Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHDC1998-020 In Thee Environmental Court Of Little Rock, Arkansas Third Division For Criminal Affidavit 10/18/2000IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS THIRD DIVISION STATE OF ARKANSAS/ PLAINTIFF CITY OF LITTLE ROCK kv BETTY DEISLINGER 1000 Rock Street Little Rock, AR 72202 DEFENDANT DOB: 09/21/30 Sex/Race: W/F ADL#: 900-84-3121 CRIMINAL AFFIDAVIT FACTS: On September 3, 1998, Betty Deislinger appeared before the Little Rock Historic District Commission ("LRHDC") for approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness ("COA") for the rehabilitation of a single family home. The LRHDC approved the application request with conditions. A building permit was issued the same month. In November 1999, Ms. Deislinger was notified in writing that the front porch windows did not comply with the approved COA. She was asked to appear before the LRHDC at its November 29th meeting in order to address the completed work and the issue of non-compliance. Ms. Deislinger was then notified in writing on January 26, 2000 that she had six months in which to comply with the ordinance and design guidelines, to replace the vinyl window, to screen the air conditioning unit on the north side and to remove the security bars. Ms. Deislinger was subsequently notified twice in writing regarding the time period in which to comply with the guidelines; however, there was no written response from Ms. Deislinger regarding the letters. On July 20, 2000, Ms. Deislinger mailed letters to each commissioner stating that she would comply with only one of the LRHDC's requests; the letter was not mailed to staff. There has been no communication with Ms. Deislinger since July 20, 2000. 1�� \ I "�) I A,5 Because of this, I believe the d (fendant has committed the offense (s) of: violating Little Rock Ark., Rev. Code § 23-132. The LRHDC did not approve the installation of the vinyl window or the air conditioning unit on the north side and security bars on windows visible from the street should be removed. I swear this information is true and correct to the best of my information and belief. Sworn to before me on this — Witness: Historic Preservation Administrator's Name: V. Anne Guthrie 500 W. Markham Street, #120W Little Rock, AR 72201 Telephone: 501-244-5420 2 IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS THIRD DIVISION STATE OF ARKANSAS/ PLAINTIFF CITY OF LITTLE ROCK V. BETTY DEISLINGER 1000 Rock Street Little Rock, AR 72202 DEFENDANT DOB: 09/21/30 Sex/Race: W/F ADL#: 900-84-3121 CRIMINAL AFFIDAVIT FACTS: On September 3, 1998, Betty Deislinger appeared before the Little Rock Historic District Commission ("LRHDC") for approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness ("COA") for the rehabilitation of a. single family home. The LRHDC approved the application request with conditions. A building permit was issued the same month. In November 1999, Ms. Deislinger was notified in writing that the front porch windows did not comply with the approved COA. She was asked to appear before the LRHDC at its November 29th meeting in order to address the completed work and the issue of non-compliance. Ms. Deislinger was then notified in writing on January 26, 2000 that she had six months in which to comply with the ordinance and design guidelines, to replace the vinyl window, to screen the air conditioning unit on the north side and to remove the security bars. Ms. Deislinger was subsequently notified twice in writing regarding the time period in which to comply with the guidelines; however, there was no written response from Ms. Deislinger regarding the letters. On July 20, 2000, Ms. Deislinger mailed letters to each commissioner stating that she would comply with only one of the LRHDC's requests; the letter was not mailed to staff. There has been no communication with Ms. ,Deislinger since July 20, 2000. Because of this, I believe the defendant has committed the offense (s) of: violating Little Rock Ark., Rev. Code § 23-132. The LRHDC did not approve the installation of the vinyl window or the air conditioning unit on the north side and security bars on windows visible from the street should be removed. I swear this information is true and correct to the best of my information and belief. AFFLANT Historic Preservation Administrator's Name: V. Anne Guthrie 500 W. Markham Street, #120W Little Rock, AR 72201 Telephone: 501-244-5420 Sworn to before me on this day of Witness: Little Rock Environmental Clerk OJI , 2000. 26 January 2000 Betty Deislinger 1000 Rock Street Little Rock, AR 72202 Dear Ms. Deislinger: On behalf of the Little Rock Historic District Commission (LRHDC), I am writing to notify you that after the inspection of your front porch windows, the Commission discussed in great detail the appropriateness and compliance of the windows with the historic district's design guidelines. It was decided at the 6 January meeting, that within six months, you must: ♦ replace the front porch vinyl windows with materials as listed on your original COA (wood sash); the windows must match the dimensions, shape and size of the existing original windows ♦ screen or fence the a/c unit located on the north (to be administratively approved prior to installation) ♦ remove the security bars Attention to details, such as windows, is a significant architectural feature of a historic structure, and not being in compliance does indeed detract from the overall physical detailing. Your compliance with the above -listed items within the time period will be noted; the six months commences upon your receipt of this letter. If these items are not changed within the specified time, and in accordance with the city ordinance and guidelines, further actions will be taken (the judicial system has the authority to level a daily fine until the items are brought into compliance). Also, the heat and air unit situated on the north side and the retention of the security bars were discussed. While your COA application did not include the installation of mechanical units, the guidelines state that mechanical equipment "should be located on the rear facade; be located where not readily visible from the street; if visible, should be screened with shrubbery or fencing." Security bars are removed normally with the installation of storm windows; the design guidelines state that security bars "should not be located on primary facades; and should not be located on windows visible from the street. If there are questions about these issues, you are encouraged to call me at 244-5420. The LRHDC appreciates your hard work and investment in the historic district, but its members are committed in upholding the ordinance and guidelines to ensure that the district's architectural integrity is maintained. Respectfully, V. Anne Guthrie, Historic Preservation Administrator xc: Little Rock Historic District Commission Anthony Black