HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0050-F Staff Analysis1- I W <
October 12, 1982
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 12
NAME:
Pleasant Ridge Street
Improvement District
APPLICANT: John S. Selig
Mitchell, Williams and Selig
1000 Savers Federal Bldg.
Capitol Avenue at Spring Street
Little Rock, AR 72201
Phone: (501) 376-3151
LOCATION_: South of Arkansas Highway #10,
encompassing part of Pleasant
Ridge and Woodland Heights
Subdivision
REQUEST: For a street, water, drainage,
and sewer improvement
district.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
This is a proposal that requests a street, water, drainage
and sewer improvement district. It includes the following:
(1) Constructing new streets and improving existing streets
including curbs, gutters, drainage and paving.
(2) Improving, extending and repairing the existing water
system.
(3) Constructing, as needed, appropriate drainage
facilities.
(4) Constructing, improving and expanding a sanitary sewer
system to be consolidated with the existing system.
The staff is not opposed to this; however, the City
Engineers need to study the intersection at Rodney Parham
and Woodland Heights. There is also a question of whether
or not the Commission would like to recommend placing a
cul-de-sac at the end of Fairview Road and one at the corner
of Woodland Heights Road where it angles to the left.
ENGINEERINGCONSIDERATIONS
1. The intersection at Rodney Parham -Woodland Heights Road
and Fairview Road to be designed after coordination
with the City Engineer_.
October 12, 1982
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 12 -- Continued
2. Overall plan is acceptable; however, specific roadway
geometric and alignments are subject to review by the
City Engineer.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval, subject to comments made.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The applicants were present. There was some discussion as
to the suggestion of terminating Woodland Heights and
Fairview Roads. The applicant reported that a survey of the
residents had been conducted and indicated a majority in
opposition. A motion was made for approval, subject to
Engineering comments. It passed by a vote -of 5 ayes,
0 noes, and 0 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The request was represented. There were no objectors
present. The Commission discussed the matter briefly
followed by a motion to recommend approval"as filed. The
motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes.,,3 absent.
w