HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0564 Staff AnalysisJuly 10, 1984
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 1
NAME:
LOCATION:
A r•_ LIMT .
DEVELOPER:
James B. Rasco
5236 Sherwood Road
Little Rock, AR 72207
Phone: 663-6580
Rasco Subdivision, A Replat of
Marcie Manor
East End of Scenic Drive
Terry Rasco
ENGINEER/APPLICANT:
McClelland Engineers
900 West Markham
Little Rock, AR
AREA: 3.456 acres NO. OF LOTS: 2
ZONING: "R-2"
PROPOSED USES: Single Family
A. Site History
FT. OF NEW ST.: 0
None.
B. Existing Condition
This site is located in a predominantly single family
area.
C. Develo ment Proposal
This is a submittal to replat property originally known
as Marcie Manor to Rasco Subdivision. The request
incorporates several desired changes:
(1) Decrease in the number of lots creating two lots
of approximately 1.25 acres each, from five lots
of approximately .5 acres each.
(2) Relocation of certain utility easements to
correspond with the actual utility placement as
they now exist.
(3) Removal of certain unused and unnecessary utility
easements.
July 10, 1984
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 1 - Continued
(4) Reduction of the ingress easement from 40' wide to
35' wide because extremely deep site conditions
make it desirable to locate homes as near as
possible to the existing rough cut access road
(approximately 35' from property line). There is
still adequate room to build a 20-foot wide
concrete private drive as previously proposed,
plus allow you to lay access.
(5) Maintain the previously platted but reserved area
for common use by each of the property owners in
Rasco Subdivision.
D. Engineering Considerations
Clarify driveway to Scenic Drive. Does this property
have 25.15 feet access on Scenic Drive.
E. Analysis
The applicant is the owner of the existing five lots
in Marcie Manor and wishes to replat them into two
lots. His immediate plans are to build his personal
residence of Lot 1. There are no plans for
construction on Lot 2 at this time. No major problems
have been found with this proposal; however, it is felt
that the applicant should extend the lot line and
incorporate portions of Tract A with each lot.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval, subject to comments made.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was present. He agreed to comply with staff's
suggestion for the extension of the lot -line.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant submitted a revised plan. A motion for
approval was made and passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes and
3 absent.