HomeMy WebLinkAboutHDC1994-007 Staff Minutes, 11/08/1984MINUTES
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 8, 1984
4:00 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. John Jarrard, Chairman
Mr. George Worthen
Mr. Sam Strauss, Jr.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ms. Beth Foti
Mr. Bill Kennedy, III
STAFF PRESENT: W. Mike Dooley
*Due to the fact that the applicant has withdrawn the request contained
herein, I have taken the liberty to somewhat abbreviate this set of
Minutes.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Mr. John Jarrard, at
4:05 P.M. and finding a Quorum to exist, the Commission moved and accepted
the Minutes of the previous meeting as recorded.
Staff reported that the required notification had been properly mailed to
the owners of property within the area of influence of the application and
that proof of notification had been received.
Item No. 1 was announced and described as:
Owner: Mr. Claude Herbert
Address: 1004-06 Rock Street
Request: Demolition
Mr. Herbert, representing the application, was called on by the Chairman
to describe his reasons for requesting that the structure be demolished.
Mr. Herbert explained that he and his wife desired to plant a flower and
vegetable garden on the site and that the structure was of no use to them
as it had not been leased for approximately three (3) years. He continued
by explaining that the structural condition of the building was poor and
cited the roof, plaster, floor and foundation as requiring repair. He
stated that he was a retired contractor and that it would require as much
as $30,000 to repair the structure. He felt that the neighborhood would
look better without a delapidated structure and explained that he did
not know there were restrictions to razing the structure when he purchased
it.
Mr. Worthen asked how long he had owned the structure and Mr. Herbert
replied that he had purchased it fifteen (15) years ago.
Mr. Worthen asked if there was a possibility he would sell the house and
Mr. Herbert said he would not.
Mr. Strauss asked if he would consider moving the house and Mr. Herbert
said that was possible if it wouldn't fall apart.
Ms. Cheryl Nichols, Executive Director of the Quapaw Quarter Association,
stated that the Board of Directors of that organization had voted to
recommend denial of the request to demolish. (Attachment No. 1) She
explained some of the historical background of the structure as well as
its architectural style and significance. She requested that if the
Commission does not choose to refuse the demolition request that they
defer same in order to work with the applicant on alternatives.
The Chairman read a recommendation prepared by the Arkansas Historic
Preservation Program (Attachment No. 2) which covered their interest in
maintaining the scale, density and setback relationships of structures
within the MacArthur Park Historic District. They noted that original
siding and roofing materials appeared to be intact and recommended that
the request to demolish be denied.
Mr. Worthen made a motion to defer the request for six (6) months in order
to work toward an agreeable solution to the demolition. Mr. Strauss
seconded the motion which passed by a vote of three (3) for, none (0)
against and two (2) absent.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 4:40 P.M.
WMD/ s e
QUAPAW QUARTER ASSOCIATION
of historic Tittle Rock
October 30, 1984
Mr. Mike Dooley
Office of Comprehensive Planning
City Hall
Markham at Broadway
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Dear Mike:
At its monthly meeting last night, the Board of
Directors of the Quapaw Quarter Association voted to oppose
the demolition of the Colonial Revival cottage at 1004 Rock
Street. (Bill Kennedy, a QQA board member who also serves
on the Historic District Commission, abstained from the
vote. Otherwise, it was a unanimous decision.) It is the
board's belief, and mine, that the issuance of a certificate
of appropriateness for the proposed demolition would set a
very bad precedent for future decisions. Particularly
because of the 'Youth" of the Historic District Commission,
the setting of precedents must be taken very seriously.
As you know, the owner of 1004 Rock contends that
the cottage is in such poor condition that it must be
demolished (and, besides, he wants to plant a vegetable
garden in its place). Contending that a building is "too
far gone to save is probably the oldest and most -used
excuse for demolition. In the case of 1004 Rock, the excuse may
be valid from the standpoint of the present owner. It is
entirely possible, however, that the cottage could be sold to
someone else who would be willing and able to restore it.
Another possibility that has been proposed to the present
owner is that a group of investors might lease the property
and renovate the cottage utilizing the 25% investment
tax credit available to historic buildings. In this manner,
the present owner would not have to sell the property, and,
at the end of the lease, he or his heirs would have a
renovated building that would be worth considerably more
than a vacant lot.
1321 South Scott a P.O. Box 1104 a Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 9 501-371-0075
Mike Dooley
10/30/84
Page 2
There almost certainlv are alternatives to the
demolition of 1004 Rock Street if additional time and effort
can be given to working with the present owner. Hopefully,
he can be made to understand that the issue is not just
whether or not he should have a vegetable garden but whether
or not the City of Little Rock should be deprived of another
historic building. On behalf of the QQA board, I encourage
the Historic District Commission to deny the certificate
of appropriateness that would allow the demolition of
1004 Rock. Once the certificate is denied, I hope the
Historic District Commission will join forces with the QQA
and residents of the MacArthur Park Historic District in
working with the owner of the cottage to find a way of
renovating it. •
cc: Wilson Stiles.
A"..
Sincerely,
Chery Griff th Nichols
Execu ive Di ector
ARKANSAS
HISTORIC
PRESERVATION
November 5, 1984 PROGRAM
Mr. Mike Dooley
Office of Comprehensive Planning
City Hall
Markham at Broadway
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: Certificate of Appropriateness
1004 Rock Street
Dear Mr. Dooley:
Thank you for providing the Arkansas Historic Preservation
Program (AHPP) with the opportunity to comment on the application
for a certificate of appropriateness for the demolition of the
structure at 1004 Rock Street.
The scale, form and setback of this circa 1906 Colonial revival
structure is very typical for the MacArthur Park Historic
District. Another important feature of this structure is that
the original siding and roofing material are still intact. If
this structure were to be removed the resulting empty lot would
create a spacing pattern and densit;r that never existed in this
area. We feel that the setbacks, density, scale and form of
individual structures within the MacArthur Park Historic District
are very important in defining the overall setting and historic
character of the district. It is for these reasons that the AHPP
recommends that a certificate of appropriateness not be issued
for the demolition of the structure at 1004 Pock Street.
If you have any questions regarding our recommendation please
contact Bill Hall of my staff at 371-2763.
Sincerely, t
i
Wilson Stiles
State Historic Preservation Officer
\ WS!ss
cc: Ms. Cheryl Nichols
Suite 200 • Heritage Center • 225 East Markham • Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 • Phone (501) 371-2763
A Division of the Department of Arkansas Natural and Cultural Heritage
�f •y
Apt,
MINUTES
LITTLE ROCK HISTORIC DISTRICT
PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 12, 1995
5:00 P.M.
COMMISSION
The meeting was called to order at 5:05 by vice Chairman Carl
Menyhart. A quorum was present - Carl Menyhart, Julie Wiedower,
and Tommy Jameson. John Bush and Bob Roddey were absent. City
Attorney Anthony Black was present.
Item #1 - Applicant:
Address:
Request:
City of Little Rock
Jack Patton, Agent
1006-8 Rock Street
Demolition
Codes Division -
Acting Chairman Carl Menyhart announced Item #1. Mr. Jack Patton,
Senior Code Enforcement Officer for District I of the City of
Little Rock, presented the application. Mr. Patton explained that
1006-8 Rock Street had been declared "unsafe." He said the
structure was not secure, the structure was sound but has numerous
problems such as obsolete wiring, plumbing, etc. He stated that
the structure is in a state of disrepair with some structural
problems on the north side.
Commissioner Menyhart asked why the house had been inspected.
Mr. Patton responded that it was from a complaint. The Code
Enforcement recommendation, from the inspection, was to initiate
repairs or demolish the structure.
Commissioner Wiedower asked Mr. Patton if the City could secure the
property and place a lien on it. Mr. Patton responded that the
City no longer can "board and secure."
Mr. Charles Marratt, representing Mr. and Mrs. Hoy of 1010 Rock,
was present and said that he had complained to the City about
1006-8 Rock Street. Mr. Marratt commented that he thought it was
not economically feasible to save this house, and his estimate to
make the house livable was $90,000 to $170,000. He also commented
that this house was a threat to the Baer House next door.
Mr. David Henry was present to represent Mr. Hoy.
A discussion regarding the structure's condition followed.
Commissioner Jameson made a motion to deny demolition of the house
at 1006 Rock Street. Commissioner Wiedower seconded. The vote was
taken. Motion carried. All ayes.
1
Commissioner Jameson made a motion to recommend to the City Manager
to board and secure the house and that a lien to cover the cost be
placed on the property. Commissioner Wiedower seconded. The vote
was taken. Motion carried. All ayes.
Mr. Jim McKenzie was present, representing the Quapaw Quarter
Association. Mr. McKenzie stated that the City needs to do
something stronger than minimum maintenance standards. He
suggested that the City provide a revolving fund for historic
resources.
Item #2 - Applicant: Mrs. L. M. Richards
Address: 1107 Cumberland
Request: Window alteration
Mr. and Mrs. Richard were present and explained their application.
They have owned the property at 1107 Cumberland since 1976 and
never realized the structure is located in a historic district.
The owners want to replace the wooden rotted windows with aluminum.
AT this point, the downstairs windows on the front and south side
have been replaced. A new arched window over the entrance has been
installed.
A lengthy discussion followed.
Mrs. Richard amended her application to encompass restoring the
front facade back to the original, rehabilitating the original
windows on the front facade and replacing the windows only on the
sides and back with new aluminum windows.
Commissioner Jameson made a motion to approve the application with
the condition that the arched window on the second floor be
replaced with the original six over one window, and that the bottom
right apartment have its original windows replaced with salvaged
original windows, and the remaining windows on the back and sides
can be aluminum. Commissioner Wiedower seconded. The vote was
taken. Motion carried. All ayes.
The next item on the agenda was The Capitol Avenue Streetscape plan
presented by Mark Webre of the Parks and Recreation Department.
Mr. Webre said that Capitol Avenue was identified as a very
significant boulevard, and in 1987 the City Beautiful Commission
was very involved in getting bond money approved for the project.
The task now is to implement a 1 1/2 block prototype for the entire
20 block project. The plan involves lighting, signage, sidewalks
and plantings. The trees will be Kings Choice Elms which were
developed in 1988 and are resistant to Dutch Elm disease.
Commissioner Wiedower made a motion to approve the Capitol Avenue
Streetscape Plan. Commissioner Jameson seconded. The vote was
taken. Motion carried. All ayes.
F
Mr. Webre commented that the large crepe myrtles in front of Curran
Hall would be transplanted.
The next item of business was discussion of CLG projects. The
Commission agreed to meet the following Friday to discuss projects.
There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting
adjourned.
3
MINUTES
LITTLE ROCK HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING
NOVEMBER 3, 1994
5:00 P.M.
The Meeting was called to order at 5:00 by Chairman John Bush. A
cruorum was present - Mr. Carl Menyhart, Ms. Julie Wiedower,
Mr. John Bush, Mr. Tommy Jameson and Mr. Bob Roddey. Assistant
City Attorney Anthony Black was present.
The Chairman asked for a motion
previous meetings. A motion was
approve the minutes as received.
Motion carried. All ayes.
Item No. 1 - Owner: Mrs. Virdie
Location: 1006-8 Rock
Request: Demolitions
to approve the minutes of the
made by Commissioner Menyhart to
Commissioner Wiedower seconded.
Herbert
Street
The Chairman announced Item No. 1 and asked the owner/applicant to
come forward and address the Commission. The owner/applicant was
not present. The Chairman stated that the petitioner needs to be
present in order for the Commission to consider this item.
Mr. David Henry, attorney for Mr. and Mrs. Pat Hoy of 1010 Rock,
was present and stated he wanted the application discussed.
Mr. Charles Marratt, area property owner, was present and stated
concern about the poor condition of the 1006 Rock Street structure.
City Attorney Anthony Black informed the Commission that
procedurally this application could not be heard.
Commissioner Wiedower made a motion to defer the application until
the December meeting. Commissioner Menyhart seconded. Motion
carried. All ayes.
Chairman Bush announced presentation of the upcoming National
Register nomination for The Luxor, The Main and The Barlow
Apartments. Ms. Sandra Taylor -Smith made a brief presentation to
the Commission.
Commissioner Wiedower made a motion to recommend approval of the
National Register nomination. Commissioner Menyhart seconded.
Motion carried. All ayes.
There being no further business before the Commission, meeting
adjourned.