Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0135 Staff Analysisugust 12, 1980 UBDIVISIONS tem No. 5 TAME: nnT Trf-'Al . T TT 7 LET !l T]L+T] . -70& its Timberidge Condominiums Kings Row Drive, 1/2 Block North of Cantrell Road "T7l, rTT L,L,D . Two States Construction Edward G. Smith Company, Inc. 401 Victory 522 Hickory Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Texarkana, Arkansas 75502 Phone: 374-1666 Phone: (501)/774-2283 AREA: 5.8 Acres NO. OF LOTS: 2 FT. OF NEW STREET: 0 ZONING: "MF-24" PROPOSED USES: Condominiums PLANNING DISTRICT: 24 CENSUS TRACT: 22.01 VARIANCES REQUESTED: (1) Interior yard set back - building 3 (height of building required/10' + provided) MW I 9 August 12, 1980 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 5 - Continued STAFF ANALYSIS A. EXISTING CONDITIONS This site has been used as a residential property since the early 50s when platted as part of the Kingwood Addition. The owners have on several occasions during recent years attempted various development types. The last action resulted in the "MF-24" zoning now in place. The site contains a mixture of topography ranging from gentle to severe. The land generally falls west to east with the high point being immediately behind the service station on Cantrell at Kingsrow. The low point being at elevation 375 which is a change in elevation of 85' more or less. A large portion of this tract is at present so located and is one of such terrain that it should probably be considered unbuildable for conventional structures. Ap This area is identified as Tract "A" on the plat and indicated as future development. The properties abutting on the north, west and east are single family and zoned "R-2." The property lying adjacent on south fronting on Cantrell Road is developed and zoned commercial. Total access will be by way of two curb cuts on Kingsrow Drive as all other options have been eliminated. B. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL The developer proposes to construct 80 condominium units in six buildings with a mixture of one and two bedroom units. All parking will be open and served by a centralized traffic corridor with access at the extreme west end and at the mid point on the north. The development will occupy Lot 1 as shown on the plan with open space held in common ownership. Site preparation will involve moderate dirt work and likely expose most of the site to view. 4 C. CONFORMANCE TO ORDINANCE STANDARDS All of the basic design requirements of the Ordinance have been addressed except as follows: LAM 9 August 12, 1980 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 5 - Continued (1) Rear yard setback on Building #3 is shown at 10' more or less and Ordinance requires equal to height of adjacent buildings. This should be at 25' more or less. A variance is requested. (2) The system for traffic circulation is 24' of pavement but does not provide the necessary 45' easement. This should be noted on the site plan and detail location on the plat. D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval of the plat and plan subject to the following: (1) Provide 45' access and service easement on the drive system. (2) Provide 24' street to City standards for a minor residential street. (3) Provide clear zone on north side of west entry to provide for proper site distance on westbound 40 traffic. (4) Provide minimum setback on unit/Building #3 by moving property line on Tract "A". (5) Redesign islands at "T" intersection to provide better turning radius (20' more or less). ( 6 ) Downzone the tract identified as Tract "A" to "O-S" Open Space District or provide specifics on development. (7) Provide for street improvement along Kingsrow Drive at the residential collector standard. Drainage to be as specified by the City Engineer. (8) Completion of plat drafting detail. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approval as recommended by the staff. The vote - 5 ayes, 0 noes. � 3 August 12, 1980 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 5 - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: After a brief discussion and staff clarification of several points, the Commission voted to approve the plat as recommended by the Subdivision Committee except as follows: 1. No. 1 be modified to allow an easement width of 38' between the buildings at the Kingsrow entrance. 2. Sidewalks be waived along Kingsrow Drive. The vote -- 6 ayes, 0 noes, 4 absent and 1 open position. C�