HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0995 Staff AnalysisEnvironmental
Scientists
Incorporated
October 11, 1993
200 Casey Drive
Maumelle, AR 72113
Tel: (501) 851-8806
Tel: (501) 851-3366
Fax: (501) 851-3368
HAND -DELIVERED
Little Rock Planning Commission
723 West Markham Street
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: Preliminary Plat, Hobbs Addition
NE Quarter, SW Quarter, SE Quarter,
Section 13, Township 2N, Range 14W
ROBERT D. HOLLOWAY
PRESIDENT
PROF. ENGINEER REGISTRATION
ARKANSAS MISSISSIPPI
LOUISIANA ALABAMA
PROF. LAND SURVEYOR REGISTRATION
ARKANSAS
Please find enclosed 17 copies of the preliminary plat for the
above referenced project, along with the subdivision
application.
The fees will be paid by the owner and the Bill of Assurance
will be forwarded by the owner's attorney.
Storm drainage analysis will be forwarded to the Public Works
with street plans.
RDH/co
Enc.
Respectfull st,
Robert D. Hollc
Consulting Engi
ENGINEERING 0 DESIGN 0 SURVEY/MAPPING
SUBDIVISION DATE
ITEM NO. FILE NO.
NAME:
LOCATION: SE 1/4, SEC. 13, TZN, R14W (HWY 10)
NAME: MONTY AND PATTY HOBBS
STREET ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 13011
CITY/STATE/ZIP: MAUMELLE, AR 72113
TELEPHONE: 851-4100
AREA: 10 ACRES NO. OF LOTS: 5
ROBERT D. HOLLOWAY
200 CASEY DRIVE
MAUMELLE, AR 72118
FT. NEW STREET: PRIVATE
ZONING: PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL
PLANNING DISTRICT: �3
J
CENSUS TRACT: diz-w J y
VARIANCES REQUESTED:
1.) Length of cul-de sac
2.)
3.)
4.)
November 16, 1993
ITEM NO.: 4 FILE NO.:_5-995
NAME: HOBBS ADDITION -- PRELIMINARY PLAT
LOCATION: Approximately 0.2 miles north of Highway 10 and
approximately 0.2 miles west of Rummell Road
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER•
MONTY AND PATTY HOBBS Robert D. Holloway
P. O. Box 13011 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS INC.
Maumelle, AR 72113 200 Casey Drive
851-4100 Maumelle, AR 72113
851-8806
AREA: 10.0 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 5 FT. NEW STREET: 1,200
ZONING: R-2
PLANNING DISTRICT: 20
CENSUS TRACT: 42.05
VARIANCES REOUESTED:
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
PROPOSED USES: Single-family Residential
None
The applicant proposes the development of a 10-acre tract to
consist of 5 residential lots fronting on a cul-de-sac. The
street system within the subdivision is proposed to be a private
street. Access to the subdivision is proposed to be by way of a
private street extending from Highway 10 to the subdivision
boundary. A portion of the access from Highway 10 is proposed to
be within an access easement.
A. PROPOSAL(REOUEST:
The applicant requests approval by the Planning Commission
of a subdivision consisting of 5 lots fronting on a cul-de-
sac on a 10-acre tract. Access to the subdivision is
proposed to be gained by a "pipe -stem" extending to Highway
10. A portion of the access is proposed to be in an access
easement. The entire street system is proposed to be a
private street.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is undeveloped and is not accessible. It is
bounded on the north by Taylor Loop Creek; on the east, by
Thomas Park Addition; and on the south and west by heavily
November 16, 1993
ITEM NO.: 4 (Continued) FILE NO.: 5-995
wooded area. There is an existing low-water crossing which
is not currently usable which is proposed to be improved and
made usable for access to the proposed subdivision.
C. ENGINEERING/UTILITY COMMENTS:
Engineering indicates that the access from public right-of-
way to the proposed subdivision is inadequate. The required
minimum width of property for access to the subdivision is
50 feet. The 25 foot easement along a portion of the access
is inadequate. Engineering asks that the subdivision
standards be adhered to in the cul-de-sac design.
Water Works reports that a water main extension will be
required.
Wastewater reports that a sewer main extension, with
easements, will be required.
Arkansas Power and Light reports that additional easements
are required.
ARKLA Gas approved the submittal without comment.
Southwestern Bell approved the submittal without comment.
The Fire Department approved the submittal without comment.
D. ISSUES/LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
The application is to indicate the source of title for the
proposed development. The application is to provide
information on the average lot size and the minimum lot
size. The application is to provide information on the
source of water supply and the means of wastewater disposal.
The plat is to show the proposed design, 'including streets
and sidewalks, easements, etc. A storm drainage analysis is
required for watercourses entering or leaving the site. A
preliminary storm drainage plan with typical ditch sections
is required. The names of abutting recorded subdivisions or
of property owners is required to be shown on the plat. The
location and physical description of monuments is to be
provided. The zoning classification of abutting properties
and of the site are to be shown. A phasing plan, if phasing
of the development is proposed, is to be shown. The
location of proposed PAGIS monuments is to be shown.
A Bill of Assurance needs to be submitted.
The Subdivision Regulations require a 50 foot access to the
site. The 25 foot access easement with the "dog -leg" offset
is not satisfactory access.
OA
November 16, 1993
ITEM NO.: 4 (Continued) FILE NO.: S-995
Provide for maintenance of the "common property" at the
cul-de-sac.
E. ANALYSIS:
There are serious concerns regarding, primarily, access to
the proposed subdivision. The developer does not have
ownership rights to a great deal of the access and is
relying on access easements. The width of the access
easement is inadequate. There is no provision for providing
a new all-weather bridge over Taylor Loop Creek for access
off Highway 10.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends denial of the application as presented. If
proper access and a new bridge can be provided, then the
project can be recommended for approval.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (October 28, 1993)
Mr. Monty Hobbs, the developer, and Mr. Robert Holloway, the
design engineer were present. Mr. Hobbs and Mr. Holloway
reviewed the staff comments in the discussion outline. Staff
presented the item and the comments. Mr. Hobbs indicated that a
property owners association was anticipated to be formed to
address the need for maintenance of the common areas and the
private street. Mr. Holloway indicated that concerns regarding
access and the bridge would be considered further by the
developer. The remaining concerns, he indicated, would be
remedied. The Committee referred the item to the Commission for
review.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (November 16, 1993)
Staff presented the item, indicated that a revised preliminary
plat addressing all concerns discussed at the Subdivision
Committee meeting had been submitted, and that there were no
outstanding concerns.
Mr. Robert Holloway, the engineer on the project, represented the
applicant. He reported that he and the City Engineering office
had reached an agreement on the design of the bridge which is to
cross Taylor Loop Creek and the design of the street.
Mrs. Evelyn Thomas, owner of adjacent property, expressed
concerns about the design of the bridge and access to the
proposed subdivision. Mr. Holloway responded that the proposed
bridge had been designed so that it would not raise the level of
the floodway of the creek. He indicated that, with a 100-year
3
November 16, 1993
ITEM NO.: 4 (Continued) FILE NO.: 5-995
flood, the bridge would be, in effect, a "low water" bridge, but
that with such a rainfall event, even Highway 10 would be under
water. Mrs. Thomas expressed a desire for conditions being
placed on the developer regarding fencing and buffers along the
boundary of the subdivision. Mr. Holloway responded that the
bridge will have white picket guard railing in keeping with the
fence along the Thomas Park subdivision property line, and will
have wheel rails for the safety of persons using the bridge.
Commissioner VonTungeln received confirmation from Deputy City
Attorney Steve Giles that the City cannot impose conditions on a
developer beyond the requirements established by the Subdivision
Regulations. Some of the items regarding fencing and buffers
being requested by Mrs. Thomas are beyond the scope of the
Commission's authority to impose. Mr. Holloway and Mrs. Thomas
indicated that a private agreement concerning these items had
been reached.
Mr. Jerry Gardner with the City Engineering office indicated that
the applicant would have to receive Board of Adjustments approval
for construction of the bridge in the floodway. He confirmed
that an agreement in principle had been reached with the
developer on the design of the street and bridge. He noted that
the street and bridge would be private improvements and would not
be maintained by the City.
With the discussion concluded, the motion was
to approve the preliminary plat. The motion
of 9 ayes, no nays, 1 absent, no abstentions,
position.
made and seconded
carried with a vote
and 1 open
4