Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0108-B Staff AnalysisNovember 10o 1981 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 3 - Nebling.,Park Replat LOCATION: REQUEST: DEVELOPER: Clifton and Company Hinson Loop Road Little Rock, AR 200-300 Block Nelbing Road To replat Lots 8 and 9 to Lots 8A, 9A and 10A. ENGINEER/APPLICANT: Robert J. Richardson Consulting Engineers, Inc. 7101 W. 12th St., Suite 400 Little Rock, AR 7-2204 Phone: 664-0003 AREA: 0.9 Acres NO. OF LOTS: 3 FT. OF NEW STS.: 0 ZONING: "R-4" PROPOSED USE: Duplexes A. EXISTING CONDITIONS This site is located west of Barrow Road in a residential area consisting of both single and multifamily uses. The land involved has been filled tc get it out of the floodplain, and is clear of underbrush, but has a few scattered trees remaining. Access to the site is currently provided by Dryad Lane, a cul-de-sac with 271/50' right-of-way. B. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (1) This is a request to replat Lots 8 and 9 of a recently approved final plat, into the three lots indicated by the sketch. Access will be provided by the existing cul-de-sac on the north, and a 20' pipe -stem, which is a part of Lot 10A. The land use proposed is for duplexes. No variances have been requested. (2) LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS The Bill of Assurance should reflect: (1) that the area is flood prone; and ( 2 ) that the 20' pipe -stem shall not contain any structures or be developed in other ways except as a driveway. November 10, 1981 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 3 - Continued C. ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS Request clarifications on plat exterior dimensions; they appear different from original plat. D. ANALYSIS Though staff is not particularly impressed with the design of the site, it is acceptable and meets basic Ordinance requirements. The only issue of importance is the location of the 25' building setback line on the pipe -stem lot. Currently it is measured from the cul-de-sac. Staff views this as unacceptable. It is requested that the building line for Lot 10A be placed 25' from where the pipe -stem adjoins the remainder of the lot. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval, subject to Staff and Engineering's comments. SUBDIVSIION COMMITTEE ACTION The applicant, Mr. Bob Richardson, was present. He did not aqree with staff's recommendation regarding the location of the 25' building line on the pipe -stem lot. He was instructed by the Committee to present evidence in defense of his position. A motion was made to approve the plat, subject to (1) further information from the applicant; (2) proper provisions in the BOA; and (3) Engineering's comments. The vote - 2 ayes, 0 nays, 3 absent. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant's engineer, Mr. Bob Richardson, presented the proposal to the Commission. Staff reported that Mr. Richardson had submitted an acceptable plan that indicated where the building would be placed on the pipe -stem lot. A motion for approval, subject to the proper provisions in the BOA and the classification of the plat dimensions on the Final, was made and passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. November 10, 1981 0 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 3 - Nebling Park Re lat LOCATION': REQUEST: DEVELOPER: Clifton and Company Hinson Loop Road Little Rock, AR 1 -B 200-300 Block Nelbing Road To replat Lots 8 and 9 to Lots 8A, 9A and 10A. ENGINEER/APPLICANT: Robert J. Richardson Consulting Engineers, Inc. 7101 W. 12th St., Suite 400 Little Rock, AR 72204 Phone: 664-0003 AREA: 0.9 Acres NO. OF LOTS: 3 FT. OF NEW STS.: 0 ZONING: "R-4" PROPOSED USE: Duplexes A. EXISTING CONDITIONS This site is located west of Barrow Road in a residential area consisting of both single and multifamily uses. The land involved has been filled to get it out of the floodplain, and is clear of underbrush, but has a few scattered trees remaining. Access to the site is currently provided by Dryad Lane, a cul-de-sac with 271/50' right-of-way. B. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (1) This is a request to replat Lots 8 and 9 of a recently approved final plat, into the three lots indicated by the sketch. Access will be provided by the existing cul-de-sac on the north, and a 20' pipe -stem, which is a part of Lot 10A. The land use proposed is for duplexes. No variances have been requested. (2) LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS The Bill of Assurance should reflect: (1) that the area is flood prone; and (2) that the 20' pipe -stem shall not contain any structures or be developed in other ways except as a driveway. A November 10, 1981 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 3 - Continued C. ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS Request clarifications on plat exterior dimensions; they appear different from original plat. D. ANALYSIS Though staff is not particularly impressed with the design of the site, it is acceptable and meets basic Ordinance requirements. The only issue of importance is the location of the 25' building setback line on the pipe -stem lot. Currently it is measured from the cul-de-sac. Staff views this as unacceptable. It is requested that the building line for Lot 10A be placed 25' from where the pipe -stem adjoins the remainder of the lot. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval, subject to Staff and Engineering's comments. .:� SUBDIVSIION COMMITTEE ACTION The applicant, Mr. Bob Richardson, was present. He did not agree with staff's recommendation regarding the location of the 25' building line on the pipe -stem lot. He was instructed by the Committee to present evidence in defense of his position. A motion was made to approve the plat, subject to (1) further information from the applicant; (2) proper provisions in the BOA; and (3) Engineering's comments. The vote - 2 ayes, 0 nays, 3 absent. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant's engineer, Mr. Bob Richardson, presented the proposal to the Commission. Staff reported that Mr. Richardson had submitted an acceptable plan that indicated where the building would be placed on the pipe -stem lot. A motion for approval, subject to the proper provisions in the BOA and the classification of the plat dimensions on the Final, was made and passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.