Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0970 Staff AnalysisApril 20, 1993 ITEM NO.: 2 FILE NO.: 5-970 NAME: Point Glen Subdivision -- Preliminary Plat LOCATION: Approximately 1,500 feet south of Kanis Road and 4,500 feet west of Bowman Road, at the west end of Westglen Dr. DEVELOPER: ENGINEER: ROD COLEMAN PAT MCGETRICK ERC PROPERTIES MCGETRICK ENGINEERING 815 Fort St. 11225 Huron Ln. Fort Smith, AR 72923 Little Rock, AR 72221 452-9950 223-9900 AREA: 6.26 AC. NUMBER OF LOTS: 25 FT. OF NEW STREET: 882 ZONING: R-2 PROPOSED USES: Single family residential PLANNING DISTRICT: 18 CENSUS TRACT: 42.07 VARIANCES RE-UESTED: None STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes a preliminary plat for the development of a 6.26 acre tract adjacent to and west of the Point West Subdivision. The plat proposes the development of 25 residential lots and 882 feet of new street construction. One street will be the extension to the west of the existing Westglen Drive in Point West Subdivision; the second, a cul-de-sac street off Westglen Dr. to the north a distance of 562 feet. The cul-de-sac street qualifies as a minor residential street. No variances from the Subdivision Ordinance are requested. A. PROPOSAW REQUEST Approval by the Planning Commission is requested for a preliminary plat for the development of a subdivision to contain 25 lots along two streets containing 882 feet of new street construction. One street, the cul-de-sac street, is proposed to be build to minor -residential street standards without sidewalks; the other, the extension of the existing Pointglen Drive, is proposed to be a standard residential street with sidewalks constructed on one side. April 20, 1993 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Continued) FILE NO.:-970 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site currently is in its natural state with vegetation and trees. Point West Subdivision forms the east boundary of the proposed site. An 0-1 zoned parcel which faces Ranis Road is on the north of the proposed development. Undeveloped R-2 zoned land lie on the south and west. C. ENGINEERING/UTILITY COMMENTS: Public Work Engineering Division comments that sidewalks are required to be constructed on one side of Westglen Dr., but concur that the cul-de-sac street meets the requirements for classification as a minor residential street which does not require a sidewalk. Engineering Division adds that the Storm Water Detention and the Excavation Ordinance are applicable and that PAGIS monuments will be required. Little Rock Municipal Water Works reports that a water main extension will be required to serve the development. Little Rock Wastewater Utility comments that sewer main extensions, with easements will be required. Little Rock Fire Department approved the plat as submitted. Arkansas Power and Light Co. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. each commented that additional easements are required as shown on the returned drawings. D. ISSUES/LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: In the project engineer's cover letter in which approval of the plat was requested, the engineer indicated that a sidewalk would be constructed on Westglen Dr. and that the location of PAGIS monuments should be shown. The engineer also indicated that the Storm Water Detention and the Excavation Ordinance would be complied with. The Engineering staff's requirements, then, were already addressed. The only remaining issues are the additional easements which the public utilities have indicated in their responses. E. ANALYSIS• This application presents no unusual situations or difficulties. Only minimal items remain to comply with all requirements. No variances from Ordinance are requested. 2 April 20, 1993 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Continued) FILE NO.: S-97Q F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the requirements as outlined. SIIBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (APRIL 1, 1993) Mr. Pat McGetrick, project engineer, was in attendance to represent the applicant. The Planning Staff presented the item. Mr. McGetrick expanded on the planned development. After a review by the Subdivision Committee, the Committee forwarded the application to the Commission for final disposition. STAFF UPDATE: A revised plat was presented by the project engineer addressing all concerns expressed by staff and the Committee members. No issues remain and staff recommends approval of this item. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 20, 1993) This item was recommended by staff for inclusion on the Consent Agenda for approval. However, one property owner was present at the hearing to express concern about the effect of the development on his property, so the item was placed on the regular agenda. Mr. Pat McGetrick, project engineer, and the property owner, Mr. Terry Buckley, had a brief conversation and then Mr. McGetrick addressed the Commission. He outlined the scheme of the proposed development. Mr. Buckley reported that he and Mr. McGetrick had resolved his concerns. After a brief discussion with Commission members on the nature of Mr. Buckley's concerns, it was moved and seconded to approve the item. The item passed with nine members voting aye, one member absent, and two members out of the room. 3