HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0057-LL Staff AnalysisSeptember 19, 2002
ITEM NO.: 2
NAME: Riverdale Addition Replat and Site Plan Review
LOCATION: Riverfront Drive at Morgan Keegan Drive
FILE NO.: S-57-LL
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
Irwin & Saviers McClelland Consulting Engineers
1701 Centerview Drive, Suite 201 900 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72211 Little Rock, AR 72201
AREA: 7.55 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 FT. NEW STREET: 0
CURRENT ZONING: PCD and 0-2
PLANNING DISTRICT: 4 — Heights/Hilicrest
CENSUS TRACT: 15
VARIANCESNVAIVERS REQUESTED: Increased sign area (120 square feet).
A. PROPOSAL:
The applicant is proposing a three (3) lot subdivision and a zoning site plan
review. A portion of the site was Final Platted in February of 2001 (Tract RH-5 a
2.87 acre site). The applicant is proposing to combine unrecorded Tract 7 and
Tract RH-5 to form three (3) non-residential lots. The lots are currently zoned
0-2 (Tract 7) and PCD (Tract RH-5). The proposed lots range in size from 2
acres to 2.22 acres. The applicant will be closing the existing central cul-de-sac
to allow for full development of the middle two (2) acre lot (Lot RH-513).
The applicant also proposes a zoning site plan review for the southern lot (Lot
RH-7A). The applicant has indicated the new office building will house the
corporate office headquarters of Winrock Enterprises, which will employ
approximately 65 professionals. The proposed building will be two (2) story and
contain 22,000 square feet. The site will be landscaped and the building will be a
"Green Building", incorporating elements of sustainable design, such as
collection of rain water for reuse in landscape irrigation, natural daylighting, many
September 19, 2002
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2
FILE NO.: S-57-LL
features which reduce energy consumption, and use of recycled building
materials. The applicant is also requesting a single ground mounted sign to be
located near the southern driveway. The applicant proposes the sign area to be
120 square feet or 30-foot in length and 4-foot in height.
There are limited parking spaces proposed in the front of the building adjacent to
River Front Drive. A remote parking lot is planned at the north end of the
property (Lot RH-5A). A parking agreement will be executed to allow a shared
parking situation between the three (3) lots and Lot RH-5A, which will house the
parking lot. There will also be a cross access walking trail to connect the three
(3) lots and the parking lot on the northern lot.
B. EXISTING CONDITIO
The site is a vacant grass covered site with office buildings backing up to the
Arkansas River to the east. Southwest of the site is a vacant field used by the
Little Rock Soccer Association as game and practice fields. A residential
subdivision, Canel Pointe, is located to the south of the site and a vacant lot
(zoned PCD) is located to the north of the site. Other uses in the area include
office and multi -family.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from area residents. The
Cedar Hill Terrace Property Owners Association and all property owners within
200-feet of the site were notified of the Public Hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
Public Works: No comment.
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements if service is
required for the project. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility for additional
details at 376-2903.
AP & L: No comment received.
ARKLA: No comment received.
Southwestern Bell: A 10-foot utility easements along new property lines is
required (5-foot each side of lot line). Contact Southwestern Bell at 373-5112
for additional details.
Water: 8 inch water main will have to be relocated at the developer's expense.
A water main extension will be required to serve Lots RH-5A and RH-5B.
K
September 19, 2002
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2
FILE NO.:
Fire Department: Place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire
Department at 918-3752 for additional details.
County Planning: No comment received.
CATA: The site is located on Bus Route #21 and has no effect on bus radius,
turnout and route.
F. ISSUES/TECHN ICAUDESIGN:
Plannina Division: No comment.
Landscape: Interior landscape islands must be at least 7 Y2 feet in width in order
to count toward fulfilling the 8% interior landscaping requirement.
Irrigation will be required to water landscaped areas.
Prior to a building permit being issued, it will be necessary to submit an approved
landscape plan with the seal of a Registered Landscape Architect.
G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (August 29, 2002)
Mr. Ron Tabor was present representing the application. Staff presented the
item stating the application was a two part proposal. Staff stated first the item
was a plat/replat combination. Staff stated a lot, which, had been previously final
platted and an unrecorded tract, were proposed to be platted as three (3) lots of
approximately 2 acres each and the second was an office site plan review of an
office building for Winrock International on the southern lot, Lot RH-7 currently
zoned O-2.
Staff stated there were easements, which needed to be included on the proposed
plat along with driveway location and curb cuts clearly identified. Staff stated the
parking area to the north would be required to be shown as a cross access
parking agreement between the three lots on the plat.
Landscaping comments were addressed along with the comments from the
Water, Wastewater and Fire Department. Staff noted the comment from
Southwestern Bell requesting easements be shown on the Final Plat.
After the discussion, the Committee then forwarded the item to the full
Commission for final action.
3
September 19, 2002
SUBDIVISION
ITEM
H. ANALYSIS:
FILE NO.: S-57-LL
The applicant submitted to staff a revised drawing indicating all driveway
locations, the trail as a cross access easement and the parking lot located on
Lot RH5-A as a cross access and parking easement.
The applicant has indicated a single ground mounted sign to be located near the
south driveway entrance. The sign will be approximately 30-foot long and 4-foot
high (120 square feet in area) with 12-inch lettering on the west face. There will
be ground lighting on the front of the sign for illumination. The permitted sign
allowable under the Ordinance [Section 36-553 (a) (2)] is 64 square feet. Staff
is supportive of the request to allow the increased sign area since the face side
lettering would only be 30 square feet in area. The sign would act as a
decorative wall in the landscaped area and not strictly a monument sign with
lettering on the entire face of the wall.
The applicant also proposes the building to be no more than 45-feet in height as
required by 0-2 zoning district. The applicant proposes the building to be
approximately 22,000 square feet in area. Minimum estimated parking required
for a building would be 52 spaces or 95% of one space per 400 square feet of
gross floor area. The applicant proposes the placement of 16 on -site parking
spaces and a cross access easement with a parking area to the north containing
215 parking spaces. Although, the parking lot will be shared between all three
lots in the preliminary plat there should not be any adverse impact with regard to
parking and the proposed lot should be sufficient to meet the parking demands of
the area.
Staff is supportive of the proposed preliminary plat and the office site plan review.
The proposal includes a variance to allow an increased sign area, which staff
supports.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed replat of Lots RH-5 and Tract - 7 into
three (3) non-residential lots and the zoning site plan review for Lot RH-7 subject
to compliance with the conditions outlined in Paragraphs D, E and F of this
report.
Staff recommends approval of the requested sign variance, as proposed.
4
September 19, 2002
ITEM NO.: 2 FILE NO.: S-57-LL
NAME: Riverdale Addition Replat and Site Plan Review
LOCATION: Riverfront Drive at Morgan Keegan Drive
DEVELOPER:
Irwin & Saviers
1701 Centerview Drive, Suite 201
Little Rock, AR 72211
ENGINEER:
McClelland Consulting Engineers
900 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
AREA: 7.55 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 FT. NEW STREET: 0
CURRENT ZONING: PCD and 0-2
PLANNING DISTRICT: 4 — Heights/Hillcrest
CENSUS TRACT: 15
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: Increased sign area (120 square feet).
A. PROPOSAL:
The applicant is proposing a three (3) lot subdivision and a zoning site plan
review. A portion of the site was Final Platted in February of 2001 (Tract RH-5 a
2.87 acre site). The applicant is proposing to combine unrecorded Tract 7 and
Tract RH-5 to form three (3) non-residential lots. The lots are currently zoned
0-2 (Tract 7) and PCD (Tract RH-5). The proposed lots range in size from 2
acres to 2.22 acres. The applicant will be closing the existing central cul-de-sac
to allow for full development of the middle two (2) acre lot (Lot RH-513).
The applicant also proposes a zoning site plan review for the southern lot (Lot
RH-7A). The applicant has indicated the new office building will house the
corporate office headquarters of Winrock Enterprises, which will employ
approximately 65 professionals. The proposed building will be two (2) story and
contain 22,000 square feet. The site will be landscaped and the building will be a
"Green Building", incorporating elements of sustainable design, such as
collection of rain water for reuse in landscape irrigation, natural daylighting, many
September 19, 2002
SUBDIVISION
M NO.: 2
FILE NO.: S-57-LL
features which reduce energy consumption, and use of recycled building
materials. The applicant is also requesting a single ground mounted sign to be
located near the southern driveway. The applicant proposes the sign area to be
120 square feet or 30-foot in length and 4-foot in height.
There are limited parking spaces proposed in the front of the building adjacent to
River Front Drive. A remote parking lot is planned at the north end of the
property (Lot RH-5A). A parking agreement will be executed to allow a shared
parking situation between the three (3) lots and Lot RH-5A, which will house the
parking lot. There will also be a cross access walking trail to connect the three
(3) lots and the parking lot on the northern lot.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is a vacant grass covered site with office buildings backing up to the
Arkansas River to the east. Southwest of the site is a vacant field used by the
Little Rock Soccer Association as game and practice fields. A residential
subdivision, Canel Pointe, is located to the south of the site and a vacant lot
(zoned PCD) is located to the north of the site. Other uses in the area include
office and multi -family.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from area residents. The
Cedar Hill Terrace Property Owners Association and all property owners within
200-feet of the site were notified of the Public Hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
Public Works: No comment.
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements if service is
required for the project. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility for additional
details at 376-2903.
AP & L: No comment received.
ARKLA: No comment received.
Southwestern Bell: A 10-foot utility easements along new property lines is
required (5-foot each side of lot line). Contact Southwestern Bell at 373-5112
for additional details.
Water: 8 inch water main will have to be relocated at the developer's expense.
A water main extension will be required to serve Lots RH-5A and RH-5B.
K
September 19, 2002
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2
FILE NO.: S-57-LL
Fire Department: Place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire
Department at 918-3752 for additional details.
County Planning: No comment received.
CATA: The site is located on Bus Route #21 and has no effect on bus radius,
turnout and route.
F. ISSUESITECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division: No comment.
Landscape: Interior landscape islands must be at least 7'/2 feet in width in order
to count toward fulfilling the 8% interior landscaping requirement.
Irrigation will be required to water landscaped areas.
Prior to a building permit being issued, it will be necessary to submit an approved
landscape plan with the seal of a Registered Landscape Architect.
G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (August 29, 2002)
Mr. Ron Tabor was present representing the application. Staff presented the
item stating the application was a two part proposal. Staff stated first the item
was a plat/replat combination. Staff stated a lot, which, had been previously final
platted and an unrecorded tract, were proposed to be platted as three (3) lots of
approximately 2 acres each and the second was an office site plan review of an
office building for Winrock International on the southern lot, Lot RH-7 currently
zoned O-2.
Staff stated there were easements, which needed to be included on the proposed
plat along with driveway location and curb cuts clearly identified. Staff stated the
parking area to the north would be required to be shown as a cross access
parking agreement between the three lots on the plat.
Landscaping comments were addressed along with the comments from the
Water, Wastewater and Fire Department. Staff noted the comment from
Southwestern Bell requesting easements be shown on the Final Plat.
After the discussion, the Committee then forwarded the item to the full
Commission for final action.
0
September 19, 2002
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2
H. ANALYSIS:
FILE NO.: S-57-LL
The applicant submitted to staff a revised drawing indicating all driveway
locations, the trail as a cross access easement and the parking lot located on
Lot RH5-A as a cross access and parking easement.
The applicant has indicated a single ground mounted sign to be located near the
south driveway entrance. The sign will be approximately 30-foot long and 4-foot
high (120 square feet in area) with 12-inch lettering on the west face. There will
be ground lighting on the front of the sign for illumination. The permitted sign
allowable under the Ordinance [Section 36-553 (a) (2)] is 64 square feet. Staff
is supportive of the request to allow the increased sign area since the face side
lettering would only be 30 square feet in area. The sign would act as a
decorative wall in the landscaped area and not strictly a monument sign with
lettering on the entire face of the wall.
The applicant also proposes the building to be no more than 45-feet in height as
required by 0-2 zoning district. The applicant proposes the building to be
approximately 22,000 square feet in area. Minimum estimated parking required
for a building would be 52 spaces or 95% of one space per 400 square feet of
gross floor area. The applicant proposes the placement of 16 on -site parking
spaces and a cross access easement with a parking area to the north containing
215 parking spaces. Although, the parking lot will be shared between all three
lots in the preliminary plat there should not be any adverse impact with regard to
parking and the proposed lot should be sufficient to meet the parking demands of
the area.
Staff is supportive of the proposed preliminary plat and the office site plan review.
The proposal includes a variance to allow an increased sign area, which staff
supports.
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed replat of Lots RH-5 and Tract - 7 into
three (3) non-residential lots and the zoning site plan review for Lot RH-7 subject
to compliance with the conditions outlined in Paragraphs D, E and F of this
report.
Staff recommends approval of the requested sign variance, as proposed.
E
September 19, 2002
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-57-LL
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (SEPTEMBER 19, 2002)
Mr. Ron Tabor was present representing the application. There were no objectors
present. Staff presented the item stating Staff was unaware of any unresolved issues
associated with the project. Staff presented a recommendation of approval of the
proposed Replat of Lots RH-5 and Tract-7 into three non-residential lots and the zoning
Site Plan Review for Lot RH-7 subject to compliance with the conditions outlined in the
"Staff Recommendation" above.
Staff stated they also recommended approval of the requested sign variance as
proposed.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda for
Approval and approved, as recommended by Staff, by a vote of 11 ayes, 0 noes and
0 absent.
5