Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEmail To Brian Minyard From Ed Sergeant 07/10/2009Page 1 of 1 Minyard, Brian From: Ed Sergeant [ESergeant@polkstanley.com] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 2:17 PM To: Minyard, Brian Subject: Application for 15th at Rock Street Houses Dear Sirs: Thank you for this opportunity to write to you. I wish to voice my opposition to the design of the houses, per the application submitted for review in July 2009, for the following reasons: 1. According to Chapter 5, paragraph B, "New construction of primary and secondary buildings should maintain, not disrupt, the existing pattern of surrounding historic buildings in the neighborhood." Due to its high modern design, the proposed design is definitely in stark contrast to the surrounding historic houses. 2. Chapter 5, paragraph B.3: "Building Form: Basic building forms and roof shapes, including pitch, which match those used historically in the area should be used. Location and proportions of entrances, windows, divisional bays, and porches are important. Also consider heights (foundation, floor to ceiling, porch height and depth.)" The roof shape is flat and should be sloped. The location and proportion of entrances look more like a commercial building. The divisions of the exterior are not a familiar scale — it is difficult to tell whether this is a one story or 6 story building based on the division by squares (they don not match used historically in the area). 3. This does not appear to be a complete submission? If so, the lack of information does not provide proper review in regard to all requirements and should be resubmitted. I did not obtain the application requirements, but I would think that site plan should include required setbacks, adjacent structures and the elevations should include building materials and heights. 4. It is great to see modern structures in the downtown area but it is not worth sacrificing the importance of the Historic District — infill housing at any cost is not worth the loss in integrity of the District. 5. Such variances should not be allowed. This may set a bad precedence for future structures and variances in the district. The same developer and architecture team have designed and built several other modern homes in the area. This is proof that a modern house may also be designed for the proposed corner which would conform to the Ordinance. 6. The district is not that large — the design of the corner could go a lot of other locations. Can the developer seek another site outside of both MacArthur and CZ? Ed Sergeant 7/10/2009