Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-1422 Staff Analysiscr"-Vb ITEM NO.: 5 AL [c.�,�,,� C�,, p 0L_ FILE NO.: S-1422 NAME: The Ridges at Nowlin Creek LOCATION: North of Highway 10 approximately five miles West of enal Parkway Planning Staff Comments: 1. Provide notification of abutting property owners of the site, complete with the ` certified abstract list, notice form with affidavit executed and proof of mailing. 2. Per Section 31-400(b). For residential lots or development tracts not served by a public or community sanitary sewerage system whose disposal is approved by the state department of pollution control and ecology, the subdivider shall submit documentation with submission of the preliminary plat that the state department of health, or its delegated authority, will approve septic tank installations, or other individual wastewater disposal methods for service to the subdivision proposed to be platted. Provide written verification from the Arkansas Department of Heath the proposed wastewater collection and treatment system is adequate to serve the subdivision. 59 3. Provide the proposed front building line for the proposed lots. 4. Provide the location of the Lake Maumelle Watershed Drainage Basin on the proposed preliminary plat. -� 5. Provide the source of title of the landowner on the proposed preliminary plat. 6. Provide the zoning classification within the proposed plat boundary for areas zoned by the City of Little Rock. Variance/Waivers: 1 2 3 A variance #o allovil the cPea�on of a i e staelat ( . Lots 1�05 112 117 159 and 171 pi ) A variance to allow increased street grades and a 150-foot stop sight distance. A variance to allow the creation of private streets to serve the development. Public Works: 1. The plat is outside the corporate limits, but a portion is within the Planning Boundary, Grading permits and storm water detention are not required. 2. Nowlin Creek Boulevard and a portion of Street E should be constructed as a collector street with 60-feet of right-of-way and a 31-foot to 36-foot street width. 3. All street names and naming conventions must be approved by the Public Works Department. Contact David Hathcock (501-371-4808) for additional information. 4. Traffic calming devices are required area required for long collectors to discourage speeding. Traffic circles or round-abouts are suggested at regular intervals and at main intersections. 5. Plans generically indicate a reduced standard for stopping sight distance is required on all streets. Identify specific locations where variances are requested. Standard stopping sight distances and grades should be provided along all designated collector portions. 6. Final construction plans should be submitted for approval prior to construction. Utilities and Fire Department/County Planning: Wastewater: Outside the service boundary. No comment. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Energy: No comment received. SBC: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: Central Arkansas Water requests that Little Rock Planning Commission postpone consideration of this development. Central Arkansas Water places a high priority on prevention of development of property within the Lake Maumelle water shed. The close proximity of this property to the water intake structure increases our concern. Negotiations are in progress and Central Arkansas Water intends to purchase this property or take it by condemnation, if necessary, in order to protect the quality of drinking water from Lake Maumelle. In regard to the remainder of the property, water service may not be available to portions of this property. Water main extensions would be required and all Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. This development may have significant impact on the existing water distribution system. If this area is served, proposed water facilities would be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection and all Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time must be met. Contact Central Arkansas Water at 992-2438 for additional details. Fire Department: The area is outside the Fire Department's service area. Place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department at 918-3752 for additional information. County Planning: No comment received. CATA: No comment received. Planning Division: No comment. Landscape: No comment. Revised plat/plan: Submit four (4) copies of a revised preliminary plan (to include the additional information, as noted above) to staff on Wednesday, April 7, 2004. October 7, 2004 ITEM NO.: B NAME: The Ridges at Nowlin Creek Preliminary Plat FILE NO.: S-1422 LOCATION: North of Highway 10, approximately 5 miles West of the Chenal Parkway Cantrell Road intersection DEVELOPER: Deltic Timber 7 Chenal Club Boulevard Little Rock, AR 72223 ENGINEER: White-Daters and Associates #24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 AREA: 1170 acres CURRENT ZONING PLANNING DISTRICT: CENSUS TRACT NUMBER OF LOTS: 302 FT. NEW STREET: 56,800 LF R-2, Single-family and An area not zoned 29 29 VARIANCESNVAIVERS REQUESTED: 1. A variance to allow the creation of private streets to serve the development_ A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The preliminary plat consists of 302 lots averaging approximately three acres in size. The developer is requesting a variance to allow the development of the subdivision with private streets. The development proposes 57,000 linear feet of private streets with a gated entrance. The street widths proposed within the development will be twenty-four feet with curb and gutter to create a quiet, rural type subdivision. October 7, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B fCont.) FILE NO.: S-1422 Sanitary sewer will be provided with a low-pressure system and a privately maintained sewage treatment plant located on the south side of the property, outside the Lake Maumelle watershed. The applicant has indicated potable water will be provided to the subdivision by Central Arkansas Water. The applicant has indicated the lots abutting Highway 10 will be left undeveloped for some future use. Large areas within the development have been set -aside for open space. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is heavily wooded with varying degrees of slopes. Cantrell Road abuts the site to the west and currently has a scattering of single-family homes in a rural setting. Lake Maumelle is located to the north of the proposed preliminary plat area. The northern portion of the proposed plat boundary is located within the Lake Maumelle Watershed. Only a portion of this area is located within the City's Planning Jurisdiction. This area is currently zoned R-2 Single-family. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from area residents. All abutting property owners were notified of the public hearing. There is not a neighborhood association located in the area. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. The plat is outside the corporate limits, but a portion is within the Planning Boundary, Grading permits and storm water detention are not required. 2. Nowlin Creek Boulevard and a portion of Street E should be constructed as a collector street with 60-feet of right-of-way and a 31-foot to 36-foot street width. 3. All street names and naming conventions must be approved by the Public Works Department. Contact David Hathcock (501-371-4808) for additional information. 4. Traffic calming devices are required for long collectors to discourage speeding. Traffic circles or round-abouts are suggested at regular intervals and at main intersections. 2 October 7, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B (Cont. FILE NO.: S-1422 5. Plans generically indicate a reduced standard for stopping sight distance is required on all streets. Identify specific locations where variances are requested. Standard stopping sight distances and grades should be provided along all designated collector portions. 6. Final construction plans should be submitted for approval prior to construction. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Outside the service boundary. No comment. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Enerav: No comment received. SBC: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: Central Arkansas Water requests that Little Rock Planning Commission postpone consideration of this development. Central Arkansas Water places a high priority on prevention of development of property within the Lake Maumelle water shed. The close proximity of this property to the water intake structure increases our concern. Negotiations are in progress and Central Arkansas Water intends to purchase this property or take it by condemnation, if necessary, in order to protect the quality of drinking water from Lake Maumelle. In regard to the remainder of the property, water service may not be available to portions of this property. Water main extensions would be required and all Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time. of request for water service must be met. This development may have significant impact on the existing water distribution system. If this area is served, proposed water facilities would be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection and all Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time must be met. Contact Central Arkansas Water at 992-2438 for additional details. Fire Department: The area is outside the Fire Department's service area. Place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department at 918-3752 for additional information. County Planning: No comment received. CATA: No comment received. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: No comment. 3 October 7, 2004 UBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B Cont. FILE NO.: S-1422 Landscape: No comment. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (April 1, 2004) Mr. Tim Daters and Mr. Joe White were present representing the request. Staff presented an overview of the proposed request indicating only a portion of the proposed plat area was located within the City's Planning Jurisdiction. Staff noted since a portion was located within the Planning Boundary the entire plat would be reviewed. Staff noted there were three variances related to the proposed request. Staff stated the applicant was requesting private streets to serve the development, a variance the Commission could approve, a variance to allow increased street grades and a 150-foot stop sight distance and the creation of four pipe stem lots. Staff stated the applicant was requesting a privately maintained sewage treatment plant located on the south side of the property outside the Lake Maumelle watershed. Staff stated per Section 31-400(b) all residential lots or development tracts not served by a public or community sanitary sewerage system whose disposal is approved by the state department of pollution control and ecology, the subdivider shall submit documentation with submission of the preliminary plat that the state department of health, or its delegated authority, would approve septic tank installations, or other individual wastewater disposal methods for service to the subdivision proposed to be platted. Staff requested the applicant contact the health department and secure an approval letter with regard to the wastewater collection and treatment system. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated grading permits and storm water detention ordinances for the city did not apply since the development was located outside the corporate limits. Staff also stated for long collector streets traffic calming devices were required to slow traffic. Staff requested the applicant indicate the streets where the standard stop sight distance could not be achieved. Central Arkansas Water addressed the concerns with water. CAW staff stated a portion of the development was located within the protected area of the Lake Maumelle Watershed. CAW staff stated the Central Arkansas Water Board voted to uphold the protection area and wanted to acquire approximately 700 acres of the proposed development area for watershed protection. CAW staff stated Central Arkansas's desire was to purchase this area through what ever means necessary; negotiated acquisition or imminent domain by condemnation. CAW Staff stated Central Arkansas Water would not furnish water to the areas located within this protected area. 2 October 7, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1422 There was a general discussion concerning the watershed and the protection areas. Staff stated the watershed contained 138 square miles and about one- third was located in the National Forest. Staff stated with limited finances a determination of critical areas had to be made for the areas to purchase first. Staff noted comments from the other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them individually for additional clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. R ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised preliminary plat to staff on April 7, 2004 addressing most of the issues raised at the April 1, 2004 Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has eliminated the requested variances with the exception of the development of the subdivision with private streets. The applicant has indicted the development will be constructed in four phases with the phase line indicated on the proposed preliminary plat. The proposed phasing is consistent with phasing allowed per the Subdivision Ordinance. The. proposed request indicates minimal lot size as per the Subdivision Ordinance. The development indicated an average lot size of three acres, more than adequate to meet the 7,000 square foot minimal lot size. The applicant has indicated a twenty-five foot front building line for all lots. The required front building lines adjacent to a collector street is thirty -feet. Staff recommends front building line platted as required by the Subdivision Ordinance or thirty -feet adjacent to indicated collector streets. The development of the subdivision as a gated community with private streets is a variance the Planning Commission may approve if deemed appropriate. The private streets must be constructed to Master Street Plan standard with regard to sidewalk placement, street widths and street design. The applicant has indicated the street width of Nowlin Creek Boulevard as 31-feet in a 60-foot right-of-way as requested by staff. The applicant has not however included round-abouts as requested by staff to serve as traffic calming devises on this proposed long collector street. The applicant has not indicated the construction of E Street with a 31-foot pavement width in a 60-foot right-of- way as requested by staff. Staff recommends the design of the streets be constructed to Master Street Plan standard including the required paving width and round-abouts at regular intervals and major intersections to serve as traffic calming devices within the subdivision. 5 October 7, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.' B [Co FILE NO.: S- The plat continues to indicate the source of water as Central Arkansas Water. Central Arkansas Water has stated they will not serve a large potion of the development located within the Lake Maumelie Watershed. Staff recommends the applicant provide an agreement from Central Arkansas Water indicating their intention to serve the proposed lots or indicate an agreement from another water source as to their ability to serve the proposed development. The applicant has not provided staff with the approval letter from the Arkansas Department of Health concerning the proposed wastewater collection and treatment system. Per Section 31-400(b) all residential lots or development tracts not served by a public or community sanitary sewerage system whose disposal is approved by the state department of pollution control and ecology, the subdivider shall submit documentation with submission of the preliminary plat that the state department of health, or its delegated authority, would approve septic tank installations, or other individual wastewater disposal methods for service to the subdivision proposed to be platted. Consistently in the past the Commission has not reviewed proposed subdivision development unless documentation of an approved wastewater collection and treatment system has been furnished. Staff recommends the applicant provide the required approval letter from the Arkansas Department of Health prior to the Commission reviewing the proposed development. Staff feels there are too many outstanding issues associated with the proposed request for the Commission to review the development and make a recommendation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed request be deferred sixty to ninety days to allow the developer sufficient time to resolve outstanding issues associated with the proposed request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 22, 2004) Mr. Jack McCray was present representing the request. There was one registered objectors present. Staff presented the item indicating there were deficiencies related to the proposed application request. Staff stated the applicant had not provided documentation from the Arkansas Department of Health concerning the wastewater treatment facility nor had the applicant provided documentation concerning the proposed source of water. A October 7, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1422 Mr. McCray stated he would accept the deferral request but he was requesting the Commission allow him 20 minutes for a presentation from an expert concerning how development could take place within the watershed and still be environmentally friendly. Staff stated if the applicant were allowed the presentation time then he would only be allowed ten minutes at the June 3, 2004 Public Hearing to provide new information. Mr. McCray stated this was acceptable. Mr. Robert Prager presented the Commission with an overview of how development could take place and not affect water quality. He stated his firm had 25 years experience in environmental design and watershed protection. He stated treatable run-off, preserve and restore design for construction, limiting surface treatments and placing monitoring wells to determine areas not complying. He stated it was important to pick plants to accumulate contaminates the development was trying to collect. A motion was made to defer the item to the June 3, 2004 Public Hearing. The motion carried by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. AFF UPDATE: The applicant has not furnished staff with the additional information concerning the proposed water source or the approval letter from the Arkansas Department of Health concerning the wastewater collection and treatment facility. Staff recommends this item be deferred until these issues are resolved. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 3, 2004) Mr. Joe White was present representing the request. There were no registered objectors present. Staff stated the applicant had not furnished staff with the additional information concerning the proposed water source and or the approval letter from the Arkansas Department of Health concerning the wastewater collection and treatment facility. Staff presented a recommendation the item be deferred until these issues were resolved. There was no further discussion of the item. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as presented by staff by a vote of 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. STAFF UPDATE: The applicant has not resolved issues related to the source of water and the means of wastewater disposal. Staff recommends this item be deferred to these issues can be resolved. 7 October 7, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B(Cont.)FILE NO.: S-1422 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (J U LY 15, 2004) Mr. Joe White of White-Daters and Associates was present representing the request. There were no registered objectors present. Staff stated the applicant had not resolved the issues related to the source of water and the means of wastewater disposal. Staff recommended the item be deferred until the issues could be resolved. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair placed the item for inclusion on the consent agenda for approval of the deferral request. The motion carried by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 26, 2004) The applicant was present representing the request. There were no registered objectors present. Staff stated the applicant had not resolved the issues related to the source of water and the means of wastewater disposal. Staff presented a recommendation the item be deferred until the issues could be resolved. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion to place the item for inclusion on the consent agenda for deferral. The motion carried by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (OCTOBER 7, 2004) Mr. Joe White was present representing the request. There were no registered objectors present. Staff stated the applicant had not resolved all the issues related to the source of water and the means of wastewater disposal. Staff presented a recommendation the item be withdrawn from consideration without prejudice until all the issues were resolved. The chair entertained a motion to place the item on the Consent Agenda for withdrawal. There was no further discussion of the item. The motion carried by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. E:3