HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0490-A Staff Analysisr
September 9, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 7
NAME: K-Mart Shopping Center Revised
Site Plan Review
LOCATION: Southwest Corner of Asher
and University
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
Flake and Company Finley Williams
425 West Capitol, Box 990 210 Victory Street
Little Rock, AR 72203 Little Rock, AR
Telephone: 376-8005 Telephone: 376-3505
AREA: NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: "C-3"
PROPOSED USES: Shopping Center
REQUEST: To expand a shopping center by addition of a Pizza
Hut.
A. Proposal:
1. (a) The construction of a Pizza Hut Restaurant
(39' by 801, on a site 140' by 260'.
(b) Provision of 73 parking spaces.
B. En ineerinq Comments
(1) A traffic impact study is needed.
(2) Explain parking located in 30' drive.
C. Analysis
The applicant has pointed out that all parking for
Pizza Hut will be separate from the rest of the center,
as the subject parcel is now unpaved.
Staff is concerned about the lack of controlled access
in this shopping center. Interior curbing or other
r�
y'
C
September 9, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 7 - Continued
lane devices are needed. Information should be
submitted on the existing square footage and number of
parking spaces.
D. Staff Recommendation
Reserved until further information is received.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The issue was identified as one of traffic and public safety
within the shopping center; due to several areas of
cross -flow with not delineations of where to go. This was
considered hazardous because of the expanding amount of fast
food restaurants around the perimeter.
One Committee member mentioned that a previous
recommendation by staff for such controls within the
shopping center was not supported by the Commission due to
an understanding that there would probably not be any
further expansions.
The applicant was asked to provide staff with the
information regarding the existing square footage and
parking, and to meet with the Traffic Engineer before the
Public Hearing.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. He reported that a revised plan
was submitted to Engineering addressing staff concerns
regarding internal traffic circulation problems. He was
asked to furnish three copies for the Planning staff file.
A motion for approval was made and passed, subject to
Don McChesney's signature on the revised site plan. The
vote: 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.