HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0050-G Staff AnalysisNovember 29, 1994
ITEM NO.: 4 FILE NO.: S-50-G
NAME: PLEASANT RIDGE SQUARE -- PRELIMINARY PLAT
LOCATION: On the south side of Cantrell Rd., between Woodland
Rd. and Pleasant Ridge Rd.
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
LOU SCHICKEL WHITE-DATERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2723 Foxcroft, Suite 201 401 S. Victory St.
Little Rock, AR 72207 Little Rock, AR 72201
225-7807 374-1666
AREA: 14.5 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: R-2, C-1, & PCD
PLANNING DISTRICT: 1
CENSUS TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCES REQUESTED: None
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
PROPOSED USES: Shopping Center &
Offices
The applicant proposes the subdivision of a 14.5 acre tract as a
commercial subdivision to contain 3 lots, and involving the
dedication of the required additional right-of-way along the
Highway 10 frontage of the site, on the Woodland Road frontage,
and on the Fairview Rd. frontage._ The applicant proposes to make
the required street improvements to Woodland Rd. and to Fairview
Rd. No variances are proposed.
A. PROPOSAL/RHQUEST:
Planning Commission approval of the preliminary plat, as
submitted, is requested. There are no variances or waivers
involved in the application.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The rear portion of the site is undeveloped; some of which
is cleared of trees and some of which is heavily wooded.
The subdivision contains the site currently occupied by the
drive-in convenience store which is immediately opposite the
Southridge Road intersection, and which is zoned PCD. The
site also contains a tract along the west boundary of the
site which is zoned C-1. All required street improvements
along Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Rd. are in place.
Woodland Rd. and Fairview Rd. have substandard rights -of -way
November,29, 1994
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 4 Continued FILE NO.: S-50-G
and street improvements. The topography rises consistently
from north to south, with approximately a 75 foot rise in
elevation from Highway 10 to the south boundary of the
tract.
The site is predominantly zoned R-2. The convenience store
at the Southridge Rd. intersection is zoned PCD; the Lot 1
area, which lies along the west boundary of the proposed
subdivision, is zoned C-1. The zoning to the south and east
is R-2. To the west is R-2 and 0-3 zoned property. To the
north, on the,.south side of Highway 10, is C-1, PCD, and C-2
land. Across Highway 10 to the north, the land is all zoned
R-2.
C. EN...GINEERINGIUTILTTY COMMENTS:
Public Works comments that: 1) Highway 10 will require
dedication of an additional 15 foot right-of-way, but will
require no street improvements; 2) Woodland Rd. will
require dedication of an additional 12.5 foot right-of-way
and construction of one-half Master Street Plan
improvements; 3) Fairview Rd. will require dedication of an
additional 3.63 foot right-of-way and construction of one-
half Master Street Plan improvements; 4) a sketch grading
and drainage plan, meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186,
will be required before construction begins, and a NPDES
permit will be required; and, 5) street plans, stormwater
detention, and boundary survey requirements will be
required.
Water Works comments that on -site fire protection may be
required.
Wastewater comments a sewer main extension, with easements,
will be required.
Arkansas Power and Light Co. comments that a 15 foot
easement will be required along the exterior boundaries of
the site, plus along the lot line between Lots 2 and 3.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. approved the submittal without
comment.
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. will require a 5 foot
easement along the south boundary line, and along each side
of the internal lot line.
The Fire Department approved the preliminary plat without
comment.
2
November 29, 1994
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 4 (Continued)„ FILE NO-: S-50-G
D. ISSUES/LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Public Works has cited the requirement for Master Street
Plan right-of-way dedication along the Highway 10 frontage
of the site, and for right-of-way dedication and one-half
street improvements along the Woodland Rd. and Fairview Rd.
frontages of the site. The applicant proposes to meet these
requirements. There are no issues to be resolved.
E. ANALYSTS:
The preliminary plat which is proposed meets all Subdivision
Ordinance requirements, with no variances being requested.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (NOVEMBER 10, 1994)
Mr. Joe White, with White-Daters & Associates, Inc., the project
engineering firm, was present. Staff outlined the deficiencies
and concerns noted in the discussion outline, and Mr. White
reviewed with staff and the Committee members these items. He
indicated that he would make the needed changes, and would
propose a preliminary plat which would meet all requirements.
The Committee forwarded the request to the full Commission for
the public hearing.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (NOVEMBER 29, 1994)
Staff reported that there are no issues to be resolved, and that
the preliminary plat, as amended following the Subdivision
Committee meeting, meets all Subdivision Ordinance requirements.
The item, then, was included on the consent agenda for approval
and was approved with the vote of 10 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent, and
0 abstentions.
3