HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0524 Staff AnalysisMarch 13, 1984
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 8
NAME: John Mattingly Site Plan Review
LOCATION: SE Corner of 65th and
Wakefield Drive
nPUPT.O'DRR • RNnTNF.RR t
John Mattingly Porter -Crawford Co., Inc.
P.O. Box 5512 P.O. Box 5512
Little Rock, AR Brady Station
Phone: 666-5407 Little Rock, AR 72215
Phone: 666-5407
AREA: 3.9 acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. OF NEW ST.: 0
ZONING: "C-3"
PROPOSED USES: Commercial
A. Site History
A Board of Adjustment variance was granted for
Building C in the past year.
B. Proposal:
1. The construction of two buildings and the use of
four existing buildings on 3.9 acres for a
commercial multiple building site.
2. Development Scheme:
Bldg.
Type
Size
A
(Existing)
3 Leasing Spaces
3,750
sq.
ft.
B
(Existing)
Brake Repair Shop
2,480
sq.
ft.
C
(Existing)
Mattingly Furniture
6,000
sq.
ft.
D
(Existing)
Car Wash
1,000
sq.
ft.
E
(Proposed)
Furniture Shop
8,400
sq.
ft.
F
(Proposed)
Lease Building
5,000
sq.
ft.
3. Provision of 68 Parking Spaces
C. Engineering Considerations
1. Repair and replace curb/gutter along Wakefield
Drive.
March 13, 1984
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 8 - Continued
2. Discuss the need for the total number of driveways
along 65th Street with the City Traffic Engineer -
at 371-4858.
D. Analysis
The major issue to be resolved involves the
establishment of an interior circulation system. Staff
feels that the site plan should be revised to
permanently fix the service drives. A plat should be
submitted dedicating the drive throughout the center
and off Wakefield as a 20' easement between Buildings A
and B and a 45' service easement on the remainder of
the property. A 45' service drive should also be
platted from 65th Street to intersect with this drive.
The second and third curb cuts from the east on 65th
should be combined and the fourth should be omitted to
provide for the 45' drive described above. Street
repairs are needed along Wakefield. All parking and
landscaping shall meet Ordinance requirements.
E. Staff Recommendation
Approval, subject to comments made.
F. Subdivision Committee Review
The applicant was present. Staff presented its
recommendation for revising the site plan. The
applicant agreed to conform with the suggestions. He
was advised to get with Engineering before the meeting
to work on the interior circulation.