Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0109-C Staff AnalysisNovember 9, 1982 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 1 - File No. 109-A NAME: LOCATION: DEVELOPER: Bailey Corp. 3rd and Gaines Little Rock, AR Phone: 374-0304 Andover Square PUD, Phase II South of Highway 10, on Andover Court ENGINEER: Edward G. Smith and Assoc. 401 Victory Little Rock, AR AREA: 184.116 sq. ft. NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. OF NEW ST.: 0 ZONING: "PRD" PROPOSED USES: Residential STAFF REPORT: This is a proposal to revise Phase II of a PUD, which was approved by the Planning Commission. The applicant feels that the revised plan is an improvement over the earlier one, since buildings and parking areas are sited to fit the contours. This allows the developer to retain some trees and ground cover previously proposed for removal, by eliminating extreme cuts and fills in the plan. The result is a decrease in the number of units from 37 to 36. Parking spaces number 96, which is 2.67 spaces per unit. Landscaping will meet or exceed Ordinance requirements. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: (1) None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval as revised, subject to proof of notification to property owners. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE ACTION: A motion in agreement with staff's recommendation of approval, subject to proof of notification to property owners was made and passed by a vote of 3 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 abstention.* (*Chairman Tabor abstained.) r November 9, 1982 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 1_- Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The developer was represented by Mr. Joe White of Edward G. Smith & Associates Engineers. Mr. Chip Baker, representing property owners in Phase 1 of the Development, requested that it be deferred for 30 days. The Commission felt that a two week deferral provided enough time for developers and the owners to resolve their problems. A question arose as to the notification of property owners. Staff reported that proof of notification according to Ordinance standards had been submitted. A motion for a two week deferral was made and passed by a vote of 6 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 abstention (abstaininq was Ron Tabor) . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (9-28-82) The applicant filed a written request for deferral of this item inasmuch as the two weeks since the last meeting failed to resolve the neighbors' objections. The Commission voted to defer the case to October 12, 1982, by a vote of 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Mr. Joe White, the applicant's engineer, informed the Committee that the developer is in the process of providing maintenance to the drainage courses which would seek to: alleviate complaints from owners in Phase I concerning drainage problems. He also stated that several minor ad ' ustments would be ma o ixeu-r� - f�� Phase II, th rpose ._4r „w icPFWUuT .e -'to open up more pace _a_n.d provide. more landscaping. Specific revisions are -to-include widening to 20' the spaces between buildings six and seven, and between one, two and three. A motion for approval as revised was made and passed by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 noes, 0 absent and 1 abstention (Ron Tabor). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (11-9-82) Mr. Joe White of Edward G. Smith and Associates represented the developer. A motion was made to approve the revised plan in accordance with the Subdivision Committee's recommendation. The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent, 1 open position and 1 abstention (Ron Tabor).