HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-1080 Staff AnalysisDecember 12, 1995
ITEM NO.: B _ FILE NO.: S-1080
NAME: T. H. J. R. ADDITION -- PRELIMINARY PLAT
LOCATION: On the north side of W. Markham St., approximately 0.2
mile east of the Chenal Parkway intersection
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
Jim Irwin Joe White
THE IRWIN CO. WHITE-DATERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
10800 Financial Center Parkway 401 S. victory St.
Little Rock, AR 72211 Little Rock, AR 72201
225-5700 374-1666
AREA: 3.1311 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: C-3 PROPOSED USES: Commercial
PLANNING DISTRICT: 19
CENSUS TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCES REQUESTED: None
STAFF UPDATE:
Following the submission of the proposed preliminary plat, the
applicant discovered that, instead of a 481, Water Utilities
easement along the 39" raw water line which bisects the property,
that Water Utilities has a 50 foot right-of-way across the
property. This necessitated a complete re -design of the lot
layout, and resulted in the applicant seeking, and being granted,
a deferral of the hearing of the preliminary plat issue until the
December 12, 1995 Commission hearing.
The revised preliminary plat has three, instead of the originally
proposed two, lots; two lots (Lots 2 and 3) along the W. Markham
St. frontage of the land, and one lot (Lot 1) in the triangular
area at the north corner of the property. This lot, Lot 1, has
no frontage on a public street, and access to this lot is
proposed to be provided by private common access easements across
Lots 2 and 3.
Sec. 31-231 of the Subdivision Regulations states that every lot
shall abut upon a public street, except where a private street is
explicitly approved by the Planning Commission. Sec. 31-287 of
the Regulations requires that, where a development requires the
creation of an internalized circulation system to provide access
to multiple lots, the Planning Commission may authorize the use
December 12, 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.) FILE NO.: s-108
of a service easement in lieu of public commercial streets. The
Regulations require that the location of the private -service
easements be indicated on the plat and the drive to be built to
public street design standards. Design of service easement
improvements shall, requires the Regulations, be subject to the
review and approval by the City Engineer. Section 210 of the
Regulations states that commercial subdivisions abutting arterial
streets are to be limited to one access point for each 300 feet
of lot frontage, and that shared or common driveways are
encouraged on lots with less than 300 feet of frontage. Any
variance from the design standards must be appealed_to-the City
Board of Directors.
The Public Works review of the revised preliminary plat notes
that the two lots fronting on W. Markham St. are each less than
300 feet in width, and, consequently, the two entry drives, one
each along the east and west boundaries of the tract, must be
combined into one central common drive. The entry drive -must,
according to the Regulations, meet minimum commercial street
standards, with a cul-de-sac, or other approved turn -around,
within the easement, and must have a sidewalk along both sides of
the drive. The minimum width of the drive at the entry must,
states Public Works, be 36 feet to allow for left turn
capability.
The applicant requests Planning Commission approval of a private
access easement to provide the required access to Lot 1. The
applicant has, however, requested a variance from the requirement
that the improvements in the access easements be constructed to
commercial street standards, to permit the drive to be 25 feet in
width, to have no sidewalks, and to have no cul-de-sac. Also,
the applicant requests that the subdivision not be -limited to the
one central access point, but be permitted to have two access
points at the east and west boundaries of the plat area. The
applicant requests a deferral of the requirement to make Master
Street Plan improvements along the W. Markham St. frontage of the
subdivision until Lots 2 or 3 are developed.
The Planning staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat,
and of a private access easement for access to Lot 1.
The Public Works staff recommends denial of the variance from the
requirement that the improvements in the access easement meet
City street standards, and recommends that the drive be
constructed to 27 feet in width, with a sidewalk along both sides
of the street, and that a turn -around device be constructed
within the access easement at the north end of the street. At
the intersection of the private commercial street with W. Markham
St., the drive should be constructed to 36 feet in width to
permit a center left -turn lane.
K
December 12, 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM B on FILE NO.: S-1 8D
TATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes a 2-lot subdivision of a 3.1311 acre
tract. One of the lots is a 0.80 acre site; the other, the
remaining 2.3311 acres of the tract. Both lots have frontage on
W. Markham St.; however, a single central common access drive is
proposed for access to the subdivision. No street improvements
are anticipated with this plat, and no variances are requested.
A.
B.
C.
PROP05AL/REQUEST
Planning Commission review and approval of a preliminary
plat is requested.
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is, predominantly, heavily wooded. There is a
cleared strip along the west property line which is an 80
foot wide Arkansas Power and Light Co. utility easement, and
a cleared strip running east and west approximately 125 feet
to the north of the W. Markham St. right-of-way, at the
north line of Lot 1, which is a Water Utility easement.
The existing zoning of the tract is C-3. This zoning
district includes abutting land to the west, and extends
southward across W. Markham St. To the east and north, is
R-2 zoned land.
ENGINEERING UTILITY COMMENTS:
Public Works comments:
On the preliminary plat, provide the base flood
elevation and the proposed minimum floor elevations of
structures to be constructed on the property. This
must be provided before the applicant obtains an "SFHAII
development permit.
Water courses entering the tract and the planned exit
points for drainage are to be shown. Rights -of -way for
drainage courses leaving the site must be dedicated.
A stormwater detention analysis is required.
West Markham St. is a minor arterial, and the right-of-
way and the width of pavement for W. Markham St. must
conform to Master Street Plan requirements. A sidewalk
will be required along the W. Markham St. frontage of
the lots.
3
December 12, 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM N B nt. FILE N S-1080
Construct the common access drive to commercial street
standards (36 feet of street width, plus sidewalks on
each side of the street.)
Water Works comments that Water Works owns a right-of-way
which includes the land 20 feet north of and 30 feet south
of the 39" raw water main. Water Works will have to approve
any construction in the right-of-way, and no building will
be allowed in this area.
Wastewater comments that a sewer main extension, with
easements, will be required.
Arkansas Power and Light Co. will require a 15 foot easement
along the W. Markham St. frontage of the subdivision and a
15 foot easement along the north side of the 39" raw water
line easement.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. approved the submittal.
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. noted that easements will be
required.
The Fire Department approved the submittal.
D. ISSUES LEGAL, TECHNICAL DESIGN:
Sec. 31-87 requires that, in addition to the information
furnished: a) the type of subdivision is to be denoted; b)
the name and address of the owner of record, and the source
of title, are to be shown; and, c) the source of water
supply and the means of wastewater disposal are to be
indicated.
Sec. 31-89 requires that: a) a storm drainage analysis,
showing drainage data for all watercourses leaving the plat
boundary, is to be provided; b) the names of all recorded
subdivisions abutting the proposed subdivision, with plat
book and page number or instrument number, and the names of
owners of all land abutting the plat area are to be shown;
c) "accurate and adequate" descriptions of all monuments is
to be provided, showing the size and type of material of all
monuments; d) the zoning classifications of the area of the
proposed subdivision, as well as of abutting land, are to be
shown; and, e) proposed PAGIS monuments are to be shown.
Sec. 31-91 requires that the Certificate of Preliminary
Engineering Accuracy be executed.
Sec. 31-210 provides that, for lots fronting on minor
arterial roadways, shared or common driveway points are
encouraged for lots that are less then 300 feet in frontage.
4
December 12, 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.) FILE NO.: 5-1080
The applicant has provided for this shared access easement.
The Traffic Engineer has commented that the drive in this
access easement is to be built to a 36 foot wide commecial
street standard, with a sidewlk on each side of the drive.
The common access easement shown on the plat is 25 feet in
width. With the Public Works comment that this access drive
is to be a 36 foot wide street, with sidewalks on both
sides, the access easement needs to be adjusted, or a
variance from the Public Works requirement needs to be
sought.
The plat fails to show the 50 foot wide Water Utility right-
of-way which runs east and west across the tract.
E. ANALYSIS•
Nearly all of the deficiencies in the submittal which have
been noted are easily remedied, and are minor in scope. The
matter of the Water Utility right-of-way not being shown,
however, affects the buildable area of, especially, Lot 1,
and could mandate a change in the lot layout.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends deferral of the hearing of the preliminary
plat approval pending the applicant amending the plat to
reflect the Water Utility right-of-way, and any change in
the lot layout made necessary by the presence of this
right-of-way.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:
(OCTOBER 12, 1995)
Staff reported that the applicant had asked that the hearing of
the item be deferred until the December 12, 1995 Planning
Commission hearing. There was, then, no discussion of the item.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(OCTOBER 31, 1995)
Staff reported that the applicant had submitted a letter
requesting that the hearing of this item be deferred until the
December 12, 1995 Commission meeting. The deferral was included
on the Consent Agenda, and the deferral was approved in the
approval of the Consent Agenda with the vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays,
2 absent, and 0 abstentions.
5
December 12, 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B(Cont.)FILE NO.: S-1080
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (DECEMBER 12, 1995)
Staff reported that the applicant and the Public Works staff had
resolved the Public Works concerns noted at the Subdivision
Committee meeting and in the agenda "write-up"; that a central
common access drive had replaced the two access points, as were
shown on the submitted drawing.
Staff reported that the Ordinance provides that, when a
development requires the creation of an internalized circulation
system to provide access to multiple lots, the Planning
Commission may authorize the use of a service easement in lieu of
a Public Street. The applicant, noted staff, requested such an
easement. Staff reported that the design of the street, with a
sidewalk along one side of the drive, meets with Public Works
requirements, and staff recommends approval of the service
easement, subject to the turn -around device at the north end of
the drive meeting the Public Works specifications.
The item was proposed to be included on the Consent Agenda for
approval; however, Commissioner Daniel indicated that he
understood that the plan had been "drastically" changed from the
plan presented at Subdivision Committee meeting, and asked that
the item be deferred until he had a chance to review the revised
plan.
David Scherer, with the Public Works staff, explained that, in
the original "write-up", the Public Works staff had expressed a
concern about the circular drive effect of the internal private
access drive, with its two access points off W. Markham St., and
had suggested a single, central access point and private drive,
with a turn -around device at its north end. This, he said, would
be in conformance with the Ordinance provisions which provides
for common access drives for access to multiple lots, where lots
have less than 300 feet of frontage on a public street. He
indicated that the applicant had complied with this design
requirement, and would provide a single 36 foot wide private
street running north off W. Markham St. between the two lots
fronting on W. Markham St., with a "T" at the north end to
provide access to the interior lot. Public Works, he said, had
agreed to permit the construction of the private street with a
sidewalk along one side of the street, only, in lieu of requiring
a sidewalk along both sides of the street, due to the short
length of the street and the limited number of lots being served
by the street. He added that this would not preclude a developer
from adding the sidewalk along the other side of the street, if
it is desirable when the lot is developed.
Neighborhoods and Planning Director Jim Lawson suggested that the
item be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular
6
December 12, 1995
IIBBIVz zo
ITEM NO.; B (Cont.) FILE NO.:S-1080
Agenda, to permit the applicant to present the revised plan to
the Commission.
Mr. Jim VonTunglen, representing the applicant, explained that
the original request for a deferral had been brought about due to
the title company's not discovering the existence of a 50 foot
wide "fee simple" right-of-way across the property which is owned
by the Water utility Commission, necessitating a redesign of the
site. He explained that, with the re -design, the property owner
had attempted to coordinate with the developer of the property to
the west for a common access drive, so that the subject property
could have two access points and retain the circular drive
effect. This, however, had not been able to be worked out. To
get the item before the Commission, then, the property owner had
agreed to comply with the Public Works requirement for a single
access point, with a 36 foot wide private street. He related
that the property owner felt that this was too wide of a street,
and that the loss of the circular drive would not proved as good
a traffic flow through the property, but that, to avoid further
opposition from Public Works, the property owner had decided to
comply with the Public works requirements. He said that the
required sidewalk would be a 5 foot walk, as required by Public
Works, and that the depth of the turn -around would be adjusted to
comply with Public Works.
Interim Chairperson Ball noted that he would need to abstain on
any vote concerning the subject item, and would defer to Interim
vice -Chairperson Chachere to chair the meeting for the hearing of
the subject item.
Interim Vice -Chairperson Chachere confirmed that there was no
further discussion, and called the question. The item was
approved with the vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays, 1 abstention (Ball),
and 1 absent.
7