Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHDC1999-028 Staff Report Minutes 01/06/2000Little Rock Historic District Commission 6 January 2000 Minutes, Page 2 The second COA application for consideration was: Applicant: Art Place, LLC Address: 916 - 924 Commerce Street Request: New fence, signage, landscaping and improved parking Tim Heiple presented the application and gave an overview of the project request; additional plans on the larger scale were available for the discussion and detailing. The organization purchased the land to the west (i.e., the northeast corner of loth and Rock streets) and are expanding the parking to the west. A request to abandon the alley from 1 Oth north to the middle of the block was approved by the city's Board of Directors; the abandonment allows for the expanded parking due west of the apartments and incorporates the abandoned alley. The required landscaping and parking have been approved by the city. Fred Grey, as partner, also presented additional information regarding parking, fencing, etc. The fencing on the apartment's west side will be wood, and there will be iron fencing along the front yard, on the north, east and south sides. The extant alley curb cut (on north side of 1 Oth) will be widened to serve as the driveway for the improved parking area. There was details about the proposed sign on the front, or east, elevation; it will have either a fountain or planter in the center; the lettering duplicates that which is on the building. Staff recommendations were read. Gordon made a motion to approve the request as submitted; it was approved unanimously. The last COA for consideration was: Applicant: City of Little Rock Address: 1422 Rock Request: Demolition of structure Barbara Hyatt, City of Little Rock Code Enforcement Supervisor of Operations, presented an update on the structure and its inclusion on the city's unsafe structures list. The property owner is before the environmental court due to the structure's need to be boarded and secured; the environmental court judge is waiting for the LRHDC's decision before it is presented to his court. Copies of the required structural condition were passed around; staff provided an update of the structure's past requests, deferrals and requested information: costs for rehab, structural condition and assessment and the extent of deterioration; the structure would have to be rebuilt completely. The owner made it known to staff that he will make no further financial investments into the structure. Hyatt explained the city process for demolition of structures damaged by last year's tornado. There was discussion about the application request for a new roof and its condition prior to the tornado. There was a motion by Weems to approve the request for the demolition of 1422 Rock; the vote unanimously approved its demolition. Under Old Business, the previously approved, though non -compliant, COA at 1000 Rock, was discussed. Note: prior to the meeting, the LRIYDC met on site to inspect the structure and its non -compliant windows; the owner's representative was notified prior to the visit but could not be present. Part of the COA request was to install new windows on the front porch's east elevation and replace the inappropriate aluminum windows with wooden, floor -to -ceiling type, emulating those at the Bragg cottage on Scott Street in terms of size and proportion. While it was agreed that the floor -to -ceiling windows do not meet code, Greer stated that in his opinion,