HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0993-F Staff AnalysisMarch 30, 2000
ITEM NO.: 2
FILE NO.: S-993-F
NAME: Mabelvale Business Park - Revised Preliminary Plat
LOCATION: South side of Baseline Road at Interstate 30
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
Ashley Development Co. White-Daters and Associates
2851 Lakewood Village Dr. 401 S. Victory Street
No. Little Rock, AR 72116 Little Rock, AR 72201
AREA: -61.6 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 21
FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: C-3 and I-2
PLANNING DISTRICT: 15
CENSUS TRACT: 41.05
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:
1. A variance to allow double frontage lots.
2. A variance from the ordinance required driveway spacing
standards.
BACKGROUND:
On November 16, 1993, the Planning Commission approved a one lot
commercial (lease lot arrangement) subdivision for this 61.6
acre property. Internal roadways were approved as a private
street system.
On August 7, 1997, the Planning Commission approved a
preliminary plat to convert the single tract lease lot
March 30, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.
FILE NO.: S-993-F
arrangement to a conventional commercial plat. The approved
plat included seven (7) lots and three (3) large tracts, set
aside for future platting. The private street system was also
approved as part of the preliminary plat. To date, Lots 1, 2A,
3, 4 and 5 have been final platted and developed.
A. PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes to revise the previously approved
preliminary plat by splitting Lot 2B into two (2) lots (2B
and 2C) and by proposing a lot design for the three (3)
large tracts as shown on the previous plat. A total of 21
lots is proposed for the subdivision. The lots have been
previously final platted one (1) at a time as they are
sold. The lots range in size from 0.6 acre to 16.6 acres.
The alignment of the two (2) internal streets has been
revised slightly from the previously approved plan. The
applicant plans to maintain these streets as private.
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow double
frontage lots. The lots proposed to -have double frontage
are Lots 1, 2B, 2C, 3, 4, 9, 12, 13 and 19. The applicant
is also requesting a variance from the ordinance required
driveway spacing standards at several locations throughout
the subdivision.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
As noted earlier, Lots 1, 2A, 3, 4 and 5 of this
subdivision are developed, with the remainder of the
property being partially wooded. There is undeveloped
property to the south, with Interstate 30 immediately
north. A service station is located immediately west of
the site along I-30 and there is a mixture of residential
structures to the west along Mabelvale Pike. The Wal-Mart
Supercenter development is located immediately east.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has received one phone call from
a person requesting information on this application. The
Mavis Circle and West Baseline Neighborhood Associations
were notified of the public hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1. Proposed driveways on Lot 1 and 2 do not conform to Sec.
2
March 30, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-993-F
31-210 or Ordinance 18,031. Eliminate driveways and use
one share driveway.
2. Proposed driveways to Lot 13, 14, 15 and 16 do not
conform to Sec. 31-210 or Ordinance #18,031.
3. Show access easements on all shared driveways.
4. Mabelvale has a 1998 average daily traffic count of
6,400.
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements
to serve property.
AP&L: No Comment.
Arkla: No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell: No Comment.
Water: Water main extensions to each parcel will be
required. On site fire protection will be required.
Some existing fire service lines may cross more than one
parcel. Modifications will be required to rectify that
situation. An acreage charge of $150 per acre applies in
addition to normal charges in this area.
Fire Department: Place fire hydrants per city code.
Contact Dennis Free at 918-3752 for details.
County Planning: No Comment received.
CATA: No Comment received.
F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division: No Comment.
Landscape Issues: No Comment.
G. ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised preliminary plat to staff
on March 15, 2000. The revised plat notes the zoning of
the abutting property as requested. The revised plat also
removes the drive locations from the south side of the
southern internal street and notes that these drives will
be determined with the development of Lots 14-16 and will
conform to ordinance standards.
3
March 30, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.)
FILE NO.: S-993-F
The applicant has also revised the driveway locations for
the other unplatted lots within this subdivision. The
majority of the drives are shared drives between lots.
Public Works notes that a shared drive is needed between
Lots 2B and 2C on Mabelvale Plaza Boulevard. Also, the
drive on the east side of Lot 2B needs to be removed as per
Public Works. Staff will attempt to have this issue
resolved prior to the public hearing, which should
eliminate the need for a driveway spacing variance.
As noted in paragraph A. of this report, the applicant is
requesting a variance to allow double frontage lots. The
lots proposed to have double frontage are Lots 1, 3, 4
(previously final platted), 2B, 2C, 9, 12, 13 and 19.
Section 31-232(d) of the City's Subdivision Ordinance
prohibits double frontage lots. Based on the fact that the
internal streets within this Subdivision are private and
were approved with the original preliminary plat of the
property, staff can support the proposed variance for
double frontage lots.
To staff's knowledge there are no outstanding issues
associated with the revised preliminary plat, other than
that of driveway spacing. The revised preliminary plat
should have no adverse effect on the general area.
H. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the revised preliminary plat
subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs D
and E of this report.
2. Staff recommends approval of the requested variance for
double frontage lots.
3. Staff recommends denial of the requested variance for
driveway spacing.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:
(MARCH 9, 2000)
Tim Daters was present, representing the application. Staff
briefly described the revised preliminary plat.
4
March 30, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.)
FILE NO.: S-993-F
The issue of driveway locations was briefly discussed. Mr.
Daters noted that he would meet with Public Works and revise the
driveway locations.
Staff noted that a variance had been requested to allow double
frontage lots. This was briefly discussed.
The proposed streets within this subdivision were briefly
discussed. Mr. Daters noted that he had been working with the
Highway Department for the past four years regarding the
westernmost street intersection. He noted that the Highway
Department was comfortable with this street intersection.
After the discussion, the Committee forwarded the revised
preliminary plat to the full Commission for final action.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(MARCH 30, 2000)
The staff presented a positive recommendation on this
application, as there were no further issues for resolution.
There were no objectors to this matter.
Staff noted that the applicant had resolved the driveway
locations with Public Works and that the variance for driveway
spacing could be eliminated. Staff also noted that the
applicant, in response to neighborhood concerns, consented to
the following:
1. Construction of a traffic signal at the Mabelvale Road
intersection on the west side of this project when warranted
and required by the Arkansas Highway Department and Public
Works.
2. That street lights would be installed at the west
intersection and the interior streets and would meet typical
city ordinance requirements.
The Chairperson place the item before the Commission for
inclusion within the consent Agenda for approval as recommended
by staff. A motion to that effect was made. The motion passed
by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays and 2 absent.
5