HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0116-A Staff AnalysisNovember 9, 1982
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 8 - File No. 202A
NAME:
LOCATION:
DEVELOPER
Hunters Glen Preliminary/
Site Plan Review
1600 Block of Napa Valley
APPLICANT/ENGINEER:
Wickard & Company, Inc. Ed Smith
#2 Innwood 401 Victory
Little Rock, AR Little Rock, AR
Phone: 374-1666
AREA: 9.17 acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. OF NEW ST.: 410
ZONING: "MF-12"
PROPOSED -USES: Multifamily
VARIANCES REQUESTED:
None.
ARC1P(1CAT. -
1. The construction of 37 one and two-story luxury
condominium units on 9.17 acres.
2. The construction of Hunters Glen Blvd., a public
street, which will form the entrance to the project.
3. Development according to the following:
(a) Land area: 399,445 square feet.
(b) Building coverage: 103,500 square feet (26
percent).
(c) Usable open space: 172,205 square feet (41
percent).
(d) Pavement coverage: 123,740 square feet (31
percent).
4. The provision of a density of 4.03 units per acre.
5. The provision of a two car garage for each unit.
November 9, 1982
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 8 - Continued
6. Security measures to include a security gate with a 6'
high brick wall along all property lines.
7. Property Owners Association to be responsible for
maintenance.
8. Landscaping to meet or exceed Little Rock City
Ordinance requirements.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS:
1. The minimum site area in "MF-6" and "MF-12" districts
should be one (1) acre. This plan complies.
2. All detached buildings should be separated by a
distance of not less than 10'. This plan complies.
ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS:
Construct Napa Valley to minor arterial standards: (1/2)
801, (1/2) 48'.
STAFF ANALYSTS:
Staff is favorable to the development plan as proposed. The
site plan, however, should be revised to include technical
requirements under Section 4-103, E2 of the Zoning
Ordinance:
(a) Dimensioned distances between buildings;
(b) Proposed floor area of buildings;
(c) Proposed structural dimensions;
(d) Explanation of unit numbers on the site plan;
(e) Breakdown of units by type. Some of these may be
submitted on a separate sheet.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval, subject to comments made.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Joe White and Bob Wickard were present in support of the
application. The applicant reported that the numbers on the
site plan represented width of building and number of
levels. He also stated that he could not provide staff with
an accurate breakdown of the unit by type since final plans
for each had not been completed. A motion was made for
approval, subject to:
r
November 9, 1982
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 8 - Continued
(1), Construction of Napa Valley to minor arterial
standards;
(2) Staff working with applicant an adjustment to two unit
sizes; and
(3) Engineering to research in -lieu contribution for
construction of Napa Valley.
The motion passed by a vote of 5 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTTON-
Mr. Joe White of Edward G. Smith and Associates, represented
the applicant. There were no objectors. Engineering
reported that the in -lieu fees amounted to $13,000 plus
interest. Mr. White requested that the City cooperate with
the developer and construct as much of the street as
possible at this time with the in -lieu fees that have been
collected from the adjoining property owners.
A motion was made for approval of the plan, subject to staff
comments, and the Commission's recommendation that the City
Board be requested to release the $13,000 plus interest
in -lieu contribution on Napa Valley at the time improvements
are to be made on Napa Valley Road. The motion passed by a
vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 open position.
I�