HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0867-NNNNNN Staff AnalysisITEM NO.: 3.
NAME: Chenal Valley Revised Preliminary Plat Phase 25B
LOCATION: located on Vigne Boulevard
Planning Staff Comments:
S-867-NNNNNN
1. Provide notification of abutting property owners of the site, complete with the
certified abstract list, notice form with affidavit executed and proof of mailing. The
notice must be mailed no later than August 30, 2006. The Office of Planning and
Development must receive the proof of notice no later than September 6, 2006.
Variance/Waivers: A variance to allow a reduced side yard setback of five (5) feet for
proposed Lots 15 — 19, 24 — 30 and 33 — 39.
Public Works Conditions:
1 _ A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required
prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and
drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of
construction.
2. If disturbed area is one (1) or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit
from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of
construction.
3. Prepare a letter of pending development addressing streetlights as required by
Section 31-403 of the Little Rock code. Contact Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-
1813 (Steve Philpott) for more information regarding streetlight requirements.
Utilities and Fire Department/County Planning:
Wastewater: Sewer available to this property.
Entergy: No comment received.
Center -Point Energy: No comment received.
AT & T: No comment received.
Central Arkansas Water: Water facilities have been installed but Central Arkansas
Water will not accept the facilities or offer service until a final plat has been approved by
the CLR and has been properly recorded.
Fire Department: Place fire hydrants per code. Gates must maintain a minimum
opening of 20-feet. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department at 918-3700 for additional
information.
Item # 3
County Planning: No comment.
CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route.
Planninq Division: No comment.
Landscape: No comment.
Revised-plat/plan. Submit four (4) copies of a revised preliminary plat (to include the
additional information as noted above) to staff on Wednesday, August 30, 2006.
Item # 3
September 14, 2006
ITEM NO.: 3,
NAME: Chenal Valley Revised Preliminary Plat Phase 25
LOCATION: located on Vigne Boulevard
Chenal Properties
#7 Valley Club Circle
Little Rock, AR 72211
ENGINEER:
White-Daters and Associates
#24 Rahling Circle
Little Rock, AR 72223
S-867-N N N N N N
AREA: 32.54 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 79 FT. NEW STREET: 4,300
CURRENT ZONING: R-2, Single-family
PLANNING DISTRICT: 19 — Chenal Planning District
CENSUS TRACT: 42.11
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:
1. A variance to allow a five (5) foot side yard setback for Lots 13 — 19, 24 —30 and 33
— 39, Block 83 of the Chenal Valley Phase 25.
BACKGROUND:
On June 22, 2001, a preliminary plat was approved for the proposed subdivision. On
October 7, 2004, the applicant proposed to replat the existing lots to allow a reduced
platted building line on a portion of the lots. The applicant indicated a fifteen (15) foot
platted building line for Lots 11 — 12 and 61 — 62 Block 83 of the Chenal Valley Phase
25 Subdivision. The applicant indicated a twenty (20) foot building line for Lots 22 — 23,
32, 38 — 43, 55 - 56, 64 and 67 — 72 Block 83 of the Chenal Valley Phase 25
Subdivision and the applicant requested a reduced rear yard setback of fifteen feet for
Lots 53 — 79 Block 83 of the Chenal Valley Phase 25 Subdivision.
The development was proposed as a gated community with private streets. There were
seventy-nine (79) lots proposed and the site contained 32.54 acres. The applicant
indicated the average lot size as 75-feet by 130-feet or 9,750 square feet. The
proposed density was 2.42 units per acre.
September 14, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 3 (CONT) S-867-NNNNNN
Three phases were proposed with Lots 1 — 12, 20 — 23, 31 — 32 and 40 — 79 in the first
phase. Lots 13 — 19 in the second phase and Lots 24 — 30 and 33 — 39 in the final
phase.
The area abutting Chenal Parkway was indicated as a dedicated tract to be preserved
as open space. The applicant indicated a no vehicular access easement through the
proposed tract.
On March 3, 2005, the Little Rock Planning Commission approved a revision to the
preliminary plat request to allow for five-foot side yard setbacks within the proposed
subdivision. The developer of the project requested a variance to allow a five-foot side
yard setback for Lots 2 — 12, 20 — 23, 31 — 32 and 40 — 79, Block 83 of the Chenal
Valley Phase 25 Subdivision.
A. PROPOSAUREQUEST:
The applicant is now proposing to revise the previously approved preliminary plat
to allow reduced side yard setbacks (5-feet) on the remaining lots within the
subdivision. The variance request includes Lots 13 — 19, 24 —30 and 33 — 39,
Block 83 of the Chenal Valley Phase 25.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site was final platted in July 2004, and construction of new homes has
begun. The Chenal Valley Country Club is located to the west of the site with the
tennis courts being located near the proposed residential lots. The area abutting
Chenal Parkway has been indicated as a dedicated tract to be preserved as
open space. To the south of the site, is a single-family subdivision (the Oaks at
Chenal), which has developed with reduced front, side and rear yard setbacks.
Chenal Parkway, a four -lane median divided roadway, is located to the east of
the site.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from area residents. The
abutting property owners along with the Bayonne Place Property Owners
Association, the Duquesne Place Property Owners Association and the
Margeaux Property Owners Association were notified of the public hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
Public Works:
1. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be
required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site
2
September 14, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 3 (CONT) S-867-NNNNNN
grading, and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to
the start of construction.
2. If disturbed area is one (1) or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water
permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the
start of construction.
3. Prepare a letter of pending development addressing streetlights as required
by Section 31-403 of the Little Rock code. Contact Traffic Engineering at
(501) 379-1813 (Steve Philpott) for more information regarding streetlight
requirements.
E.
r
G
UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer available to this property.
Entergy: No comment received.
Center -Point Energy: No comment received.
AT & T: No comment received.
Central Arkansas Water: Water facilities have been installed but Central
Arkansas Water will not accept the facilities or offer service until a final plat has
been approved by the City of Little Rock and has been properly recorded.
Fire Department: Place fire hydrants per code. Gates must maintain a
minimum opening of 20-feet. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department at 918-
3700 for additional information.
County Planning: No comment.
CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route.
ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division: No comment.
Landscape: No comment.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:
(August 24, 2006)
The applicant was present representing the request. Staff presented the item
indicating there were few technical issues associated with the request. Staff
stated a previous approval allowed for reduced side yard setbacks on a number
3
September 14, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 3(CONT) FILE NO.: S-867-NNNNNN
of lots within the proposed subdivision. Staff stated the current request would
allow the reduced setback on the remaining lots.
Public Works comments were noted. Staff stated a grading permit would be
required prior to construction and if one or more acres was disturbed permits
would be required.
Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and
agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information
and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee
then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action.
H. ANALYSIS:
There were no outstanding issues associated with the proposed request from the
August 24, 2006, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant is proposing to
revise the previously approved preliminary plat to allow a five-foot side yard
setback within the proposed subdivision. Previous approvals allow for reduced
setbacks on selected lots for the front, side and rear yards. The affected lots
include Lots 13 — 19, 24 —30 and 33 — 39, Block 83 of the Chenal Valley Phase
25.
The developer has indicated a reduced side yard setback (5-feet) on these
selected lots would allow the subdivision to be developed in an alternating
pattern and allow for additional buildable area on these lots. The developer has
also indicated the concept of the subdivision is one that allows for varying side
yard setbacks which adds character to the development. Staff is supportive of
this request. Staff does not feel the reduced side yard setback will have an
adverse impact on the adjoining properties. To staffs knowledge there are no
outstanding issues associated with the proposed request.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the
conditions outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the above report.
Staff recommends approval of the applicant's request to allow a five-foot side
yard setback on the indicated lots.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (September 14, 2006)
The applicant was present representing the request. There were no registered
objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the
request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in
4
September 14, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 3 (CONT)
FILE NO.: S-867-NNNNNN
paragraphs D, E and F of the above agenda staff report. Staff also presented a
recommendation of approval of the applicant's request to allow a five-foot side yard
setback on the indicated lots.
There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for
placement of the item on the Consent Agenda for Approval. The motion carried by a
vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
5