HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-1280-A Staff AnalysisApril 19, 2001
ITEM NO.: 5
FILE NO.: S-1280-A
NAME: Valley Falls Estates - Revised Preliminary Plat
LOCATION: South end of South Katillius Road
DEVELnPRR .
ENGINEER_
Valley Falls Estates, LLC White-Daters and Associates
404 E. Kiehl 24 Rahling Circle
Sherwood, AR 72020 Little Rock, AR 72223
AREA: 120 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 94
FT. NEW STREET: 8,500 linear feet
ZONING: R-2
PLANNING DISTRICT: 19
CENSUS TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:
1. A variance to allow double -frontage lots (Lots 21-23 and 27).
2. A variance to allow reduced rear yard setbacks (Lots 25-26).
BACKGROUND:
On May 11, 2000, the Planning Commission approved the Valley
Falls Estates - Preliminary Plat. The approved plat included 86
larger single family residential lots with approximately 8,500
linear feet of new streets. The lots were proposed to be final
platted in phases. On June 20, 2000, the Board of Directors
passed Ordinance 18,299, which granted a five (5) year deferral
for the street improvements for the unnamed arterial street
along the subdivision's east boundary.
April 19, 2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.)
A. PROPOSAL:
FILE NO.: 5-1280-A
The applicant proposes to revise the previously approved
preliminary plat, adding a total of 8 lots within the
southeastern portion of the subdivision. The previously
approved plat showed ten (10) large lots within phases 7
and 8. The applicant proposes to revise these two phases,
for a net increase of eight (8) lots. With the revision of
phases 7 and 8, the applicant is requesting two (2)
variances. The first is a variance to allow Lots 21-23 and
27 to be double -frontage lots. These lots have street
frontage on two (2) streets.
The second variance is requested to allow a reduced rear
yard setback for Lots 25 and 26. A 15-foot rear yard
setback is proposed for these two lots due to the excess
slope in this area. The applicant notes that the homes to
be constructed on these lots need to be pushed back as far
as possible on the lots.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
Street improvements are currently under construction within
Phase I of this subdivision. Model homes are also under
construction on Lots 1 and 77. The remainder of the
subdivision is undeveloped and wooded, with varying degrees
of slope. The general area is made up of single family
residences on large lots.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has received no comment from the
neighborhood. The Johnson Ranch and Bayonne Place
Neighborhood Associations were notified of the public
hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
Same Comments as previously submitted on 5-1280 as follows:
1. Unnamed arterial is listed on the Master Street Plan as
a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of-way to 35
feet from centerline is required. Location needs to
match Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street
improvements or request deferral.
2. Provide design of South Katillius conforming to "MSP"
(Master Street Plan). Construct one-half street
kA
April 19, 2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.) FILE NO.: 5-1280-A
improvements to this street including 5-foot sidewalk
with planned development.
3. Lots shall not have access to minor arterial per
Ordinance 15,594, show no access easement on the plat.
4. All private streets shall conform to Public Street
Standards and be submitted for Design approval.
5. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
6. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
7. Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities
are required.
8. Prepare a letter of pending development addressing
streetlights as required by Section 31-403 of the Little
Rock Code. All requests should be forwarded to Traffic
Engineering.
9. Define drainage easements and show preliminary drainage
design on plat.
10. A Grading Permit per Secs. 29-186 (c) and (d) will be
required with a building permit.
11. Contact the ADEQ for approval prior to start of work.
12. Access easements serving tracts shall be minor
residential standards with cul-de-sacs or "T" turnaround
with 24 feet pavements in 45 feet right-of-way.
13. Name all streets, contact David Hathcock.
14. Street "B" and "C" do not meet minor residential
standards.
New Comments:
1.Show easement for proposed storm drainage at Lot 53,
upstream of flared end section.
2.Clarify eastern boundary street location (Lucky Lane) and
any changes to MSP this area affecting street
classification, connectivity, and water main route
selection.
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements to
serve property.
Entergy: No Comment received.
ARKLA: No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell: No Comment.
3
April 19, 2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.)
FILE NO.: S-1280-A
Water: Current maximum service elevation at this location is
approximately elevation 490. Service (and fire protection)
for proposed lots 27-31 and 36A-36F will require site
Grading to lower the ground elevation or additional water
line improvements, interior and/or exterior to the
development. Hydraulic analysis will be required for
approval of water plans. Acreage fees of $300 per acre
will apply in addition to normal.
Fire Department: No Comment.
County Planning: See attached Pulaski County memorandum
dated March 19, 2001.
CATA: Project site is not located on a dedicated bus
route and has no effect on bus radius, turnout and route.
F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division:
No Comment.
Landscape Issues:
No Comment.
G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:
(MARCH 29, 2001)
Tim Daters was present, representing the application.
Staff briefly described the revised preliminary plat.
Staff noted that the average slope needed to be shown on
the plat for Lots 25-31 and that a rear access easement
needed to be shown for Lots 24-26. Staff also noted that a
maximum service elevation note needed to be shown on the
plat as requested by waterworks.
The Public Works issues were briefly discussed. Staff made
Mr. Daters aware of the comments made by Pulaski County
Planning (memorandum dated 3/19/01).
After the discussion, the Committee forwarded the revised
preliminary plat to the full Commission for final action.
4
April 19, 2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.)
H. ANALYSIS:
FILE NO.: S-1280-A
The applicant submitted a revised preliminary plat drawing
to staff on April 4, 2001. The revised plat addresses the
issues as raised by staff at the Subdivision Committee
meeting. The revised plat notes the average slope for Lots
27-31 and shows a rear access easement for Lots 24-26. The
waterworks note concerning maximum service elevation has
also been added.
Staff required that the average slope be shown for Lots 27-
31 based on the fact that the applicant is proposing
hillside standards for these lots. According to ordinance,
lots that have an average slope in excess of 18 percent may
have a platted front building line of 15 feet. Lots 27-31
qualify for the hillside standards based on the average
slope being in excess of 18 percent and the lots having an
area greater than 10,000 square feet.
As noted in paragraph A., the applicant is requesting a
variance to allow Lots 21-23 and 27 with double street
frontage. The ordinance typically prohibits double -
frontage lots. However, the ordinance allows double -
frontage lots to be used to help facilitate residential
development in hillside areas, which is the case here.
Staff supports the variance as requested.
The applicant is also requesting a variance to allow a
reduced rear yard setback for Lots 25-26. The applicant is
proposing a 15-foot rear yard setback for these two lots.
The ordinance requires a minimum rear yard setback of 25
feet for residential lots. The applicant is requesting a
reduced rear yard setback for these lots due to the
existing topography (extreme slope). The applicant wishes
to have the homes constructed on the lots as far back as
possible. The proposed 15 foot rear yard would align with
the front platted building lines for Lots 27-31. Staff
also feels that this variance is reasonable given the
hillside situation.
Otherwise, there should be no outstanding issues associated
with the revised preliminary plat. The revised plat should
have no adverse impact on the general area. The lots shown
in Phases 7 and 8 far exceed the minimum ordinance
standards for lot width and area.
5
April 19, 2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.)
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
FILE NO.: 5-1280-A
Staff recommends approval of the revised preliminary plat
subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs
D and E of this report.
2. Staff supports the variances for double frontage lots
and reduced rear yard setbacks as noted in paragraph H.
of this report.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(APRIL 19, 2001)
The staff presented a positive recommendation on this
application, as there were no further issues for resolution.
There were no objectors to this matter.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff.
A motion to that effect was made. The motion passed by a vote
of 8 ayes, 0 nays and 3 absent.
0
FILE NO.: S-1280-A
NAME: Valley Falls Estates - Revised Preliminary Plat
LOCATION: South end of South Katillius Road
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
Valley Falls Estates, LLC White-Daters and Associates
404 E. Kiehl 24 Rahling Circle
Sherwood, AR 72020 Little Rock, AR 72223
AREA: 120 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 94
FT. NEW STREET: 8,500 linear feet
ZONING: R-2
PLANNING DISTRICT: 19
CENSUS TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:
1. A variance to allow double -frontage lots (Lots 21-23 and 27).
2. A variance to allow reduced rear yard setbacks (Lots 25-26).
BACKGROUND:
On May 11, 2000, the Planning Commission approved the Valley
Falls Estates - Preliminary Plat. The approved plat included 86
larger single family residential lots with approximately 8,500
linear feet of new streets. The lots were proposed to be final
platted in phases. On June 20, 2000, the Board of Directors
passed Ordinance 18,299, which granted a five (5) year deferral
for the street improvements for the unnamed arterial street
along the subdivision's east boundary.
FILE NO.: S-1280-A (Cont.)
A. PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes to revise the previously approved
preliminary plat, adding a total of 8 lots within the
southeastern portion of the subdivision. The previously
approved plat showed ten (10) large lots within phases 7
and 8. The applicant proposes to revise these two phases,
for a net increase of eight (8) lots. With the revision of
phases 7 and 8, the applicant is requesting two (2)
variances. The first is a variance to allow Lots 21-23 and
27 to be double -frontage lots. These lots have street
frontage on two (2) streets.
The second variance is requested to allow a reduced rear
yard setback for Lots 25 and 26. A 15-foot rear yard
setback is proposed for these two lots due to the excess
slope in this area. The applicant notes that the homes to
be constructed on these lots need to be pushed back as far
as possible on the lots.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
Street improvements are currently under construction within
Phase I of this subdivision. Model homes are also under
construction on Lots 1 and 77. The remainder of the
subdivision is undeveloped and wooded, with varying degrees
of slope. The general area is made up of single family
residences on large lots.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has received no comment from the
neighborhood. The Johnson Ranch and Bayonne Place
Neighborhood Associations were notified of the public
hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
Same Comments as previously submitted on S-1280 as follows:
1. Unnamed arterial is listed on the Master Street Plan as
a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of-way to 35
feet from centerline is required. Location needs to
match Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street
improvements or request deferral.
2. Provide design of South Katillius conforming to "MSP"
(Master Street Plan). Construct one-half street
improvements to this street including 5-foot sidewalk
with planned development.
2
FILE NO.: S-1280-A (Cont.)
3. Lots shall not have access to minor arterial per
Ordinance 15,594, show no access easement on the plat.
4. All private streets shall conform to Public Street
Standards and be submitted for Design approval.
5. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
6. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
7. Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities
are required.
8. Prepare a letter of pending development addressing
streetlights as required by Section 31-403 of the Little
Rock Code. All requests should be forwarded to Traffic
Engineering.
9. Define drainage easements and show preliminary drainage
design on plat.
10. A Grading Permit per Secs. 29-186(c) and (d) will be
required with a building permit.
11. Contact the ADEQ for approval prior to start of work.
12. Access easements serving tracts shall be minor
residential standards with cul-de-sacs or "T" turnaround
with 24 feet pavements in 45 feet right-of-way.
13. Name all streets, contact David Hathcock.
14. Street "B" and "C" do not meet minor residential
standards.
New Comments:
1. Show easement for proposed storm drainage at Lot 53,
upstream of flared end section.
2.Clarify eastern boundary street location (Lucky Lane) and
any changes to MSP this area affecting street
classification, connectivity, and water main route
selection.
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements to
serve property.
Entergy: No Comment received.
ARIA,: No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell: No Comment.
Water: Current maximum service elevation at this location is
approximately elevation 490. Service (and fire protection)
for proposed lots 27-31 and 36A-36F will require site
Grading to lower the ground elevation or additional water
line improvements, interior and/or exterior to the
K7
FILE NO.: S-1280-A (Cont.
development. Hydraulic analysis will be required for
approval of water plans. Acreage fees of $300 per acre
will apply in addition to normal.
Fire Department: No Comment.
County Planning: See attached Pulaski County memorandum
dated March 191 2001.
CATA: Project site is not located on a dedicated bus
route and has no effect on bus radius, turnout and route.
F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division:
No Comment.
Landscape Issues:
No Comment.
G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (MARCH 29, 2001)
Tim Daters was present, representing the application.
Staff briefly described the revised preliminary plat.
Staff noted that the average slope needed to be shown on
the plat for Lots 25-31 and that a rear access easement
needed to be shown for Lots 24-26. Staff also noted that a
maximum service elevation note needed to be shown on the
plat as requested by waterworks.
The Public Works issues were briefly discussed. Staff made
Mr. Daters aware of the comments made by Pulaski County
Planning (memorandum dated 3/19/01).
After the discussion, the Committee forwarded the revised
preliminary plat to the full Commission for final action.
H. ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised preliminary plat drawing
to staff on April 4, 2001. The revised plat addresses the
issues as raised by staff at the Subdivision Committee
meeting. The revised plat notes the average slope for Lots
27-31 and shows a rear access easement for Lots 24-26. The
waterworks note concerning maximum service elevation has
also been added.
4
FILE NO.: S-1280-A (Cont.
Staff required that the average slope be shown for Lots 27-
31 based on the fact that the applicant is proposing
hillside standards for these lots. According to ordinance,
lots that have an average slope in excess of 18 percent may
have a platted front building line of 15 feet. Lots 27-31
qualify for the hillside standards based on the average
slope being in excess of 18 percent and the lots having an
area greater than 10,000 square feet.
As noted in paragraph A., the applicant is requesting a
variance to allow Lots 21-23 and 27 with double street
frontage. The ordinance typically prohibits double -
frontage lots. However, the ordinance allows double -
frontage lots to be used to help facilitate residential
development in hillside areas, which is the case here.
Staff supports the variance as requested.
The applicant is also requesting a variance to allow a
reduced rear yard setback for Lots 25-26. The applicant is
proposing a 15-foot rear yard setback for these two lots.
The ordinance requires a minimum rear yard setback of 25
feet for residential lots. The applicant is requesting a
reduced rear yard setback for these lots due to the
existing topography (extreme slope). The applicant wishes
to have the homes constructed on the lots as far back as
possible. The proposed 15 foot rear yard would align with
the front platted building lines for Lots 27-31. Staff
also feels that this variance is reasonable given the
hillside situation.
Otherwise, there should be no outstanding issues associated
with the revised preliminary plat. The revised plat should
have no adverse impact on the general area. The lots shown
in Phases 7 and 8 far exceed the minimum ordinance
standards for lot width and area.
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the revised preliminary plat
subject to the following conditions:
1.Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs D
and E of this report.
2.Staff supports the variances for double frontage lots and
reduced rear yard setbacks as noted in paragraph H. of
this report.
5
FILE NO.: S-1280-A (Cont.)
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 19, 2001)
The staff presented a positive recommendation on this
application, as there were no further issues for resolution.
There were no objectors to this matter.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff.
A motion to that effect was made. The motion passed by a vote
of 8 ayes, 0 nays and 3 absent.
2
1324.71'
69
s 70
82 6
+ 83
68
171
a�
el PHI
o I
67
72
�I
x
80!
m 85
L
66
P
73
p
9
79
Lu
5 a 86
F
65
87
77
78
YS•s
64 I
75
�a se Y
FAIL 5 prt1V
�3
2
63 j
—
I
42
LI
62
4
43
40 ,
S
TALL BRICK WALL WITH
J 12" TALL COLUMNS
DEVELOPER SHALL DEDICATE 25' R.O.W.
FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET
7FVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT 1/2 STREET
IMPROVEMENTS FOR 26' RESIDENTIAL STREET
10 10
61 1311'
N 44 3 r
60 I 45 6 PHASE V ` `—
38 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15
59 PHASE VI
46 37
58 [ VALLEY CREEK VIEW
47 36H
36G ���• 32 33 34 35 36 I II 19 18 17 16
57 48
Sa
56 I w 31
49 30 20
55 I a 36F 29
+ 50 AS VfljB I
27 ` HASE
54
51 36E �9 26 22
53
CHASE IX 36D 36C 25 �p
52 36B
36A 24 23
1324.71' 30• ACCESS
TRST2NR14W24 � ITEM NO
CT 42.06 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT
PD 19 S-1280- A
WARD 0 SOUTH END OF KATILLUS ROAD NORTH