Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHDC2011-022 Staff Report 09/12/2011DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT fi I LITTLE ROCK ;r 723 West Markham Street Ar�1� ' HISTORIC %II�� ; "I DISTRICT Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 •'`'� �� i Phone: 501 371-4790 Fax: 501 399-3435 ',+'fi�fiIA;p;, COMMISSION I•A,r . STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. One. DATE: September 12, 2011 APPLICANT: George DeRoeck ADDRESS: 1301 Cumberland COA REQUEST: Iron fence PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION: The subject property is located at 1301 Cumberland. The property's legal description is "Lot 1, Block 48, Original City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas." This house was built in ca. 1885. The 2006 survey form states: "This simple Tudor style structure has arched openings, large dominant chimney and steep roof slopes typical of this style." It is considered a "Contributing Structure" to the MacArthur Park Historic District. This application is for the installation of an iron fence. The fence will be 34-36" tall. It will be installed along the Cumberland Street frontage, the western portion of the 13th Street frontage, and part of the south property line starting at the southwest corner of the property. The existing fence at the northwest corner of the house will be reinstalled along the 13th Street frontage. PREVIOUS ACTIONS ON THIS SITE: ` 4TH, w �• .. - - CAP tt m w m � 9TH - U 107H ` Ar�Ceao 1r7f� . Q' 17 � o Location of Project On September 3, 2008, a COC was approved and issued to Karen Butler Miller Reddig for the painting of the non -masonry portions of the rear structure. It also acknowledged her restoring the two windows on the west fagade of the house that were under enforcement. On September 11, 2008, a COC was approved and issued to Karen Butler Miller Reddig for the painting of the trim on the main house. On May 8, 2006, a COA was issued to Karen Butler Miller Reddig for an amendment to the COA per the letter issued by the City Attorney's office for violations of the previous COA. On February 12, 2004 a COA was issued to Karen Butler Miller Reddig for addition of a secondary structure. The Neighborhood Loan Fund focuses on low and moder- ate income historic neighborhoods in need of revitaliza- tion and stabilization. The fund is used to purchase en- dangered properties which are developed for owner occu- pied affordable housing and to make rehabilitation loans to owners who cannot get conventional financing due to income level and/or the condition of the building and area. Funds are committed on a short-term basis and are "revolved" back into the capital fund when a building is resold or as loans are paid back. Seventy -percent of the contractors used for projects are minority -owned and/or women -owned and reside in the neighborhoods that the Revolving Fund serves. Since 1982, the Neighborhood Loan Fund has invested over $7.4 million in low and moderate income neighborhoods for 460 building restora- tions, including the renovation of 46 previously aban- doned buildings. This has leveraged over $23.75 million in additional fmancing. . Endangered propertie&such as the Woodruff House at 1017E. 8"' Stree In Bloomington, Indiana a non-profit organization, could benefit from a Revolving Fur: Bloomington Restorations Inc., started a revolving fund in program. 1980 with $63,800 in Community Development Block Grant funds through the City of Bloomington. The organi- zation committee then began making loans from the fund to owners of historic buildings. As of 2009, the organiza- tion has made some 37 loans totaling more than one and a quarter million dollars for restoration projects in the city and county. Providence and Bloomington illustrate two approaches to successful Revolving Fund programs and there are many others across the country. The Quapaw Quarter Associa- tion (QQA) is encouraged to start such a program in coor- dination with the city. A Revolving Fund program could benefit the QQA not only through increased visibility and hands-on work in the communit ut Wcould also serve as a source of funding for additional staff and programs as part of overall program management. 87 Citywide Historic Preservation Plan, Little Rock, Arkansas West (front) elevation from 2006 Survel r - A_ I�' Ilk North (side) elevation from 2006 Survey PROPOSAL: The fence will be made of tubular steel. There will be a 2" square steel post every seven feet. The rails are one -inch square tube. The vertical pickets are one-half inch and face welded to the rails. The existing fence, which has one-half inch square pickets, will be modified and places by the 13th Street entrance. The fence will be painted a satin black. i,r . ice` '�;4 I I �'•' Existing fence in front yard to be moved. Sketch of fence to be installed. !r fr .� Lly ? WRITTEN ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION BASED OFF OF INTENT AND GUIDELINES The guideline state on page 66: 3. Fences and Retaining Walls: Iron, wood, stone, or brick fences or walls that are original to the property (at least 50 years old) should be preserved. If missing, they may be reconstructed based on physical or pictorial evidence. Sometimes a low stone or brick wall supports an iron or wooden fence. 0 Goal — Promote Building Rehabilitation By Easing Home Occupation Standards One of the trends occurring across the country is the in- crease in the number of home offices and businesses. This trend is expected to continue in coming decades. Using part of the first floor for an office in a two-story dwelling is becoming frequently common for pre-1960 homes. Houses particularly well suited for such combination resi- dences/home offices will have side by side housing units or separate upstairs and downstairs units. Little Rock's Zoning Ordinance allows for home occupa- tions under certain conditions. These conditions include no more than 49% or 500 square feet of the dwelling to be used for office space, no outside employees, and no traffic generated in greater volume than would normally be ex- pected in a residential neighborhood. Home occupations also need to provide parking off the street. In order to in- crease investment and rehabilitation of Little Rock's older dwellings, these limitations should be amended. The 49% of square footage should be rnaintaineut the limit of 500 square feet should be removed. One employee on the premises should also be allowed. This approach to home offices is becoming increasingly common in recognition of demographic trends and the rise in self employment and outsourcing. Dwellings in Little Rock's historic dis- tricts should have more flexibility in their use as home occupation busi- nesses (129 Thayer Street). Citywide Historic Preservation Plan, Little Rock, Arkansas 88 Fencing material should be appropriate to the style and period of the house. Cast iron fences were common through the Victorian period and should be retained and maintained. Wrought iron and bent wire fences are also historic. Wood picket fences may be located in front, side, or rear yards, generally following property lines. They should be no taller than three feet (36') tall: pickets should be no wider than four inches (4N) and set no farther apart than three inches (3"). The design shall be compatible with and proportionate to the house. Wood board privacy fences should be located in rear yards. They should be no taller than six feet (72'), of flat boards it? a single row (not stockade or shadowbox), and of a design compatible with the structure. The privacy fence should be set back from the front facade of the structure at least halfway between the front and back walls. Chain -link fences may be located only in rear yards, where not readily visible from the street, and should be coated dark green or black. Screening with plant material is recommended. Fences should not have brick, stone, or concreteRu - piers or posts unless based on pictorial or, .: ; = _ k ? physical evidence. Free-standing walls of brick, stone, or concrete are not appropriate. New retaining landscape walls are discouraged in front yards. Certain front yards that are in close proximity to the sidewalk may feature new walls that match the materials of the building and be consistent with historic walls in the neighborhood. Landscaping walls should match the materials of the building and be consistent with historic walls in the neighborhood. ..n Existing fence at front porch The fence that is proposed is different from the fence that is located on the front porch, which is also different from the fence that is to be modified and moved to the side of the structure along 13th Street. (There is a similar fence to the one proposed at the southeast corner of 13th and Scott Streets, although the fence there is more ornate than the one proposed here.) Since this is to be a new fence, it may be appropriate for the fence at the street to be different from the fence at the front porch. In the letter from the applicant dated August 16, 2011, the applicant states that the existing fence will be modified and placed at the end of the proposed fence. The applicant has not stated how that fence will be modified. If the fence materials were to be used to create more linear footage of the new proposed fence, that could be appropriate. Staff does not feel that it is appropriate have three discernable types of fencing on the property. Staff does support the addition of the proposed fence in the locations noted on the submitted plan as shown at the end of this report. Staff does not support additional locations of fences that are not shown in the submitted plans. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS AND REACTION: At the time of distribution, there were no comments regarding this application. 3 IX. GOAL —INCREASE EFFECTIVENESS OF CITY AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS � � ram` Additional`�eighborhood&puch as Broadino � ay choose to approve protectiveal ordinance districts in the future and increase the re- sponsibilities of the HDC (1 S Arch - wood Drive). Historic preservation in Little Rock is promoted and ad- ministered through the efforts of the city's Planning and Development Department, Historic District Commission, and Capitol Zoning District Commission. Organizations such as the Quapaw Quarter Association, Downtown Lit- tle Rock Partnership, and neighborhood associations all play an important role in advocacy for preservation and tourism- promotion. Historic preservation benefits when these government, non-profitjand private entities coordi- nate their efforts and focus on strategies to make their work more efficient. The following actions are recom- mended to increase the effectiveness and profile of his- toric preservation agencies and organizations in the city. Lf Action - Increase the Size and Role of the Historic Dis- trict Commission and Its Operations The Little Rock Historic District Commission undertakes a wide variety of activities on behalf of the community. The HDC members are appointed and serve based on their knowledge of historic preservation and commitment to the city. One of the most important actions of the HDC is the consideration of appropriate rehabilitation and new construction in the city's local ordinance district. The only existing local ordinance district is MacArthur Par, but it is anticipated that additional areas will be desig- nated as historic or conservation districts in the years to come)requiring increased responsibilities for HDC re- view In order to increase the effectiveness of the HDC, it is rec- ommended that the current five -member commission be expanded to seven or nine members. Most cities azra '-� .te_&o*aUy the size of Little Rock have at least seven members on their historic district commissions. This num- ber helps to insure that a quorum will be available at most meetings and also increases the experience and perspec- tive of the commission. The city's historic preservation ordinance should be revised within the next year to reflect this change. 89 Citywide Historic Preservation Plan, Little Rock, Arkansas STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval with the following conditions: 1. Obtaining a building permit. 2. Removal of the existing fence at the northwest corner of the house with the first phase of the fence installation. 3. Gate and gateposts shall be same height as the fence. Gateposts may be larger in width, but not in height to the other posts. COMMISSION ACTION: September 12. 2011 The applicant was offered a deferral since there were five or less commissioners present and the applicant stated that he wanted to hear his item at the meeting. Staff made a brief presentation to the Commission and stated that the Staff recommendation was forthcoming. Dr. George DeRoeck, the applicant, made a short presentation to the commission. He stated that the fence in the application was Victorian, but he stated that he could not find a "Tudor" fence but thought that this fence was suitable. He stated that other fences in the area were more ornate than this one proposed. He wants to improve his property. Commissioner Wiedower clarified where the fence was to be located. Commissioner Randy Ripley asked about the other fence that was to be reused. Dr. DeRoeck stated that it was an office and that he did not live there. He stated that he worked with Accent Iron Works to come up with the design. Commissioner Ripley clarified whether the fence was and stated that code did not dictate that a fence be on the front porch. Commissioner Vanlandingham commented that the fence could be taken down. Dr. DeRoeck said that he had intended to keep the porch railing but add new. Chairman Marshall Peters asked if the south side of the fence was to go back to the wood fence on his property. He stated yes. To clarify for the commission, the proposed fence will start on the south property line at his 6' wood fence, go along south property line to Cumberland Street, along Cumberland Street to the street corner (including a gate), along 13th street to the rear of the house, and then return to the house at the corner as shown on the drawings. Mr. Minyard stated that the Staff Recommendation was to support the fence as filed, in the location as specified in his meeting but not to support the reuse of the fence that is to be removed anywhere on the property along with the gate and post comments in the printed recommendation. Commissioner Ripley questioned the functionality of reusing the fence at the driveway in the rear from a functional and aesthetic standpoint. Dr. DeRoeck amended his application to remove the use of the existing fence and to place it where described in he meeting. No persons spoke in the public comment stage. Commissioner Wiedower made a motion to approve the application as amended by the applicant and Commissioner Ripley seconded the motion. It was approved with a vote of 4 ayes, 1 absent and 2 open positions. 0 The HDC conducts its review of properties using pub- lished and adopted design guidelines. The current guide- lines were revised in 2006 and address rehabilitation and kp new construction in the only existing local ordinanc ie trict, MacArthur Park. Design guidelines are updated peri- odically to clarify the review process, address new materi- als, or to reflect a new approach to a design issue. In 2009, the HDC was conducting an internal review of its policies and revisions to the existing guidelines may be forthcoming. Overall, the current guidelines are consistent with those in use by many other communities across the country and no major revisions are recommended. If additional areas are included as local ordinance dis- tricts, the existing MacArthur Park design guideline man- ual should be revised to serve as guidelines for these areas as well. Rather than create new design guideline manuals for each new overlay district, a more cost effective ap- proach would be to create one set of guidelines to govern all of the city's residential districts. The residential guide- line manual could then be used by the staff and HDC as additional local ordinance districts are approved. This ap- proach is often used in cities such as Little Rock and pro- vides for clear and consistent review and decision mak- ing. Expanding the HDC to seven or nine members also pro- vides the opportunity to streamline the nomination of The MacArthur Park Design Guideline properties to the National Register. As a Certified Local Manual provides recommendations on Government, Little Rock can nominate propert'es directly 'Sign issues such as preserving origi- to the National Register office in Washingtorl�s porches (top) and avoiding porch In order to do this, the HDC enclosures (bottom). must have the proper expertise on the board such as archi- tectural historians and historians who meet federal re- quirements. Expanding the HDC has the potential to add these individuals who could conduct the review of nomi- nations prepared in the city. Citywide Historic Preservation Plan, Little Rock, Arkansas 90 - l.4ECE�V�+D DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND LITTLE ROCK DEVELOPMENT ;�If ri �r, HISTORIC 723 West Markham Street � DISTRICT Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 COMMISSION i"' Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 1 RECEIVED AUG 0 8 20il APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATE 1. Application Date: 'T U ly 100 07,511 2. Date of Public Hearing:_ SeeT. I . A0I.I _ at 5:00 p.m. 3. Address of Property: / 3 0 I U,* Lest n „ 4. Legal Description of Property:_ 4 a j ez /A cof Gldr — or+c r ze 5. Property Owner (Printed Name, Address, Phone, Email): _ a r4 tq. �� F2�-r- tx c c G• a 2 2 L3 aCo,q 6. Owner's Agent: (Printed Name, Address, Phone, Email): 7. Brief Project Description: L,r7 111c %A ,;2 1 Tel- 414,;X .._ SC 7 ?A� C.h 8. Estimated Cost of Improvements: X ,9' O 9. Zoning Classification: Is the proposed change a permitted use? (S�G No 10. Signature of Owner or Agent (The owner will need to authorize any Agent or person representing the owner at the public hearing). NOTE: Should there be changes during construction (design, materials, size, etc.) from the approved COA, applicant shall notify Commission staff and take appropriate actions. Approval by the Commission does not excuse applicant or property from compliance with other applicable codes, ordinances or policies of the city unless stated by the Commission or staff. Responsibility for identifying such codes, ordinances, or policies rests with the applicant, owner, or agent. ............ -....... ........ ----------------------------------------------------------- ------ -------_. ._........ (This section to be completed by staff): Little Rock Historic District Commission Action —.Denied _ Withdrawn _ Approved _ Approved with Conditions __ See Attached Conditions Staff Signature: Date: 40 Revised 7/2009 5 Action — Improve the Knowledge and Expertise of the Re- view Boards Through Regular Training Members of the Historic District Commission and Capitol Zoning Design Review Committee are expected to have certain levels of expertise in architecture and historic preservation. However, new members often need some level of training and orientation as to how these review bodies operate, what kinds of decisions they have typi- cally made in the past and how they generally approach design review requests. Long-term members of these re- view bodies also need regular updates and training in or- der to keep up with new materials for rehabilitation, make their decisions as consistent as possible, and share knowl- edge among members in other communities. The Arkansas Historic Preservation Program (AHPP) pro- vides training for HDC members several times a year. HDC members should make it a priority to take advantage of these training sessions as often as possible. The AHPP annually sponsors the Arkansas Preservation Conference, in conjunction with the Historic Preservation Alliance of Arkansas. In recent years, the state office has also hosted a CAMP (Commission Assistance & Mentoring Program) the day before the state conference Additionally, k-6p spo sors 2-3 trainings per year on me advan ed topics Pent past resources, demolition so p ( by neglect iese are typically geared toward staff, but commissioners are encouraged to attend as well. The City of Little Rock is encouraged to apply for grant funding to send their staff to these quarterly training meetings, and their commissioners to CAMP. l rlian. stl rtlr.=': rr ?r�.ers a. wa Cvaar.•i0y4 The National Alliance of Preservation Commissions supports the work of re- view boards and commissions such as in Little Rock. J1;QRememher Summer Camp? n.e nmenm.G nd 1—IWh+n9, You Mvar IMupht g,Ya Q¢4 �nGd m D+• White LM eounYl¢n ditl W W PCfCvhirh-merry Ao 1"5 �•u. � efD..dH� ir,.„, pgC,y der:4 M r•IebraUan. fJA1J& +Details ; f.kW,.rtr,.DAY rW Yr'w.d.+N ev r.��J.l r�.r.lei.. a1..M• ueNx 1 �d.f.f. wJw N.r.r• { .eiw'-[eW V.i1' A. r. A HALF y11.Wr riy Downleadr: CAMP brochure Post CAMPsltes list The NAPC's CAMP provides extensive training for historic district commis- sion members and their staff. Over the past several years the Arkansas Historic Preser- vation Program has provided grants to members of the 7 e v*-Dr-0 Net Little Rock HDC to travel to the f the National Alliance of Preservation Commissions. This nation-wide organization supports the work of design re- view boards and commissions across t e ,country through an on-line list -serve, newsletters an i-annual eenfef- tee. The city and state should continue to apply for grants and send as many HDC and CZD members to the NAPC conference as possible. r f Citywide Historic Preservation Plan, Little Rock, Arkansas 92 z August 22, 2011 Mr. Brian Minyard Department of Planning and Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. N inyard, Per the application, I am sending a cover letter regarding.changes proposed at 1301 Cumberland Street. Specifically, as I forwarded information to this end, I am anticipating installing a Victorian -style fence approximately 34 inches tall around the property. There is a property approximately 100 yards to the south that has a fence the same size from the 1890's. "There is currently a steel fence butting from the front entrance which was placed to prevent pedestrians from "cutting through" the yard when walking from Cumberland Street to 130 Street requiring pedestrians to walk on the sidewalk. This fence will no longer be necessary and I anticipate having it placed at the hack entrance on 13'" Street at the end of the proposed new fencing. As per the requirements, I have obtained information from residents within 150 feet of the property. In addition, the residents were sent letters regarding the proposed change and I have here to date not received any questions or concerns from the residents. In addition, a letter was sent to the Arkansas Department of Highway and Transportation also informing them of the proposed changes, as two sides of the property are within 150 feet. As per the letter, the fence is to be made of tubular steel. The proposed cost is approximately $5,800 and will be completed in stages, as 1 can afford it. As indicated on the drawing, there will be a gate in place, as well. It is my understanding that the posts will be set in concrete though the concrete will not be visible due to grass around the foundations. At this point, the color is to be dull satin black. There are a couple antique white fences in the neighborhood though the black fence is in keeping with the one closest to my property. The work is to be done by Accent Ironworks of Benton and they are a reputable dealer in this area. If you have other questions, please contact me at the office (501) 376-2205 or on my cell (870) 530-0933. 1 look forward to meeting with you on September 12, 2011 at 5:00 p.m. in the boardroom at City Hall. George NI. De3toeck, Psy.D. GMD/jw Cover Letter 0 Action — Improve Enforcement Provisions in the Historic Districts Little Rock is unusual in that it has two historic districts with two separate review boards for each district. The Capitol Zoning District Commission was created in 1975 by the Arkansas Legislature to protect neighborhoods around the Governor's Mansion and a State Capitol. Both the Mansion and the Col �s require design review for construction projec well as review for pro- posed land uses. The Little R ck Historic District Com- mission was created in 1981 and conducts design review in the local ordinance districts which currently consists of MacArthur Park.�� (/ In the Capitol Zoning District (CZD) property owners are required to get a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) or a Design Review Permit (DR) prior to getting a Building Permit from the City of Little Rock. Property owners are also required to get a Certificate of Compliance (CC) prior to getting a Building Permit from the City. Most ap- plications can be approved on a staff level with only those proposals involving new construction, variances, condi- L'/ional user land uses not allowed by right having to be leviewed and permitted by the CZD Commission itself. operty owners who conduct work without a permit or dedeviate from the provisions of their permit are in violation 1pf the CZD requirements. In those cases, the CZD may W zaquimthe City of Little Rock Code Office to issue a Stop cot Work Order until the violation is resolved; the CZD may list the property in violation and not issue any additional permits on said property or any other property in the dis- trict owned by the owner of the property in violation until said violation is resolved; and/or the CZD may file a law- suit against the property owner if all efforts to resolve the violation go unheeded. This process is potentially expen- sive and time consuming and can result not only in work detrimental to historic buildings as well as deterioration and neglect, but an injurio s reputation to the State Agency (CZ as N. To counter this problerrobe Commission should seek leg- islation that would allow it to have enforcement fines and penalties in keeping with those of Little Rock's HDC. This change is recommended since it would create a uni- form approach to enforcement within both the Capitol Zoning District and local ordinance districts. Strong enforcement measures help pre- vent demolition by neglect and ensur- ing that rehabilitation is completed in accordance with a COA. Citywide Historic Preservation Plan, Little Rock, Arkansas 94 z Center T. August 16, 2011 Brian Minyard Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 RE; Victorian Fence to be installed at 1301 Cumberland Street Dear Mr. Minyard, The drawing notes 2" by 2" stud post tube (large one every 7'). The horizontal bottom tube is 1" by 1". The vertical tube is %" by %" face welded. The other fence is to be modified and placed by the 1.3` 1 Street entrance. If feel free to contact me if you should have other questions. Sincerely, 55� , 4'k'(4 J George PA. Del?oeck Cover Letter continued P,.-1 Box 24638 tittle Rock, AR ; 2221 3 ;& 2 205 Office (w01)37-6-2209"r,x XI S'Vca r 0 ce n ti-' ii.' a t. t, n. et VA Vacant space in downtown historic buildings offers potential for loft apart- ments and condominiums (320-322 S. Main Street). Action — Conduct a Base Survey of Downtown to Identify Preservation Opportunities The city's Planning and Development Office and the Downtown Little Rock Partnership should either inde- pendently or jointly conduct an analysis of downtown to provide base data on historic buildings. This base data should include information on each National Register - listed or —eligible property including current status, devel- opable square footage, available parking and potential for sale or lease by the owner. While some of this informa- tion is currently available, the purpose of this base survey would be to oordinate the data m ket his otoric build - in 'n tdually or collectively? nngg particular blocks. The added financial incentive of the state rehabilitation tax credit will be an extra stimulus for investment in his- toric buildings in the years to eo�nd having base sur- vey data would assist in their market�g4d promotion. A downtown survey would identify properties listed on the Na- tional Register, their condition and available space for reha- bilitation (Federal Reserve Bank, 123 W. Third Street). 95 Citywide Historic Preservation Plan, Little Rock, Arkansas ALLEY DRIVELO r Le I � , N i 7I � 1 , �1 CIO,, p� CUMBERLAND STREET ------ ---------- •i Fencrn Plan Action —Expand Heritage Tourism Opportunities One of Little Rock's achievements in the past decade has been its tourism development. Little Rock has become a "Destination City" with the opening of the Central High School National Historic Site, the Clinton Presidential Center, and the development of the River Market District. There are also numerous historic homes tours available in MacArthur Park and the Governor's Mansion Historic Districts sponsored by the Quapaw Quarter Association. National Historic Trails efforts are also underway to iden- tify sites associated with the Trail of Tear vznVV xCivil War tour of Little Rock is also available. Currently, most heritage tourism opportunities are down- town and in the MacArthur Park and Governor's Mansion Historic Districts. The city's other historic districts should be highlighted and connected by driving and walking L tours in the years to come. Hillcrest, Central High�io the Heights, Dunbar and other neighborhoods possess buildings of notable architectural and historical signifi- cance worthy of inclusion in driving and walking tours. The neighborhoods of Broadmoor and Briarwood also appeal to those with an interest in 1950s architectur rid driving tours should be developed for these areas. Another opportunity for heritage tourism is developing walking and driving tours for the city's historic cemeter- ies. Mount Holly, Oakland, and Calvary cemeteries con- tain exceptional examples of funerary art and monuments of the 19th and early 20th centuries. In addition to their sty- listic and artistic merits, these cemeteries also contain the graves of many of Little Rock's leading citizens. The de- velopment of additional tour materials for these historic sites is highly recommended. `C;Iic `bl���teri« (xx.cz r;,,,,,,ms ti,c (iur;mo,'.i Marsiun H:,wrw Dr>tna Wnt of (;late, soot kiiioric Little Rock flrka+t w-, Uutty".tNkl 11 The QQA has developed excellent walking tours for the Governor's Mansion Historic District including the Mount Holly Cemetery. Calvary Cemetery features many sig- nificant examples of mortuary art and statuary. Citywide Historic Preservation Plan, Little Rock, Arkansas 96 Z o n � � o n � � N � � N O - 5 UQQ CD CD 0 C /1 CD 0 Q t... CID CD n O �, Q: L•� CD 1 U 487,20' \ \ S f I � Illllr \ I O// O 1 ,IIl1 moo= \ I �Illl oao > 1 i I E I Illl I rn pill loll 02 Ill lti. o 11 �� ' 105.02' y � � it I I ' , '� �,1•i f 71 ' � l t ! n ° ,ro and sra % N72 o. N m < g I I � m � � J Z I I "o z Coo O_ cM. o V 3 \\ i rr _ p I 1 2V. 8 1 i I p Qg s'�- v�'�' ,7 zraf 20'-0• zs•� sx 1 12 P.S. Q 9'-0• , OB'-0" m 1 a -1 M. ' ++ram � - -• _ 'gyp- ��, ; e i Wig$---- - ------�-� �a� P'o,v STAGECOACH ROAD �o _ I