HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0494-A Staff AnalysisAT T RAP, .
DEVELOPER:
Mike Ipson, Keith Perett
Monroe Manor Revised
"Short -Form PRD" (Z-4073-A)
Monroe at "B" Streets
T;Mn TM T:D.
Robert Richardson
1717 Rebsamen Park Road
Little Rock, AR 72202
Phone: 664-0003
AREA: .51 acres NO. OF LOTS: 4 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: "PRD" PROPOSED USE: Single Family Attached "PRD"
A. Proposal/Request
(1) To revise an approved "PRD" from a fourplex of
3,337 square feet to four single family detached
dwellings.
(2) Proposed plan will include 4,146 square feet or an
increase of 22.8 percent over the existing plan.
Land coverage with 15.33 percent on the original
plan, but will now be 18.8 percent.
(3) Development Statistics
(a) Lots lA and 1B
1800 square feet with a two car carport on
each lot.
Lots 1C and 1D
1700 square feet with a one car carport on
each lot.
(b) Design will match existing structure.
Z-4073-A - Continued
( c ) Units will be two bedroom and 2.5 bath.
(d) Bill of Assurance - Provisions will be made
for common shared driveway.
B. Issues/Discussion/Legal/Technical/Design
(1) Notify abutting property owners.
C. Engineering Comments
(1) Fifty -foot right-of-way required unless granted
variance approved.
(2) Stormwater and Excavation Ordinance to be complied
with.
D. Staff Recommendation
Approval, subject to comments made. Staff is favorable
to the changes requested but suggest that the applicant
notify the neighborhood due their extensive
participation in the past. The applicant is merely
modifying a fourplex to detached units with no change
in density.
E. Subdivision Committee Review
The item was reviewed and passed to the Commission.
F. Planning Commission Action
The applicant was present. No one objected. The
motion for approval was made and passed, subject to
comments made. The vote was 10 ayes, 0 noes, and
1 absent.
1. Name: Monroe Manor Revised Short -Form PRD (Z-4073-A)
2. Location: Monroe at "B" Streets
3. Developer: Mike Gipson, Keith Perett
4. Engineer: Robert Richardson
5. Existing Use: Single Family
6. Proposed Use: Single Family
Development
7. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to notifying
neighboring property owners and engineering comments.
8. Planning Commission Action: The applicant was present.
No one objected. A motion was made and passed for
approval, subject to staf.f's recommendation. The vote:
10 ayes, 0 noes, and 1 absent.