HomeMy WebLinkAboutHDC2006-018 Cover Sheet And Email To Brian Minyard From Karen Reddig 05/09/2006Minyard, Brian
From: breddig@baldwinshell.com
To: Minyard, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:11 AM
Subject: Return Receipt (displayed) - HDC minutes of 3/13/06
Your message
To: breddig@baldwinshell.com; Karen.Reddig@alltel.com; Weldon, Debra
Subject: HDC minutes of 3/13/06
Sent: 5/9/2006 9:35 AM
was read on 5/9/2006 10:11 AM.
Minyard, Brian
From:
Weldon, Debra
To:
Minyard, Brian
Sent:
Tuesday, May 09, 2006 9:36 AM
Subject:
Read: HDC minutes of 3/13/06
Your message
To: breddig@baldwinshell.com; 'Karen.Reddig@alltel.com'; Weldon, Debra
Subject: HDC minutes of 3/13/06
Sent: 5/9/2006 9:35 AM
was read on 5/9/2006 9:36 AM.
Minyard, Brian
From: Karen. Reddig@alltel.com
To: Minyard, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 9;37.AM
Subject: Read: HDC minutes of 3/13/06
Your message
To: Karen. Reddig@alltel.com
Subject:
was read on 5/9/2006 9:37 AM.
Page 1 of 1
Minyard, Brian
From: Weldon, Debra
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 7:17 AM
To: Minyard, Brian
Cc: Weldon, Debra
Subject: Staff Report
Brian,
I was not able to download your staff report to my home computer and must provide my recommendations without
a revised document. Here are some brief comments:
The report does not indicate whether this is a contributing structure.
A 2. In the third paragraph, please eliminate the first sentence "This application is the result of an enforcement
action." since the City has not taken any enforcement action yet.
3. 1 would also change the sentence after that to read that "The owner has submitted this application to amend
,/their COA in response to a letter from the City Attorney's Office dated March 6, 2006." (In case it is not the
applicant's wish to amend their COA.)
4. To avoid confusion about jurisdiction, the discussion about the CUP should not be the basis for the HDC's
decision. I would mention that "The presence of a detached accessory dwelling with kitchen and bath facilities will
require approval by the Little Rock Planning Commission." and, set off in parenthesis, explain what the Planning
Commission will consider and that any change in an approved amended COA will come back to the HDC.
5. Under "Previous Actions on This Site," The July 7, 2004 discussion is described as a public hearing, while the
February 12, 2004 meeting is not. Please confirm, but I am thinking that the February 12 meeting was the
advertised public hearing and that notices were not sent out for a July 7 hearing. The purpose of the July 7
discussion was only to approve materials -- as a condition of the already approved COA. This point should also
be made in the point -by -point analysis under Number 3 and Number 4.
6. Also to avoid confusion about jurisdiction of the HDC and Planning Commission or Board of Adjustment,
please make sure that your staff recommendations are based on the HDC guidelines and not on the zoning
regulations. Any recommendation that exceeds the zoning limits could be made subject to approval by the PC or
Bd.Adj.
I should be in the office later this morning, if you have any questions or concerns s about these recommended
changes.
Debra
5/1/2006