HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-1220-A Staff AnalysisMarch 4, 1999
ITEM NO.: 4.1
FILE NO.: S-1220-A
NAME: Boen Plaza Subdivision - Revised Preliminary Plat
LOCATION: Northwest corner of Colonel Glenn and Bowman Roads
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER-
Boen Enterprises LLC McGetrick and McGetrick
10600 Colonel Glenn Road 319 E. Markham St., Ste. 202
Little Rock, AR 72204 Little Rock, AR 72201
AREA: 25.87 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 4 FT. NEW STREET: 400 if
ZONING: 0-3 and C-2
PLANNING DISTRICT: 18
CENSUS TRACT: 42.07
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested.
A. PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes to subdivide 25.87 acres at the
northwest corner of Colonel Glenn and Bowman Roads into
four (4) lots with 400 linear feet of new street. The lots
range in size from 1.74 to 8.54 acres. Lot 1 and a portion
of Lot 2 are zoned C-2, with the majority of Lots 2 all of
Lots 3 and 4 being zoned 0-3.
The applicant is proposing to rezone Lots 1 and 2 to POD
(item 4. on this agenda) for office-showroom/warehouse
uses. Lots 3 and 4 will remain zoned 0-3.
The applicant has stated that Lots 1 and 2 will be final
platted first with Lots 3 and 4 being reserved for a future
office development.
March 4, 1999
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 4.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: 5-1220-A
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is undeveloped and partially wooded. It appears
that some of the property, mainly the more level areas, was
mostly cleared of trees some time in the past.
The general area has a mixture of uses, including a mobile
home park to the north and a few residential structures on
large tracts to the west. A large office building is
located at the northeast corner of Colonel Glenn and Bowman
Roads. There are a couple of single-family structures to
the south across Colonel Glenn Road, with a convenience
food store and a building supply business located at the
southeast and southwest corners of Colonel Glenn and Lawson
Roads. There is also a large amount of vacant property in
the general area.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
Staff has received no neighborhood comments as of this
writing. All adjacent property owners were notified of the
proposed preliminary plat. There was no neighborhood
association to notify.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1.Bowman Road is listed on the Master Street Plan as a
minor arterial; dedication of right-of-way 45 feet from
centerline is required, plus 10-foot additional right-of-
way for turn lane at the arterial intersection will be
required. (Existing southbound traffic on Bowman Road is
2,100 vehicles/day.) Colonel Glenn Road right-of-way
dedication, as shown on submitted plan, is in conformance
with Master Street Plan. (Existing traffic on Colonel
Glenn Road is 11,400 vehicles/day.)
2. A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required
at the intersection of Colonel Glenn Road and Bowman
Road.
3. Provide design of street conforming to "MSP" (Master
Street Plan). Construct one-half street improvements to
these streets, including 5-foot sidewalks, with planned
development.
4. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
5. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
6. Submit preliminary plans for stormwater management,
2
March 4, 1999
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 4.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: 5-1220-A
including drainage easements and on -site detention.
7. Maximum cut allowed is 30 feet, unless approved by the
Planning Commission; provide grading plan for review.
8. Developer shall fund 25% of cost for future traffic
signal installation.
9. Contact the AHTD for work within the State Highway right-
of-way.
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements
to serve property.
AP&L: Easements are requested along all lot lines.
Contact utility for details.
Arkla: No Comment.
Southwestern Bell: No Comment.
Water: An acreage charge of $600 per acre applies in
addition to normal fees. On site fire protection may be
required. Any needed relocation of existing facilities
will be at the expense of the developer.
Fire Department: No Comment.
County Planning: No Comment received.
CATA: Approved as submitted.
F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division: No Comment.
Landscape Issues: No Comment.
G. ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised preliminary plat to staff
on February 19, 1999. The applicant has made several
changes in the plat. The changes are as follows:
1. Lot sizes and configurations have changed slightly. The
lots now range in size from 1.23 to 8.77 acres. The lot
line between Lots 1 and 2 has been slightly altered to
accommodate a shared drive.
2. The 400 foot cul-de-sac street between Lots 3 and 4 has
been eliminated.
k'
March 4, 1999
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 4.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1220-A
The applicant needs to submit a revised preliminary plat
with the following required items noted:
1.Name/address of landowner/subdivider and source of title
2. Preliminary storm drainage plan and analysis.
3.Names of abutting property owners.
4. Zoning of abutting property.
5.Location of PAGIS Monuments.
Although the Subdivision Committee has not reviewed this
particular revised preliminary plat, staff feels that the
revised plat in conjunction with the revised site plan
(item 4) is an improvement over the plat initially
submitted.
H. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject
to compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs
D, E and G of this report.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:
(FEBRUARY 11, 1999)
This preliminary plat application was briefly discussed in
conjunction with the POD application (Item 4.). Staff presented
the applicant with a list of additional items which needed to be
shown on the preliminary plat. Pat McGetrick indicated that a
revised plat would be submitted to staff. It was noted that the
Public Works requirements for the plat were the same as those
discussed for the POD.
After the brief discussion, the Committee forwarded the plat to
the full Commission for final action.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(MARCH 4, 1999)
The staff presented a positive recommendation on this
application, as there were no further issues for resolution.
There were no objectors to this matter.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff.
A motion to that effect was made. The motion passed by a vote
of 9 ayes, 0 nays and 2 absent.
4