HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-1479 Staff AnalysisApril 14, 2005
ITEM NO.: D FILE NO.: S-1479
NAME: Yarberry Place Addition Preliminary Plat
LOCATION: Located South of Yarberry Lane, East of Kerry Road
DEVELOPER:
Mr. Michael Smith
#51 Westfield Court
Little Rock, AR 72210
ENGINEER:
McGetrick and McGetrick Engineers
10 Otter Creek Court, Suite A
Little Rock, AR 72210
AREA: 2.67 acres
CURRENT ZONING:
PLANNING DISTRICT
CENSUS TRACT:
NUMBER OF LOTS: 12
R-2, Single-family
15 — Geyer Springs West
41.06
FT. NEW STREET: LF
VarianceNVaivers: A variance to allow a reduced building line for Lots 4 — 9 (15-feet).
The applicant submitted a request dated February 14, 2005, requesting a deferral of this
item to the April 14, 2005, Public Hearing. The applicant has indicated additional time is
necessary to respond to comments received at the February 10, 2005, Subdivision
Committee meeting and to look at possible revisions in the lot layout requested by the
Owner/Developer. Staff is supportive of the deferral request to the April 14, 2005,
Public Hearing.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(MARCH 3, 2005)
Mr. Pat McGetrick of McGetrick Engineers was present representing the request. There
were no registered objectors present. Staff stated the applicant had submitted a
request dated February 14, 2005, requesting the item be deferred to the April 14, 2005,
April 14, 2005
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1479
Public Hearing. Staff stated the applicant had indicated additional time was necessary
to respond to comments received at the February 10, 2005, Subdivision Committee
meeting and to look at possible revisions in the lot layout requested by the
Owner/Developer. Staff stated they were supportive of the deferral request to the
April 14, 2005, Public Hearing.
There was no further discussion of the item. The Chair entertained a motion to place
the item for inclusion on the Consent Agenda for Deferral. The motion carried by a vote
of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
STAFF UPDATE:
The applicant submitted a request dated March 30, 2005, requesting this item be
withdrawn from consideration without prejudice. Staff is supportive of the withdrawal
request.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 14, 2005)
The applicant was present representing the request. There were no registered
objectors present. Staff presented the item stating the applicant had submitted a
request dated March 30, 2005, requesting this item be withdrawn from consideration
without prejudice. Staff stated they were supportive of the withdrawal request.
There was no further discussion of the item. The Chair entertained a motion to place
the item on the Consent Agenda for Withdrawal. The motion carried by a vote of
11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent.
2