HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0759 Staff AnalysisDecember 16, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 3�_
NAME: Wood Creek
LOCATION_: South side of West Markham
Parkway, West of Pride Valley
Road, West end of Huckleberry
Drive
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
Winrock Development White-Daters and Associates,
Company, Inc. Inc.-
P.O. Box 8080 401 Victory Street
Little Rock, AR 72203 Little Rock, AR 72201
Telephone: 663-5340 Telephone: 374-1666
AREA: 33.27 acres NO. OF LOTS: 96 FT. NEW STREET: 4900
ZONING: "R-2"/Outside City
PROPOSED USE: Residential
A. Proposal/Request:
1. To preliminary plat 33.27 acres into 96 lots and
4900 feet of new street for single family use.
B. Existing Conditions:
Single family area located at urban fringe, floodway on
property.
C. Issues/Discussions/Legal/Technical/Design:
1. Indicate sidewalks.
2. Show boundaries of City/State intentions for
annexation.
3. Give notice according to Ordinance if required.
4. Indicate abutting property owners and plats as
required per Ordinance.
December 16, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 3 - Continued
5. Lots abutting Pride Valley and West Markham should
have building lines that exceed 25 feet.
D. Engineering Comments
1. Show calculation and detention facilities.
2. Show minimum flood elevation on Lot 1, Block 1,
and Lot 1, Block 5.
3. Make Wood Creek Drive perpendicular to West
Markham Parkway.
4. Dedicate floodway.
E. Staff Recommendation
Approval, subject to comments made.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The item was reviewed. The applicant agreed to comply with
staff's comments.
1. Water - Water main extension plus on -site fire
protection required. An acreage charge of $300 per
acre will apply.
2. Additional easements shall be required around the
closed sewer mains.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
Staff reported at the agenda meeting that during Subdivision
Committee, the applicant had requested to go back to the
plan originally submitted with minor modifications, but
which would serve to address any objection by the abutting
December 16, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 3 - Continued
church. Parkway Church was concerned about the revision on
the revised plan that removed Huckleberry from its original
position as a perimeter street and left them with what they
considered to be inadequate excess.
There was no objection to the applicant's request. A motion
for approval was made and passed by a vote of: 9 ayes,
0 noes and 2 absent.