HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0829-D Staff AnalysisJune 18, 1991
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2 FILE NO: S-829-B
NAME: Pratt Remmel Subdivision - Replat
LOCATION: SW Corner of Pratt Remmel Road and Lindsey Road
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER•
WINGFIELD MARTIN BEN KITTLER, JR.
6133 Dena Drive
Little Rock, AR 72206
888-3960
AREA: 40 Ac. NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 FT. NEW STREET: 1,143 ft.
ZONING: I-2 PROPOSED USES: Expansion of Motor Freight
Terminal
PLANNING DISTRICT: 25
CENSUS TRACT: 40.01
VARIANCES REQUESTED: None
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
A. PROPOSAL REQUEST:
The proposal consists of a two lot replat out of large and
undeveloped parcel of land to accommodate Motor Freight
Terminal located directly north. Part of the 20 acre tract
has just been rezoned to I-2.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site in question is located between Lindsey Road and
Frazier Pike in an area that is referred to as the "Port
Industrial District". Part of the property is identified as
wetlands and covered with the natural foliage of the area,
principally hardwoods.
C. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
An excavating permit will be required. Detention
requirements were previously satisfied.
June 18, 1991
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2 Continued FILE NO: S-829-B
D. ISSUES LEGAL TECHNICAL DESIGN:
The only issue in this category which will require a
resolution is including the turn -around easement inside the
plat boundary.
E. ANALYSIS•
The Planning Staff finds no serious fault with the replat
apart from the need to resolve the item pointed out above.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the approval of the replat subject to the
minor modifications.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENTS: (JUNE 6, 1991)
The applicant was present. This matter was discussed briefly.
Mr. Wingfield Martin indicated that the staff's recommendation
presented no problem. The Planning Staff stated that the revised
copy of the replat had already been submitted for review. There
were no significant issues to relate to the full Commission.
The item was forwarded without further comments.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 18, 1991)
The applicant, Mr. Wingfield Martin, was in attendance. The
Planning Staff reported that this item should be placed on the
Consent Agenda for approval because there were no remaining
issues to be resolved. After a brief discussion, the Commission
determined that it was appropriate to place this item on the
Consent Agenda for approval. A motion was made to that effect.
The motion passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent.
2