HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-1273-A Staff AnalysisAugust 3, 2000
ITEM NO.: 1 FILE NO.: S-1273-A
NAME: Stagecoach Village - Revised Preliminary Plat
LOCATION: West side of Stagecoach Road, approximately 1,600
feet south of Baseline Road
DEVELOPER:
ENrINEER:
Stagecoach Village, LLC McGetrick & McGetrick
9222 Stagecoach Road 319 E. Markham St., Ste. 202
Little Rock, AR 72209 Little Rock, AR 72201
AREA: 19.15 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 4 lots, FT. NEW STREET: 400 if
1 tract
ZONING: R-2/PCD (Lot 2)
PLANNING DISTRICT: 16
CENSUS TRACT: 42.08
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:
1. Variance from the minimum required centerline radius for two
(2) points on Staley Drive
2. Variance from the minimum horizontal tangent distance between
two (2) curves on Staley Drive.
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission approved a preliminary plat for this
property on February 17, 2000. The approved plat included four
(4) lots, one (1) large tract and one (1) new street, Staley
Drive.
August 3, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1273-A
As part of the original review, staff recommended that the
future uses for the property be tied to the preliminary plat.
The Planning Commission approved C-2 permitted uses for Lots 1
and 2, and 0-3 permitted uses for Lots 3 and 4. The land use
plan shows mixed use for this portion of the property. Tract A
is to be retained for a future single family development.
A. PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes to revise the previously approved
preliminary plat for this property. The applicant proposes
to revise the alignment of Staley Drive and switch the
future uses for two (2) of the lots.
The new alignment of Staley Drive has a reverse curve
between Stagecoach Road and Tract A. Staley Drive had a
straight alignment on the previously approved plat.
The applicant has requested two (2) variances for the
proposed street. The first is a variance from the minimum
required centerline radius at two (2) points on the
proposed street. The ordinance requires a minimum radius
of 250 feet. The first curve has a proposed radius of 160
feet and the second curve has a proposed radius of 75 feet.
The second variance requested is from the minimum
horizontal tangent distance requirement between two curves.
The minimum horizontal tangent distance as required by
ordinance is 200 feet. The applicant is proposing a zero
horizontal tangent distance.
The applicant is also proposing to switch the proposed
future uses of Lots 2 and 4. The applicant proposes 0-3
permitted uses for Lot 2 and C-2 permitted uses for Lot 4.
The revised preliminary plat showing the proposed new
street design is attached for Planning Commission review.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
There is an existing building on the site (Lot 2), with an
existing driveway from Stagecoach Road. The property was
previously used as a golf driving range.
The property to the south, along Stagecoach Road, is vacant
and wooded. There are three single family residences to
2
August 3, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1273-A
the north along the west side of Stagecoach Road, with
single family residences to the northwest. There are three
single family residences to the east across Stagecoach
Road.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has received one (1) phone call
from a neighbor with concerns. The Otter Creek, Crystal
Valley and SWLR UP Neighborhood Associations were notified
of the public hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1. Right-of-way dedication required per the "MSP", curve
radii, and tangent distances violate MSP.
2. Sidewalks shall be shown conforming to Sec. 31-175 and
the "MSP" (buffered) .
3. Driveways shall conform to Sec. 31-210 or Ordinance
18,031.
4. Stormwater Detention per Ordinance 14,787 and the
"Drainage Manual" is required.
5. Direction of flow for watercourses leaving the property
is required.
6.-Drainage area size and runoff coefficient for
watercourses entering the tract is required.
7. Proposed ditch sections are required.
8. Description of existing surface features including soil
type and vegetation is required.
9. Prepare a letter for streetlights as required by
Sec. 31-403.
10. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
11. Contact the AHTD for work within the State Highway
right-of-way.
12. Cul-de-sac required at end of Staley Drive prior to
entry gate for public to turnaround safely.
13. A Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan per Sec. 29-186(e)
will be required with a building permit.
14. A Grading Permit for Special Flood Hazard Area per
Sec. 29-186(b) will be required.
15. A Development Permit for Flood Hazard Area per
Sec. 8-283.
16. Contact the ADEQ for approval prior to start of work.
17. Construct Staley Drive to MSP standards.
3
August 3, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.)
FILE NO.: S-1273-A
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements
to serve property.
AP&L : No Comment.
Arkla: No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell: No Comment.
Water: A development fee applies, based on the size of
connection, in addition to normal charges for water
service. A water main extension will be required for the
lot that does not have frontage on Stagecoach Road.
Fire Department: Check with Water Works regarding the
nearest fire hydrant.
County Planning: No Comment received.
CATA: Site is not on a dedicated bus route; however, the
proposed development should be designed to allow
bus/transit access.
F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division:
No Comment.
Landscape Issues:
No Comment.
G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:
(DULY 13, 2000)
Pat McGetrick and Olan Asbury were present, representing
the application. Staff briefly described the revised
preliminary plat.
The Public Works requirements were briefly discussed.
Mr. McGetrick stated that he had no issues with the staff
comments or requirements.
After the brief discussion, the Committee forwarded the
application to the full Commission for final action.
►N
August 3, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.)
H. ANALYSIS:
FILE NO.: S-1273-A
The applicant submitted a revised preliminary plat to staff
on July 19, 2000. The revised plat shows the proposed
driveway locations along Staley Drive and a cul-de-sac at
the end of the street, as requested. Public Works does not
support the two (2) drives nearest to Stagecoach Road (Lots
2 and 4). These drives are proposed to be right in/right
out only and will be discussed further with the site plans
for the lots (Items 1.1 and 1.2 on this agenda).
As noted in paragraph A. of this report, the applicant is
requesting variances from the minimum required centerline
radii and the minimum horizontal tangent distance for
Staley Drive. Public Works does not support the variance
requests and requests that the developer redesign the
street.
Otherwise, there should be no outstanding issues associated
with the preliminary plat. With the Staley Drive design
issues and the driveway locations being resolved, the
revised plat should have no adverse effect on the general
area.
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the revised preliminary plat
subject to the following conditions:
1.Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs D
and E of this report.
2. The two (2) drives nearest Stagecoach Road (Lots 2 and 4)
must be removed.
3. The design of Staley Drive must be resolved. Public
Works recommends denial,of the variances as requested.
4. The existing access drive from Stagecoach Road to Lot 2
will be closed and removed when Staley Drive is
constructed.
5. The uses for the proposed lots will be as follows:
a. Lots 1 and 4 - C-2 permitted uses
b. Lots 2 and 3 - 0-3 permitted uses
C. Tract A - single family residential
5
August 3, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: 5-1273-A
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 3, 2000)
Pat McGetrick was present, representing the application. There
was one (1) person present with concerns. Staff briefly
described the revised preliminary plat, with a recommendation of
approval with conditions. Staff noted that the applicant had
worked out the street alignment and driveway issues.
David Henning addressed the Commission with concerns. He stated
he had no objection to the development, but was concerned with
the impact it would have on the area. He stated that conditions
should be placed on the development restricting signage, hours
and allowing no external pay phones or vending machines. Mr.
McGetrick addressed Mr. Hennings concerns. Staff noted that
restrictions included in staff's recommendation for Lots 2 and 4
(Items 1.1 and 1.2) covered Mr. Henning's concerns.
Chair Adcock asked Mr. McGetrick about Henning's letter
pertaining to the south buffer and the large oak tree near the
southeast corner of the property. Mr. McGetrick noted that he
would work to save the oak tree. He noted that the required
sidewalk could go around the tree if the tree is in the right-
of-way.
The signage issues associated with Lots 2 and 4 were briefly
discussed.
Staff noted that the Staley Drive and driveway issues had been
resolved. Staff noted that no variances were needed for the new
Staley Drive alignment. Staff also noted that the drive for Lot
2 which is nearest to Stagecoach Road,will be removed and the
drive on Lot 4 nearest to Stagecoach Road will be an "exit only"
drive.
There was a motion to approve the revised preliminary plat
subject to the conditions as noted by staff.
Chair Adcock asked about drainage issues. Bob Turner, of Public
Works, noted that the applicant will have to provide on site
detention and explained what would be required.
The Chair called for a vote on the previous motion. The motion
passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays and 2 absent.