HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-1221 Staff AnalysisOctober 15, 1998,
ITEM NO.: 3 FILE NO.: S-1221
NAME: Chenal Valley - Phase 18 -- Preliminary Plat
LOCATION: Along the south side of Highway 10, west of Chenal
Parkway
DEVELOPER•
ENGINEER•
Deltic Timber Corp. White-Daters and Associates
7 Chenal Club Cr. 401 Victory Street
Little Rock, AR 72223 Little Rock, AR 72201
AREA: 488.2 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 915 FT. NEW STREET: 57,400
a
ZONING• R-2
PLANNING DISTRICT: 19
CENSUS TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:
1. A variance for an increased intersection grade for twelve
(12) intersections.
2. A variance for increased cul-de-sac length for two (2)
streets.
A. PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes to subdivide 488.2 acres along the
south side of Highway 10 into 915 single-family residential
lots with 57,400 linear feet of new streets. The property
is zoned R-2. The applicant proposes to final plat the
subdivision in approximately 11 phases.
Thirty-six (36) of the proposed lots fall within the
Hillside Subdivision regulations, lots with slopes exceeding
eighteen (18) percent. Eighty-three (83) percent of the
lots are over 10,000 square feet in area (at least 80
percent required by ordinance), and the applicant is showing
a 15 foot platted front building line for these lots, as
permitted by ordinance.
October 15, 1998
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S--1221
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a 10 percent
grade at the following intersections:
Epernay Place at Epernay Way
Epernay Place at Epernay Place
Epernay Lane at Epernay Place
Epernay Lane at Epernay Way
Clervaux Way at Clervaux Drive
Chambord Cove at Chambord Place
Chambord Place at Chambord Lane
Chambord Circle at Chambord Circle
Chambord Lane at Chambord Circle
Chambord Loop at Chambord Circle
Chambord Court at Chambord Court
Brionne Court at Brionne Cove (7% Requested)
The applicant is also requesting a variance to allow two (2)
cul-de-sac streets with lengths greater than 1,000 feet.
The applicant is proposing Cherain Court with a length of
1,300 linear feet and Brionne Cove with a length of 1,400
linear feet.
The applicant is also proposing to access Lots 1-7, Block 75
by utilizing a parallel street. These lots are located
along the west side of Chalamont Drive between Epernay Place
and Chervaux Place. The lots will not have individual
access on Chalamont Drive. These are the only lots within
the subdivision which actually abut Chalamont Drive.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The 488 acre tract is heavily wooded with varying degrees of
slope. Joe T. Robinson Junior High and High Schools are
located north of the site, along the south side of Highway
10. There are several single-family residences on larger
tracts located along the south side of Highway 10 and the
east side of Ferndale Cut-off. The Duquesne Subdivision is
located at the southeast corner of this plat. Chenal
Mountain is located to the south.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
Staff has received no neighborhood comment as of this
writing. All abutting property owners as well as the
Aberdeen Court Neighborhood Association were notified of the
public hearing.
E
October 15, 1998
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 3 Cont. FILE NO.: S-1221
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1. Cantrell Road is listed on the Master Street Plan as a
principal arterial, dedication of right-of-way to 55
feet from centerline will be required plus 10 feet for
right lane at Chalamont Drive.
2. Clervaux Drive needs to be collector street (31 foot
wide with residential alignment standards. No parking
permitted on Chalamont Drive.
3. No access from lot to Chalamont Drive. Left turn lanes
to be provided at each street access to Chalamont Drive.
We recommend that sidewalks and bike lanes be required
on both sides of Chalamont Drive.
4. Prepare streetlights plan for review by Traffic
Engineer.
5. Geo tech firm required certifying dam construction 100-
year spillway design without over topping roadway.
6. Contribute 66% of construction cost and design cost to
traffic light at the intersection of Hwy. 10 and
Chalamont Drive. Show width of streets and right-of-
ways with all curve data per preliminary plat
requirements.
7. All pavement markings should be at the developer's
expense.
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements
to serve property. Capacity Contribution Fees will be
charged for this project. Up sizing of existing
outfalls may be required as project is phased in,
contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility for details.
AP&L: No Comment received.
Arkla: No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell: Additional 5 foot utility easement
requested beyond the street right-of-way line on all
streets. Contact utility for details.
Water: No objection. Water Main extensions required.
Fire Department:
1. Recommend 50 foot turning radius for cul-de-sacs.
2. Place fire hydrants per code.
3. One-way in only on some sections. Contact Dennis Free
at 918-3752 for details.
County Planning: No Comment received.
CATA: Not located on a CAT fixed -route. Hwy. 10 Express
serves the area. Not a good example of neo-traditional
design; too many cul-de-sacs, circuitous streets.
3
October 15, 1998
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1221
F.
G.
ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division:
Landscape Issues:
ANALYSIS•
No Comment.
No Comment.
The applicant submitted a revised preliminary plat to staff
on September 30, 1998. The revised plat addresses some of
the issues as raised by staff and the Subdivision Committee.
The applicant needs to note the following on a revised plat:
a. Lot line dimension for all corner lots, including radii.
b. Names of owners of abutting unplatted tracts.
c. Names of recorded subdivision abutting the proposed
plat.
d. Zoning of property and abutting property.
e. Location of PAGIS Monuments.
There are several traffic islands shown within this proposed
plat. The applicant must provide for the maintenance of
these traffic islands within the subdivision's Bill of
Assurance. Any specific design issues associated with these
islands can be addressed with final platting.
As noted in paragraph A, the applicant wishes to prohibit
direct access from any lot to Chalamont Drive, and is
proposing a parallel street to serve Lots 1-7, Block 75.
Public Works has noted no problem with the idea of a
parallel street, however, some minor redesign needs to be
done to the street.
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a 10 percent
grade at the intersections as noted in paragraph A.
According to the City's Subdivision Ordinance, Section 31-
206(d), "In approaching intersections, the leveling area
shall have a grade not exceeding five (5) percent for a
distance of not less than thirty (30) feet measured from the
nearest curb or edge of the pavement." Public Works is
recommending denial of the variance request.
The applicant is also requesting a variance to allow two (2)
cul-de-sac streets with lengths greater than 1,000 feet.
Cherain Court is proposed to be 1,300 linear feet in length
and Brionne Cove is proposed to be 1,400 linear feet.
According to the City's Subdivision Ordinance, Section 31-
202(a), "Cul-de-sacs shall have a maximum length of 1,000
4
October 15, 1998-
SUBDIVISION7
ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-
feet." Staff can support this variance request due to the
fact that the cul-de-sacs serve less than 35 lots each.
Staff feels comfortable that the major technical issues
associated with the preliminary plat have been discussed and
resolved. This item will need to be retained on the regular
agenda to allow for discussion by the full Commission of the
requested variance of street grades at intersections.
H. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to
the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the comments as noted in paragraphs D, E
and G of this report.
2. Staff recommends denial of the variance for increased
grades at several intersections.
3. Staff recommends approval of the variance for increased
cul-de-sac length for Cherain Court and Brionne Cove.
4. The applicant must provide for the maintenance of the
traffic islands within the subdivision's Bill of
Assurance.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (SEPTEMBER 24, 1998)
Joe White and Tim Daters were present, representing the
application. Staff gave a brief description of the preliminary
plat, noting several items which need to be shown on a revised
preliminary plat.
Staff informed the applicant that a detailed letter requesting
the specific variances needed to be submitted. Mr. White stated
that a letter requesting variances for maximum cul-de-sac length
and street grades at some of the intersections would be
submitted.
In response to questions from staff, the applicants stated that
the property at the southeast and southwest corners of Hwy. 10
and Chalamont Drive would possibly be a future commercial node.
The applicants also noted that the individual phases of the
subdivision would not be gated and that there would be a
neighborhood park along the north side of Chalamont Drive.
There was a brief discussion relating to the connectivity of the
various phases of the subdivision. The applicants stated that
there would be a path system within the open space areas which
would connect the phases of the subdivision.
0
October 15, 1998
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 3 Cont. FILE NO.: S-1221
Tad Borkowski, of Public Works, reviewed the Public Works
requirements with the applicants and Committee. The applicants
indicated no problem in conforming to the requirements.
After the discussion, the Committee forwarded the preliminary
plat to the full Commission for final action.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (OCTOBER 15, 1998)
Tim Daters and Joe White were present, representing the
application. There were no objectors present. Staff gave a
brief description of the preliminary plat and a recommendation of
approval with conditions.
Jim Lawson, Director of Planning and Development, asked that the
concerns of the commissioners be discussed without a full
presentation by the applicant.
Commissioner Berry asked why staff was recommending approval of
the waiver of maximum cul-de-sac length for two streets.
Bob Turner, of Public Works, stated that the variance could be
supported based on the fact that each street will serve less than
35 lots.
Commissioner Berry asked if the proposed intersection grades
(being 5 percent instead of the 10 percent grades originally
proposed) would cause any deep land cuts.
Tim Daters stated that the difference would only be 2 or 3 feet
in depth.
Commissioner Berry asked how much of the 488 acres will be
devoted to parks and open space.
Mr. Daters stated that there was approximately 110 acres of park
and open space in this development. He stated that the community
park site was approximately 5 acres in size. Mr. Daters
described the various open space areas within the development
including the area around the proposed lakes. He noted that all
open space and park areas will be maintained by the homeowner's
association.
Commissioner Berry asked if the amount of park space was adequate
for a development of this size.
Mr. Daters noted that there were other community parks in the
area.
Commissioner Berry asked staff what the standard was for park
space (number of persons per acre of park).
R.
October 15, 1998-
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 3 Cont. FILE NO.: S-1221
Mr. Lawson stated that a member of the parks department would be
called.
The path areas which would connect the various phases of the
subdivision were briefly discussed.
Brian Day, of Parks and Recreation, stated the national standard
for park space was somewhere in the range of 3 to 5 acres per
1,000 people.
Commissioner Hawn noted traffic circulation concerns.
The access to the development was briefly discussed. Bob Turner,
of Public Works, noted that the street system within the
development would be more than adequate to handle the traffic
generated by the residences.
There was a brief discussion relating to sidewalk construction.
Mr. Daters noted that most of the streets within the subdivision
would have a sidewalk on one side. He pointed out the minor
residential streets within the subdivision where no sidewalk is
required.
Commissioner Berry asked who would maintain the pathway system.
Mr. Daters stated that the property owner's association would
maintain these areas.
Commissioner Earnest stated that he would like for traffic impact
studies to be done in the future for these types of developments.
Mr. Turner stated that the traffic generated by this development
will not adversely impact the area.
A motion was made to approve the application as recommended by
staff, including the variance for cul-de-sac lengths. The motion
passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays and 2 absent.
7