HomeMy WebLinkAbout22722 ORDINANCE NO. 22,722
2
3 AN ORDINANCE TO DECLARE IT IMPRACTICAL AND UNFEASIBLE
4 TO BID; TO AUTHORIZE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE FIRM OF
5 WRIGHT, LINDSEY& JENNINGS, LLP, FOR LEGAL WORK IN A CASE
6 THAT QUESTIONS THE PROPRIETY OF MUNICIPAL FRANCHISE
7 FEES; TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY;AND,FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
8
9 WHEREFORE, litigation has been filed against the City, Central Arkansas Water("CAW"), and the
10 Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority("LRWRA",)as to the amount of franchise fees assessed by the
11 City of Little Rock for the use of its right-of-way by CAW and LRWRA; and,
12 WHEREAS,the nature of this litigation required expertise that is not currently possessed by the Office
13 of the City Attorney,and therefore it was necessary to obtain such expertise as quickly as possible in order
14 timely to answer the Complaint in this matter; and,
15 WHEREAS,the law firm of Wright,Lindsey&Jennings,LLP,as set forth in the attached Engagement
16 Agreement,consented to do this work for the City,and meets all of the qualifications needed by the City in
17 this matter.
18 NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY
19 OF LITTLE ROCK,ARKANSAS:
20 Section 1. The Board declares that the time frame to research and respond to the complaint in this
21 particular matter makes it impractical and unfeasible to bid for legal services.
22 Section 2. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of Exhibit A to this Ordinance, an engagement agree-
23 ment with the law firm and particular attorneys, the City Manager may authorize expenditures needed to
24 assist in the named litigation.
25 Section 3. At the time in the future when the City Manager and Finance Director believe it to be
26 necessary a specific Account for the payment of legal fees shall be named.
27 Section 4.This Resolution authorizes the City's execution of Exhibits A-C attached hereto.
28 Section 5. Severabiliry. In the event any title, section, paragraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or
29 word of this ordinance is declared or adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such declaration or
30 adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance, which shall remain in full force and
31 effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional was not originally a part of this
32 ordinance.
33 Section 6.Repealer. All ordinances or resolutions of the City in conflict herewith are hereby repealed
34 to the extent of such conflict.
[Page 1 of 101
1 Section 7. Emergency Clause. The ability to represent the City's legal interest in litigation that deals
2 with the collection of franchise fees for two utilities and to assure that all corporate and municipal
3 considerations are properly presented by the City is essential to the public health, safety, and welfare
4 especially in light of the short time frame between the service of the litigation and the time for a responsive
5 pleading; an emergency is, therefore, declared to exist and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
6 from and after the date of its passage.
7 PASSED: February 3,2026
8 ATTEST: APPROVED:
9
10 AVAA v
11 Allison Segars,City Frank Scott,Jr.,Mayor
12 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
13
14 ke i it.4J i i , •
15 Thomas M. Carpenter,City Atto d y
16 //
17 //
18 //
19 //
20 //
21 //
22 //
23 //
24 //
25 //
26 //
27 //
28 //
29 //
30 //
31 //
32 //
[Page 2 of 10]
EXHIBIT A
Engagement Agreement as to the City
ivrL
WRIGHT LINDSEY JENNINGS
200 West Cap10I Avenue.Su,1e 2300 Lille ROcE.AR 72201.3699 Mar 50'371.3808 FAz 50'376 9442 wp can
Judy Simmons Henry
ATTORNEY
Direct 501 212 1391 I elon7'0>bAI corn
January 9, 2026
Via Email:tcarpenter@littlerock.ttov
Tom Carpenter
Office of the City Attorney
City of Little Rock
500 W.Markham Street
Little Rock,AR 72201
RE: Donald R. Shellabarger,Individually and on the behalf of those similarly
situated us. City of Little Rock,Frank Scott, in his capacity as Mayor of the
City of Little Rock, Central Arkansas Water, Stan Benton in his capacity as
Director of Central Arkansas Water;Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority
(formerly known as Little Rock Wastewater);and Jean Block, in her capacity
as Director of Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority(formerly known as
Litle Rock Wastewater);
Case No.60CV-25- 15780;Circuit Court of Pulaski County,Arkansas
Dear Mr. Carpenter:
This letter will confirm the City of Little Rock's("City")engagement of Wright,
Lindsey&Jennings LLP("WLJ")to represent it in the above-referenced lawsuit
("Shellabarger Case"). The City has been made aware that WLJ also represents co-
defendants Central Arkansas Water("CAW")and Little Rock Water Reclamation
Authority("LRWRA")in other unrelated matters, and the City has waived any
conflict for WLJ to continue to represent those entities in unrelated matters and to
also represent the City in connection with the Shellabarger Case. Likewise, CAW
and LRWRA have agreed to waive or have waive any conflict for WLJ to represent
the City in the Shellabarger Case and other unrelated matters.
On behalf of WLJ,I will serve as the City's prim contact. As the scope of the
representation becomes clearer, I will appropria y staff the engagement with
lawyers and professionals at WLJ. Communicat' ns will be directed to you and to
anyone else to whom you instruct me to keep inf ed. You are authorized by the
3535755.vI
IPage 3 of 101
WRIGHT LINDSEY JENNINGS
January 9, 2026
Page 2
City, after consultation with the City Manager, ayor and/or Board of Directors, to
make substantive decisions and provide WLJ di = ion in connection with the
Shellabarger Case.
The present engagement is limited to the performance of services related to the
defense of the Shellabarger Case. The City may expand the scope of the
representation from time to time,so long as any substantial expansion is agreed to
by WLJ. In the event the scope of our responsibility changes significantly, a new or
amended engagement letter may be required to reflect the agreements or the
changes in the role and responsibilities of WLJ.
This letter will also confirm the fee arrangements of WLJ. WLJ will submit its
billing invoices to you for services rendered and expenses incurred on a monthly
basis at the then hourly rates for each timekeeper. My current hourly rate is
$475.00 per hour. WLJ partner and associate rates will range from approximately
$240.00—$500.00,commensurate with experience, and paralegals current rates are
$165.00 per hour. WLJ's eDiscovery director's rate is$175.00 per hour. All rates
are subject to adjustment at the outset of each new calendar year.
WLJ may make routine disbursements on behalf of the City in connection with this
matter which will be itemized in the invoices. T ese would include expenses paid
by us such as long distance telephone charges,o rnight delivery charges,electronic
research, travel, deposition charges and photoco ying.
Enclosed is a copy of WLJ's Memorandum of Un rstanding("MOU")which
contains general terms that,along with this let , govern the relationship with the
City.
WLJ appreciates the opportunity to represent th City and to work with you in
defending the Shellabarger Case. If,as this mat r proceeds,you have any
questions or concerns,please don't hesitate to co tact me.
Sincerely,
WRIGHT,LINDSEY&JENNINGS LLP
) 01.--i
Judy Simmons Henry
Attachment:Memorandum of Understanding
3535755•v1
[Page 4 of 10]
WRIGHT, LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP
200 West Capitol Avenue,Suite 2300 3333 Pinnacle Hills Parkway,Suite 510
Little Rock,Arkansas 72201-3699 Rogers,Arkansas 72758-8960
(501)371-0808 (479)986-0888
Memorandum of Understanding
We are pleased to have the opportunity to serve you. Experience has shown that our
relationship will be stronger if we start with a mutual understanding about the services we will
provide you and the terms of engagement including the fees and expenses for those services.Unless
a separate engagement letter alters these arrangements,we will assume that these terms are
acceptable to you and that they will also apply to future matters you refer to us.We encourage you
to ask questions about any aspect of these arrangements or our statements including the amount of
our statements. 1
Client.The person or entity that is our client is the person or entity that is identified as
such in our engagement letter.Our client does not include any affiliates of such person or entity.
For example,if you are a corporation or partnership,then,absent another express agreement,we do
not represent any parents,subsidiaries,employees,officers,directors,shareholders,or partners of
the corporation or partnership,or commonly-owned corporations or partnerships.Likewise,if you
are a trade association,we do not represent any members,employees,officers,or directors of the
trade association.
Attorney-Client Relationship.It is our policy that the attorney-client relationship will be
considered terminated upon our completion of the services that you have engaged us to perform.If
you later retain us to perform further or additional services,our attorney-client relationship will be
revived subject to these terms of engagement,as they may be supplemented at that time.
Fees.Our fees are formulated in an effort to assess the value of our services to our clients.
When deciding on our fee or hourly rate,in addition to time required,we may also consider other
factors such as the novelty or complexity of the issues and problems encountered,the extent of the
responsibility involved,the results achieved,the efficiency of our work,the customary fees for
similar legal services,and other factors that will enable us to arrive at a fair fee.In those instances
where the nature of the work demands extraordinarily intinsive efforts of our lawyers and staff,
that factor of the engagement will also be taken into account.
Work Assignments.Where we deem it appropriate,the attorney principally responsible for
your file may assign parts of your work to other attorneys or paralegals under the responsible
attorney's supervision.The responsible lawyer will continue to be responsible for the entire
engagement and will be available to discuss the use of other personnel with you.
Services Rendered and Disbursements on Your Account.Statements will normally be
provided monthly for work done the previous month unless our engagement letter provides
otherwise.Statements may be sent through electronic for t,e-Billing platform,or by physical mail
as agreed to by you.Our statements will identify services ndered as well as disbursements and
other charges and will conform to any agreed billing guide nes.These disbursements and charges
include expenses paid by us on your behalf such as long-di ance telephone charges,special postage,
delivery charges,fax charges,travel,photocopying,and f for the use of providers of special
services such as printers or experts,if needed.In litigated atters,we include payments we must
make for court fees,process servers,court reporters,inves gators,witness fees,and the like.
Sizeable disbursements may be billed directly to you for p ment.We also include as an expense the
use of computerized legal research systems and computeri document and deposition indexing.
Payment.Payment will be due upon receipt of our filling statement or invoice.If we do not
receive comment about the statement within 15 days of th invoice date,we will presume you have
3041363-v1 R•vked 3/4/2025
IPage 5 of 101
seen the invoice and find it acceptable.Payment should be made by check payable to"Wright,
Lindsey&Jennings LLP"or by electronic transfer.You may also pay your invoice or your retainer
deposit by credit card,debit card,or e-check through our additional payment options at
www.wlj.com under the Contact tab. Our firm's Taxpayer Identification Number is 71.0239196.If a
statement has not been paid in full within 90 days of receipt,we reserve the right to cease work on
the engagement in accordance with applicable rules of professional conduct.Accounts over 60 days
old may be subject to a 6%interest charge if not paid within a reasonable period of time.
Possible Representation of Opposing Counsel.Our firm has been retained by
malpractice insurance carriers that insure some Arkansas lawyers.This means that our firm may
have represented,might now be representing,or might in the future represent opposing counsel in
your case.If this occurs,it will not in any way affect the diligence or vigor with which we represent
your interests in the matter or matters on which you have employed our firm.
Termination.You may terminate our representation at any time,with or without cause,by
notifying us.If such termination occurs,we will provide you with a copy of the materials in your file
as required by the applicable rules of professional conduct. Your termination of our services will not
affect your responsibility for payment for legal services rendered and additional charges incurred
before termination and in connection with an orderly transition of the matter.Likewise,we reserve
the right to terminate our representation consistent with applicable rules of professional conduct.
Storage of Files.We retain records relating to professional services that we provide so that
we are better able to assist with your needs and,in some cases,to comply with professional
guidelines.Our file will include documents and other materials furnished by you or on your behalf
in addition to documents and materials that we generate.After the engagement ends,we will store
the significant substantive contents of the file for a minimum of 5 years or a longer period of time
appropriate to the nature of the engagement.Eventually, a will destroy all file contents.
Consequently,if you wish to preserve any documents or other materials when the engagement is
concluded,you should promptly request that our firm transmit them to you upon the conclusion of
the engagement.
Privacy Policy Notice.At Wright,Lindsey&Jennings LLP,we value our clients'privacy
and have protected the confidentiality of the personal information clients have given us for over 100
years.The attorneys at Wright,Lindsey&Jennings LLP a bound by professional standards of
confidentiality found in Rule 1.6 of the Model Rules of Pro ssional Conduct adopted by the
Arkansas Supreme Court.In the course of providing our c' nts advice,we may receive significant
nonpublic personal information from our clients.Such inf mation that we receive from you is held
in confidence,and is not released to people outside the firm,except as agreed to by you,or as
required under an applicable rule or law or under the Model Rules of Professional Conduct.
Corporate Transparency Act.As of January 1, 24,the Corporate Transparency Act
(CTA)requires many entities formed or registered in the United States to report information to the
U.S.Department of Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network(FinCEN).For each
reporting company,this includes detailed information about the company,its beneficial owners,and
for newly formed entities,individuals involved in the formation of the company.Compliance with
the CTA is the responsibility of the reporting companies,and our engagement does not include legal
advice relating to any potential CTA reporting obligations,beneficial ownership analysis,or other
assistance relating to the CTA.For the avoidance of doubt,even if our engagement includes
assistance in connection with(i)forming,registering,licensing,or otherwise qualifying a new legal
entity or(ii)a transaction that may trigger a reporting obligation,we will not be advising in
connection with the CTA or any other similar state or local reporting obligations.Information
regarding the Beneficial Ownership Information reporting requirements can be found
at httpsi/www.fincen.gov/boi.
3041E13-v1 Revised 3/4/2025
!Page 6 of 101
EXHIBIT B
Waiver of Conflict of Interest
Ica
WRIGHT LINDSEY JENNINGS
200 West Capital Avsrws,Suds 2300 Ube Rods,AR 72201-3609 Mar 501 371.0606 Fax 501.376 0442 w1;cc m
Judy Simmons Henry
ATTORNEY
Dina 501.212.1391 11Mnrypsy.co n
January 9, 2026
VIA EMAIL:tcaipenter@littlerock.gou
Tom Carpenter
Office of the City Attorney
City of Little Rock
500 W.Markham Street
Little Rock,AR 72201
Re: Conflict Consent and Waiver
Donald R. Shellabarger,Individually and on the behalf of those similarly
situated vs. City of Little Rock,Frank Scott, in his capacity as Mayor of the
City of Little Rock, Central Arkansas Water, Stan Benton in his capacity as
Director of Central Arkansas Water;Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority
(formerly known as Little Rock Wastewater);and Jean Block, in her capacity
as Director of Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority(formerly known as
Litle Rock Wastewater);
Case No.60CV-25- 15780;Circuit Court of Pulaski County,Arkansas
Dear Mr. Carpenter:
The City of Little Rock(the"City")has by separate letter engaged Wright, Lindsey
&Jennings LLP("WLJ")to represent it in the above-referenced case("Shellabarger
Case")in which the City, Central Arkansas Water("CAW")and Little Rock Water
Reclamation Authority("LRWRA")are named defendants. I have disclosed to the
City,that CAW and LRWRA are current clients of WLJ on a variety of legal issues
and matters,wholly unelated to the Shellabarger Case. The City authorized me to
disclose to CAW and LRWRA that the City has uested WLJ to represent and
defend it in the Shellabarger Case,and those di sures have been made. This
confirms that both CAW and LRWRA have waive or committed to waive in writing
any conflict of interest in WLJ representing and fending the City in the
Shellabarger Case.
WLJ believes the factual and legal issues that ar likely to arise in the Shellabarger
Case are unrelated to the work WLJ attorneys a doing or are likely to do for CAW
35-10017-v1
[Page 7 of 10]
WRIGHT LINDSEY JENNINGS
January 9, 2026
Page 2
and LRWRA. I write also to confirm in writing t t the City likewise has been
informed and waives any conflict for WLJ to rep sent it in the Shellabarger Case
and to continue to represent the CAW and LRW in other unrelated matters.
Under Rule 1.7 of the Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct,WLJ may not be
directly adverse to a current client,even on an unrelated matter,without the
informed consent of each affected client. Although as co-defendants,the interests of
the City, CAW and LRWRA appear to be aligned,there is the potential that the
interests could become adverse. This means that WLJ must explain to the City,
CAW and LRWRA the material risks of,and reasonably available alternatives to
WLJ representing the City in the Shellabarger Case,and that WLJ cannot proceed
with the representation unless all of you consent.
In deciding whether to consent,the City should consider how WLJ's representation
of the City as described above and WLJ's representation of CAW and LRWRA in
other unrelated matters could or might affect the representation of the City in the
Shellabarger Case. The City should also consider that the existing representations
of CAW and LRWRA are wholly unrelated to the Shellabarger Case. Further, CAW
has engaged other counsel to represent it in the Shellabarger Case,and it is my
understanding that LRWRA is in the process of securing other representation as
well.
For these reasons,we do not believe that there is any material risk that WLJ's
commitment and dedication to City's interests will be adversely affected by the
representation of the CAW and LRWRA's in other matters. Any privileged,
sensitive,proprietary,or other confidential information of a nonpublic nature,if
any, acquired by WLJ as a result of representation of City in the Shellabarger Case
will not be shared with CAW or LRWRA unless disclosure is authorized by the City.
Similarly,without their consent,WLJ will not share with the City any such
information regarding CAW or LRWRA acquired by WLJ in the course of
representing them in other matters.
Please review this matter carefully. If the City s any questions,please let me
know. If the City is willing to consent after app • riate review,please ask an
authorized representative of the City to sign this letter in the space provided and
return it to me.
3540017-v1
[Page 8 of 10]
WRIGHT LINDSEY JENNINGS
January 9, 2026
Page 3
Sincerely,
WRIGHT LINDSEY 1&JENNINGS LLP
/'Ii%
Judy Sim ,ons Henry
The City of Little Rock understands the information described above and consents
to WLJ'a representation of the City in the Shellabarger Case and waiver of any
conflict in WLJ's continued representation of CAW and LRWRA in other unrelated
matters.
The City of Little Rock
By:
Printed:
Title:
Date:
35400l;.vI
(Page 9 of 101
EXHIBIT C
Engagement Agreement as to Mayor Scott
r rL
WRIGHT LINDSEY JENNINGS
200 West Caortol Avenue.State 2300 Line Rock,AR 72201-3899 Mato 501 371.0808 Fax 501 376.9442 vdj.cOm
Judy Simmons Henry
ATTORNEY
D rect.501.212.1391 I thenroanti cOm
January 30,2026
Via Email:tcarpenter@littlerock.gov
Tom Carpenter
Office of the City Attorney
City of Little Rock
500 W.Markham Street
Little Rock,AR 72201
RE: Donald R. Shellabarger,Individually and on the behalf of those similarly
situated vs. City of Little Rock,Frank Scott, in his capacity as Mayor of the
City of Little Rock, Central Arkansas Water, Stan Benton in his capacity as
Director of Central Arkansas Water;Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority
(formerly known as Little Rock Wastewater);and Jean Block, in her capacity
as Director of Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority(formerly known as
Litle Rock Wastewater);
Case No.60CV-25- 15780;Circuit Court of Pulaski County,Arkansas
Dear Tom:
This letter expands the engagement of Wright, Lindsey&Jennings LLP("WLJ")as
documented in my letter of January 9,2026. WLJ has been requested and agreed to
include defendant Frank Scott in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Little Rock
(the"City")as a WLJ client in connection with the defense of the above referenced
case. All other terms of my January 9 letter and the Memorandum of
Understanding are affirmed here and remain the same. WLJ appreciates the
opportunity to serve the City and Mayor Scott.
Cordially,
WRIGHT,LINDSEY&JENNINGS LLP
Judy Sim ons Henry
!Page 10 of 10i