HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0871 Staff AnalysisAugust 28, 1990
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 9 FILE NO.: S-871
NAME: Ray Satterfield Tract
LOCATION: 17250 Raines Road
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
Ray Satterfield Ben Kittler
17221 Raines Road
Little Rock, AR 72210
455-0601
AREA: 4.5 Acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: R-2 PROPOSED USES: Multifamily
PLANNI_NG..._DI.STRI_CT: Crystal Valley
CENSUS TRACT:
VARIANCES REqUESTED : None
A. PROPOSAWREQUEST:
This proposal consists of a site plan review for 12
free standing one bedroom houses on the 3 acre tract
located 3 miles from City Limits west of Stagecoach
Road.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
This site is surrounded by a mixture of both
residential and some nonconforming activities. The
property is bounded by a county road, being Raines Road
on the north. The lot is partially cleared with mature
timber on the back side of the property.
C. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
Provide minor arterial R/W and improvements for Raines
Road. On -site roads should be paved (HMAC). On -site
drainage design will need to be approved by Engineer.
Detention Ordinance applies.
1
August 28, 1990
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO. 9 _(Continued?._...........__....__._.____._._......
D . ISSUES/LEGAL[TECHIYI_CALf DE_S I.GN
There are several issues to be introduced. They are as
follows:
1. Provide a 40 foot wide easement with 22 foot paved
surface and include in Bill of Assurance.
2. Increase building setbacks to 25 foot.
3. Provide letter from Health Department approving
septic tank installation.
E. ANALYSIS:
The Planning and Engineering Staff have thoroughly
reviewed this submittal with respect to all elements as
required by ordinance. WE find little or no concern
with the construction of the 12 free standing houses.
We would support a waiver of street improvements if the
developer does not plat Lot 1 and 2 at this time.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval if the developer agrees to
comply with Planning and Engineering Staff comments.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: (August 16, 1990)
....... ..._... _.............................
Mr. Satterfield was present. He described the site plan and
various elements of the proposal. He indicated that a lack
of fire protection forced him to build 12 individual small
buildings instead large free standing building.
The right-of-way dedication issue was explained to
applicant, as well as, easement requirement for back lot, if
app.licant decide to replat his tract.
A discussion of septic tank installation resulted in the
Staff suggesting the applicant contact the Health Department
for final approval and present letter to Planning Staff.
The question of the need for replat was raised as to whether
it would be easier for applicant to leave this tract in
present condition. There were several opinions expressed.
It was determined that the applicant will meet with his
engineer and choose one of the options presented by
Committee.
2
August 28, 1990
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO. 9 (Cgnt_inued)._... w............
PLANNING_COMMI_SSION_._ACTION: (August 28, 1990)
Mr. Ray Satterfield was present. The Staff recommended
—approval of the site plan if developer agrees to pave his
driveway. The Planning Staff also indicated that applicant
must dedicate additional R/W and asked for waiver of all
street improvements.
Mr. Gardner from Public Works stated he supports waiver of
all street improvements. He also indicated that any future
subdivision of this tract would require all street
improvements.
The Chairman then asked Mr. Satterfield for his comments.
He stated that he does not object paving driveway after
receiving financial return from tenants.
Commissioner McDaniel asked a question about septic system.
Developer/Owner stated that he will use four septic tanks.
Mr. Satterfield also added that he lives next door and he
will protect this site from demolishing.
A brief discussion then followed involving Mr. Sat'terfield
and several of the Commissioners.
It was determined that applicant will pave driveway one year
after last building completed or three years after final
approval of this application.
A motion was made to approve this application as amended and
passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 1 nay, and 1 absent.
3