Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0065-GG Staff AnalysisMarch 26, 1991 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.• 3 File No. 5-65-FF NAME: St. Charles, revised Preliminary Plat, lots 450-492, 494-514 LOCATION: Off Loyola Dr. on Chambery Dr. DEVELOPER ENGINEER WINROCK DEVELOPMENT WHITE-DATERS & ASSOC., INC. P.O. Box 8080 401 Victory Little Rock, AR 72203 Little Rock, AR 72201 AREA: 30.7 ac. NUMBER OF LOTS: 93 FT. NEW STREET: 4400 ZONING: R-2 PROPOSED USES: Single-family PLANNING DISTRICT: Chenal - 19 CENSUS TRACT: 42.06 VARIANCES REQUESTED: none A. PROPOSAL RE UEST This proposal consists of a revised Preliminary Plat filing for 62 single-family homes. The development format is one of large lots on a series of street with three entry points to serve the neighborhood. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Existing land area is undisturbed at this time with natural foliage in place, principally hardwood. The west boundary of this property is bordered by J.W. Shackleford Development. The south side is bordered by Parkway Village. C. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PAGIS Monument Plan required. Excavation and Detention ordinances apply. D. ISSUES LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: The only issue in the category is assigning a separate name for the Southern Cul-de-Sac. 1 March 26, 1991 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.• 3(Cont.) E. ANALYSIS• File No. 5-65-FF The Planning Staff finds little issue with the revised Preliminary Plat. It is well designed and drafted. F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval subject to the Engineering and Planning Staff comments. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENTS: (March 14, 1991) The applicant was present. The only points that were indicated by the Staff were the need for a PAGIS monuments plan and assigning a separate name for the Southern Cul-de- Sac. Mr. Joe White indicated that the Staff recommendation presented no problem and he would follow through on those items before the Planning Commission meeting. There being no further discussion, the matter was forwarded to the full Commission for final resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION (March 26, 1991) There were no objectors in attendance The application was represented. After a brief discussion, the Commission determined it appropriate to place this item on the consent agenda for approval. A motion was made to that effect and passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 nays, and 3 absent. 2