The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHDC2013-017 Parcel Details, COA Expiration, From 9/11/2006 Minutes And 10/13/2008. 7/15/2013ARCountyData.com Page 1 of 2 Will.� Data.cam . Links a, PARCEL DETAILS Home h1y_A�r,¢un,J , Basic Information Conrad Us Parcel Number: 34LO200203000 HeID County Name: Pulaski County Ownership Information: DUNCAN INVESTMENTS LLC New Users 902 CUMBERLAND ST About our Service LITTLE ROCK, AR Account Slonuo Mau This Address Test Drive Billing Information f?j: DUNCAN INVESTMENTS LLC 902 CUMBERLAND ST LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 A Sen*9 01 Total Acres: 0.64 Timber Acres: 0.00 1n:nrmatit Sec-Twp-Rng: 2-1N-12 SNE,ms, Inc. Lot/Block: 9-12/25 Subdivision: CITY OF LR L2 Legal Description: CITY OF LR LTS 9-10-11 & 12 EXC 41 SQ FT MOL FOR R/W School District: 001 LRSD - 001 Homestead Parcel?: No Tax Status: Taxable Over 65?: No Land Information Land Divisions: Land Type Quantity Front Width Rear Width Depth I Depth 2 Quarter COMSQFr 27,878 sgft Valuation Information Appraised Assessed Land: 130,750 26,150 Improvements: 213,850 42,770 Total Value: 344,600 68,920 Taxable Value: 68,920 Millage: 0.0701 Estimated Taxes L?l: $4,831.29 Assessment Year: 2012 Sales History Ll Date Price Grantor Grantee Book Page Deed Type 9/30/2011 335,000 GRAVES PROPERTIES LLC DUNCAN INVESTMENTS LLC 201 : 058434 WD(Warranty Deed) 2/1/1999 0 GRAVES TO CITY OF 99 008968 WADS 11/1/1998 229,000 COLUMBUS TO SAME 98 92858 DEED(Deed) Improvement Information Commercial Improvements Commercial Improvement #1 Building Section #: 1 Business Name: GRAVES LITHO SERVICE Location: 902 CUMBERLAND ST LITTLE ROC Total SF: 8,284 Stories: 1 Year Built: 1960 Effective Age: 25 Occupancy: Code Description Class Percent 344 Office Building C-2 100% Additive Items: Description Qty. Paving 2" Asphalt Paving-2" base 12260 Structural Elements: Description Qty. Ceilings Painted Dry Wall X Electrical Average X Log In http://www.arcountydata.com/parcel.asp?County=Pulaski&ParcelID=34L0200203000 7/15/2013 (b) GDR Expirafiorr. A certificate of aggropriateness shall expire if all ermits re uired for constructing or altering structures are not obtained within one 1 ear of the commission's apgroval of the certificate of approgriateness. If all re uired permits are obtained within one 1 year of the commission's approval of the certificate of a ro riateness the certificate of appropriateness shall be valid as long as each permit remains valid. if a building ermit or other permit granted for purposes of constructing or altering structures is not required, a certificate of agpropriateness shall be valid for one ear• and the groiect must be completed within that on year period. A six-month extension of a certificate of a ro riateness may be Cirantod by the commission based on ood cause beyond the control of the agplicant. All apUlications for extension of a certificate of apgrol2riateness must be submitted to the commission at least one 1 month prior to expiration of the certificate of appropriateness. s ARCountyData.com Page 2 of 2 Exterior Walls Brick Veneer X Exterior Walls Non Bearing X Floor Covering Carpet X Floor Structure Slab Grade X Foundation Concrete X Heating and Cooling Warm and Cool Air X Insulation Roof X Interior Finish Dry Wall X Plumbing Lavatory X Plumbing Water Closet X Plumb-ng Water Neater X Roof Cover Tar & Gravel X Roof Structure Steel Joist, Comp X Site Work Preperation X Structural Frame Concrete Block X Building Section #: 2 Business Name: Location: Total SF: 2,352 Stories: 1 Year Built: 1960 Effective Age: 25 Occupancy: Code Description Class Percent 406 Storage Warehouse C-2 100 Structural Elements: Description Qw. Ceilings None X Electrical Average X Exterior Walls Brick Veneer X Exterior Walls Non Bearing X Floor Covering None X Floor Structure Slab Grade X Foundation Concrete X Heating and Cooling Suspended Heaters X Insulation Roof X Interior Finish None X Plumbing Lavatory X Plumbing Water Closet X Plumbing Water Heater X Roof Cover Tar & Gravel X Roof Structure Steel Joist, Comp X Site Work Preperation X Structural Frame Concrete Block X pc 2013 Apprentice InformationSystems, Inc. Privacy Policy I Terms of Use http://www.arcountydata.com/parcel.asp?County=Pulaski&ParcelID=34L0200203000 7/15/2013 Below are excerpts of the minute records of discussion on time limits. From 9-11-06 minutes: The topic of time limits for completion or commencement of COA's were discussed by the Commission. It was decided by the commission to add it to the Staff Recommendations on a case -by -case basis. From 10-13-08 minutes: A discussion ensued on time conditions on COA's, in particular, the vacant lot on Rock Street by Answerfone. Mr. Minyard asked of Ms. Weldon if the time condition ran out, would the applicant have to reappear before the commission before proceeding with work if there was no changes. She stated that the commission would have to give permission t❑ Staff to do that. Chairman Peters asked if a motion could be made to give permission to Staff to do so under dire circumstances. Ms. Weldon asked who determined "dire circumstances"? Chairman Peters said he had enough faith in Staff to do that. Mr. Minyard stated that Staff would be changing the motion if the Staff changed fhe time condition. Ms. Weldon said that she would look into it and was not sure that Staff could do that. Chairman Peters said that some applications needed a time restraint where others did not. Eve Gieringer stated that with the opposition to the house on Rock Street, the neighbors are counting on the time constraint and could feel betrayed by Staff If it was extended without their notification. The applicant should be involved with the time condition and agree to such in the meeting. Commissioner Bob Wood asked that the Commission be consistent in applying time conditions. Ms. Weldon stated that different scales of projects would require different time limits. From 1-12-09 minutes: A discussion was held on the appropriateness of time limits with comments on small, medium, and large projects. It was discussed by the Commission to not have time limits on the Staff Recommendations or listed in the motion. It was discussed that the Commissioners could ask of the applicant, during the hearing, what the timetable was for the item. Page 10 of the report was discussed and the other time limits of other boards and commissions and building permits. Commissioner Wiedower asked that the Commission be friendly and work with the applicants on the time limits. The time limits do not affect the COA - the actual projects look and materials. If a project drags on too long, Staff can put a Stop Work Order on them when their building permit runs out. After further discussion of the differing scales of projects, the Commission decided that the Staff should not list time limits in the staff report and that the Commission should not enforce time limits. The Commission can ask the applicant in the hearing about the timeline. A note can be made to obtain a building permit in the recommendation. From 7-9-12 minutes Statewide responses Original email question: