HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0543-A Staff AnalysisMay 15, 1984
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 6
NAME:
Base Line and Lew Drive
(Revised Site Plan)
LOCATION: SW Corner of Base Line and
Lew Drive
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
Ampersand, Inc. Canino, Maune, and McQueen
#2 Van Circle #2 Van Circle
Little Rock, AR 72207 Little Rock, AR
Phone: 554-1000 Phone: 664-1000
AREA: 3.0 acres NO. OF LOTS: 2 FT. OF NEW ST.: 0
ZONING: "C-3"
PROPOSED USES: Commercial
A. Staff Report
The Commission approved a multiple building review on
this site for the construction of mini -warehouses
during the later part of 1983. Since that time, plans
for development have changed in Tract B, and the rear
of the property will be developed by a different owner
than Tract 4-A. An application for a lot -split has
been submitted to the staff.
This request is for revision of the site plan review
for Tract B, which previously included six buildings on
this portion of the site. The buildings totaled 56,720
square feet. Revisions include:
(1) An increase from six to eight buildings.
(2) Increase in square footage to 61,000 square feet.
(3) Change in phasing so that south area is Phase I
and north portion is Phase II.
May b
SUBDIVISIONS '
Item No. 6 i Continued
B. Proposal
Area
Nb_—Units
Total
Area
Size
5' x 8'
40
�_q.
>
Ft.
�`
3,187.5
Sq. Ft.-
. F}-
Sq.
8' x 8.5'
42.5 Sq. Ft.
75
2,880
Sq. Ft.
7.5' x 8'
60
Sq.
Ft.
b
7,680
Sq. Ft.
02 8'
80
100
Sq.
Sq.
rt.
Ft.
�20
22,000
Sq. Ft.
1.5�' x
15' x 8'
120
Sq.
Ft_:
96
1-1,520
6,720
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
17.5' x 8'
140
Sq.
Ft.
48
32
5,120
Sq. Ft.
20 x 8
160
Sq.
Ft.
1
612.5
Sq. Ft.
Apt.
612.5
Sq. Fta
647
61,000
Sq. Ft.
Total
C. Staff Recommendation
Staff does not object to the revision, provided that
the plan still conforms to the landscaping and buffer
requirements.
D. En��ineerin Comments
(1) Improve Base Line to arterial standards, five lane
intersection may be required; dedicate
right-of-way for arterial street.
(2) Plan appears to construct buildings over drainage
structure. Submit internal drainage plan.
(3) Complete curb/gutter on Lew Drive in the vicinity
of Base Line Road.
E. Staff Recommendation
Approval, subject to comments made.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicantresent. The main issue discussed
was p
involved the time frame for the construction of Base Line
improvements. The applicant referred to a previous
commitment that Base Line would be built when Phase 11 is
built. Engineering requested that the internal drainage
plan be submitted before the 15th.
:ax'�4mu...s.,+.bus:ss1'x-+.�rsre�a�rrw,�.a.....•....•.s�....,r,.,�4.... ..••-.�..�-.��........�.. ,_........_�.�,e-,...M„_.�._, _..-..__............--
May 15, 1984
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 6 - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
Mr. Mike McQueen represented the developer. A revised plan
was submitted which reflected internal drainage plans. A
motion was made and passed for approval, subject to the
completion of engineering comments. The vote: 9 ayes,
0 noes, 2 absent.