Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-1275-A Staff AnalysisSeptember 14, 2000 ITEM NO.: 2 FILE NO.: S-1275-A NAME: Richdale/Hughey Replat - Preliminary Plat LOCATION: North side of Baseline Road, approximately 120 feet east of Stanton Road nT?XY' i-T.nv1P'0 Richdale Development Co. 9800 Maumelle Blvd. Maumelle, AR 72113 Margaret Hughey 4808 Baseline Road Little Rock, AR 72209 Fur_TTi.FQ McGetrick and McGetrick 319 E. Markham St., Ste. 202 Little Rock, AR 72201 AREA: 5.00 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 ZONING: R-2/C-3 PLANNING DISTRICT: 14 CENSUS TRACT: 41.07 VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: FT. NEW STREET: 0 Deferral of street improvements to Stanton Road A. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to subdivide five (5) acres near the northeast corner of Baseline and Stanton Roads into two (2) lots. An illegal subdivision was recently created when the area shown as Lot 2 on the proposed plat was sold to Margaret Hughey. Richdale Development Co. (owners of the area shown as Lot 1) was the previous owner of Lot 2. The September 14, 2000 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1275-A proposed preliminary plat will correct the illegal subdivision. The applicant has noted that the 25 foot access easement, which was dedicated when Lot 2 was sold, will be abandoned with the proposed plat. The applicant is also proposing to rezone the R-2 portion of the property to C-3 (see Item 2.1 on this agenda). B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: There is an existing commercial building and parking area within the south portion of Lot 1, with the north portion of this lot being undeveloped. The area shown as Lot 2 is also undeveloped. There is a convenience store at the northeast corner of Baseline and Stanton Roads, with mobile home parks and an auto repair garage across Stanton Road to the west. There is a school and undeveloped R-2 zoned property to the north, with a mixture of commercial and office uses to the east. There are several single family residences to the south across Baseline Road. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received one (1) phone call requesting information on this application. The Upper Baseline, SWLR United for Progress, Windamere and Cloverdale Neighborhood Associations were notified of the public hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. Stanton Road is listed on the Master Street Plan as a collector street. Dedicate right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline. 2. Baseline Road is listed on the Master Street Plan as a principal arterial, dedication of right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline is required. 3. Provide design of Stanton Road conforming to "MSP" (Master Street Plan). Construct one-half street improvements to this street including 5-foot sidewalk with planned development. 4. Property frontage needs to have the sidewalks and ramps brought up to the current ADA standards. 2 September 14, 2000 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1275-A 5. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 6. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. 7. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property. 8. Baseline Road has a 1998 average daily traffic count of 18,000. 9. Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway right-of-way from AHTD, District VI. 10. Driveways shall conform to Sec. 31-210 or Ord. 18,031. Show driveway locations on the plat. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer available, not adversely affected. AP&L: No Comments. ARKLA: No Comments received. Southwestern Bell: No Comments. Water: No Comments. Fire Department: Place fire hydrants per city code. Contact Dennis Free at 918-3752 for details. County Plannin : No Comments received. CATA: Site is on a bus route #15 and has no effect on bus radius, turnout and route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: No Comment. Landscape Issues: No Comment. September 14, 2000 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: 5-1275-A G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (AUGUST , 2000) Bob Lowe and Larry Lester were present, representing the application. Staff briefly described the proposed preliminary plat. Staff noted that the front platted building lines could be 25 feet and that the existing driveway locations needed to be shown. The Public Works requirements were briefly discussed. A possible deferral of street improvements was discussed. Public Works representatives indicated support of a deferral. There being no further issues for discussion, the Committee forwarded the preliminary plat to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised preliminary plat to staff on August 30, 2000. The revised plat addresses the issues as raised by staff and the Subdivision Committee. The revised plat shows the right-of-way to be dedicated for Baseline and Stanton Roads and the existing driveway locations. The applicant is requesting a deferral of street improvements for Stanton Road for 5 years, until further development of Lot 1 or until adjacent development, whichever occurs first. Public Works supports the deferral as requested. =The required improvements exist for Baseline Road. Otherwise, to staff's knowledge, there are no outstanding issues associated with the proposed preliminary plat. The plat should have no adverse impact on the general area. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs D and E of this report. 2. Staff recommends approval of the deferral of street 4 September 14, 2000 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1275-A improvements to Stanton Road for 5 years, until further development of Lot 1 or until adjacent development, whichever occurs first. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (SEPTEMBER 14, 2000) The staff presented a positive recommendation on this application, as there were no further issues for resolution. There were no objectors to this matter. The Chairperson placed the item before the Commission for inclusion within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff. A motion to that effect was made. The motion passed by a vote of 11 ayes and 0 nays. 5