HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-1051 Staff AnalysisFebruary 21, -1995
ITEM NO.: 2a FILE NO.: 5-1051
NAME: ARDOIN INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION -- PRELIMINARY PLAT
LOCATION: On the west side of South Shackleford Road,
approximately 0.4 mile south of the Colonel Glenn Road
interseciton
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER•
Pete Ardoin Pat McGetrick
c/o James Osborne MCGETRICK ENGINEERING
CENTRAL STRUCTURES COMPANY 11225 Huron Ln., Suite 200
P. O. Box 95031 Little Rock, AR 722111
Little Rock, AR 72295 223-9900
376-3694
AREA: 4.4 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 FT. NEW STREET: 396
ZONING: I-1 PROPOSED USES: Industrial
PLANNING DISTRICT: 12
CENSUS TRACT: 24.05
VARIANCES RE VESTED: Access to property to be gained from an
existing private street in an access easement.
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes a two lot subdivision, with access to the
proposed interior lot, Lo'-- 2, to be by way of an existing private
drive in an access easement which is to abut the south boundary
of the proposed subdivision. The east property line of the
subdivision and of the proposed Lot 1 abuts Shackleford Road, and
Lot 1 is proposed to have frontage on both Shackleford Road and
the private drive.
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Planning Commission approval of a preliminary plat for the
proposed subdivision is requested. Approval by the Planning
Commission for use of an existing private drive and an
access easement for access to the subdivision is requested.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is undeveloped, but has been cleared in preparation
for construction on Lot 2.
February 21, 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2a (Continued) FILE NO.: 5-1051
The existing zoning of the site is I-1. The Little Rock
Waterworks plant property abuts the site on the south and
west, and it is Little Rock Waterworks which developed the
private street which abuts the south boundary of the
proposed subdivision, and which owns the property on which
the access easement is proposed to be provided. The Little
Rock Waterworks tract to the south and west is zoned I-1, as
is the tract across Shackleford Rd. to the east. Abutting
the site to the north is R-2 property.
C•. ENGINEERINGIUTILITY COMMENTS:
Public Works comments that: 1) dedication of right-of-way
along S. Shackleford Rd. to provide a minimum of 45 feet
from the centerline of S. Shackleford Rd. and construction
of one-half of a 60-foot street section pursuant to Master
Street Plan standards for a minor arterial roadway will be
required; 2) a 20 foot radius will be required at the
corner of S. Shackleford Rd. and Waterworks Dr.; 3) evidence
must be provided of the right of access to the site from the
private drive and access easement; 4) a sidewalk will be
required along the Waterworks Dr. frontage of the site; 5)
an easement will be required for proposed stormwater
detention facilities; 6) driveways must conform to the
requirements of Sec. 31-210; 7) proposed ditch sections are
required; 8) stormwater detention must be provided; 9)
utility excavations within the right-of-way shall be
performed in compliance with Article V of Sec. 30; and, 10)
a sketch grading and drainage plan, meeting the requirements
of Sec. 29-186, is required; a grading permit will be
required.
Water Utilities comments that: 1) the Fire Department needs
to evaluate this project to determine the location of
required fire hydrant(s); and, 2) a pro-rata front footage
charge of $12.00 per foot applies, in addition to normal
connection charges, along Clearwater Dr. (Waterworks Dr.)
(486.09 feet @ $12.00 per foot = $8,833.08)
Wastewater Utilities comments that sewer is available, with
no adverse effect.
The Fire Department approved the submittal without comment.
D. IS_SUESILEGAL/TECHNICALIDESIGN:
Neighborhoods and Planning Staff comments that:
1) Sec. 31-87 of the Subdivision Regulations requires the
following information, which has not been -supplied, to
be included in the application for preliminary plat
E
February 21, 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2a (Continued) FILE NO.: 5-1051
review: a) the name and address of the owner of
record is to be furnished; b) the source of title is to
be shown; c) any existing and the proposed covenants
and restrictions are to be identified; d) the proposed
source of water and the means of wastewater disposal is
to be indicated; e) the linear feet of proposed or
required street construction is to be noted; and, (f
any variances and/or waivers are to be requested; e.g.,
if a waiver from the requirement to provide Master
Street Plan improvements along S. Sharckleford Rd. is
desired, a request for the waiver must be made by the
applicant.
2) Sec. 31-89 of the Subdivision Regulations requires, in
addition to the information submitted, the following
items be included on the preliminary plat drawing: a)
the proposed street design is to be shown, and the
location of sidewalks is to be designated; b) natural
features (drainage channels, bodies of water, wooded
areas, etc.) and cultural features (streets, bridges,
culverts, utility lines, pipelines, power transmission
lines, easements, park areas, structures, city and
county lines, section lines, etc.) are to be shown; c)
a storm drainage analysis for any watercourses entering
and leaving the site is to be supplied; d) a
preliminary storm drainage plan is to be provided; e)
the names of recorded subdivision abutting the proposed
subdivision (with book & page number or instrument
number), and the names of owners of all land abutting
the proposed subdivision are to be shown; f) the zoning
classifications within the plat and abutting areas is
to be shown; g) an adequate physical description of all
monuments shall be shown, indicating the size, type -of
material, and construction; and, h) the certificates of
preliminary surveying accuracy and preliminary
engineering accuracy are to be executed;
3. The zoning Regulations, in Sec. 36-2, Definitions,
states that a lot must have frontage on a public
dedicated right-of-way or other approved private drive.
Sec. 31-231 of the Subdivision Regulations requires
that every lot shall abut upon a public street, except
where a private street is explicitly approved by the
Planning Commission. Sec. 31-207 permits the Planning
Commission to approve private streets to serve
commercial developments under limited circumstances;
e.g., when the design standards for a public street are
followed, and for developments of less than five acres
where short loop or cul-de-sac streets are adequate to
serve the area. Sec. 31-207 requires the -permanent
maintenance of a private street is to be provided for
3
February 21, 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2a Continued FILE NO.: S-1051
in the Bill of Assurance. The applicant has requested
approval of access to the subdivision to be by way of
the existing private street constructed by and for the
Little Rock Waterworks to its facility. The developer
must provide evidence of the availability of this
private drive for use for access to the subject
development; must provide evidence that an access
easement for his use has been established; and must
provide information on the permanent maintenance of the
private street.
E. ANALYSIS•
Assuming that the applicant can provide the required
evidence of his right to utilize the existing Waterworks
private street, and will be provided an access easement by
Waterworks, the proposed subdivision meets the requirement
for access to the interior lot. There are only minor
deficiencies remaining in the submittal.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATI_QNS:
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat, subject
to the applicant furnishing documentation that Waterworks
has approved an access easement for the applicant's benefit
along Waterworks Dr., and that evidence is furnished which
provides for the permanent maintenance of Waterworks Dr.
Staff recommends approval of the use of private drive for
access to the subdivision.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (FEBRUARY 2, 1995)
Mr. Jim Osborne, representing the applicant, was present. The
applicant had requested a site plan review for a development on
the tract, with the tract being a single lot incompassing the
entire 4.4 acre tract. In the discussion on the item, the
applicant indicated that he would probably want to divide the
site at a later date, and sell or develop the S. Shackleford Rd.
frontage at that time. Staff pointed out that, if a preliminary
plat were proposed concurrent with the site plan review, and
development of the S. Shackleford Rd. fronting lot were developed
at a later date, the required Master Street Plan improvements
along S. Shackleford Rd. could be deferred until the second lot
were developed. Mr. Osborne indicated that the applicant would
want to pursue this course and reported that Mr. Pat McGetrick,
the project engineer, would provide the required preliminary plat
for review. The Committee forwarded the site plan review item to
4
February 21; 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2a Continued FILE NO.: 5-1051
the Commission with the understanding that a preliminary plat
review would be added to the agenda.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (FEBRUARY 21, 1995)
Staff reported that a letter from Waterworks had been furnished
by the applicant indicating that Waterworks would approve and
file the required access easement for access to the south
boundary for the proposed subdivision. Staff recommended the
item be approved, subject to the access easement being furnished
and filed at the Circuit Clerk's office. The item was included
on the Consent Agenda for approval, and was approved with the
vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays, 2 absent, and 0 abstentions.
5
February 21, 1995
ITEM NO_: 6 FILE NO.: Z-4555-B
NAME: CAPITOL CITY PACKAGING, INC. -- SITE PLAN REVIEW
LOCATION: On the west side of South Shackleford Road,
approximately 0.4 mile south of the Colonel Glenn Road
interseciton
DEVELOPER•
ENGINEER:
Pete Ardoin Pat McGetrick
c/o James Osborne MCGETRICK ENGINEERING
CENTRAL STRUCTURES COMPANY 11225 Huron Ln., Suite 200
P. O. Box 95031 Little Rock, AR 722111
Little Rock, AR 72295 223-9900
376-3694
AREA: 2.5 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: I-1 PROPOSED USES: Packaging Supplies and Service
PLANNING DISTRICT: 12
CENSUS TRACT: 24.05
VARIANCES REQUESTED: None
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes the development of a 2.5 acre lot, which
is to have its frontage on and access from an existing private
street, Waterworks Dr., and an access easement which lie along
the lot's southern boundary. A 30,000 square foot, single -story,
building is proposed to be erected, and parking for 58 vehicles
is to be provided. Landscaping, to meet City standards, is
proposed.
STAFF REPORT•
The application is coupled with Item 2a, Ardoin Industrial
Subdivision Preliminary Plat. In the preliminary plat issue, the
access from a private street and the requirements for
establishment of an access easement are addressed. The approval
of the preliminary plat and the Planning Commission granting the
variance for the private street and access easement are required
for the approval of the site plan for the subject item.
February 21, 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 6 (Continued) FILE NO.: Z-4555-B
A. PROPOSAL/RE UEST:
Approval by the Planning Commission of the proposed site
plan is requested. No variances are requested as part of
this item.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is undeveloped, but has been cleared in preparation
for the construciton of the building.
The existing zoning is I-1, and this I-1 district extends to
all land to the west, south, and across S. Shackleford Rd.
to the east. Immediately to the north of the site is R-2
zoned land.
C. ENGINE_ERING/UTILITY COMMENTS:
Public Works comments that a sketch grading and drainage
plan, meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186, is required;
a grading permit will be required.
Water Utilities comments that: 1) The Fire Department needs
to evaluate this project to determine the location of
required fire hydrant(s); and 2) A pro-rata front footage
charge of $12.00 per foot applies, in addition to normal
connection charges, along Clearwater Dr. (486.09 feet @
$12.00 per foot = $8,833.08)
Wastewater Utilities comments that sewer is available, with
no adverse effect.
The Fire Department approved the submittal without comment.
D. ISSUES/LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Neighborhoods and Planning Staff comments that 1) The
availability of public utilities, with the size and locaiton
shown, is to be addressed on the site plan; and 2) On site
fire hydrants, both existing and proposed, are to be shown.
Landscape review comments that a six foot high opaque screen
will be required along the northern perimeter of the site.
This screen may be a wood fence with its face directed
northward, or be dense evergreen plantings. With the
exception of those areas devoted to loading and unloading,
six percent of the interior of the vehicular use area must
be landscaped. A three-foot wide landscape strip between
the public parking areas and the building is required,
except at doorways.
2
February 21, 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 5 Continued FILE NO.: Z-4555--B
E. ANALYSIS•
There are only minor deficiencies in the submittal to be
addressed, and these may easily be completed. The site
plan, as revised and presented, is sufficiently detailed and
complete to meet the requirements of the regulations.
Subject to the approval of Item 2a, Ardoin Industrial
Subdivison Preliminary Plat; approval of the private drive
for access to the site; and, providing evidence of the
establishment of an access easement along the south boundary
of the site to provide the required legal access to the lot,
the site plan can be approved.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the site plan, subject to the
conditions noted.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (FEBRUARY 2, 1995)
Mr. Jim Osborne, representing the applicant, was present. The
applicant had requested a site plan review for a development to
include the property extending to S. Shackleford Rd., with the
tract being a single 4.4 acre lot. In the discussion on the
item, the applicant indicated that he would probably want to
divide the site at a later date, and sell or develop the S.
Shackleford Rd. frontage at that time. Staff pointed out that,
if a preliminary plat were proposed concurrent with the site plan
review, and development of the S. Shackleford Rd. fronting lot
were developed at a later date, the required Master Street Plan
improvements along S. Shackleford Rd. could be deferred until the
second lot were developed. Mr. Osborne indicated that the
applicant would want to pursue this course and reported that
Mr. Pat McGetrick, the project engineer, would provide the
required preliminary plat and a revised site plan for review.
The Committee reviewed with Mr. Osborne the information presented
in the discussion outline, and Mr. Osborne responded that the
deficiencies would be addressed. The Committee forwarded the
site plan review item to the Commission for the public hearing.
3