HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0065-GG Staff AnalysisMarch 26, 1991
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.• 3 File No. 5-65-FF
NAME: St. Charles, revised Preliminary Plat, lots 450-492,
494-514
LOCATION: Off Loyola Dr. on Chambery Dr.
DEVELOPER
ENGINEER
WINROCK DEVELOPMENT WHITE-DATERS & ASSOC., INC.
P.O. Box 8080 401 Victory
Little Rock, AR 72203 Little Rock, AR 72201
AREA: 30.7 ac. NUMBER OF LOTS: 93 FT. NEW STREET: 4400
ZONING: R-2 PROPOSED USES: Single-family
PLANNING DISTRICT: Chenal - 19
CENSUS TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCES REQUESTED:
none
A. PROPOSAL RE UEST
This proposal consists of a revised Preliminary Plat
filing for 62 single-family homes. The development
format is one of large lots on a series of street with
three entry points to serve the neighborhood.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
Existing land area is undisturbed at this time with
natural foliage in place, principally hardwood. The
west boundary of this property is bordered by J.W.
Shackleford Development. The south side is bordered by
Parkway Village.
C. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PAGIS Monument Plan required. Excavation and Detention
ordinances apply.
D. ISSUES LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
The only issue in the category is assigning a separate
name for the Southern Cul-de-Sac.
1
March 26, 1991
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.• 3(Cont.)
E. ANALYSIS•
File No. 5-65-FF
The Planning Staff finds little issue with the revised
Preliminary Plat. It is well designed and drafted.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval subject to the Engineering and
Planning Staff comments.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENTS: (March 14, 1991)
The applicant was present. The only points that were
indicated by the Staff were the need for a PAGIS monuments
plan and assigning a separate name for the Southern Cul-de-
Sac. Mr. Joe White indicated that the Staff recommendation
presented no problem and he would follow through on those
items before the Planning Commission meeting.
There being no further discussion, the matter was forwarded
to the full Commission for final resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION (March 26, 1991)
There were no objectors in attendance The application was
represented. After a brief discussion, the Commission
determined it appropriate to place this item on the consent
agenda for approval. A motion was made to that effect and
passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 nays, and 3 absent.
2