. 3. Fence a. The fence and piers be only 6 feet tall, have no more than one quarter inch gaps between boards, and be approved by the Board of Adjustment. 4. Rear Facade. a. The horizontal siding and verge board visible from 11 h Street be cement fiberboard or wooden. b. The underside of shed roof (if needed) be wood. 5 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS SEE SEPARATE BUNDLE PROVIDED BY APPLICANT DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT LITTLE ROCK 723 West Markham Street HISTORIC Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 DISTRICT Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. Two. DATE: June 16, 2005 APPLICANT: Jennifer Herron w/Herron Horton Architects ADDRESS: 1410, 1416 Commerce Street, Little Rock, AR 72202 COA REQUEST: Construct one new home and a detached garage/apartment. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION: The subject property is located at 1410, 1416 Commerce Street. The property's legal description is "The North 28 feet, of Lot 9 Block; All of Lot 10; and the South 1 1/2 feet, of Lot 11 Block 54, Original City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. The properCy at 1410, 1416 Commerce Street. Since the home is of new construction it cannot be considered as a "Contributing Structure" to the MacArthur Park Historic District until it is at least 50 years old. This application is also undergoing an application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for construction of a second detached living unit. It's current zoning of R4A (Urban Residence District) allows for duplex development as long as the units are attached. In the event that the CUP is approved the permit will run in perpetuity or until it is revoked by the property owner. This CUP should not affect the application. Staff will meet with the zoning staff to ensure that the two applications are compatible. The CUP is scheduled for the September 1, 2005 Planning Commission Hearing. August 4, 2009 ITEM NO. Two (CONT.): 1410,1416 Commerce Street ANALYSIS: There are several criteria related to this case in the District's Guidelines. The Design Guidelines for new construction of primary buildings should maintain., not disrupt the existing pattern of surrounding historic buildings. This calls for new construction to be compatible with existing historic structures on the street block. The design guidelines state that compatibility is calculated by evaluating shape; building scale; roof shape and pitch; orientation to the street; location and proportion of entrances, windows, porches, and divisional bays; foundation height, floor -to -ceiling height; and porch height and depth. Exterior materials and material colors are looked at for compatibility as well. If the exterior to be used is brick and mortar, and color tones should be similar. If the new construction is frame matching lap dimension with wood or smooth masonite is considered encouraged. Vinyl and aluminum siding are not encouraged on any construction in the historic district. New construction also requires a more in depth look at the exterior characteristics of the building. Details such as trim around windows, doors, eaves, eave depths, watercourses, corner boards, etc. should be similar to those of surrounding properties. An important rule with new construction within the historic district is that new buildings should blend in with adjacent buildings and not be too imitative of historic styles. The reason for this is so that new construction can be distinguished from historic buildings in the district. "New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired." (Secretary of the Interior's Standard). In 1990 the homes at 1416 and 1410 Commerce Street were demolished by the city at the request of nearby residents because the structures were burned, dilapidated, and had been declared unsafe and a public nuisance. The properly at 1416 (left), 1410 (right) Commerce Street. Shawn in this 1988 picture The proposal is for a single family home 2196 sq. ft. in size on two vacant lots. in MacArthur Park. The building orientation will result in a two story house oriented towards Commerce Street. A secondary building, a garage with first floor living unit, will also be included in the August 4, 2005 ITEM NO. Two (CONT.): 1410,1416 Commerce Street design. The buildings total height will be 26 feet, 8 inches which is an approximate measurement from the grade to the top of the home. The homes total width will be 51 feet 5 inches. The foundation height of the home will be 2 feet. Floor heights are all nine feet with vaulted ceilings in the dining room. This total width measures from the southerly sunroom to the northern chimney. The principle facade and front porch will measure approximately 22 feet in width and be closest to Commerce Street. The porch will be 33 feet from Commerce Street. Setbacks on this street vary and range from 32 feet to 40 feet. The home to the north is setback approximately 40 feet and the one to the south is 33 feet. The projecting faCade's depth of 33 feet will be closer to the southerly property and should remain in character. The applicant's proposed sunroom extending out Existing Single Family home near the property. Above. Across the Street. Bottom Left.• immediately South. Bottom Right: Immediately north the northern farsade will be setback will be approximately 55 feet from the property line. This setback may not be as noticeable because of the prominent projecting facade. The applicant has indicated that the roof pitch on the projecting far,ade will be 8:12. The home immediately across the street has a roof pitch of 8:12. The porch and side porch will have a 3.5:12 pitch hipped roof above. The northern and southern facades will have shed roofs that have a similar 8:12 pitch. The northern facade will have an exposed gable bisected by a brick fireplace. The total height of the porch from ground to top grade will be 14 feet 6 inches. The roof and porch pitches and heights could appear to be in character with homes on the block. Staff believes that the roof character is not detrimental to the neighborhood. August 4, 2009 ITEM NO. Two (CONT.): 1410,1416 Commerce Street A covered breezeway will connect the home and the secondary structure. Because of the terrain the breezeway will have steps and change in elevation in order to match the topography. At the present time, the applicant had not come to a final conclusion as to where the elevation changes will occur. Since the breezeway is located in the rear of the home and located immediately behind the home, the structure height will reduce its visibility and may not have a significant impact on the historic district's character. The proposed foundation will be constructed of concrete block with a brick veneer. The applicant has not indicated the size of brick that will be used to cover the foundation. Large bricks may be out of character while smaller, more traditional brick sizes would be in character. The applicant has indicated that siding to be used on the home will be fiber cementitious lap siding, as well as corner boards, trim, and fascia. Staff feels that clarification of the soffit material is necessary. The lap siding placement and design will result in a 5-inch exposure that will be painted. The exterior materials of the building should be compatible with the district's character. The applicant has described the porch area as having "wood tongue and groove wood flooring and ceiling." Also on the porch will be permacast square columns. The square columns would reflect similarity to the home mi unediately north of the application. The applicant has not stated whether or not a railing will be featured on the front porch. Nearby properties in the historic district have ornate wooden railings on them. Not continuing the ornate wooden railings on this porch may disrupt the level of craft that is supported by surrounding homes. The applicant has proposed architectural asphalt shingles for the roof and proposes a 1 foot overhang. The design guidelines encourage dark colored roofs on residential buildings within the district. The proposed one foot overhang appears in character with the district with staff noting the similarity in overhang size to that directly across the street. The applicant has provided elevation plans that illustrate the window patterns on the house. Most of the windows will be double hung windows with simulated divided lights. The applicant has indicated that the windows will be metal clad wood windows and will appear to be two -over -two with a majority of the windows being double hung. Also indicated on the plans are several casement windows. The overall window placement in the house appears to be consistent with the neighborhood character. Staff has only one concern with windows on the front fagade. A double hung window at the southern end of the front (east) facade may be more appropriate in place of the smaller casement window. Staff also has concerns regarding the artificial lights in the windows. In the event that they are approved staff believes that any, decorative muntin grids are stuck to both the interior and exterior of the windows, and one between glass panes. The exterior grille can be made of wood and would be permanently adhered to the glass. The proposed secondary building will be located off the alley and be used as a garage with an attached living unit. This part of the application is the reason for the Conditional Use Permit because it will result in two single family detached units on a lot. This application August 4, 2005 ITEM NO. Two (CONT.): 1410,1416 Commerce Street will be heard at the September 1, 2005 hearing. The applicant has indicated that the building will be constructed using similar materials as the home. This structure should not have a negative impact on the district. The applicant has not mentioned what material the front door will be. Wooden doors are common in the historic district and may be the least intrusive to the neighborhood. The applicant has not indicated where fences on the property will be located. Staff believes that a 6' non -painted dog eared fence would be appropriate for this property if set back from the entire front facade of this building. Staff will require a detailed fencing plan before fence construction were to begin. Additionally, any new fence should have a positive relationship with existing fences nearby. North of the property a fence exists that a new fence should match and attempt to align with. In the event of air conditioning of the proposed structures it would be best to utilize a central airconditioning unit. Staff would recommend placement of the airconditioning unit behind the proposed fence and out of view from the street. On the site are existing steps from a previous residence. Staff would prefer that they remian to help illustrate the overall history of the area. This homes new construction will result in the construction of a new pathway connecting the front porch to the street. To be in line with the overall character of the neighborhood a sidewalk perpendicular to Commerce Street would be most appropriate. In the event that a proper alignment could not be made and the existing steps would be removed staff would recommend construction of similar steps in their place. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS AND REACTION: At the time of distribution, there were no comments regarding this application. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the application as filed with the following conditions: 1. Wood fencing shall be 6' wood dog-eared fence with no stain or paint applied. Plans to be submitted to staff to be approved by staff prior to construction. 2. Brick to be used on chimney and foundation be small brick similar in size to adjacent properties. 3. Double hung, one -over -one, wood -clad windows on all elevations of the home as illustrated in the elevation plans with no snap in or flush muntins. 4. A wooden front door on the eastern facade. 5. Any external air conditioning units be located in the rear of the yard behind the fence and not visible from Commerce Street. DEPART\PENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPN NT ,ITTLE ROCK 723 West Markham Street :HISTORIC Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 DISTRICT Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 ;OMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Application Date: U �� �• 6Dr✓- � da of Uy 200 �at UP p.m. 1. Date of Public Hearing: y 2. Address of Property: MI) ) 4 + D WI 14 CRC16 C/1 7 7 L/ir, 9 0 Gk /\KYJI N 'c�A 5 3. Legal Description of Property: TO E N0 Ot 20 op oT M N L 60 D t7 K [4 VKr•- 40O NT Ar N AC1 • l A't. Gl�I o L171L6 �o&V) V1At1V4 Gi aIANT-11 IkRGAl�` : _Np 7N� Aft 1 Y2- Fe &FLol 11 r ,01 , ORlb►wAI- 4. Pro erty Owner aZm-e, Address, PhoneFax): F Lf-' G% DONN el�7C�ovci� w l10R76FE-mNS. Owner's An 6. Project Description (additional pages maybe added): e2ee A 7. Estimated Cost of Improvements: #S%G M• Do 8. Zoning Classification Ry ' 9. Signature of Owner or Agent: Is the proposed change a �pe�rmitted use? 'e No l (The owner will r d to authorize any Agent or person representing the owner at the public hearing). NOTE: Should there be changes (design, materials, size, etc.) from the approved COA, applicant shall notify Commission staff and take appropriate actions. Approval by the Commission does not excuse applicant or property from compliance with other applicable codes, ordinances or policies of the city unless stated by the Commission or staff. Responsibility for identifying such codes, ordi- nances or policies rests with the applicant, owner or agent. (This section to be completed by staff): Little Rock Historic District Commission Action ❑ Denied ❑ Withdrawn ❑ Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions ❑ See Attached Conditions Staff Signature: Date: Little Rock Historic District Commission ♦ Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street ♦ Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 ♦ Phone: (501) 371-4790 ♦ Fax: (501) 399-3435 July 6, 2005 Mr. Charles Bloom City of Little Rock Department of Planning & Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Charles: On behalf of our client, Ms. Donna Colon, we are submitting an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a new single-family residence at 1410 & 1416 Commerce Street. We also propose a detached two -car garage with an apartment. The garage will be connected to the main house by a covered breezeway. We have also included a letter from Ms. Colon granting Herron Horton Architects authority to act as an agent for this project. The following items address the New Construction section in the MacArthur Park Historic District Design Review Guidelines for Primary buildings and secondary structures: 1. The proposed single-family house is approximately 2, 196 square feet and is oriented so that the main entry is facing east on Commerce Street. It is bordered to the south by a single story house and to the north by a two-story house. It is currently proposed to have the existing concrete steps along Commerce Street removed; however, when a survey has been completed, they might be reused to line up with a new concrete sidewalk to the front porch. 2. The total height of the proposed house is 26'-8" which is an approximate measure from the grade to the ridge. The total width is approximately 51' -5" from the sunroom to the edge of the chimney. 3. The proposed roof slope for the gable roofs are 8:12 and the proposed roof slope for the shed roof is 8:12. There will be a ridge vent at the vaulted living room roof. 4. The main entry is located at Commerce Street. 5. There is a main front porch and partial side porch with a hip roof at 3.5:12. There is also a rear porch which connects to the breezeway. The proposed windows are insulated, metal clad wood windows with simulated divided lites. A proposed alternate to the windows is an insulated metal clad wood window with out divided lites. The majority of the proposed windows are double -hung. The double -hung windows on the first floor are 2'-8" x 6'-079 . The casement window units on the first floor are 2'-6" x 3'-0" and 2'-6" x 3'-8". The proposed double -hung windows at the second floor are 2'-8" x 4'-91 . H E R R O N H O R T O N 300 S Spring St. Ste 720 Little Rock, AR 72201 www. hh-architects.com tel. 5 0 1 - 9 7 5 - 0 0 5 2 fax. 501-978-0078 ARCHITECTS 6. The proposed foundation height is approximately 2'-0" with a minimum of 18" for code. 7. The proposed floor -to -ceiling height is 9'-0" except for the living room area which is vaulted. 8. The proposed porch height and depth is 14'-6" from grade to top of roof and the depth is 8' -0" . 9. The material for the foundation will be brick veneer over concrete block. At this time a decision on the color of brick has not been made. The material for the walls will be a fiber cementious lap siding with an exposure of 5" and will be painted. The material for the roof will be architectural asphalt shingles. The material for the front and rear porch will be Permacast square columns, wood tongue & groove wood flooring and ceiling. The wood floor and ceiling will be painted. 10. The proposed trim at the windows and doors is lx6 with a sill and apron. The comer boards will be 1x6 and the overhang will be 1'-0". The material for the trim, comer boards and fascia will be the fiber cementitious material. 11. The placement of the new house on the site is such that the front porch is approximately 31'- 0" from the property line; the north side of the house is 8'-0" from the north property line; the south side of the house is 24'-0" from the south property line and the west side of the house is 58'-6" from the west property line. The proposed secondary structure is a two -car garage with an apartment on the first floor. It is proposed that the garage is connected to the primary building by a covered breezeway. The proposed garage is approximately 576 square feet and the apartment is approximately 466 square feet. Therefore, the total square feet for the secondary structure is 1,010. 1. The proposed garage/apt. structure is smaller in scale to the primary building. 2. The proposed garage is a square in plan with the same slope of the primary building. The apartment is L-shape in plan and shares a porch with the garage. The columns at the porch will connect to the breezeway. The square footage for the porch is 84. 3. The location of the garage/apt. is 3'-0" from the west property line; 10'-5" from the north property line and 20'-2" from the south property line. 4. The materials for the secondary structure will also be fiber cementitous lap siding and architectural asphalt shingles to match the roof at the primary building. The proposed garage/apt. will be concrete slab on grade. The window and door trim will be 1x4 fiber cementitious material as well as the lx4 comer boards. The connected breezeway is approximately 7'-0" x 30'-0". It will have painted square Permacast columns and an architectural asphalt shingle roof to match the roof at the garage and house. The paving material has not been decided at this time. It is proposed to have the ceiling/rafters exposed. The breezeway will have to vary in height in order to tie into the roof at the garage. As soon as a survey and spot elevations have been completed, this might need to be adjusted. Also, there is the possibility of having a slope from the breezeway to a patio area which will need to accommodate someone in a wheelchair. Please call either myself or Jeff Horton if additional information is needed or if there are questions. Sincerely, r Per Herron, AIA cc: Ms. Donna Colon file NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS TO OWNERS OF LAND LYING WITHIN 150 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED AT Address: 4-10 X 14-1 N COVOWeVC61 General Location: d 0 P210 L o %D 1M IM 6169 �7 " �iW 1)A4 �Ufi�� nV I Ve 1S S'Iye�t Owned by: P d V1 V1 A CO 10 V1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness on the above described property requesting the following changes: A e w - I r I R m V( fed W,111 Wipi Vlv� �. Rava f� fr re eei a ii A eY-t 15, 4 r/ t � a� t•d o f1�, l g���aYLtG3 rGt1 �14 his has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A Public hearing oil said Application will be held by the Historic District Commission in the Sister Cities Conference Room City Hall 500 W. Markham Street on Pm 4 A 2005 at 5:00 p.m. ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST MAY APPEAR and be heard at said time and place or may notify the Little Rock Historic District Commission of their views on this matter by letter. All persons interested in this request are invited to call or visit the Department of Planning and Development to review the application with Commission staff. Department of Planning and Development + 723 West Markham Street e (501) 371-4790 Instructions for applicant: Please return the completed form and signed affidavit, UNCUT, to staff no later than fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. Mail the top portion "Notice of Public Hearing" (8 % X 11) after contacting staff to recorded property owners no later than fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing date. This will ensure the applicant hasten (10) days notice of tine hearing. AFFIDAVIT I hereby certify that I have notified all the property owners of record within 150 feet of the above described property, that subject property is being considered for a Certificate of Appropriateness and that a Public Hearing will be held before the Little Rock Historic District Commission at the time and place described. A �v Applicant aner or authorised re resentative Date: 2 �� city d I..im11 Roo ?m West Marftm Sftm UWO R^ AA IM-1334 Attn: Ctmrft Bloom Der Mr. t3bmn,. Canmerr B � Hf � ot 3ROM 4 �dAWM . 110 AmtftxbxW frrm d Hamm HorW AmNwCW Im. is the ®rioNka VW i hrtve hare(,# W MAft "Wt OW p" ft SdWR&W plane 10 VW h rg)W COMWtsn. 3 *MW aU H*d you t ft(d fhe pMoMW, sow JMFUW or ..leff, all dm oDurbeskM m v t w►e pre"* tom!" y*t. f #weac aq M*WM Md POOM of Bftney ta the AWhMM M VA" is Pm6m 0* PD)M 10 YOU wW army arty and al qmmkm on ib 6)OA or July 4, 2005 Charles Bloom Little Rock Historic District Commission Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Re: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) August 4"' Hearing Date Charles, Enclosed are the drawings of the proposed additions/modifications to our property located at 1020 Rock Street, Little Rock, AR 72202. The legal description of the property is: Original City of Little Rock, East 68' of Lot 7 Block 45 We estimate the costs of the improvements to be: $131000. We are requesting: Enlarge existing garage door opening to accommodate 8' 6"garage door and 3' exterior door. Install new solid wood door and garage door — design replicated from old commercial building — see photos. Actual design shown is approximate. 2. Replace existing fence on 11 th street side (South) with 8' board on board fence with brick piers. Piers replicated from NE corner 111h & Scott. Includes planting/flower beds between each pier 3. Replace existing fence on North property line with 8' board on board fence. 4. Add slant roof porch to rear (West) of building (approx 10' x 30'). Install pair of 3'x 8' antique oak doors in new opening in brick. Roof material — corrugated tin Posts — wood 4x4 5. Add awning over each pair of front (East) entry doorways. Wood brackets — design replicated from old commercial building — see photo. Roof material — metal standing seam All materials and designs utilized will be appropriate for a commercial building of this period. J (- Respec lly, Barbara Core 10612 Lathrop Drive Dallas, TX 75229 214-904-2264 ,�6 M 09 q AiM ro p rD "m rn rn p, ❑ o rn G G m o' ro ro rn n r' rt O y �:F' pq 0, n rn rn o G K rD rn a" �O rn Cl- rD .rn- rD O p O V1 u, rD naq ,rni n rn m •. i rrD G m . ...- -- - a«: . :.�.. \ w. a k DO \ E \ < 2 - ` 2 % ® % % \ m % < � % \ ƒ n \ r ƒ \ § a J \ 0 q & \ \rD ] SD 2\23 7 \ } 3 \ \ \ \ rD / / § � . § & , \' \ \ G % R ) c ®\ / \\\\ \ i " rD \ / §1 7-7 z G 0 x �• ., z °Q � rn k - IL 1020 ROCK ST EXISTING, GARAGEDOOR - � - , - . - - "•_ram:..�: �.��v�.�:.. ,_ q�'::.-.:•'__ . .. .. _ .. " " . '�^� Fy, • Nat �r ,. •5, :: '=: l: �'�: t"-•: • _ :: .• , is3:'�1 "ate"i't'� yyf Lam• :"„��_ n � y'-.•' :L_='•• •.. y�' µ.�• ,.fix, � :.., �.-: `�. ��� ; , ilk '� ,h� t• -`lit �'='?'�''=-,� 0 o 0 z0 a m W U z W in h W ad W G1 �/ O 0 V � � N O waA p 0 z N W O m a h w oji a �++ I ��! � ����fi d �; �I ��I �'l I;E � moil r it [� I • II; I jr N I 11IN li �I J'til t 11 9 1 Jill r I it 41,11 4 17 If Ila I I. I C4 0 LU ■ I 9 m E I 9 m E 1 .. : • v:-o' -. - y:n mm LY ,. -•�� b�rar �'`�.Jr'��i.T ��••: �, ,"arc , •. ��• __ _. W Z W 0 W ad W w UI ' HNSI ,r":-77. FRI ;1 -j-i6", ifAlll .... ... -- ----- --- mop— ui z LU Q cn LU Cie ul Im 0 u o 02 z LU u ui © , zn— w uj w �a V Q y a� c N V• 00 y 7j 'I d 9U1� oii o 15 H �• V N � wait:i•ssmvve p s° i r f " r- H LU V Z tu 0 .e) Ww ui w u