HomeMy WebLinkAboutHDC2013-025 Arkansas Architectural Resources Form, Proposal Existing Land Use And Zoning, Master Street Plan, Bicycle Plan, Parks, Analysis, Staff Recommendations, Planning Comission Action,ARKANSAS ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FORM
ARKANSAS r
HISTORIC 1, Resource Number; 1
PRESERVATION f�
PROGRAM 2. Survey Number:
3. District Name:
4. Contributing/Non-Contributing: LLJ
ABOVE FOR AHPP USE ONLY
_^ 5. Date Recorded: Lo� 1 ��
GENERAL DATA 6. Recorded By: 1 i
lfl�ljl111_J
7. Historic Narrie: i 1154
b
8. Alternate Name:
9, Quad Map: L
10. Geographic Location: S T C)116) R
11. UTM Coordinates: Z E 1 N L `i i�91
12. Town/Nearest Community: I ref? [-I V I I jGi tom`
13. Street Address/Directions to Resource: r I
Zip
14. Street Nome: � eA U
15.Owner: 0 RO IN61TOA1
16. Owner Address: 1 311191 I91 1G1U-V%1LLAVrD1 I i Li Zip 11OZ10114
17. Owner Phone Number: (51011 ) - �"1S
18. informant Name & Phone Number: POILIA19r,111 JUDIS S
l 't V - 161117
DESCRIPTIVE DATA
19. UselOriginai: Other:
20. Use/Present.- 101110 I Other:
0101-Single Family Dwelling 0 1 02-Multi-Family Dwelling 0301-General Retail Store
0308-Sank 0401-Church 0601-School 9800-Structure Aban/Unocc. 9900-Other
March 2001
°-Lt7 °- g
21. Setting: IJf Other:
1-Rural, Undisturbed 2-Rural, Built -Up 3-Urban Encroachment 4-Smalf Town 5-Urban
9-Other
22.Threats to Property: LU Other:
1-NonelPrrperty Stable 2-NeglecbVeterforalion 5-Private Development
7-Urban Encroachment 9-0fher
23, Total Number of Site Features:
(e.g. concrete walis, ponds, statuary)
24. Total Number of Ancillary Structures:
(e.g, outbuildings, etc.)
25, Style Influence: Primary: 01
01-Plain/Traditional 04-Greek Revival
15-Craftsman 19-Art Moderne
21-Standard Commercial 19"' Century
26. Plan: Lill
01-One Roonf/single-pen
07-Rertangular 08•Square
Secondary: 11151 Other:
05-ttalianate 09-Queen AnnelEastlake 10-Classical Revival
24-Fnrglish Revival 25-Colonial Revival 26-American Foursquare
22-Standard Commercial 20`4 Century 18-Art Deco 99-0ther
Other:
03-Double-pen 04-Dogtrot 05-Single Pile wlCentral Hall
09-Irregular 11-T-shaped 12-L-shaped 99-0ther
27, Height (Stories): 10111 Other:
01-Orre 02-0ne & One -Half 03-Two 04-Tyro & One -Half 99-0ther
28. Basement/Cellar:Other:
1-Full 2-Partial 3-No COO] 8-Unknov✓n 9-01her
29. Wings and/or Projections: A� B _ C _ Other:
01-Rear Shed 02-Rear L 03-Rear T 04•-Sidee 05-Prow 08-Bay Projection 99-0ther
30. Construction: A n1k S L_LI Other:
01-Log 06-Frame 07-Box 08-Brick 09-Stone 12-Reinforced Concrete 99-0ther
31. Wall MateriallOriginal: A [Qu
32. Wall Material/Present: A [011-1
01-Log 02-Weatherboard
10-Stucco 12-Gut Stone
B I I I Other:
B I I Other:
03-Novelty Siding 04-BoardlBatten 05-Bfck 09-Synthetic Siding
13-Field Stone 14-Asbestos 97-Unknown 99-Other
33, Roof Type(s): A [C�U B I I J C L__] Other:
01-Gable 02-Gable w!Parapet 03-Clipped Cable 04-Gable on Hip 06-Hip
07-Pyramid 08-Gambrel 12-Flat 13-Flat wlParapet 99-Other
34. Roof Features (if present)_ A I0I() B Other: _
01-Dormerfsj 02-Steeple 03-Cupola 04-Cresting
08-Belfry 99-Other
05-Clock Tower 07-TowerlTurret
35. Roof Materials: A LC� , B L_L.1 Other:
01-Wood 02-Composition Shingle 03-Metal 05-Tire 06-TarBuilt•up 99-01her
36, Chimney Placement: A U B" C L_j D U Other:
f-Exterior Fnd 2-Interior End 3-Other Exterior 4-interior Central 5-0ther Inferior 9-Other
37. Chimney Material:
1-Brick
Au Bu CL_j D1' 1Other:
4-Cut Stone 5-Field Stone 6-Mete] 7 -Other
38. Foundation Type: A I Other:
1-Continuous 2-Piers
9-Other
August 3, 2006
ITEM NO.: H FILE NO.: LU06-02-01
Name: Land Use Plan Amendment - Rodney Parham Planning District
Location: 100 Santa Fe Trail
Request: Single Family to Suburban Office
Source: Paul Atkins for Robert & Mary Atkins
PROPOSAL 1 REQUEST:
Land Use Plan amendment in the Rodney Parham Planning District from Single
Family to Suburban Office. Suburban Office represents low intensity
development of office or office parks in close proximity to lower density
residential areas to assure compatibility. The proposal is to convert an existing
house to a professional office use — Insurance Agency.
EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING:
The property is a single-family home currently zoned R2, Single Family and is
0.16 acres t in size. The properties to the north, south and east are zoned R2,
Single Family and have houses on them. The property to the west is zoned
Planned Office District and then 03, General Office. There are existing office
uses on both of these tracts. Generally to the north and south are single-family
neighborhoods, with R2 Single Family zoning. Along Markham to the west are a
mix of office uses with a few commercial and public (churches) uses. The zoning
pattern is generally 03 General Office. At Markham and John Barrow Road
there is C3 General Commercial zoning with an existing shopping center. This is
a developed part of Little Rock, with established residential and non-residential
areas.
FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND RECENT AMENDMENTS:
On December 12, 2000, several changes were made to the Land Use Plan to
more accurately reflect the existing and likely future development of the area.
One change was to the west on Markham from Suburban Office to Public
Institutional; one was south of the site from Single Family to Public Institutional;
one was east of the site from Single Family to Commercial and the last was
southeast of the site from Single Family and Multifamily to Low Density
Residential. All these changes surround the application area along Markham.
On May 6, 2003, a change was made from Single Family and Low Density
Residential to Multifamily Low Density Residential and Public Institutional. These
changes were made to more accurately reflect the current and likely future
39. Foundation Material: A Other:
1-Wood Block 2-Stone 3-Brick 4-Gast Concrete 5-Concrete dock 9-0ther
40. Porch Type(s): A 12a1 B L[5j C "! Other:
01-Full, Front 02-Three-quarter; Front 03-One-Bay, Central Front
06-Awning 07-One-Half, Front 08-Recessed, Front 09-Side
05-Wrap-around
10-Full, Rear 99-Other
41. Porch Height (Stories): A I 11 B Ij I C I Other:
1-0ne 2-0ne & One -Half 3-Two 4-Two & One -Half 9-Other
42. Porch Roof Type(s): A � B + C U Other:
1-Gable 2-Hip 3-Flat 4-Shed 5-Clipped Gable 9.01her
43. Parch Detail(s): A QLBJ B 1010! C L.L_J Other:- _
01-Chamfered Posts 02-Tamed Posts 03-Columns 04-Balustrade 05-Wood Omamen!
06-Lattice 06-Columns on Piers 11-Posts 13-Screened-in 99-Other
44. Window Type( s): A jj la C U Other:
1-Double-hung 2-Triple-hung 3-Casement 4-Stationary 9-Other
45. Light/Pane Arrangement: A R W / I () 11-1 B 10 11 1 L�J C y_ I I 1 1 1 1
46. Condition:
1-Excellent
47. Architectural Comments
HISTORIC DATA:
48. Architect::
49. Builder:
50. Construction Date:
51. Historic Context:
2-Good 3-Fair 4-Deteriorated 5-Ruin
j s 6 6_ Sirq f I t2 1Vl rdd a W
nnlrdA kds fle6 4karl
101r) IK1"10 loin 1 1 I 1 11. 1 I I I I I I I I i i I I �
IOIA14_l
(� C-circa D-date' Other:
JhMbkJ►1
52. Please rate the level of significance of this property compared to others within survey area:
1-Very Significant 2-Moderately Significant 3-Significant Within a Group Context
4-Marginal 5-Non-Significant
53. Are any significant archeological features located on the property? � -0,0N 1LiDW H
i --
54. Ethnic Heritage: A � B Lj__j Other:
01-Asian 02-African American 03-European 04-Hispanic 05-Native American 09-Other
55. NR Eligibility:
1-Eligible
56. Destroyed:
BELOW FOR AHPP USE ONLY
3-Listed 4-Delisted 5-Arkansas Register 6-Eligible in a District
(Y or N) Date: I I 1 1,
August 3, 2006
ITEM NO.: H (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU06-02-01
development of the areas along Mara Lynn Road over a mile to the north west of
the site.
The Land Use Plan shows Single Family use to the north and east. The Plan
shows Public Institutional to the south. Suburban Office is shown to the west of
the site. A large area of Single Family is to the northeast and northwest, as well
as to the south. To the west are Suburban Office use areas along Markham, with
a couple of Public Institutional use interspersed. A large Commercial area is
shown at the southwest corner of Markham and John Barrow Road to the east.
MASTER STREET PLAN:
Markham is shown as a Minor Arterial, with Santa Fe Trail a Local Street on the
plan. A Minor Arterial is designed to provide connections to and through the
urban area, with a primary function to move traffic not provide access to adjacent
properties. A Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties; movement
of vehicles is a secondary function. There are no plans at this time to make
further street improvements to either roadway. As a result of this application
additional right-of-way or widening may be requested.
BICYCLE PLAN:
There are no Bike routes shown on the City Master Bike Plan adjacent to the
area under review. The closest routes are proposed to be along Rock Creek to
the south and Brushy Flat Creek to the east.
PARKS:
The Little Rock Parks and Recreation Master Plan indicates there is a deficient
area on the south of Markham. However there is an existing public or private
recreation or open space within 8-blocks of this site as recommended by the
Plan.
HISTORIC DISTRICTS:
There are no city recognized historic districts that would be affected by this
amendment.
CITY RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLAN:
The site is within the area covered by the West Markham Neighborhoods Plan.
The Plan does not address the issue of converting a single-family house to
non-residential. However it does call to "Limit expansion of non-residential
development to areas shown as non-residential on the Future Land Use Plan as
well as limiting businesses to areas zoned for non-residential activity." The Plan
2
August 3, 2006
ITEM NO.: H (Cont.
FILE NO.: LU06-02-01
also recommends repair and replacement of sidewalks along Arterials
(Markham).
ANALYSIS:
The site under review is at the northwest corner of Santa Fe and Markham. The
general area is single family homes with offices/institutional uses to the west.
This is a developed area of Little Rock with any proposals for the area likely to be
redevelopment proposals. The structures in the area appear to be in good
condition and occupied. This is true for both the residential and non-residential
uses in the area. To the east along Markham, the City has opposed the
conversion of single-family homes to non-residential uses.
To the south and north of Markham are single-family subdivisions, which are fully
developed with homes. To the west are both small offices and large office
buildings. This development pattern starts at this site and continues west to
1-430 for a half mile. There are a couple of churches and one retail center also
located in this corridor. To the east is all Single Family until you get to the
southwest corner of Markham and John Barrow Road where a commercial center
has been located for many years. The tenant mix has changed significantly over
the years but the occupancy rate is high for the center.
Markham is a minor arterial. The function of a minor arterial is to move vehicles
around the city not to provide access to adjacent land. It is important that
developments along Markham be designed to limit access and signage which
might reduce the efficiency of the road to move vehicles. The Planned
Development with this item proposes that the access be from the side street,
Santa Fe Trail.
In a developed area with homes fronting a major street, the City is continually
pressured to allow the conversion of the residential to non-residential uses. The
City policy is not to line major roads with retail or non-residential uses. This is to
discourage some of the negative affects on the street of such uses lining them.
Santa Fe Trail is a local street providing access to Markham for the
neighborhood to the north. This site and the house at the northeast corner front
Markham rather than Santa Fe Trail. It should be noted that there are several
other homes which front Markham further to the east. The City policy does not
recognized that just because a home is on a major street it can no longer be
residential. For that matter there are many homes on Cantrell Road, Markham
and other main roads in Little Rock.
Based on a review of the structures in the area, there does appear to be demand
for office space in the area. There are not a large number of vacant office
structures or space. However the homes in the area are also in good condition
and there does not appear to be a single-family vacancy or abandonment issue
3
August 3, 2006
ITEM NO.: H [Cont.
FILE NO.: LU06-02-01
in this area. Thus there is demand for both uses in the area. The only reason
given to make a change is that the current owners of the property would like to
use it for an office. No one has tried to indicate that there is more demand for
office than residential in the area and thus a change is appropriate.
The impact of a change in use from single family could have a negative impact
on the desirability of the remaining homes. A change would introduce non-
residential traffic on Santa Fe Trail, a residential street currently. Even if the
current structure is used for the new use, the site will change in character with
the addition of parking, signage, activity, and hours of usage. Of even larger
concern is what a change to office might mean for the other homes fronting
Markham to the east. The question becomes if it is okay to change this structure
why not the others and what impact all these changes would have on the
neighborhood.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations: Pen nbrook/Clover
Hill Property Owners Association, Santa Fe Heights and Treasure Hills
Neighborhood Association. Pennbrook/Clover Hill Neighborhood Association,
which covers this site, is opposed to the change.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff believes the change is not appropriate.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(MARCH 30, 2006)
Walter Malone, Planning Staff review the conditions around the site. Current
there appears to be demand for both Single Family and Office use in the vicinity.
Staff is concerned about the implication a change might have on other single-
family properties to the east. Staff can not support the requested change.
Ms. Donna James presented the Planned Office District request and the two
items were heard together. For a complete record of comments see item 22.1.
A motion was made to approve the application as filed. By a vote of 0 for,
10 against the request was denied.
STAFF UPDATE: (July 6, 2006)
The applicant applied the Planning Commission's denial to the Board of
Directors. At the Board level the applicant proposed some changes to the site
plan. The Board determined that the Commission should review the changes
and referred the items back to the commission for your review. There is no
change proposed in the Land Use Plan amendment. Staff remains opposed to
-19
44.
August 3, 2006
ITEM NO.: H(Cont.)FILE NO.: LU06-02-01
the requested change of Suburban Office at the northwest corner of Santa Fe
Trail and Markham.
r' urr,urwrNZ El
41
ri 7 TREASF{ICLa:# A
r L tg> srtz"J3i.6 r.
LZ
vMi3�€o� c��, • ..� � .�, �t"r.=SF�=�nnl�t� ��' � � ' : � ` = g�t�o��v
nq Q, _ �~ p
7P� � r
77 r+� I zr a o
` - Cc 3wvn�;44 LIX
D SO
A
S,
r�7` 1 a��I�'• •3*n gg
erAIFtI�AVi'i+1'a Yl�
ICGTd
y p QS
0
Vicinity Map
9
YFf
���g�trlf ra a' � yefsrt_ : •: : rr �
Plan Amendment
Case: LUO6-02-01
Location: 100 Santa Fe
SF to SO
Ward: 6
PD: 2
CT: 22.05
TRS: T1NR13W3
0 325 650 Feet
• VINSON
J.
PR 1
TREASURE f-IILI_ �'�€:+3i
,.. :fir •.G"' G�tB t,�"1 Lf ks'.� 5'si r'S1 r fd . L -� PO
BROOKS �a. W
;.�
• . � t",° `� _, �,� • � t nor - s '�0 y - 4� � �! q� r,+3:
bi
�rE> PL't-:: z o log
w • ' _ Y:� :� •aRp KR � :�• � i
sa
i
3 v �tg
!.. .1 �� P PIT � ° t W
-w
r• -
®, ;
ITO
v Q
1.
U
� FAIi7T\S 1- ti�a 13
AVEN
re � 1�•� a�
r a .ti e
- -�
KW?FLOVItR'
t `I fF-ifll�
f.� W
:A -ter OVER'
¢si1�.i:=="�
A
Vicinity Map
a
r-W •
Area .
Collin
Case: LU06-02-01
Location: 100 Santa Fe
Ward: 6
PD: 2
CT: 22.05
TRS: T1NR13W3
0 250 500 Feet