Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0520 Staff AnalysisFebruary 14, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 9 NAME: Space Saver Short Form PCD (Z-4074) LOCATION: Approximately 600' West of University on the North side of Asher (6300 Asher) nRVRT.nPRR! RMnTMFRP• Lance Allworth Edward G. Smith & Associates Space Saver, Inc. 401 Victory 4940 Carol Canyon Road, #D Little Rock, AR San Diego, CA 92121 Phone: 374-16.66 AREA: 3.3 acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 ZONING: "C-3" PROPOSED USES: Mini -warehouses VARIANCES REQUESTED: None A. Site History None. FT. OF NEW ST.: 0 B. Development Proposal 1. The construction of 692 mini -warehouse units and one office dwelling on 3.3 acres. 2. Development Proposal (a) Land Area ............ 43,893 sq. ft. (b) Building Area ........ 82,950 sq. ft. (c) Building Cover ....... 73,775 sq. ft. (51.3%) (d) Paved Area ........... 67,644 sq. ft. (47.0%) (e) Landscaped Area ...... 2,473 sq. ft. (1.7%) (f) Parking .............. 3 public, 1 private C. Engineering Comments (a) Improve Asher to minor arterial standards; install curb/gutter to align with curb adjacent to this property. (b) Driveway permit must be obtained from District 6 of the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department. February 14, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 9 - Continued D. Staff Analysis Staff recommends that the site plan be more specific relative to dimensioning. No adverse impact is expected from the development. E. Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to comments made. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The Committee reviewed the application. The applicant promised to provide a properly dimensioned site plan. Water Works reported that on -site fire facilities were required, along with a 15-foot easement adjoining the north right-of-way of Asher Avenue. .Y. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. Mr. Ed Gray and two other persons from the neighborhood expressed concerns about the - possibility of liability for a retaining wall on the north which is currently leaning to the south. The engineer of the project, Mr. Joe White, said that the wall would be checked out prior to development. A motion for approval was made and passed by a vote of 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent.