HomeMy WebLinkAboutHDC1998-020 In Thee Environmental Court Of Little Rock, Arkansas Third Division For Criminal Affidavit 10/18/2000IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
THIRD DIVISION
STATE OF ARKANSAS/ PLAINTIFF
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
kv
BETTY DEISLINGER
1000 Rock Street
Little Rock, AR 72202
DEFENDANT
DOB: 09/21/30 Sex/Race: W/F ADL#: 900-84-3121
CRIMINAL AFFIDAVIT
FACTS: On September 3, 1998, Betty Deislinger appeared before the Little Rock Historic
District Commission ("LRHDC") for approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness ("COA") for
the rehabilitation of a single family home. The LRHDC approved the application request with
conditions. A building permit was issued the same month. In November 1999, Ms. Deislinger
was notified in writing that the front porch windows did not comply with the approved COA.
She was asked to appear before the LRHDC at its November 29th meeting in order to address the
completed work and the issue of non-compliance.
Ms. Deislinger was then notified in writing on January 26, 2000 that she had six months in which
to comply with the ordinance and design guidelines, to replace the vinyl window, to screen the
air conditioning unit on the north side and to remove the security bars. Ms. Deislinger was
subsequently notified twice in writing regarding the time period in which to comply with the
guidelines; however, there was no written response from Ms. Deislinger regarding the letters.
On July 20, 2000, Ms. Deislinger mailed letters to each commissioner stating that she would
comply with only one of the LRHDC's requests; the letter was not mailed to staff. There has
been no communication with Ms. Deislinger since July 20, 2000.
1�� \ I "�) I A,5
Because of this, I believe the d (fendant has committed the offense (s) of: violating Little
Rock Ark., Rev. Code § 23-132. The LRHDC did not approve the installation of the vinyl
window or the air conditioning unit on the north side and security bars on windows visible from
the street should be removed.
I swear this information is true and correct to the best of my information and belief.
Sworn to before me on this —
Witness:
Historic Preservation Administrator's Name:
V. Anne Guthrie
500 W. Markham Street, #120W
Little Rock, AR 72201
Telephone: 501-244-5420
2
IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
THIRD DIVISION
STATE OF ARKANSAS/ PLAINTIFF
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
V.
BETTY DEISLINGER
1000 Rock Street
Little Rock, AR 72202
DEFENDANT
DOB: 09/21/30 Sex/Race: W/F ADL#: 900-84-3121
CRIMINAL AFFIDAVIT
FACTS: On September 3, 1998, Betty Deislinger appeared before the Little Rock Historic
District Commission ("LRHDC") for approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness ("COA") for
the rehabilitation of a. single family home. The LRHDC approved the application request with
conditions. A building permit was issued the same month. In November 1999, Ms. Deislinger
was notified in writing that the front porch windows did not comply with the approved COA.
She was asked to appear before the LRHDC at its November 29th meeting in order to address the
completed work and the issue of non-compliance.
Ms. Deislinger was then notified in writing on January 26, 2000 that she had six months in which
to comply with the ordinance and design guidelines, to replace the vinyl window, to screen the
air conditioning unit on the north side and to remove the security bars. Ms. Deislinger was
subsequently notified twice in writing regarding the time period in which to comply with the
guidelines; however, there was no written response from Ms. Deislinger regarding the letters. On
July 20, 2000, Ms. Deislinger mailed letters to each commissioner stating that she would comply
with only one of the LRHDC's requests; the letter was not mailed to staff. There has been no
communication with Ms. ,Deislinger since July 20, 2000.
Because of this, I believe the defendant has committed the offense (s) of: violating Little
Rock Ark., Rev. Code § 23-132. The LRHDC did not approve the installation of the vinyl
window or the air conditioning unit on the north side and security bars on windows visible from
the street should be removed.
I swear this information is true and correct to the best of my information and belief.
AFFLANT
Historic Preservation Administrator's Name:
V. Anne Guthrie
500 W. Markham Street, #120W
Little Rock, AR 72201
Telephone: 501-244-5420
Sworn to before me on this day of
Witness:
Little Rock Environmental Clerk
OJI
, 2000.
26 January 2000
Betty Deislinger
1000 Rock Street
Little Rock, AR 72202
Dear Ms. Deislinger:
On behalf of the Little Rock Historic District Commission (LRHDC), I am writing to notify you
that after the inspection of your front porch windows, the Commission discussed in great detail
the appropriateness and compliance of the windows with the historic district's design guidelines.
It was decided at the 6 January meeting, that within six months, you must:
♦ replace the front porch vinyl windows with materials as listed on your
original COA (wood sash); the windows must match the dimensions, shape
and size of the existing original windows
♦ screen or fence the a/c unit located on the north (to be administratively
approved prior to installation)
♦ remove the security bars
Attention to details, such as windows, is a significant architectural feature of a historic structure,
and not being in compliance does indeed detract from the overall physical detailing. Your
compliance with the above -listed items within the time period will be noted; the six months
commences upon your receipt of this letter. If these items are not changed within the specified
time, and in accordance with the city ordinance and guidelines, further actions will be taken (the
judicial system has the authority to level a daily fine until the items are brought into compliance).
Also, the heat and air unit situated on the north side and the retention of the security bars were
discussed. While your COA application did not include the installation of mechanical units, the
guidelines state that mechanical equipment "should be located on the rear facade; be located
where not readily visible from the street; if visible, should be screened with shrubbery or
fencing." Security bars are removed normally with the installation of storm windows; the design
guidelines state that security bars "should not be located on primary facades; and should not be
located on windows visible from the street.
If there are questions about these issues, you are encouraged to call me at 244-5420. The
LRHDC appreciates your hard work and investment in the historic district, but its members are
committed in upholding the ordinance and guidelines to ensure that the district's architectural
integrity is maintained.
Respectfully,
V. Anne Guthrie, Historic Preservation Administrator
xc: Little Rock Historic District Commission
Anthony Black