Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0194-A Staff AnalysisSeptember 15, 1981 A r SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 2 - LA QUINTA "PCD"/SITE PLAN REVIEW 40 r 11111A TT nXI . REQUEST: ENGINEER/ARCHITECT: AREA: 4.434 Acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 Fair Park Boulevard and I-630. To reclassify an area from "O-3" and "R-3" to "PCD" (Planned Commercial District) B.J. Coney 262 South Shackleford Little Rock, AR 72211 Bozeman and Associates 570 Prospect Building Little Rock, AR Phone: 664-2405 ZONING: "0-3 and "R-3" FT. OF NEW STREET: 0 PROPOSED USES: Motels/Offices W .0 September 15, 1981 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 2 - LaQuinta PCD/Site Plan Review PROPOSAL: 1. The construction of three commercial uses on a two block area of 4.34 acres/193,124 square feet. 2. The provision of .97 acres/42,326 square feet (21.92 percent) in total building coverage. 3. Development according to the following scheme: Units Building Type Size Land Coverage A Restaurant 7,222 sq. ft. 7,042 sq. ft. B Motor Inn 11,632 sq. ft. 5,816 sq. ft. C Motor Inn 15,624 sq. ft. 7,812 sq. ft. D Motor Inn 18,144 sq. ft. 9,072 sq. ft. E Office No. 1 12,600 sq. ft. 6,600 sq. ft. F Office No. 2 13,760 sq. ft. 7,360 sq. ft. 4. The provision of open space accordingly: Open space -Landscaped area 38,048 -sq. ft. 19.70 percent -Street, drives and walks 110,650 sq. ft. 57.29 percent -Pool and deck 2,100 sq. ft. 1.0 percent Total open space 150,798 sq. ft. 78.8 percent 5. The provision of a 6' opaque fence and a 15' visual and sound buffer along the entire eastern property line. 6. The provision of a 6' opaque fence for 132' from east to west along the southern property line to screen parking in this area. 7. The provision of extensive landscaping, with many trees and plants that are indigenous to the area. 8. Street and alley closures involving Maryland (9th Street), two blocks of Tyler Street and a 12' alley running north to south through the development. September 15, 1981 40 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 2 - Continued 9. The addition of a traffic lane for the two blocks from loth to I-630 on the east side of Fair Park. 10. The provision of 235 parking spaces, plus four designated for the handicapped. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sites considered according to PUD concept must be 2.0 acres or greater. This plan complies. 2. A minimum of 10 percent of Gross Plan Commercial Mixed Use District, (PCD), areas shall be designated as landscaped open space, not to be used for streets or parking. This plan complies. 3. A detailed landscaping plan must be submitted. The application complies. 4. Conformance to the Oak Forest Neighborhood Plan. The proposal complies to the basic design concept of the neighborhood plan. 5. The provision of 227 parking spaces. _This plan complies. ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Street improvements: (a) Improve Fair Park to one-half of 48' street section/minor arterial standards. (b) Extend turning lane access to I-630 for a total length of not less than 150'. (c) Improve West loth Street to one-half of a 27' residential street. (d) Clarification of proposed use of Tyler Street. 2. Internal drainage study. 'A 1i a September 15, 1981 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 2 - Continued STAFF ANALYSIS No problem was found with the general layout of the proposal; however, there are several concerns. 1. Of major importance is the protection of the immediate residential area. Since this is the first of what is anticipated to be major redevelopment activity in the area, the neighborhood should be shielded from adverse effects through extensive buffering and screening. Therefore, Staff is suggesting that the addition of shrubbery intermingled with the greenery already indicated on the plan. 2. Since drainage has been a neighborhood concern toward the southeast of the development, a detailed drainage study should be done. 3. The Oak Forest Neighborhood Plan recognizes redevelopment in the area, but not extending beyond Tyler Street, so it emphasizes a need for adequate buffering on the east and streetscaping on Fair Park (street lighting, sidewalks, etc.) because of its function as an emtramce to the War �10 Memorial Complex and The Zoo, which are major recreational public facilities. 4. Staff would like to suggest, in light of the current shortage of affordable houses, that some of the existing structures on the two block site be salvaged and relocated instead of demolished. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval, subject to comments by Staff and Engineering. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE ACTION: The applicant was present. The Committee made a motion to approve this item subject to: (1) Further discussion regarding internal drainage problems between City Engineering and applicant. (2) The provision of a vehicle turn -around on 9th Street. (3) Improvement of Fair Park to 1/2 of 48' street/minor arterial standards. qL-11 (4) Improvement of West loth to residential standards. L-1 L19 September 15, 1981 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 2 - Continued (5) Intensive buffering and the addition of shrubbery to shield the surrounding neighborhood. (6) Extensive streetscaping (street lighting, sidewalks, landscaping, etc.), on Fair Park. Staff was instructed to contact the Wastewater Department regarding any possible problem with this development. The motion passed by a vote of 3 aye 0 noes and 1 absent. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant, Mr. Doug Coney, and his representatives, Mr. Ralph Bozeman and Mr. Terry Moore, spoke in behalf of the proposal. Mr. Bozeman gave a brief overview of the project, during which he showed photos of the east side of the development along Tyler Street. Eighteen persons were in opposition. Three petitions opposing the rezoning and the closing of Tyler Street were submitted. Spokespersons for the group were: (1) Mr. Don Potter - representing his mother who resides on Maryland (2) Ms. Leola Phillips - 5320 Maryland (3) Ms. Finnegan - 5312 West Maryland (4) Mr. Joel Ward - 5409 West loth The main objections to the rezoning of the property centered around several issues: an increase in noise levels, lighting and insects, and a disruption of views from homes due to the height of the motel. Objections to the closing of Tyler Street were based on fears of undue hardships on families in the area, especially those on fixed incomes. Several examples sited were: (a) An annual increase in travel by 550 miles; (b) irreparable damage to property values; (c) disruption of the neighborhood, causing mental anguish; and (d) the prevention of ingress and eqress of an attached carport at the rear of the residence at 5320 Maryland Avenue. If the rezoning is approved in spite of the objections raised, the residents are requesting the following modifications: September 15, 1981 4 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 2 - Continued (1) Extension of the proposed fence along West loth to shield 5413 West loth from the development; (2) Provision of a 15' sound/visual buffer along West loth, such as that proposed along the eastern boundary; (3) Use of a taller fence along the east and south sides of the property; and (4) Fence construction to be of wood, so as to blend into the surrounding area. After some discussion, Mr. Bozeman requested that the application be amended to formally include the Tyler Street closure petition in conjunction with the PCD. A motion was made to approve the proposal as indicated, with the exception, from, as was originally filed, that: (1) the issue involving Tyler Street, be contingent upon the applicant's workinq out a satisfactory closure agreement with the adjacent property -owners; if not, they are agreeing to bring it back before the Commission on September 29th, at the Zoning Public Hearing for a decision on whether or not to close the right-of-way in spite of objections or to require adjustments in the plan; and (2) screening on loth Street should be extended further to the west. The motion passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 1 noe and 0 absent.* *(No vote, Commissioner Tabor). SUBDIVISION ITEM NAM LOCATION LCLou NAME: L lf� ! - `�.�1+ , STREET ADDRESS-2 CITY/STATE/ZIP,. TELEPHONE # DATE FILE # 1 'UNk q AREA C. NUMBER OF LOTS FEET NEW STREET ZONING PROPOSED USES PLANNING DISTRICT CENSUS TRACT VAIIIANC-98 REQUESTS*: l') 3,} 4.) OIL ?f /954 14 September 29, 1981 Item No. 12 - LA QUINTA "PCD"/SITE PLAN REVIEW LOCATION: Fair Park Boulevard and I-630. REQUEST: OWNER: ENGINEER/ARCHITECT: AREA: 4.434 Acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. OF NEW STREET: 0 To reclassify an area from 110-3" and "R-3" to "PCD" (Planned Commercial District) B.J. Coney 262 South Shackleford Little Rock, AR 72211 Bozeman and Associates 570 Prospect Building Little Rock, AR Phone: 664-2405 ZONING: "0-3 and "R-3" PROPOSED USES: Motels/Offices A:l vWw September 29, 1981 Item No. 12 - Continued PROPOSAL: 1. The construction of three commercial uses on a two block area of 4.34 acres/193,124 square feet. 2. The provision of .97 acres/42,326 square feet (21.92 percent) in total building coverage. 3. Development according to the following scheme: Units Building Type Size Land Coverage A Restaurant 7,222 sq. ft. 7,042 sq. ft. B Motor Inn 11,632 sq. ft. 5,816 sq. ft. C Motor Inn 15,624 sq. ft. 7,812 sq. ft. D Motor Inn 18,144 sq. ft. 9,072 sq. ft. E Office No. 1 12,600 sq. ft. 6,600 sq. ft. F Office No. 2 13,760 sq. ft. 7,360 sq. ft. 4. The provision of open space accordingly: Open space -Landscaped area 38,048 sq. ft. 19.70 percent -Street, drives and walks 110,650 sq. ft. 57.29 percent -Pool and deck 2,100 sq ft. 1.0 percent Total open space 150,798 sq. ft. 78.8 percent 5. The provision of a 6' opaque fence and a 15' visual and sound buffer along the entire eastern property line. 6. The provision of a 6' opaque fence for 132' from east to west along the southern property line to screen parking in this area. 7. The provision of extensive landscaping, with many trees and plants that are indigenous to the area. 8. Street and alley closures involving Maryland (9th Street), two blocks of Tyler Street and a 12' alley running north to south through the development. On Fair Park, Staff was instructed to contact the Wastewater Department regarding any possible problem with this development. The motion passed by a vote of 3 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. 71 W September 29, 1981 Item No._12 - Continued r 9. The addition of a traffic lane for the two blocks from loth to I-630 on the east side of Fair Park. 10. The provision of 235 parking spaces, plus four designated for the handicapped. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sites considered according to PUD concept must be 2.0 acres or greater. This plan complies. 2. A minimum of 10 percent of Gross Plan Commercial Mixed Use District, (PCD), areas shall be designated as landscaped open space, not to be used for streets or parking. This plan complies. 3. A detailed landscaping plan must be submitted. The application complies. 4. Conformance to the Oak Forest Neighborhood Plan. The proposal complies to the basic design concept of the neighborhood plan. 'to 5. The provision of 227 parking spaces. This plan complies. ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Street improvements: (a) Improve Fair Park to one-half of 48' street section/minor arterial standards. (b) Extend turning lane access to I-630 for a total length of not less than 1501. (c) Improve West loth Street to one-half of a 27' residential street. (d) Clarification of proposed use of Tyler Street. 2. Internal drainage study. lt, .71 September 29, 1981 Item No. 12 - Continued 15r STAFF ANALYSIS No problem was found with the general layout of the proposal; however, there are several concerns. 1. Of major importance is the protection of the immediate residential area. Since this is the first of what is anticipated to be major redevelopment activity in the area, the neighborhood should be shielded from adverse effects through extensive buffering and screening. Therefore, Staff is suggesting that the addition of shrubbery intermingled with the greenery already indicated on the plan. 2. Since drainage has been a neighborhood concern toward the southeast of the development, a detailed drainage study should be done. 3. The Oak Forest Neighborhood Plan recognizes redevelopment in the area, but not extending beyond Tyler Street, so it emphasizes a need for adequate buffering on the east and streetscaping on Fair Park (street lighting, sidewalks, etc.) because of its function as an emtramce to the War Memorial Complex and The Zoo, which are major recreational public facilities. 4. Staff would like to suggest, in light of the current shortage of affordable houses, that some of the existing structures on the two block site be salvaged and relocated instead of demolished. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval, subject to comments by Staff and Engineering. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE ACTION: The applicant was present. The Committee made a motion to approve this item subject to: (1) Further discussion regarding internal drainage problems between City Engineering and applicant. (2) The provision of a vehicle turn -around on 9th Street. (3) Improvement of Fair Park to 1/2 of 48' street/minor arterial standards. (4) Improvement of West loth to residential standards. 41 ,ow- b vo September 29, 1981 Item No. 12 - Continued (5) Intensive buffering and the addition of shrubbery to shield the surrounding neighborhood. (6) Extensive streetscaping (street lighting, sidewalks, landscaping, etc.), on Fair Park. Staff was instructed to contact the Wastewater Department regarding any possible problem with this development. The motion passed by a vote of 3 aye 0 noes and 1 absent. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (Sept. 15, 1981) The applicant, Mr. Doug Coney, and his representatives, Mr. Ralph Bozeman and Mr. Terry Moore, spoke in behalf of the proposal. Mr. Bozeman gave a brief overview of the project, during which he showed photos of the east side of the development along Tyler Street. Eighteen persons were in opposition. Three petitions opposing the rezoning and the closing of Tyler Street were submitted. Spokespersons for the group were: (1) Mr. Don Potter -- representing his mother who resides on Maryland (2) Ms. Leola Phillips - 5320 Maryland (3) Ms. Finnegan -- 5312 West Maryland (4) Mr. Joel Ward -- 5409 West loth The main objections to the rezoning of the property centered around several issues: an increase in noise levels, lighting and insects, and a disruption of views from homes due to the height of the motel. Objections to the closing of Tyler Street were based on fears of undue hardships on families in the area, especially those on fixed incomes. Several examples sited were: (a) An annual increase in travel by 550 miles; (b) irreparable damage to property values; (c) disruption of the neighborhood, causing mental anguish; and (d) the prevention of ingress and egress of an attached carport at the rear of the residence at 5320 Maryland Avenue. If the rezoning is approved in spite of the objections raised, the residents are requesting the following modifications: rI September 29, 1981 Item No. 12 - Continued (1) Extension of the proposed fence along West loth to shield 5413,West loth from the development; (2) Provision of a 15' sound/visual buffer along West loth, such as that proposed along the eastern boundary; ( 3 ) Use of a taller fence along the east and south sides of the property; and (4) Fence construction to be of wood, so as to blend into the surrounding area. After some discussion, Mr. Bozeman requested that the application be amended to formally include the Tyler Street closure petition in conjunction with the PCD. A motion was made to approve the proposal as indicated, with the exception, from, as was originally filed, that: (1) the issue involving Tyler Street, be contingent upon the applicant's working out a satisfactory closure agreement with the adjacent property -owners; if not, they are agreeing to bring it back before the Commission on September 29th, at the Zoning Public Hearing for a decision on whether or not to close the right-of-way in spite of objections or to require adjustments in the plan; and (2) screening on loth Street should be extended further to the west. The motion passed A.) by a vote of 10 ayes, 1 noe and 0 absent.* *(No vote, Commissioner Tabor). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (9-29-81) Mr. Ralph Bozeman, the architect for the project, spoke in behalf of the developer. He introduced an alternate proposal in an effort to provide a solution for the access problem to the Potter residence. The proposal included dedicating a portion of the 20 feet gained after the Tyler Street closure to Mrs. Potter as an easement for ingress and egress. Since no agreement on the Tyler Street issue was reached between the applicant and the resident, a motion to approve the site plan, without including Tyler, was made and approved by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes and 3 absent.* *(Commissioners Wright, Turner and Taylor were not in attendance during this item). 4-