HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0140-B Staff Analysisr
March 15, 1.983
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 4 _- File No _ 140-B
NAME:
LOCATION:
DEVELOPER:
Ron Tabor/Flake & Co.
P.O. Box 990
Little Rock, AR 72203
Phone: 376-8005
Lewis Square "PCD"
Southeast Corner of Markham
and Shackle -ford Road
ENGINEER:
Edward G. Smith & Associates
401 Victory
Little Rock, AR 72201
Phone: 379-1666
AREA: 1.349 acres No. OF LOTS: 1 FT. OF NEW St-.: 0
ZONING: "C-2" (Existing)
"PCD" (Proposed)
PROPOSED USES:_ Commercial
REQUEST:
Reclassify an area from "C-2" to "PCD."
VARIANCESS REQUESTED:
(1) Parking in setbacks 15' from property.
(2) Joint access to Shacklef.ord with tract to the south.
(3) Joint access to West ;Markham with tract to east.
I. DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PHILOSOPHY
(A) yTo provide a suburban location for the owner to
use for retail purposes.
(B) To provide leasing space for another client who
will use it for compatible retail purposes.
II. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
(A) Parcel Size - - - - y
- - - - 1.349 acres
(B) Existing Zoning - - - - -
- "C-2"
March 15, 1983
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 4 - Continued
(C) Development Scheme:
(1) Number of Buildings - - -- -- -- 1
(2) Bui.ldina SiZe - - - - - - - - 15,000 sq. ft.
(3) Ratio to Site - - - - 1.3.9 or 25.6%• 74.4%
(D) Total Parking -- - - t9 - 53
Required - -- 49 -- Ratio/Bldg. - 1:284.43 sq. ft.
(E) No. of Access Points - - - 2
ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS:
( 1) Verify that access on Shackleford is as previously
approved for Holiday Inn development.
(2) Clarify driveway access on West Markham. Explain
whether or not it is an existing, joint use driveway.
AMAT.VCTC.
No major problems were found. The applicant has worked very
closely with the staff before filing this application. The
applicant, however, should clarify who is to build
improvements on Shacklefor_d Road and design access to
incorporate abutting properties.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval, subject to comments made.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: RECOMMENDATION-.
The applicant clarified his proposal by sating that since
this was a PUD, no variances were requested. He also stated
that they were currently attempting to work out an agreement
with the property to the east and the Holiday Inn tract to
the south on joint driveways. A motion was made and passed
for approval, subject to submission of a one -lot plat and
Bill of Assurance indicating who will be responsible for the
access easement from Markham. The motion passed by a vote
of: 2 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent.
March 15, 1983
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 4 Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
Mr. Ron Tabor represented the developer. No objectors were
present. A motion in conf_ormange with the Subdivision
Committee's recommendation of approval, subject to:
1. Submission of a one lot plat and Bill of Assurance
indicating who will be responsible for the access to
Markham.
2. An agreement with properties to the east: and south on
joint drives.
The motion passer by a vote of S ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and
1 abstention*.
*(Abstaining - Commission John Clayton)