HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0579-C Staff Analysisr`
July 8, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 7
NAME:
LOCATION:
nRVF.T.nPF.R
GNP Enterprises
10018 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: 225-7107
Langston Acres
North off Yarberry
ENGINEER:
Robert J. Richardson
1717 Rebsamen Park Road
Little Rock, AR 72202
Phone: 664-0003
AREA: 20.3 acres NO. OF LOTS: 108 FT. NEW ST.: 3,000 LF
ZONING: "R-7A" being reviewed for "R-3" rezoning
PROPOSED USES: "R-3" Single Family lot development
A. Existinq Conditions
This site is located in an area near the edge of the
City that is developed as single family.
B. Development Proposal
The applicant has stated that his submission involves
108 lots on 20.22 acres. Linear feet of street
consists of 3,000 feet. There is an average lot size
of 6,000 square feet and a minimum lot size of 5,750
square feet. No variances have been requested.
C. Analysis
This is a small subdivision that was originally
approved as a mobile home subdivision zoned "R-7A" for
lot sales.
The applicant failed to submit an outline of revisions
and continues to search for the prior preliminary plat.
The primary purpose of this filing is to provide a
different access to four lots approved previously with
Yarberry Lane access. These lots will now access from
Granger Loop within the interior of the subdivision.
IF
July 8, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 7 - Continued
The applicant is requested to provide width of surface
on the private drive; down zone the property; reflect
buildable areas on the plat because of small lots (15'
building lines allowable on Lots 33-37); center
hammerhead between Lots 36 and 37 since this is the end
of private easement and would make better building
sites; and provide sidewalks. David Hathcock of Public
Works indicates that the stub of Granger Loop that runs
off Warren Road was final platted as Langston Lane on
the final plat of Phase I. He requests that a name
change of Langston Lane be made to eliminate confusion
in the future.
D. Staff Recommendation
Approval, subject to comments made.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE ACTION:
(6-26-86)
The Committee discussed this plat at length and determined
that there were no issues of substance involved. The
engineer for the project accepted staff's design changes for
the private street.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (7-8-86)
The applicant was present.' There were no objectors in
attendance. After a brief discussion, the Commission voted
on a motion to approve the application as filed. The motion
passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent and 1 open
position.