HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0495-B Staff AnalysisNovember 11, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 3
NAME:
LOCATION:
DEVELOPER:
Helen & James Pate
10510 "I-30" #5
Little Rock, AR 72209
River Subdivision Replat
NW Corner of Fourche Dam Pike
and I-440
VMnTMVVD .
Steve Atherton
McClelland Consulting Engineers
900 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
Phone: 371-0272
AREA: 8.726 Acres NO. OF LOTS: 4
ZONING:
PROPOSED USES: Industrial
FT. NEW STREET: 0
A. Proposal/Request:
To revise an approved preliminary by: (a) reducing
Tract A to acreage, and (b) eliminating street
dedication on west end of Fluid Drive.
B. Existing Conditions:
Flat, industrial area.
C. Issues/Discussion/Legal/Technical/Design:
1. Noncompliance with instructions from the City
Attorney and the Planning Staff.
D. Engineering Comments:
1. Intersection is not correct.
E. Staff Recommendation:
Reserved, subject to further direction from the City
Attorney.
This plat was filed as a result of an option offered
the developer due to noncollection by the City on a
performance bondf.
November 11, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 3__
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
Staff was asked to prepare a history of the events leading
to the submission. The Committee felt that it was very
important that the adjacent property owners be satisfied
with whatever action is taken.
Sewer - Add sanitary sewer easement required across lot
"IR." Contact L.R.W.W.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
As requested by the applicant, a motion for withdrawal was
made and passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, and 3 absent.
November 11, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 3
NAME:
LOCATION:
DEVELOPER:
Helen & James Pate
10510 "I-30" #5
Little Rock, AR 72209
River Subdivision Replat
NW Corner of Fourche Dam Pike
and I-440
Steve Atherton
McClelland Consulting Engineers
900 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
Phone: 371-0272
AREA: 8.726 Acres NO. OF LOTS: 4
ZONING:'
PROPOSED USES: Industrial
A. Proposal/Request:
FT. NEW STREET: 0
To revise an approved preliminary by: (a) reducing
Tract A to acreage, and (b) eliminating street ,
dedication on west end of Fluid Drive.
B. Existing Conditions:
Flat, industrial area.
C. Issues/Discussion/Legal/Technical/Design:
1. Noncompliance with instructions from the City
Attorney and the Planning Staff.
D. Engineering Comments:
1. Intersection is not correct.
E. Staff Recommendation:
Reserved, subject to further direction from the City
Attorney.
This plat was filed as a result of an option offered
the developer due to noncollection by the City on a
performance bondf.
November 11, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 3 _
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
Staff was asked to prepare a history of the events leading
to the submission. The Committee felt that it was very
important that the adjacent property owners be satisfied
with whatever action is taken.
Sewer - Add sanitary sewer easement required across lot
"I-R. rt Contact L.R.W.W.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
As requested by the applicant, a motion for withdrawal was
made and passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, and 3 absent.