HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0535-B Staff AnalysisMay 15, 1984
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 7
NAME: Rock Creek Court Site Plan
Review
LOCATION: North Side of Rock Creek
-- Parkway approx. 1,000'
east of Parkway Place Drive
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
Sexton Company Mehlburger, Tanner & Associates
20 East 91st Street 201 S. Izard Street
Indianapolis, IN 46240 Little Rock, AR 72201
Phone: (317) 846-4444 Phone: 375-5331
AREA: 31.624 acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. OF NEW ST.: 0
ZONING: "MF-18"
PROPOSED USES: Multifamily
VARIANCES REQUESTED:
None.
A. Site History
None.
B. Proposal
(1) The construction of a 394 unit apartment complex
on 31.624 acres.
Total
Unit
Unit
Unit
Square
No.
Type
Size
Footage
16
1-Bdrm/1-Bath
640
sq.
ft.
10,320
56
1-Bdrm/1-Bath
540
sq.
ft.
35,840
32
1-Bdrm/1-Bath
555
sq.
ft.
17,760
32
1-Bdrm/1-Bath
580
sq.
ft.
18,560
40
1-Bdrm/1-Bath
500
sq.
ft.
20,000
40
1-Bdrm/1-Bath
515
sq.
ft.
20,600
2
1-Bdrm/1-Bath
615
sq.
ft.
1,230
24
2-Bdrm/1-Bath
865
sq.
ft.
20,760
24
2-Bdrm/1-Bath
920
sq.
ft.
22,080
48
2-Bdrm/1-1/2 Bath
1,015
sq.
ft.
64,960
16
2-Bdrm/1-1/2 Bath
1,070
sq.
ft.
17,120
48
2-Bdrm/1-1/2 Bath
1,085
sq.
ft.
56,880
1 Clubhouse 1,750
Total Floor Area 307,860
May 15, 1984
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 7 - Continued
(3) Parking
- Open Parking..................564 spaces
- Carports ..................... 74 spaces
Total 638 spaces
1.62 spaces per dwelling unit
(4) Landscaping Plan
A landscaping plan has been submitted. It
indicates a 40' buffer and 6' fence adjacent to
the area zoned for PRD on the west, and the same
for the area on the north that is zoned for single
family. No fence is shown for the area on the
north zoned for multifamily. Landscaping should
meet the requirements of the City's Ordinance.
C. En2ineering Comments
Request channelization of traffic at the entrance to
preclude left turns from entrance. Indicate whether
detention will be used in this project.
D. Analysis_
Technically the site plan appears to conform to
requirements, except that the 40' building setback area
adjacent to the PRD in the single family area should be
revised to read "40' buffer area." The property
boundary with respect to the City right-of-way should
be delineated more clearly. The applicant is
requesting to identify the agreement he has with the
City for use of City property for a driveway. A water
line is also shown in that area. Driveway intrusions
are indicated in the buffer areas. The applicant is
reminded that in these instances a minimum of 15'
should be retained in its natural state.
E. Staff Recommendation
Approval, subject to comments made.
May 15, 1984
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 7 - Continued
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
Staff reported that AP&L objected to the plat until
overhangs into their easements are eliminated. The
applicant agreed to make a formal application to the Board
for use of City right-of-way and indicate the buffered area.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
Mr. Robert Brown represented the developer. He submitted a
revised plan and letter to the City Board which resolved the
remained issues. Staff reported that AP&L had called and
said there are no remaining issues. A motion for approval
was made and passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent.